<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;Jim Conway Developed a Better Solution&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/03/jim-conway-developed-better-solution.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/03/jim-conway-developed-better-solution.html</link>
	<description>Frustrated or intrigued by email teasers from investment newsletters and advisers? We solve them and track their performance here ... so stick around, participate and subscribe (it's free)!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:05:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/03/jim-conway-developed-better-solution.html/comment-page-1#comment-4194</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=30#comment-4194</guid>
		<description>Now 11 with point and figure chart target of 7.
So much for high cost info. Remindful of what Bill Sharpe used to say in his Stanford Biz School classes: if I knew of a great way to make money in competitive markets, why would I tell anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now 11 with point and figure chart target of 7.<br />
So much for high cost info. Remindful of what Bill Sharpe used to say in his Stanford Biz School classes: if I knew of a great way to make money in competitive markets, why would I tell anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/03/jim-conway-developed-better-solution.html/comment-page-1#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=30#comment-71</guid>
		<description>I was recently looking at this one... I knew what it was halfway into the first sentance...  I definately think it&#039;s a good buy.&lt;br/&gt;It&#039;s got a PEG of .21 and earnings yield of 15.23%, as if you can get much lower then that.  It&#039;s earnings have been climbing, it&#039;s recently been in the IBD 200...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The IBD overall rating is currently a 95, (98 EPS rating and 99 RS rating).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I checked this on vectorvest.com, a rating system, and it&#039;s got a 1.62 Value rating, a 1.18 safty rating, and a 1.7 timing rating and an overall VST rating of 1.52...&lt;br/&gt;Basically it&#039;s ranked on a scale of 0 to 2.0 and anything above 1.25 is considered &quot;excellent&quot;... You will be very hard pressed to find ratings of 1.5 or higher, and the highest I&#039;ve found is 1.6 (ROCM had 1.6 about a week ago, PRXI did as well, and SPAR currently has a 1.6 rating)&lt;br/&gt;another rating by vectorvest is the &quot;confort index&quot; which is basically a safty rating based on past history only.  A stock&#039;s history risk tolerance is usually a pretty good indicator of saftey, where as history of a stocks growth is not. ROCM&#039;s confort index rating is a 1.85, which makes the average 1.18 much more comforting...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;After some closer inspection of the SEC filings and listening to any press conferences, this one could very easily be a screaming buy...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;p.s. thanks for all the great info... Even if I don&#039;t buy a single stock because of this site, it&#039;s very interesting to look at, and is helping me learn a few things about what people tend to &quot;hype up&quot; about a stock, vs. what actually seems to work.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;p.p.s&lt;br/&gt;If you could somehow post a daily tracker of those &quot;sluethed&quot; stocks or something it would be great... just a suggestion&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;-Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was recently looking at this one&#8230; I knew what it was halfway into the first sentance&#8230;  I definately think it&#8217;s a good buy.<br />It&#8217;s got a PEG of .21 and earnings yield of 15.23%, as if you can get much lower then that.  It&#8217;s earnings have been climbing, it&#8217;s recently been in the IBD 200&#8230;</p>
<p>The IBD overall rating is currently a 95, (98 EPS rating and 99 RS rating).</p>
<p>I checked this on vectorvest.com, a rating system, and it&#8217;s got a 1.62 Value rating, a 1.18 safty rating, and a 1.7 timing rating and an overall VST rating of 1.52&#8230;<br />Basically it&#8217;s ranked on a scale of 0 to 2.0 and anything above 1.25 is considered &#8220;excellent&#8221;&#8230; You will be very hard pressed to find ratings of 1.5 or higher, and the highest I&#8217;ve found is 1.6 (ROCM had 1.6 about a week ago, PRXI did as well, and SPAR currently has a 1.6 rating)<br />another rating by vectorvest is the &#8220;confort index&#8221; which is basically a safty rating based on past history only.  A stock&#8217;s history risk tolerance is usually a pretty good indicator of saftey, where as history of a stocks growth is not. ROCM&#8217;s confort index rating is a 1.85, which makes the average 1.18 much more comforting&#8230;</p>
<p>After some closer inspection of the SEC filings and listening to any press conferences, this one could very easily be a screaming buy&#8230;</p>
<p>p.s. thanks for all the great info&#8230; Even if I don&#8217;t buy a single stock because of this site, it&#8217;s very interesting to look at, and is helping me learn a few things about what people tend to &#8220;hype up&#8221; about a stock, vs. what actually seems to work.</p>
<p>p.p.s<br />If you could somehow post a daily tracker of those &#8220;sluethed&#8221; stocks or something it would be great&#8230; just a suggestion</p>
<p>-Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
