<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;breakthrough &#8230; from a tiny company deep in China&#8217;s heartland&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/03/breakthrough-from-tiny-company-deep-in.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/03/breakthrough-from-tiny-company-deep-in.html</link>
	<description>Frustrated or intrigued by email teasers from investment newsletters and advisers? We solve them and track their performance here ... so stick around, participate and subscribe (it's free)!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:52:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lochmonster</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/03/breakthrough-from-tiny-company-deep-in.html/comment-page-1#comment-6029</link>
		<dc:creator>lochmonster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=24#comment-6029</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure monocrystalline silicon ingots for solar panels are made FROM polysilicon, which makes your analysis very very wrong and in fact harmful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure monocrystalline silicon ingots for solar panels are made FROM polysilicon, which makes your analysis very very wrong and in fact harmful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/03/breakthrough-from-tiny-company-deep-in.html/comment-page-1#comment-2654</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=24#comment-2654</guid>
		<description>Might want to take a look at SOL..re:this industry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might want to take a look at SOL..re:this industry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/03/breakthrough-from-tiny-company-deep-in.html/comment-page-1#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>One Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=24#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Thanks!  Always good to get an education -- and I&#039;m glad to see that my readers are smarter than I am!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!  Always good to get an education &#8212; and I&#8217;m glad to see that my readers are smarter than I am!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: butcherbird</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/03/breakthrough-from-tiny-company-deep-in.html/comment-page-1#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>butcherbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=24#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Amorphous silicon cells vs Monocrystalline silicon cells the basics:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Amorphous Silicon Cells are composed of silicon atoms in a thin homogenous layer rather than a crystal structure. Amorphous silicon absorbs light more effectively than crystalline silicon, so the cells can be thinner. Amorphous silicon is also known as a &quot;thin film&quot; PV technology and it can be deposited on a wide range of substrates, both rigid and flexible. Amorphous cells are less efficient than crystalline based cells, with typical efficiencies of around 6%, but they are easier and therefore cheaper to produce. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Monocrystalline Silicon Cells are made from very pure monocrystalline silicon. The silicon has a single and continuous crystal lattice structure with almost no defects or impurities. The principle advantage of monocrystalline cells are their high efficiencies, typically around 15%, although the manufacturing process required to produce monocrystalline silicon is complicated, resulting in slightly higher costs than other technologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amorphous silicon cells vs Monocrystalline silicon cells the basics:</p>
<p>Amorphous Silicon Cells are composed of silicon atoms in a thin homogenous layer rather than a crystal structure. Amorphous silicon absorbs light more effectively than crystalline silicon, so the cells can be thinner. Amorphous silicon is also known as a &#8220;thin film&#8221; PV technology and it can be deposited on a wide range of substrates, both rigid and flexible. Amorphous cells are less efficient than crystalline based cells, with typical efficiencies of around 6%, but they are easier and therefore cheaper to produce. </p>
<p>Monocrystalline Silicon Cells are made from very pure monocrystalline silicon. The silicon has a single and continuous crystal lattice structure with almost no defects or impurities. The principle advantage of monocrystalline cells are their high efficiencies, typically around 15%, although the manufacturing process required to produce monocrystalline silicon is complicated, resulting in slightly higher costs than other technologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
