<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;Classified Uranium Enrichment Secret&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/04/classified-uranium-enrichment-secret.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/04/classified-uranium-enrichment-secret.html</link>
	<description>Frustrated or intrigued by email teasers from investment newsletters and advisers? We solve them and track their performance here ... so stick around, participate and subscribe (it's free)!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:22:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Len Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/04/classified-uranium-enrichment-secret.html/comment-page-1#comment-12815</link>
		<dc:creator>Len Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=36#comment-12815</guid>
		<description>URZ: A THORIUM fueled Rocketship?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>URZ: A THORIUM fueled Rocketship?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Eastman</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/04/classified-uranium-enrichment-secret.html/comment-page-1#comment-9597</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Eastman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=36#comment-9597</guid>
		<description>Went to $2.
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=SILXF.PK&amp;t=2y&amp;l=on&amp;z=m&amp;q=l&amp;c=</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Went to $2.<br />
<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=SILXF.PK&amp;t=2y&amp;l=on&amp;z=m&amp;q=l&amp;c=" rel="nofollow">http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=SILXF.PK&amp;t=2y&amp;l=on&amp;z=m&amp;q=l&amp;c=</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DenverDave</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/04/classified-uranium-enrichment-secret.html/comment-page-1#comment-5049</link>
		<dc:creator>DenverDave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=36#comment-5049</guid>
		<description>I have heard that China is developing a few of the thorium-only reactors. I don&#039;t have any knowledge about the technical problems nor how they are dealing with them, successfully or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have heard that China is developing a few of the thorium-only reactors. I don&#8217;t have any knowledge about the technical problems nor how they are dealing with them, successfully or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KRL</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/04/classified-uranium-enrichment-secret.html/comment-page-1#comment-4754</link>
		<dc:creator>KRL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 21:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=36#comment-4754</guid>
		<description>Silex cannot at this time achieve the enrichment levels desired. They are likely dead in the water.

If you want exposure to uranium, look into USEC INC(NYSE:USU). Although not without voltaile risk, I think their worst troubles are behind them and we may be handsomely rewarded in the years to come.

Junior miner Fronteer (FRG) may pan out (pun intended), especially if gold prices ascend in the future. They do have a small amount of uranium finds on some of their properties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silex cannot at this time achieve the enrichment levels desired. They are likely dead in the water.</p>
<p>If you want exposure to uranium, look into USEC INC(NYSE:USU). Although not without voltaile risk, I think their worst troubles are behind them and we may be handsomely rewarded in the years to come.</p>
<p>Junior miner Fronteer (FRG) may pan out (pun intended), especially if gold prices ascend in the future. They do have a small amount of uranium finds on some of their properties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/04/classified-uranium-enrichment-secret.html/comment-page-1#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=36#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Before you bet the farm on uranium stocks (either mining or processing), you might want to consider the impact of thorium - it&#039;s about 3 times more plentiful, and every bit of it can be turned into nuclear fuel, without isotopic separation.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There are some technical hurdles to running a thorium-only reactor, but they&#039;re not insurmountable, and I predict they&#039;ll be solved in a big way long before uranium hits $600 a pound</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before you bet the farm on uranium stocks (either mining or processing), you might want to consider the impact of thorium &#8211; it&#8217;s about 3 times more plentiful, and every bit of it can be turned into nuclear fuel, without isotopic separation.</p>
<p>There are some technical hurdles to running a thorium-only reactor, but they&#8217;re not insurmountable, and I predict they&#8217;ll be solved in a big way long before uranium hits $600 a pound</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
