“MLP Yielding 10.2% Makes BIG, Bold, Bullish Move!”

Roger Conrad's Big Yield Hunting teases pick that has "raised its dividend for 6 consecutive quarters."

By Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe, December 14, 2011

Now that even Jim Cramer won’t shut up about Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) as a safer, high-yield, non-euro-exposed investment, perhaps we’ve “jumped the shark” on this investment? It’s always hard to tell — popular investments can always get more popular.

But one thing’s for sure, Roger Conrad’s been talking up MLPs for quite a bit longer than Mr. Cramer — and pushing all kinds of high-dividend utility-type businesses for years and years now. His latest newsletter is the more aggressive (ie, riskier picks with higher current yields) Big Yield Hunting, and for that letter he’s pitching a MLP that sports a much-higher-than-usual 10.2% yield.

So we’d better find out what it is, eh? And no, we’re not going to do it the easy way (sign up for a subscription to Big Yield Hunting), we’re going to do it the hard way … the Gumshoe way, by making our list of clues, checking it twice, wrapping up our answer nice and tidy for you with a festive red bow, and letting you decide whether it’s naughty or nice.

Here’s how Roger tantalizes us:

“How would you like a mouthwatering 10.2% added to your wealth every year? In fact, this energy company specializing in natural gas liquids just RAISED its distributions 3%.

“That’s right! In the middle of one of the worst economic times, this Master Limited Partnership (MLP) just gave all of its unitholders a nice raise!

“But that’s not all. Its third-quarter distribution is the sixth consecutive quarterly distribution increase since May 2010. Can you imagine? Its investors are getting a raise every 3 months!”

And it gets better — maybe more dividend raises to come?

“In fact, this energy firm’s CEO recently stated he expects BETTER fourth-quarter numbers, and for the company to meet full-year guidance.”

Conrad goes on to tell us that we need to “get in while the price is still way below $18” … and before the ex-dividend date, which is in “early 2012.” So that’s not a lot of clues. Anything else?

He says that 500 shares will cost you $8,535 and get you $870 in dividends — which means the stock is just about exactly at $17, and pays a dividend of $1.74 per year. I’m assuming, since they’ve raised the dividend, that this is annualizing the last quarter’s dividend, which would mean the last payout was 43.5 cents per share. So those are a few more clues for us to toss into the Thinkolator.

And what answer comes rolling out the other end? This must be… Breitburn Energy Partners (BBEP)

I don’t remember ever having looked at this one in any detail — Breitburn is an energy producing MLP, not a midstream or pipeline MLP, so that in part explains the fact that their yield is high for the sector (big pipeline MLPs tend to yield about 6% these days), though Breitburn also carries a substantially higher yield than two of the other MLP producers we’ve looked at (albeit briefly) over the years, Linn Energy (LINE) and Legacy Resources (LGCY) — LINE is much larger, with a market cap of around $6 billion, and has been credited with a very prescient hedging program that let them keep the dividend steady during the downturn, they yield 7.4%; LGCY is about the same size as Breitburn, with a market cap near a billion dollars, and yields 8.1%.

Breitburn describes itself thusly:

“BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P. is an independent oil and gas partnership focused on the acquisition, exploitation and development of oil and gas properties in the United States. Our objective is to manage our oil and gas producing properties for the purpose of generating cash flow and making distributions to our unitholders.

“Our assets consist primarily of producing and non-producing crude oil and natural gas reserves located in the Antrim Shale in Michigan, the Los Angeles Basin in California, the Wind River and Big Horn Basins in central Wyoming, the Sunniland Trend in Florida, and the New Albany Shale in Indiana and Kentucky. Our assets are characterized by stable, long-lived production and reserve life indexes averaging greater than 16 years. Our fields generally have long production histories, with some fields producing for over 100 years. We have high net revenue interests in our properties.”

So — that’s the kind of thing you like to see in a producing MLP or an energy trust, assets that can produce for a long time and with proven and predictable production profiles. I own a near-peer company myself and have suggested it to the Irregulars in the past (that’s Dorchester Minerals (DMLP) — I like it mostly because I personally prefer Dorchester’s low profile, relatively low-risk royalty-focused model, and huge unexplored land potential), but that’s not to say that I have anything against Breitburn.

