Comments on: Louis Navellier’s “Glitch” http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/09/louis-navelliers-glitch.html Frustrated or intrigued by email teasers from investment newsletters and advisers? We solve them and track their performance here ... so stick around, participate and subscribe (it's free)! Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:52:09 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: John http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/09/louis-navelliers-glitch.html/comment-page-1#comment-8108 John Sun, 08 Mar 2009 01:38:27 +0000 http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=508#comment-8108 http://investorcrap.blogspot.com/ http://investorcrap.blogspot.com/

]]> By: fred http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/09/louis-navelliers-glitch.html/comment-page-1#comment-7338 fred Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:11:19 +0000 http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=508#comment-7338 The January issue of Navellier's Blue Chip Growth shows 25 of his recommendations out of the total portfolio of 30 picks are in negative territory ranging from -3.27% loss to -70.65% loss. Only 5 are positive ranging from 6.56% to 128.03% (Monsanto recommended in Feb.05). His writings sell hope, alas, for me not profit. The January issue of Navellier’s Blue Chip Growth shows 25 of his recommendations out of the total portfolio of 30 picks are in negative territory ranging from -3.27% loss to -70.65% loss. Only 5 are positive ranging from 6.56% to 128.03% (Monsanto recommended in Feb.05). His writings sell hope, alas, for me not profit.

]]> By: Edward M. Fischer http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/09/louis-navelliers-glitch.html/comment-page-1#comment-6341 Edward M. Fischer Mon, 03 Nov 2008 05:26:47 +0000 http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=508#comment-6341 Is it possible that the picks didn't pan out because the panic had already started and trades weren't made for any other reason than fear and a get out at any cost mentality. He's the first to admit that not all of his picks turn out to be winners, but he's far more often right than wrong. The whole market's star has faded, but ...there's still money to be made. Not to brag, but I selected 17 of his Blue Chip and Global Growth suggested buys for $59K and I'm up $7.5k. At least his logic is always on and his Portfolio Picker is a great analytical tool. 21 of his Aug buys I tracked in a paper portfolio that grew from $117k to $132k ytd during some of the worse months. Not all turned out to be winners, but I could care less, as long as the bottom line meets my expectations. He's worth millions, manages a multi-billion $ investment firm VERY successfully and doesn't need his news letters to earn a living. By the way, just because you lost some money following picks that didn't turn out for you doesn't mean that he lied. Sounds like the StockLord is now the StockLower. Tch, tch tch. Is it possible that the picks didn’t pan out because the panic had already started and trades weren’t made for any other reason than fear and a get out at any cost mentality. He’s the first to admit that not all of his picks turn out to be winners, but he’s far more often right than wrong. The whole market’s star has faded, but …there’s still money to be made. Not to brag, but I selected 17 of his Blue Chip and Global Growth suggested buys for $59K and I’m up $7.5k. At least his logic is always on and his Portfolio Picker is a great analytical tool. 21 of his Aug buys I tracked in a paper portfolio that grew from $117k to $132k ytd during some of the worse months. Not all turned out to be winners, but I could care less, as long as the bottom line meets my expectations. He’s worth millions, manages a multi-billion $ investment firm VERY successfully and doesn’t need his news letters to earn a living. By the way, just because you lost some money following picks that didn’t turn out for you doesn’t mean that he lied. Sounds like the StockLord is now the StockLower. Tch, tch tch.

]]> By: Edward M. Fischer http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/09/louis-navelliers-glitch.html/comment-page-1#comment-6340 Edward M. Fischer Mon, 03 Nov 2008 05:09:46 +0000 http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=508#comment-6340 John, WHICH of Louis's portfolios are you dishing? Blue Chip Growth, Emerging Markets, Global Growth, or anon. What support do you offer,that the index beats his portfolio 2:1 AND that he excludes the losses from his ratio to the S&P that the ratio only includes his successful trades? Just go to his web sites published Track Record to see the truth. Do you really believe someone would consistently subscribe to his services if they weren't making money following his picks. Managing a multi $billion investment firm for many years lends support to his integrity and honesty and the only lies I hear are those from people who don't have a clue, life's losers. Put up the numbers to Prove he's a liar, as I did with my Aug - Oct $14k+ profit for a 12.6% gain. How much profit did YOU make during the past Qtr from your Index investing? John, WHICH of Louis’s portfolios are you dishing? Blue Chip Growth, Emerging Markets, Global Growth, or anon. What support do you offer,that the index beats his portfolio 2:1 AND that he excludes the losses from his ratio to the S&P that the ratio only includes his successful trades? Just go to his web sites published Track Record to see the truth. Do you really believe someone would consistently subscribe to his services if they weren’t making money following his picks. Managing a multi $billion investment firm for many years lends support to his integrity and honesty and the only lies I hear are those from people who don’t have a clue, life’s losers. Put up the numbers to Prove he’s a liar, as I did with my Aug – Oct $14k+ profit for a 12.6% gain. How much profit did YOU make during the past Qtr from your Index investing?

]]> By: John http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/09/louis-navelliers-glitch.html/comment-page-1#comment-6332 John Sun, 02 Nov 2008 13:38:45 +0000 http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=508#comment-6332 Louis is not honest if not a liar. His performance like beating S&P 4:1, 10:1 & 30:1 in his newsletters only mean his sucessful trades. He did not count his loss trades. Overall this year, index beat his portfolilio at least 2:1. Louis is not honest if not a liar.

His performance like beating S&P 4:1, 10:1 & 30:1 in his newsletters only mean his sucessful trades. He did not count his loss trades. Overall this year, index beat his portfolilio at least 2:1.

]]>