Comments on: “Geothermal Energy: A situation you can’t ignore!”

By: ron martin

ron martin — Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:41:23 +0000

I did a high school science project in 1957 on geothermal power. Actual implementation of this energy source in the ensuing 51 years has been nil. Exciting future ideas do not equal current gains to investors. By the way, I am one of the 1% loyal gumshoe-addicts that awaits his sleuthology reports even on holidays.

By: charlotte

charlotte — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:53:39 +0000

My cat licks its paw, even if it’s not especially tasty.
C.P.

By: Geo

Geo — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:32:28 +0000

I just noticed Reuters research rated RZ outperform on 4-15-08.

By: G IMBURG

G IMBURG — Sat, 09 Feb 2008 02:00:52 +0000

I like goethermal for a variety of reasons. First,the company has a one time set up cost and very little maintenance cost there after. There is no toxic emmision. It doesnt rely on weather,sunshine or wind,it just keeps producing electricity whatever the weather. Less employees are required , and the water left over from the procss is recycled. The recurring costs in the future should be less than using coal,nat gas,wood pellets or any other fuel to get to the final product. This reduced cost should translate into higher profits and in terms of competition,each watt can be sold cheaper. If anyone disagrees,post it. I would enjoy reading a better arguement.

By: Kevin Rooney

Kevin Rooney — Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:49:59 +0000

Hey you didn’t post my web site! http://www.cgafoundation.org
Use biodiesel more!!!