<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;The Canary Wharf Estate &#8212; Secret Society #4&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/canary-wharf-estate-secret-society-4.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/canary-wharf-estate-secret-society-4.html</link>
	<description>Frustrated or intrigued by email teasers from investment newsletters and advisers? We solve them and track their performance here ... so stick around, participate and subscribe (it's free)!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:52:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bg</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/canary-wharf-estate-secret-society-4.html/comment-page-1#comment-638</link>
		<dc:creator>bg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/05/the-canary-wharf-estate-secret-society-4/#comment-638</guid>
		<description>I also had shares of BAM that had done quite well for me. I held them thru a two splits and sold for a gain of 95% in just short of 2 years. I sold it and admit I do miss it although it has only gained another 5 points in the past year (so I&#039;m happy that it seems I got out at the right time). &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;PS Navallier no longer owns it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also had shares of BAM that had done quite well for me. I held them thru a two splits and sold for a gain of 95% in just short of 2 years. I sold it and admit I do miss it although it has only gained another 5 points in the past year (so I&#8217;m happy that it seems I got out at the right time). </p>
<p>PS Navallier no longer owns it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/canary-wharf-estate-secret-society-4.html/comment-page-1#comment-637</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/05/the-canary-wharf-estate-secret-society-4/#comment-637</guid>
		<description>According to Chris Meyer in his &quot;Capital &amp; Cisis&quot; newsletter, BAM is set to spin off it&#039;s infrastructure division  sometime this month.  Current shareholders will receive 1 new share for every 25 shares of Bam.  Bam will retain 40% ownership and continue to manage the new company.  BIP (Brookfield Infrastructure Partners) will contain 62% transmission lines - 38% timber and price around $25 per unit with a yield of approx. 5%.  Meyer recommends holding onto Bam and it&#039;s new spinoff.  I currently hold some Bam in a IRA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Chris Meyer in his &#8220;Capital &#038; Cisis&#8221; newsletter, BAM is set to spin off it&#8217;s infrastructure division  sometime this month.  Current shareholders will receive 1 new share for every 25 shares of Bam.  Bam will retain 40% ownership and continue to manage the new company.  BIP (Brookfield Infrastructure Partners) will contain 62% transmission lines &#8211; 38% timber and price around $25 per unit with a yield of approx. 5%.  Meyer recommends holding onto Bam and it&#8217;s new spinoff.  I currently hold some Bam in a IRA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/canary-wharf-estate-secret-society-4.html/comment-page-1#comment-636</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 01:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/05/the-canary-wharf-estate-secret-society-4/#comment-636</guid>
		<description>Given the need for investment in infrastructure, the rise of Brazil, this does sound like something that should at least be followed for dips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the need for investment in infrastructure, the rise of Brazil, this does sound like something that should at least be followed for dips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/canary-wharf-estate-secret-society-4.html/comment-page-1#comment-635</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/05/the-canary-wharf-estate-secret-society-4/#comment-635</guid>
		<description>Count me as a fan of Brookfield Asset Management (BAM).  My wife and I held a few shares of Brascan (a predecessor company), but we sold off because I couldn&#039;t figure out the impact of the conversion to BAM.  We&#039;ve subsequently bought shares of BAM, and the company keeps making money for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Count me as a fan of Brookfield Asset Management (BAM).  My wife and I held a few shares of Brascan (a predecessor company), but we sold off because I couldn&#8217;t figure out the impact of the conversion to BAM.  We&#8217;ve subsequently bought shares of BAM, and the company keeps making money for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