And I do generally prefer the MLPs to the trusts in this space, since they have the potential to increase production and grow (US energy trusts have their hands tied — they really exist just to produce known assets and can’t generally invest in other fields or growth projects). There are other publicly traded partnerships that are energy explorers and producers too, including Vanguard Natural Resources (VNR) and QRE Energy (QRE) — those two happen to fall between LINE and BBEP on the yield spectrum, I don’t know of any other decent-sized producing MLPs that have yields higher than BBEP’s 10%ish. I should also note that of those names, all but BBEP and DMLP have traded almost in lockstep over the past year, and DMLP has narrowly beaten out BBEP for the title of “worst performer” in that group over that same time period … so to be kind (to me) we’ll note that my favorite pick for that group has yet to “see its value realized.”

Like LGCY and LINE, Breitburn makes some effort to protect the stability of its payout from fluctuation of commodity prices, and they have hedged more than 2/3 of their expected oil and gas production through 2013 (at $6-7 for nat gas and $92-100 for crude oil) — so they have some pretty good downside protection against collapsing oil or gas prices over the next two years, though the coverage drops to well below 50% for 2014 and 2015. The flip side, of course, is that if oil goes to $200 and natural gas to $10 next year they’ll see very little cash benefit in their sales. They have spent the last couple years investing in natural gas, which makes some sense since those assets have been less expensive, but they are producing their oil much faster than their gas right now — their reserves are about 70/30 gas/oil, production is about 60/40 gas/oil and projected to stay that way for several years.

And … that’s about all I know about Breitburn. They have good coverage of their dividend, according to their presentation materials, and a higher dividend than their peers, and they have at least a decent reserve life in the teens currently (15-17 years) and solid hedging to ensure pretty good cash distribution levels for at least a couple years. They carry a pretty similar level of debt (about a third of their enterprise value) to LINE and LGCY, and they’re certainly heavily exposed to natural gas, so if natural gas is going to be at $3 (or lower) for decades thanks to the shale gas revolution, as some folks think, then that would doubtless hurt them.

Otherwise, I’m new to this company so I’ll open up the floor — any thoughts on Breitburn or the other energy producer MLPs? Are you interested in buying into a partnership with volatile prices and production and reserves considerations to get a higher yield, or do you prefer the steadier “toll road” businesses of most of the pipeline MLPs? Let us know with a comment below.

Related Gumshoe Articles

Is it “Time to buy the ‘Greek Goddess’ Yielding 10.7%?”

Sleuthing the latest teaser pick from Big Yield Hunting

14 Comments Read More

“What this CEO said that has me salivating for BIG 11.8%-YIELD profits!”

Roger Conrad's latest "Yieldabeast" for Big Yield Hunting

19 Comments Read More

Share Your Thoughts

ShowHide Comments (11)
    1. Tom t
      Dec 14 2011, 04:07:58 pm

      Travis, I realize money is still being made investing in dollar denominated securities, and this
      could be an excellent income play. For me, a big concern is the future value of dollars, euro, and yen in particular, and paper currencies in general. That said, these MLPs are generating income based on energy, and that is a big positive.
      Owning energy is most appealing when denominated in a preferred currency.
      Right now the dollar is king, and commodities are taking a hit. This could last a while due to the euro, yen, yuan circumstances so I will consider this, but – the dollar will peak, and when it does it seems wise to be holding something else.
      This sounds easy, but historically it hasn’t been, and preserving one’s wealth is #1 priority.

      • 3984 |
        Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe
        Dec 14 2011, 04:19:39 pm

        I know a lot of people feel that way — do keep in mind that with the exception of banks and some cash-rich companies, you’re not really buying dollars when you buy a company that does business mostly in dollars. You’re buying a share of their profits, the revenues they might post and assets they own, and the potential growth in business they might see over time. Whether those revenues and profits are described in dollar terms in ten years is not as important as whether or not they’re going to have value to their customers — we have to have some kind of commonly used currency to measure and lubricate the exchange of goods and services, but whether or not that currency rises or falls shouldn’t impact the value of the most businesses (for the long term, anyway). I think diversifying some of your cash into different currencies and precious metals is probably wise, and it is nice to see a bump when a foreign company you own rises in price in dollar terms, but I think profitable businesses with good assets can be a hedge against currency weakness even if they do their business primarily in a currency that you fear (assuming, of course, that you’re not talking Zimbabwe-style inflation).

