Comments on: "Oracle of Oil and Motley Fool’s #1 Value Stock" http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/05/oracle-of-oil-and-motley-fools-1-value.html Frustrated or intrigued by email teasers from investment newsletters and advisers? We solve them and track their performance here ... so stick around, participate and subscribe (it's free)! Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:52:09 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: farley 5 http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/05/oracle-of-oil-and-motley-fools-1-value.html/comment-page-1#comment-4211 farley 5 Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:00:11 +0000 http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=69#comment-4211 CHK - very sad stock. 2 for 5 positive. Textbook series of lower tops and lower bottoms since July. Gave you clear exit points at: $63 db after HPW, $61 2nd DB, $57 spd trip bot, $51 spd trip bot, $48 spd db, $45 trendline break. I don't feel sorry for anyone that is left in this pig. Supply & Demand is irrifutable.(sp?) CHK – very sad stock. 2 for 5 positive. Textbook series of lower tops and lower bottoms since July. Gave you clear exit points at: $63 db after HPW, $61 2nd DB, $57 spd trip bot, $51 spd trip bot, $48 spd db, $45 trendline break. I don’t feel sorry for anyone that is left in this pig. Supply & Demand is irrifutable.(sp?)

]]> By: Rich http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/05/oracle-of-oil-and-motley-fools-1-value.html/comment-page-1#comment-4210 Rich Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:43:34 +0000 http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=69#comment-4210 CHK from 27 to 74 to 45. Agree with Shawn. Also with Ryan on MKL from 366 to maybe 496. CHK from 27 to 74 to 45.
Agree with Shawn.
Also with Ryan on MKL from 366 to maybe 496.

]]> By: Shawn http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/05/oracle-of-oil-and-motley-fools-1-value.html/comment-page-1#comment-2408 Shawn Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:19:51 +0000 http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=69#comment-2408 Have owned CHK since $19. Unfortunately right now I think Chessie is going into a consolidaton mode. Aubrey, the cEO, recently announced a new issuance resulting in a 4% dilution. Most people think this dilution was cheap to develop a huge new NG find. But, if he does the same as he did in the past, this will be but the first of a series of new issues. The last time he did this CHK got stuck near $30 for a couple of years. I think it is a great stock, but be prepared for the underlying asset value to grow much faster then the share price for a while as new issuance is the only way they can afford to develop their recent find. Have owned CHK since $19. Unfortunately right now I think Chessie is going into a consolidaton mode. Aubrey, the cEO, recently announced a new issuance resulting in a 4% dilution.

Most people think this dilution was cheap to develop a huge new NG find. But, if he does the same as he did in the past, this will be but the first of a series of new issues. The last time he did this CHK got stuck near $30 for a couple of years.

I think it is a great stock, but be prepared for the underlying asset value to grow much faster then the share price for a while as new issuance is the only way they can afford to develop their recent find.

]]> By: Ryan http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/05/oracle-of-oil-and-motley-fools-1-value.html/comment-page-1#comment-1487 Ryan Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:52:21 +0000 http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=69#comment-1487 sorry, i followed the wrong link. MKL is actually the "The One REMARKABLE Stock to Own Now" sorry, i followed the wrong link. MKL is actually the “The One REMARKABLE Stock to Own Now”

]]> By: Ryan http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/05/oracle-of-oil-and-motley-fools-1-value.html/comment-page-1#comment-1486 Ryan Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:47:54 +0000 http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=69#comment-1486 You should change your post here to the correct stock: MKL. http://www.fool.com/newsletters/14/sfr/03/04.htm?source=eivyhoemh8460007 You should change your post here to the correct stock: MKL. http://www.fool.com/newsletters/14/sfr/03/04.htm?source=eivyhoemh8460007

]]>