<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Dividend Superstars: Part 2 &#8230; Shipping and Secret Investments&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/08/dividend-superstars-part-2-shipping-and-secret-investments.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/08/dividend-superstars-part-2-shipping-and-secret-investments.html</link>
	<description>Frustrated or intrigued by email teasers from investment newsletters and advisers? We solve them and track their performance here ... so stick around, participate and subscribe (it's free)!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:52:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Levine</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/08/dividend-superstars-part-2-shipping-and-secret-investments.html/comment-page-1#comment-9915</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Levine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/08/dividend-superstars-part-2-shipping-and-secret-investments.html#comment-9915</guid>
		<description>FRO is a $20 stock with a 5% yield. That implies they have cut the dividend from $11 in 2007 to only $1.00/shr in 2009. Can you confirm?

OSG is $30 stock with a 6% yield. That implies they pay about $1.80/shr in 2009. Can you confirm?

Are these yields sustainable?
Are there higher yielding alternatives you would recommend?

Kinder Morgan at 8.19% yield or El Paso Pipeline at 7.33% yield?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FRO is a $20 stock with a 5% yield. That implies they have cut the dividend from $11 in 2007 to only $1.00/shr in 2009. Can you confirm?</p>
<p>OSG is $30 stock with a 6% yield. That implies they pay about $1.80/shr in 2009. Can you confirm?</p>
<p>Are these yields sustainable?<br />
Are there higher yielding alternatives you would recommend?</p>
<p>Kinder Morgan at 8.19% yield or El Paso Pipeline at 7.33% yield?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Levine</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/08/dividend-superstars-part-2-shipping-and-secret-investments.html/comment-page-1#comment-9914</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Levine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/08/dividend-superstars-part-2-shipping-and-secret-investments.html#comment-9914</guid>
		<description>ACAS

The stock price has fallen from $45 per share to $2.84 per share.
But the Dividend Yield is 150% which means they still pay out a dividend of $4.20 per share!

What is the underlying value of ACAS? What do they own? Will the $4.20/shr dividend continue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ACAS</p>
<p>The stock price has fallen from $45 per share to $2.84 per share.<br />
But the Dividend Yield is 150% which means they still pay out a dividend of $4.20 per share!</p>
<p>What is the underlying value of ACAS? What do they own? Will the $4.20/shr dividend continue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/08/dividend-superstars-part-2-shipping-and-secret-investments.html/comment-page-1#comment-7611</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/08/dividend-superstars-part-2-shipping-and-secret-investments.html#comment-7611</guid>
		<description>Dividend Superstars...terrible record. Current issue crows about a double in ACAS from their last recommendation at $3 per share. Didn&#039;t mention they originally recommended ACAS at $43!!

Don&#039;t believe ACAS is paying a dividend at all now, yet is carried in the Superstars current recommendations...yikes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dividend Superstars&#8230;terrible record. Current issue crows about a double in ACAS from their last recommendation at $3 per share. Didn&#8217;t mention they originally recommended ACAS at $43!!</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t believe ACAS is paying a dividend at all now, yet is carried in the Superstars current recommendations&#8230;yikes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: destry</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/08/dividend-superstars-part-2-shipping-and-secret-investments.html/comment-page-1#comment-4576</link>
		<dc:creator>destry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/08/dividend-superstars-part-2-shipping-and-secret-investments.html#comment-4576</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m ashamed.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m ashamed&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: farley 5</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/08/dividend-superstars-part-2-shipping-and-secret-investments.html/comment-page-1#comment-4568</link>
		<dc:creator>farley 5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/08/dividend-superstars-part-2-shipping-and-secret-investments.html#comment-4568</guid>
		<description>Destry, destry, destry...  You mean to tell me you don&#039;t want to pay 3%/year plus 20% of all profits and 0% of all losses to make substandard returns?  Shame on you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Destry, destry, destry&#8230;  You mean to tell me you don&#8217;t want to pay 3%/year plus 20% of all profits and 0% of all losses to make substandard returns?  Shame on you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
