<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;The ONE Remarkable Stock to Own Now&quot; Redux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/12/one-remarkable-stock-to-own-now.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/12/one-remarkable-stock-to-own-now.html</link>
	<description>Frustrated or intrigued by email teasers from investment newsletters and advisers? We solve them and track their performance here ... so stick around, participate and subscribe (it's free)!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:52:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ste</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/12/one-remarkable-stock-to-own-now.html/comment-page-1#comment-4255</link>
		<dc:creator>ste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/12/12/the-one-remarkable-stock-to-own-now-redux/#comment-4255</guid>
		<description>i bought it at 420 when motley fool say abouti it around 350 (tree years ago) i sold it at 500 after it peaking 550 and i cancelled motley subscription i think motly is mass rubbish and mkl dont wirth actualy more than 250 it s too slow mover
i preferr a lot uve in this moment very cheap dividend payer and it is moving from florida in other 5 states just now
i d like to know what you think about this stock</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i bought it at 420 when motley fool say abouti it around 350 (tree years ago) i sold it at 500 after it peaking 550 and i cancelled motley subscription i think motly is mass rubbish and mkl dont wirth actualy more than 250 it s too slow mover<br />
i preferr a lot uve in this moment very cheap dividend payer and it is moving from florida in other 5 states just now<br />
i d like to know what you think about this stock</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Jervis</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/12/one-remarkable-stock-to-own-now.html/comment-page-1#comment-3894</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Jervis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/12/12/the-one-remarkable-stock-to-own-now-redux/#comment-3894</guid>
		<description>Hi Gumshoe,

what do you think of MKL at these prices, i picked some up at 376.00, if i had more money i would be buying more as we speak. What are your thoughts? i think Mr. Market is giving this company away at a reasonable price now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gumshoe,</p>
<p>what do you think of MKL at these prices, i picked some up at 376.00, if i had more money i would be buying more as we speak. What are your thoughts? i think Mr. Market is giving this company away at a reasonable price now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockGumshoe</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/12/one-remarkable-stock-to-own-now.html/comment-page-1#comment-3457</link>
		<dc:creator>StockGumshoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/12/12/the-one-remarkable-stock-to-own-now-redux/#comment-3457</guid>
		<description>Thanks Mike.  All depends how you look at it -- Berkshire Hathaway is a $200 billion company, so Markel could expand 50-fold before catching up. $4 billion is big by many standards, but certainly not huge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mike.  All depends how you look at it &#8212; Berkshire Hathaway is a $200 billion company, so Markel could expand 50-fold before catching up. $4 billion is big by many standards, but certainly not huge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/12/one-remarkable-stock-to-own-now.html/comment-page-1#comment-3456</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 22:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/12/12/the-one-remarkable-stock-to-own-now-redux/#comment-3456</guid>
		<description>Thanks for debunking those annoying advertisements!

Given MKL is already $4 billion, isn&#039;t it kind of late to jump in if one really thought it was the next BRK?

I wish they were a little more transparent about their investment portfolio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for debunking those annoying advertisements!</p>
<p>Given MKL is already $4 billion, isn&#8217;t it kind of late to jump in if one really thought it was the next BRK?</p>
<p>I wish they were a little more transparent about their investment portfolio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockGumshoe</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/12/one-remarkable-stock-to-own-now.html/comment-page-1#comment-3094</link>
		<dc:creator>StockGumshoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 19:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2007/12/12/the-one-remarkable-stock-to-own-now-redux/#comment-3094</guid>
		<description>Good points, student of wealth.  This has been a Fool favorite for several years, from $200 to $500 and back down to $400, more or less.  I still own shares of Markel, though I&#039;ll probably wait for a bit more of a dip before adding to my position -- I would hesitate to call them a hedge fund, they just have a good value investing philosophy and cheap access to cash from their float, though they&#039;ve not been as aggressive at snapping up whole companies as Berkshire has of late, this is more like early Berkshire, buying shares of steady public companies.  We&#039;ll see if they grow and look like Berkshire in 20 years and start buying whole operating companies like Buffett has.  

Altucher has also speculated that MKL would be an interesting acquisition target for BRK, though I have not heard any actual rumblings about that otherwise and Berkshire generally doesn&#039;t buy out public companies because they prefer not to engage in bidding wars or pay a big premium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, student of wealth.  This has been a Fool favorite for several years, from $200 to $500 and back down to $400, more or less.  I still own shares of Markel, though I&#8217;ll probably wait for a bit more of a dip before adding to my position &#8212; I would hesitate to call them a hedge fund, they just have a good value investing philosophy and cheap access to cash from their float, though they&#8217;ve not been as aggressive at snapping up whole companies as Berkshire has of late, this is more like early Berkshire, buying shares of steady public companies.  We&#8217;ll see if they grow and look like Berkshire in 20 years and start buying whole operating companies like Buffett has.  </p>
<p>Altucher has also speculated that MKL would be an interesting acquisition target for BRK, though I have not heard any actual rumblings about that otherwise and Berkshire generally doesn&#8217;t buy out public companies because they prefer not to engage in bidding wars or pay a big premium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
