<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;The Next Franco-Nevada&#8221; and Nickel Prices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/09/the-next-franco-nevada-and-nickel-prices.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/09/the-next-franco-nevada-and-nickel-prices.html</link>
	<description>Frustrated or intrigued by email teasers from investment newsletters and advisers? We solve them and track their performance here ... so stick around, participate and subscribe (it's free)!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:01:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blake Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/09/the-next-franco-nevada-and-nickel-prices.html/comment-page-1#comment-5138</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=499#comment-5138</guid>
		<description>On a broader scale, I am of the opinion that Agora and Stansberry, along with most premium investment newsletters, are not worth the paper they are printed on. I owned subscriptions to newsletters in each, allocated a portion of my portfolio to them and went &quot;all in&quot; on their stock picks. Not a single winner and now down over 20% in that portion of my portfolio! It amazes me how they throw out all their &quot;winners&quot; in the sales letters and make it appear that you can come out way ahead following their advice, yet when you come aboard, everything seems to head south.
Thank God for you Travis! I have really gotten an education on just how rediculous all these things are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a broader scale, I am of the opinion that Agora and Stansberry, along with most premium investment newsletters, are not worth the paper they are printed on. I owned subscriptions to newsletters in each, allocated a portion of my portfolio to them and went &#8220;all in&#8221; on their stock picks. Not a single winner and now down over 20% in that portion of my portfolio! It amazes me how they throw out all their &#8220;winners&#8221; in the sales letters and make it appear that you can come out way ahead following their advice, yet when you come aboard, everything seems to head south.<br />
Thank God for you Travis! I have really gotten an education on just how rediculous all these things are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: farley 5</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/09/the-next-franco-nevada-and-nickel-prices.html/comment-page-1#comment-5102</link>
		<dc:creator>farley 5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=499#comment-5102</guid>
		<description>Watch for a spread double bottom break at $44 canadian for Canadian Oil Sands.  That would be the second sell signal and send this one to $37 Canadian.  Broke the trendline at $46 - never a good sign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch for a spread double bottom break at $44 canadian for Canadian Oil Sands.  That would be the second sell signal and send this one to $37 Canadian.  Broke the trendline at $46 &#8211; never a good sign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Shansky</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/09/the-next-franco-nevada-and-nickel-prices.html/comment-page-1#comment-5097</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Shansky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=499#comment-5097</guid>
		<description>Canadian Oil Sands Trust Units (COSWF) and Freehold Royalty Trust Units(FRHLF) don&#039;t look too shabby at this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canadian Oil Sands Trust Units (COSWF) and Freehold Royalty Trust Units(FRHLF) don&#8217;t look too shabby at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SageNot</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2008/09/the-next-franco-nevada-and-nickel-prices.html/comment-page-1#comment-5077</link>
		<dc:creator>SageNot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 15:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=499#comment-5077</guid>
		<description>Running out the door, but I must know a dozen investors who&#039;ve been &quot;done in&quot; by ROY&#039;s failures &amp; also LMC, which is down almost 60% now! Nickel isn&#039;t the only industrial metal that&#039;s suffering, we have a world-wide recession dulling demand, yet the very adroit Chris Mayer seems to have overlooked same.

If you must invest in these royalty stocks, &quot;nibble but don&#039;t gobble&quot; as some analyst once said. (Was that you Travis?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Running out the door, but I must know a dozen investors who&#8217;ve been &#8220;done in&#8221; by ROY&#8217;s failures &amp; also LMC, which is down almost 60% now! Nickel isn&#8217;t the only industrial metal that&#8217;s suffering, we have a world-wide recession dulling demand, yet the very adroit Chris Mayer seems to have overlooked same.</p>
<p>If you must invest in these royalty stocks, &#8220;nibble but don&#8217;t gobble&#8221; as some analyst once said. (Was that you Travis?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
