<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;Inside Value: Spinoff from a Financial Services Giant&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/inside-value-spinoff-from-financial.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/inside-value-spinoff-from-financial.html</link>
	<description>Frustrated or intrigued by email teasers from investment newsletters and advisers? We solve them and track their performance here ... so stick around, participate and subscribe (it's free)!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:06:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/inside-value-spinoff-from-financial.html/comment-page-1#comment-4202</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/17/inside-value-spinoff-from-a-financial-services-giant/#comment-4202</guid>
		<description>ACH 90 to 23, maybe 6.
DFS 31 to 10.
RIO 38 to 23.
Just the facts m&#039;am.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ACH 90 to 23, maybe 6.<br />
DFS 31 to 10.<br />
RIO 38 to 23.<br />
Just the facts m&#8217;am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/inside-value-spinoff-from-financial.html/comment-page-1#comment-1830</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/17/inside-value-spinoff-from-a-financial-services-giant/#comment-1830</guid>
		<description>I was a Skousen subscriber. He has featured ACH before.  It made some money for shareholders in past years, (1 year, up 68%, 3 years, up 159% and 5 years, up 803%!)...However, I am glad I got out of it, because year to date it is down 22%, and over the last six months, ACH is down 38%.  OUCH!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a Skousen subscriber. He has featured ACH before.  It made some money for shareholders in past years, (1 year, up 68%, 3 years, up 159% and 5 years, up 803%!)&#8230;However, I am glad I got out of it, because year to date it is down 22%, and over the last six months, ACH is down 38%.  OUCH!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corey</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/inside-value-spinoff-from-financial.html/comment-page-1#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator>corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/17/inside-value-spinoff-from-a-financial-services-giant/#comment-1034</guid>
		<description>I came here by accident, but just might stay :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came here by accident, but just might stay <img src='http://www.stockgumshoe.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/inside-value-spinoff-from-financial.html/comment-page-1#comment-681</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/17/inside-value-spinoff-from-a-financial-services-giant/#comment-681</guid>
		<description>It has to be ACH they are the only company from China to go public almost 6 years ago that fits the criteria.  Is this the one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has to be ACH they are the only company from China to go public almost 6 years ago that fits the criteria.  Is this the one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: da.bro7</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/inside-value-spinoff-from-financial.html/comment-page-1#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>da.bro7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/17/inside-value-spinoff-from-a-financial-services-giant/#comment-680</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think its RIO, though Skousen has recommended RIO recently.  First, its a Brazilian company, not chinese, PE is nearly 17 (trailing 12 mos), or if you want forward PE it is about 13.  Price to book is 5.73 (from Yahoo Finance) and that doesn&#039;t fit either.  A possible candidate is ANGGY but I can&#039;t find enough hard facts about them yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think its RIO, though Skousen has recommended RIO recently.  First, its a Brazilian company, not chinese, PE is nearly 17 (trailing 12 mos), or if you want forward PE it is about 13.  Price to book is 5.73 (from Yahoo Finance) and that doesn&#8217;t fit either.  A possible candidate is ANGGY but I can&#8217;t find enough hard facts about them yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
