// you’re reading...
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Enter your Email address for a FREE subscription

Recent Articles

“The California Effect: Make 900% Thanks to the Green Mafia”
November 18, 2009
By StockGumshoe
“The Biggest Gold Mine in Europe Will Reopen in 2012″
November 17, 2009
By StockGumshoe
“Bursting with Gold: Newfoundland’s Golden Mountain” (Dan Ferris)
November 16, 2009
By StockGumshoe
“This once-shunned tiny penny gold … sitting on 17.3 million ounces.” (Chuck de Castro)
November 12, 2009
By StockGumshoe
“$4 Doubler to Hit $8 With or Without You” Navellier
November 11, 2009
By StockGumshoe

Weekend Rerun: One Stock to Own for the Next Ten Years

I’ve seen this email crop up again many more times this week, so I thought I’d share it with the faithful Gumshoe readership again as a little weekend bonus … hopefully I’ll have a chance to get some new stuff sleuthed out for you before the Super Bowl, too, but you never know.

This one is from Inside Value at the Motley Fool, and it’s a teaser that essentially talks about the value that you can now find in megacap companies. But more importantly, from my perspective, it goes into great detail on a teaser stock that they’ve been teasing for at least two or three years now (during which time it has about doubled, if my memory serves). I’ve written about this same teaser several times, most recently just a couple months ago, so I apologize if it’s a repeat for you … but hey, it’s the weekend! They call it the “Berkshire Miracle” and the “Next Berkshire Hathaway,” among other things.

So without further ado, click here: Philip Durell from Inside Value’s “One Remarkable Stock to Own Now.”

Have a great weekend, everyone. Oh, and for full disclosure, I do still own this particular stock and I actually was thinking about adding some more with the recent dip in price, but haven’t yet.


                  ———–

Looking to learn? There are plenty of good trading courses out there, but for traders just starting out, they’re a bit pricey. Here’s an alternative — and an “on the house” preview!



The author will always disclose any direct long or short equity, debt or option position in any stocks written about as of the day of publication, and will not trade in any stocks mentioned for three days (72 hours) after publication. Full disclaimer is at the bottom of the page.

Related Articles:

  • “Brazilian High Yield Utility” redux
  • Money for Nothing? Chaffee Royalties Return
  • Fake Names for Options Trading … a Vacation Special
  • Now it’s your turn …
  • “The Next Hyper Growth Stock”
  • Discussion

    10 comments for “Weekend Rerun: One Stock to Own for the Next Ten Years”

    1. Any thoughts on the latest from Penny Seuth about what “fund ” they are touting? They call it the “2.5 Trillion “retirement recovery” fund. I’m having trouble figuring it out so I came to the expert. Love your stuff by the way.

      [Reply]

      Posted by Chris | February 2, 2008, 11:36 am
    2. To the Gumshoe ,what have you heard about these Nevada royalties from these gold and silver mining companies,being touted on the S&A news letter?

      respectfully,

      Jim

      [Reply]

      Posted by jim | February 2, 2008, 3:45 pm
    3. Hi Chris — that sounds like the big sovereign wealth fund teaser that’s been going around, I wrote about it here: http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/01/lifeboat-stocks-lifted-by-secret-25.html

      And Jim, I have seen that one but haven’t looked into it yet. There are quite a few small royalty-based “mining” firms, I’ll try to get to it soon and see if there are some specific ideas worth investigating.

      [Reply]

      Posted by StockGumshoe | February 2, 2008, 8:39 pm
    4. i think royal gold ticker rgld gets royalities from other mining companies

      [Reply]

      Posted by doug | February 3, 2008, 11:33 am
    5. Is stansberryresearch.com a reputable publisher of email service providers. I made the mistake of subscribing to two of their services and now my email is overflowing with what appear to be different companies publishing different newsletter offering advice on how to become a millionaire in the matter of five to ten years. However, when I go down to the very bottom of the email well over half of them seem to be affiliated with stanfsberryresearch.com

      Thanks,

      Jerry

      [Reply]

      Posted by jerry | February 3, 2008, 6:24 pm
    6. A commemt to Jerry. I think they all sleep together in Baltimore.

      [Reply]

      Posted by G IMBURG | February 3, 2008, 10:58 pm
    7. Comment for Jerry and G Imburg. I’m one of their subscribers to two products. The jury’s still out for me on them. They are inexpensive, but on the other hand their attitude is that if you are dumb enough to buy our marketing that’s your problem, and they seem to have few ethics about it. Unfortunately, some of their readers tend to agree, which just eggs them on, though it also frames the debate. According to one of their editors, Porter Stansberry, he was apparently sued by the SEC for a report he made, hasn’t extricated himself and feels it’s very unfair that he be accused of whatever they claimed, and writes in detail about it. (So check out his comments about it.) Things like that reveal their attitude about their product and marketing, so that’s why you get a zillion of their teasers. They have to sell it to survive and are unapologetic about it.

      [Reply]

      Posted by Bart | February 4, 2008, 5:47 pm
    8. A note to Jerry and Bart: Their latest tactic is to brag about how much taxes they are paying. The implication is they are making money hand over fist, and if you come along for the ride, you will to. FAIR COMMENT: I think their self images are a bit overbloated and pompous, and they dont take well to criticism for their half baked ideas. Most of my controversil posts are designed to enccourage the readers to think for themselves with the tools the market gives you, both technicals and fundamentals. The lesson learned is that these self styled gurus screw up big time. Prediction is a tough game. Your skills will increase as the light bulb gets brighter.

      [Reply]

      Posted by G IMBURG | February 4, 2008, 9:22 pm
    9. i followed porters advice on SOLM who lost a court battle with toyota along with my money that was “sure to go into the stratosphere”It was a while ago it could have been Skousen`s pick.But I really like these guys in the long run.Like G IMBURG says,buyer beware! I did have a chace to get out,I just thought that they might win the court battle. I should have known better wit the info I had and invested less. O well I learned that the greed will get you.Porter says never invest more than 4% of your portfolio and use 25% trailing stop.You will never lose more than 1%.That rulw would have saved me.I had like 25% invested.LIVE AND LEARN
      JEFF

      [Reply]

      Posted by jeff furlong | May 23, 2008, 1:01 am
    10. US MedSys Corporation, who wouldn’t own this @$0.004? Yes this is insane as they are now part of HNSO which has a market cap under 1 million!

      [Reply]

      Posted by J Bailey | May 23, 2008, 8:41 pm

    Post a comment



    Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Like what you read here today? Enter your Email address for a FREE subscription and you'll hear about all of our great articles to come

    Archives

    Recent Forum Posts