<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transaction ID: 896***AE7 &#8212; Pay $1 and Legally &#8220;Secure&#8221; 110% Gains?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2009/09/transaction-id-896ae7-pay-1-and-legally-secure-110-gains.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2009/09/transaction-id-896ae7-pay-1-and-legally-secure-110-gains.html</link>
	<description>Frustrated or intrigued by email teasers from investment newsletters and advisers? We solve them and track their performance here ... so stick around, participate and subscribe (it's free)!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 04:47:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2009/09/transaction-id-896ae7-pay-1-and-legally-secure-110-gains.html/comment-page-1#comment-10490</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 22:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=1711#comment-10490</guid>
		<description>Freescale has several debt payments coming due in 2013 and 2014, which they have to either pay up on or (more likely) re-finance to a later maturity before they can pay the bonds coming due in 2016.  

If they default on any of those earlier bonds (which is not impossible, since it is not likely that they would have accumulated enough cash by then), everybody who owns their debt will take a huge haircut (perhaps even 100%), as this debt is mostly unsecured.  The secured debt on their balance sheet is not traded publicly and is mostly traded only between institutions.

Study their balance sheet and income statement carefully, and look to make sure that their EBITDA   (a measure of cash flow) is sufficient to cover their total interest payments by at least 2-to-1 or higher.  No bank will re-finance their debt coming due in 2013/2014 unless that is true.  And if they can&#039;t cut it by then, Ch. 11 is more likely than you getting your money back.  There&#039;s a reason why Blackstone has written down their equity by 85%.  In reality, they should have written it down by 100%.  In all likelihood, their equity is worth zilch today, as the total outstanding debt exceeds any fair measurement of what their equity is worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freescale has several debt payments coming due in 2013 and 2014, which they have to either pay up on or (more likely) re-finance to a later maturity before they can pay the bonds coming due in 2016.  </p>
<p>If they default on any of those earlier bonds (which is not impossible, since it is not likely that they would have accumulated enough cash by then), everybody who owns their debt will take a huge haircut (perhaps even 100%), as this debt is mostly unsecured.  The secured debt on their balance sheet is not traded publicly and is mostly traded only between institutions.</p>
<p>Study their balance sheet and income statement carefully, and look to make sure that their EBITDA   (a measure of cash flow) is sufficient to cover their total interest payments by at least 2-to-1 or higher.  No bank will re-finance their debt coming due in 2013/2014 unless that is true.  And if they can&#8217;t cut it by then, Ch. 11 is more likely than you getting your money back.  There&#8217;s a reason why Blackstone has written down their equity by 85%.  In reality, they should have written it down by 100%.  In all likelihood, their equity is worth zilch today, as the total outstanding debt exceeds any fair measurement of what their equity is worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hugh jass</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2009/09/transaction-id-896ae7-pay-1-and-legally-secure-110-gains.html/comment-page-1#comment-10475</link>
		<dc:creator>hugh jass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 02:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=1711#comment-10475</guid>
		<description>Great work again Gumshoe. very much appreciated.

I just got the email and was curious as to the secret. Would never pay for it, as it screams bs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work again Gumshoe. very much appreciated.</p>
<p>I just got the email and was curious as to the secret. Would never pay for it, as it screams bs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maryanne Huang</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2009/09/transaction-id-896ae7-pay-1-and-legally-secure-110-gains.html/comment-page-1#comment-10474</link>
		<dc:creator>Maryanne Huang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=1711#comment-10474</guid>
		<description>Much appreciated Stockgumshoe!  saved us a lot of time, grief and money (now that Stansberry is charging 10% cancellation fees)   Their products that works for me are 12% and Put Strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much appreciated Stockgumshoe!  saved us a lot of time, grief and money (now that Stansberry is charging 10% cancellation fees)   Their products that works for me are 12% and Put Strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimble Jury</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2009/09/transaction-id-896ae7-pay-1-and-legally-secure-110-gains.html/comment-page-1#comment-10472</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimble Jury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=1711#comment-10472</guid>
		<description>I found this site by Googling Transaction ID companies. Just wanted to thank you for your straight talk re Mike Williams. The thing I have found about any of these &quot;exclusive&quot; newsletters such as Stansberry, Oxford Club, True Wealth etc is that they all seem to be related and by subscibing to them all you get is invitations to subscribe to other more expensive packages. Any tips they give you are usually out of date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this site by Googling Transaction ID companies. Just wanted to thank you for your straight talk re Mike Williams. The thing I have found about any of these &#8220;exclusive&#8221; newsletters such as Stansberry, Oxford Club, True Wealth etc is that they all seem to be related and by subscibing to them all you get is invitations to subscribe to other more expensive packages. Any tips they give you are usually out of date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2009/09/transaction-id-896ae7-pay-1-and-legally-secure-110-gains.html/comment-page-1#comment-10464</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 04:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockgumshoe.com/?p=1711#comment-10464</guid>
		<description>I got interested in this whole FINRA thing about a year ago; there are a lot of very substantial companies (Coca Cola)on that FINRA list, offering upwards of 100%; why are Coca Cola and some very large others willing to pay 100% for 6 months to a year?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got interested in this whole FINRA thing about a year ago; there are a lot of very substantial companies (Coca Cola)on that FINRA list, offering upwards of 100%; why are Coca Cola and some very large others willing to pay 100% for 6 months to a year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
