<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;Intravenous Ultrasound &#8212; Once in a Generation Opportunity&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/07/intravenous-ultrasound-once-in.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/07/intravenous-ultrasound-once-in.html</link>
	<description>Frustrated or intrigued by email teasers from investment newsletters and advisers? We solve them and track their performance here ... so stick around, participate and subscribe (it's free)!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:52:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom T</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/07/intravenous-ultrasound-once-in.html/comment-page-1#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 02:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=123#comment-402</guid>
		<description>you bring up a very good point about insiders cashing out.  if they really thought there was a good chance of a good multiple to market price, I doubt they would sell their shares(of course, could always be personal reasons).  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;options don&#039;t really &quot;expire&quot; per se upon acquisition.  top management usually has acceleration of vesting upon a change of control.  for others, options in the old company are typically converted into options in the acquiring company.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;main point being that seeing an acquisition on the horizon is usually cause to hold onto shares, not sell them.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I see from an edgar filing that they are doing another private placement (dated 10/18/07) at below market pricing.  congratulations, everybody else just got diluted a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you bring up a very good point about insiders cashing out.  if they really thought there was a good chance of a good multiple to market price, I doubt they would sell their shares(of course, could always be personal reasons).  </p>
<p>options don&#8217;t really &#8220;expire&#8221; per se upon acquisition.  top management usually has acceleration of vesting upon a change of control.  for others, options in the old company are typically converted into options in the acquiring company.  </p>
<p>main point being that seeing an acquisition on the horizon is usually cause to hold onto shares, not sell them.  </p>
<p>I see from an edgar filing that they are doing another private placement (dated 10/18/07) at below market pricing.  congratulations, everybody else just got diluted a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/07/intravenous-ultrasound-once-in.html/comment-page-1#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=123#comment-401</guid>
		<description>interesting that insiders continue to cash out their options, especially Dalhldorf (as of 8/7/07 owns zero according to Yahoo), if the company is to be bought out per Skousen. i&#039;m sure some of the options expire, but all of them? Dahldorf is the CFO. Huennekens, the CEO only owns 50,600. Bergheim, the CH., only owns 2,126 directly? All have been regular sellers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting that insiders continue to cash out their options, especially Dalhldorf (as of 8/7/07 owns zero according to Yahoo), if the company is to be bought out per Skousen. i&#8217;m sure some of the options expire, but all of them? Dahldorf is the CFO. Huennekens, the CEO only owns 50,600. Bergheim, the CH., only owns 2,126 directly? All have been regular sellers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
