<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;Railroad Baron&#8217;s $4 Billion Energy Stash Unlocked&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/railroad-barons-4-billion-energy-stash.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/railroad-barons-4-billion-energy-stash.html</link>
	<description>Frustrated or intrigued by email teasers from investment newsletters and advisers? We solve them and track their performance here ... so stick around, participate and subscribe (it's free)!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:01:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: One Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/railroad-barons-4-billion-energy-stash.html/comment-page-1#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>One Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/21/railroad-barons-4-billion-energy-stash-unlocked/#comment-683</guid>
		<description>Good question to ask, I certainly don&#039;t know the answer yet.  This is in a relatively densely packed region of the Gulf, infrastructure-wise, and there are other companies simultaneously exploring nearby plots both on and offshore the island, so it&#039;s not like they&#039;ll have to build a pipeline from a brand new producing area all on their own ... but I&#039;m sure there will be infrastructure costs of some kind. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And holy cow, I just noticed that the shares went up to $1.40 for a few minutes around 10:30 this morning -- I hope that wasn&#039;t a pop from the Gumshoe readers, that would be an inauspicious first.  There must be some other news out there somewhere, I hope, since natural gas is actually down a couple percentage points today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question to ask, I certainly don&#8217;t know the answer yet.  This is in a relatively densely packed region of the Gulf, infrastructure-wise, and there are other companies simultaneously exploring nearby plots both on and offshore the island, so it&#8217;s not like they&#8217;ll have to build a pipeline from a brand new producing area all on their own &#8230; but I&#8217;m sure there will be infrastructure costs of some kind. </p>
<p>And holy cow, I just noticed that the shares went up to $1.40 for a few minutes around 10:30 this morning &#8212; I hope that wasn&#8217;t a pop from the Gumshoe readers, that would be an inauspicious first.  There must be some other news out there somewhere, I hope, since natural gas is actually down a couple percentage points today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/railroad-barons-4-billion-energy-stash.html/comment-page-1#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/10/21/railroad-barons-4-billion-energy-stash-unlocked/#comment-682</guid>
		<description>Okay, assume they are successful establishing production wells, how are they planning on moving the gas to a shore tie-in and the cost?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, assume they are successful establishing production wells, how are they planning on moving the gas to a shore tie-in and the cost?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
