<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Navellier&#8217;s &#8220;The Google of 2008&#8243;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/02/navelliers-the-google-of-2008.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/02/navelliers-the-google-of-2008.html</link>
	<description>Frustrated or intrigued by email teasers from investment newsletters and advisers? We solve them and track their performance here ... so stick around, participate and subscribe (it's free)!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:43:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike help with teaser please!</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/02/navelliers-the-google-of-2008.html/comment-page-1#comment-2537</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike help with teaser please!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 14:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/02/navelliers-the-google-of-2008.html#comment-2537</guid>
		<description>Too rich .... better plays out there . FYI - I have been killing it on this stock...SOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too rich &#8230;. better plays out there . FYI &#8211; I have been killing it on this stock&#8230;SOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockGumshoe</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/02/navelliers-the-google-of-2008.html/comment-page-1#comment-1293</link>
		<dc:creator>StockGumshoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/02/navelliers-the-google-of-2008.html#comment-1293</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s true, but I&#039;d be careful about the Motley Fool &quot;community&quot; when it deals with a stock that is recommended in one of their newsletters -- if you look at any stock that&#039;s an active recommendation of theirs in their CAPS system, you&#039;ll almost always see an overwhelming 90-10 bullish sentiment, at least.  The heavy participants in their community are also the most likely to be subscribers, and they&#039;re most likely to agree with the recommendations made.  

Not that they&#039;re wrong, just that in my experience they tend to be one-sided when it comes to stocks picked by Fool newsletters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true, but I&#8217;d be careful about the Motley Fool &#8220;community&#8221; when it deals with a stock that is recommended in one of their newsletters &#8212; if you look at any stock that&#8217;s an active recommendation of theirs in their CAPS system, you&#8217;ll almost always see an overwhelming 90-10 bullish sentiment, at least.  The heavy participants in their community are also the most likely to be subscribers, and they&#8217;re most likely to agree with the recommendations made.  </p>
<p>Not that they&#8217;re wrong, just that in my experience they tend to be one-sided when it comes to stocks picked by Fool newsletters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: esquire415</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/02/navelliers-the-google-of-2008.html/comment-page-1#comment-1292</link>
		<dc:creator>esquire415</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/02/navelliers-the-google-of-2008.html#comment-1292</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s up 5% since Feb 6 ($46.93).  Now trading at $49.46

I wish I saw it when it was trading between $40-$42 and sell today for a nice profit.

How does it compare to DTSI? It looks like the Motley Fool community doesn&#039;t think much about that other company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s up 5% since Feb 6 ($46.93).  Now trading at $49.46</p>
<p>I wish I saw it when it was trading between $40-$42 and sell today for a nice profit.</p>
<p>How does it compare to DTSI? It looks like the Motley Fool community doesn&#8217;t think much about that other company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom E</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/02/navelliers-the-google-of-2008.html/comment-page-1#comment-1244</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 05:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/02/navelliers-the-google-of-2008.html#comment-1244</guid>
		<description>I need your input on MARL the stock robot.  It was featured as one of your sponsors.  I paid $87.00 for the program and it picks pennny stocks based on some technicals; however, it behaves contrary to the users guide and picks stock symbols that don&#039;t exits.  I have written to their help desk but all I get is dumb responses.  Can you please look into this. thanks Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need your input on MARL the stock robot.  It was featured as one of your sponsors.  I paid $87.00 for the program and it picks pennny stocks based on some technicals; however, it behaves contrary to the users guide and picks stock symbols that don&#8217;t exits.  I have written to their help desk but all I get is dumb responses.  Can you please look into this. thanks Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockGumshoe</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/02/navelliers-the-google-of-2008.html/comment-page-1#comment-1238</link>
		<dc:creator>StockGumshoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/02/navelliers-the-google-of-2008.html#comment-1238</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d have to consider it to be a mashup between consumer electronics makers and semiconductors, at least as far as the drivers of their business go, but I don&#039;t know how they&#039;re technically classified by different raters.  The only really direct competitor that&#039;s focused solely on this business and that is public is DTSI, and they are much, much smaller.  Be careful about comparing them to sectors or industries (it&#039;s hard to compare royalty companies to manufacturers, for example).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to consider it to be a mashup between consumer electronics makers and semiconductors, at least as far as the drivers of their business go, but I don&#8217;t know how they&#8217;re technically classified by different raters.  The only really direct competitor that&#8217;s focused solely on this business and that is public is DTSI, and they are much, much smaller.  Be careful about comparing them to sectors or industries (it&#8217;s hard to compare royalty companies to manufacturers, for example).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
