<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What are &#8220;Payment On Demand&#8221; Certificates?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2009/06/what-are-payment-on-demand-certificates.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2009/06/what-are-payment-on-demand-certificates.html</link>
	<description>Frustrated or intrigued by email teasers from investment newsletters and advisers? We solve them and track their performance here ... so stick around, participate and subscribe (it's free)!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:52:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: wm parkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2009/06/what-are-payment-on-demand-certificates.html/comment-page-1#comment-9729</link>
		<dc:creator>wm parkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=1552#comment-9729</guid>
		<description>i have been using mcdonald&#039;s bond trader since september, 08 having bought 30 of his recommended bonds to-date.  i have also sold 6 of the bonds realizing annualized returns from 7% to 123% (roi&#039;s 3% to 34%). 

the most major drawback to buying these corporate bonds is that i must buy a minimum of 10 bonds through my online broker.  since mcdonald gives the specific cusip, you are able to order just the actual bond he recommends at or near his suggested price.  there have been a few instances where i was unable to get the bond due to price and/or lack of availability, but overall buying has not been an issue (nor selling at my requested price).

mcdonald uses a staggered maturity date for the bonds and usually doesn&#039;t go out more than 3 to 4 years from the current date, thus negating the inflation issue.

i don&#039;t mean to be a shrill for this service but it has been by far the most worthwhile service that i have subscribed to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have been using mcdonald&#8217;s bond trader since september, 08 having bought 30 of his recommended bonds to-date.  i have also sold 6 of the bonds realizing annualized returns from 7% to 123% (roi&#8217;s 3% to 34%). </p>
<p>the most major drawback to buying these corporate bonds is that i must buy a minimum of 10 bonds through my online broker.  since mcdonald gives the specific cusip, you are able to order just the actual bond he recommends at or near his suggested price.  there have been a few instances where i was unable to get the bond due to price and/or lack of availability, but overall buying has not been an issue (nor selling at my requested price).</p>
<p>mcdonald uses a staggered maturity date for the bonds and usually doesn&#8217;t go out more than 3 to 4 years from the current date, thus negating the inflation issue.</p>
<p>i don&#8217;t mean to be a shrill for this service but it has been by far the most worthwhile service that i have subscribed to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2009/06/what-are-payment-on-demand-certificates.html/comment-page-1#comment-9605</link>
		<dc:creator>gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 03:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=1552#comment-9605</guid>
		<description>Steve Sjuggerud in his Daily Wealth mentions 40% annually in Brazilian bonds. I assume Brazilian gov&#039;t bonds. Any idea what it is, &amp; how to find it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Sjuggerud in his Daily Wealth mentions 40% annually in Brazilian bonds. I assume Brazilian gov&#8217;t bonds. Any idea what it is, &amp; how to find it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockGumshoe</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2009/06/what-are-payment-on-demand-certificates.html/comment-page-1#comment-9594</link>
		<dc:creator>StockGumshoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=1552#comment-9594</guid>
		<description>From Mike Williams?  Interesting, most of the ones I&#039;ve seen teased have been junk bonds, but of course I have no idea what his full portfolio is.  

Then again, &quot;junk&quot; or not depends, according to most opinions, on the ratings agencies, and does anyone trust them anymore?  If the annual yield is dramatic, at perhaps 15% a year or more, we&#039;d probably be better off considering any bond to be a bit risky, and if it has an implied return of 30, 40, 50%, we certainly ought to consider that there&#039;s a good chance of default, bankruptcy, or some kind of cram-down deal for bondholders ... the real gains come if you can figure out which ones are considered junk by the market, but which will actually perform and pay you back your principal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Mike Williams?  Interesting, most of the ones I&#8217;ve seen teased have been junk bonds, but of course I have no idea what his full portfolio is.  </p>
<p>Then again, &#8220;junk&#8221; or not depends, according to most opinions, on the ratings agencies, and does anyone trust them anymore?  If the annual yield is dramatic, at perhaps 15% a year or more, we&#8217;d probably be better off considering any bond to be a bit risky, and if it has an implied return of 30, 40, 50%, we certainly ought to consider that there&#8217;s a good chance of default, bankruptcy, or some kind of cram-down deal for bondholders &#8230; the real gains come if you can figure out which ones are considered junk by the market, but which will actually perform and pay you back your principal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strong Eagle</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2009/06/what-are-payment-on-demand-certificates.html/comment-page-1#comment-9535</link>
		<dc:creator>Strong Eagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=1552#comment-9535</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... International Lease Finance is the largest aircraft lessor by value with more than 900 aircraft purchased.  It is now owned by AIG.
  
It would seem to me that the viability of these bonds is dependent upon two things:  How many aircraft deliveries are deferred and how much the company&#039;s financing costs will rise as part of the AIG bailout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; International Lease Finance is the largest aircraft lessor by value with more than 900 aircraft purchased.  It is now owned by AIG.</p>
<p>It would seem to me that the viability of these bonds is dependent upon two things:  How many aircraft deliveries are deferred and how much the company&#8217;s financing costs will rise as part of the AIG bailout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Lo</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2009/06/what-are-payment-on-demand-certificates.html/comment-page-1#comment-9517</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Lo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=1552#comment-9517</guid>
		<description>These guys are all a greedy bunch of bastards. They try to sell the same old ideas, (bonds)as if they&#039;re a brand new idea that they just discovered. They make up some exotic new name and blow as much hot smoke up your a$# as they can to GET YOU TO BUY! It&#039;s really quite disgusting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These guys are all a greedy bunch of bastards. They try to sell the same old ideas, (bonds)as if they&#8217;re a brand new idea that they just discovered. They make up some exotic new name and blow as much hot smoke up your a$# as they can to GET YOU TO BUY! It&#8217;s really quite disgusting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
