<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;MAJOR INSIDE BUY – Wall Street&#8217;s Insider Play of the Year&#8221; Xcelerated Profits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/04/major-inside-buy-%e2%80%93-wall-streets-insider-play-of-the-year-xcelerated-profits.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/04/major-inside-buy-%e2%80%93-wall-streets-insider-play-of-the-year-xcelerated-profits.html</link>
	<description>Frustrated or intrigued by email teasers from investment newsletters and advisers? We solve them and track their performance here ... so stick around, participate and subscribe (it's free)!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:52:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/04/major-inside-buy-%e2%80%93-wall-streets-insider-play-of-the-year-xcelerated-profits.html/comment-page-1#comment-4201</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/04/major-inside-buy-%e2%80%93-wall-streets-insider-play-of-the-year-xcelerated-profits.html#comment-4201</guid>
		<description>Re whether ID or LLL the better investment:
ID went from 22 to 11 with a P&amp;F target of 7, while LLL went from 80 to 95 with a P&amp;F target of 116: http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?lll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re whether ID or LLL the better investment:<br />
ID went from 22 to 11 with a P&amp;F target of 7, while LLL went from 80 to 95 with a P&amp;F target of 116: <a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?lll" rel="nofollow">http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?lll</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/04/major-inside-buy-%e2%80%93-wall-streets-insider-play-of-the-year-xcelerated-profits.html/comment-page-1#comment-4200</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/04/major-inside-buy-%e2%80%93-wall-streets-insider-play-of-the-year-xcelerated-profits.html#comment-4200</guid>
		<description>My dog gives better investment advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My dog gives better investment advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NeverLift</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/04/major-inside-buy-%e2%80%93-wall-streets-insider-play-of-the-year-xcelerated-profits.html/comment-page-1#comment-2778</link>
		<dc:creator>NeverLift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 00:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/04/major-inside-buy-%e2%80%93-wall-streets-insider-play-of-the-year-xcelerated-profits.html#comment-2778</guid>
		<description>I have -- or rather, had -- been using Navellier&#039;s Quantum Growth as my chief source of investment advice, and have spreadsheeted his actual performance, week by week, since 10 Jan 2005.  For the years when the market was well-behaved, taking the top 12 picks each week:  Phenomenal performance, 0.5%/week compounded on a long term (2 year) basis.  But:  Since the market went mad last year, QG is a total disaster.  I paid for a two year subscription just around then -- to get the discount -- and have since learned to not use his recommendations at all.  (As a specific example:  for the 113 weeks ending 4/28/08, the average gain is over all his buys was -0.11%, compounding to -11.97%.  If I use me &quot;top 12&quot; rule, I get 0.06%/week, or 7.01% total.  In that same period, the S&amp;P500 had a gain of 7.9%, for a compounded weekly gain of 0.07%.  For the last 26 weeks, QG lost 21% -- almost 1%/week -- while the S&amp;P lost 9.38%.  His top 12 lost almost 19%.)  I still chart QG, in horrifying detail -- but am doing much better with a few stocks that I follow very closely, sometimes day-trading their swings.  Wish I could get a refund from good ole Lou.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have &#8212; or rather, had &#8212; been using Navellier&#8217;s Quantum Growth as my chief source of investment advice, and have spreadsheeted his actual performance, week by week, since 10 Jan 2005.  For the years when the market was well-behaved, taking the top 12 picks each week:  Phenomenal performance, 0.5%/week compounded on a long term (2 year) basis.  But:  Since the market went mad last year, QG is a total disaster.  I paid for a two year subscription just around then &#8212; to get the discount &#8212; and have since learned to not use his recommendations at all.  (As a specific example:  for the 113 weeks ending 4/28/08, the average gain is over all his buys was -0.11%, compounding to -11.97%.  If I use me &#8220;top 12&#8243; rule, I get 0.06%/week, or 7.01% total.  In that same period, the S&amp;P500 had a gain of 7.9%, for a compounded weekly gain of 0.07%.  For the last 26 weeks, QG lost 21% &#8212; almost 1%/week &#8212; while the S&amp;P lost 9.38%.  His top 12 lost almost 19%.)  I still chart QG, in horrifying detail &#8212; but am doing much better with a few stocks that I follow very closely, sometimes day-trading their swings.  Wish I could get a refund from good ole Lou.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/04/major-inside-buy-%e2%80%93-wall-streets-insider-play-of-the-year-xcelerated-profits.html/comment-page-1#comment-2427</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/04/major-inside-buy-%e2%80%93-wall-streets-insider-play-of-the-year-xcelerated-profits.html#comment-2427</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like some feedback on the best place (newsletters or anything else) for small cap investing.  I feel like I&#039;m drowning in information which is less than useless.  Thanks to Gumshoe, I can almost always recognize the b.s. and proceed cautiously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like some feedback on the best place (newsletters or anything else) for small cap investing.  I feel like I&#8217;m drowning in information which is less than useless.  Thanks to Gumshoe, I can almost always recognize the b.s. and proceed cautiously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khunbill1</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/04/major-inside-buy-%e2%80%93-wall-streets-insider-play-of-the-year-xcelerated-profits.html/comment-page-1#comment-2424</link>
		<dc:creator>khunbill1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/04/major-inside-buy-%e2%80%93-wall-streets-insider-play-of-the-year-xcelerated-profits.html#comment-2424</guid>
		<description>I bought the Inside Code for $1977 and it was all about FOREX trading. 10 CDs. i didn&#039;t have the time, so i returned it and am expecting my refund from Agora within 15 days of their receipt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought the Inside Code for $1977 and it was all about FOREX trading. 10 CDs. i didn&#8217;t have the time, so i returned it and am expecting my refund from Agora within 15 days of their receipt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