        Which is a long way of saying, owning US-based assets doesn’t always mean that the value of the US dollar is a primary concern. For me, at least.

      • Barry Ellis
        Dec 14 2011, 04:35:56 pm

        Travis, I have been considering BreitBurn Energy Partners as a possible dividend income opportunity. It has had a buy recommendation in Harry Domash’s Dividend Detective for sometime. However, this stock may be a little too volatile for my liking.

    2. fireball
      Dec 14 2011, 04:26:58 pm

      hi gs,
      i had bbep for about a year. it was good. i made money on payouts and the price rose well. i was into severqal mlps. they all seemed to be getting pricey so i liquidated. my stomach was getting uneasy and it proved to be right. now the payouts seem to be getting nice percentages again so i am looking at moving back into them. i had just been looking at bbep before i opened today’s email.
      if agora is right in their new marketing hype about iran maybe u.s. producers will be very good.
      i had dmlp for a few months. i gave up on it as it didn’t seem to catch the rise the others caught. if the price is down to the 17$ area i will take another look at it. i was also looking at nmm. the payout seems high so it might be ok.

    3. John W
      Dec 14 2011, 05:09:06 pm

      Owned BBEp for a few years, just bawt more at “dip”. Has a slightly lower beta than the 500, but not compared to other MLPs I own, which run flatter (how I prefer it).

    4. Walt Diem
      Dec 14 2011, 10:38:47 pm


      I have owned units in both LGCY and LINE for several years, and LGCY has been the better performer of the 2 MLP’s. It is my understanding that LGCY specializes in taking over fields and wells where the daily production level has fallen below what the oil major who previously owned will permit and still maintain production and ownership. As such, LGCY is taking over already producing wells with very low maintainance, infrastructure and transportation set up costs.

    5. Roger B
      Dec 19 2011, 12:29:48 am

      These MLP’s are a “bunch of junk” to make money off people who think “we can win”. Look at over 90% of them , over the past year, are down 25 to 30 to 50%. So what is a 10 or 15% dividend worth if you lose 10 to 40% capital. HOw can a company with a pj/e of 300 pay an 8% dividend. The Dj average is the same as it was a year ago, yet MLP’s are nearly all down. Wy? They are not regulated and are not a good business model, despite what Cramer and others say! And this is with oil up! Wait til it drops! OUCH! REIT’s are the same – they are cleverly designed by Wall street folks, Ratigan’s “Greeedy BAStards” to make them more money. Good luck. There are about 5 of 150 high div stocks and MLP’s that seem ok – that’s a small percentage in my book. cheers RB

    6. Jess
      Dec 19 2011, 07:20:36 pm

      BBEP pays a higher dividend for three reasons in my opinion.
      1. They were the only E and P MLP that suspended their dividend during the sell off after 2008 and the market still remembers and doesn’t trust them to do as good a hedging job as others. That is: if they suspended before, they will suspend again.
      2. They have a large shareholder in Quicksilver who got a lot of units for production they sold to BBEP. Qucksilver recently sold a large number of shares and this drove the price down. They also still have a large number of shares that they would like to get rid of that are hanging over the market.
      3, They are not as oily as some of the other E and P MLPs
      If you can look past those reasons, or don’t think they are valid reasons for a higher yield, or If you think BBEP learned from what happened in 2008 that caused them to suspend the dividend, or if you think their management was conservative in suspending the dividend when they did, then maybe you should take advantage of the market allowing you to get a better return on BBEP than on its peers who are in essentially the same business and have the same business plan.
      I own some BBEP. I think they provide a better risk adjusted return than their peers, but I also own the others because for various reasons think are better managed than BBEP.

    What These Icons Mean

    • The user who posted this comment is a Stock Gumshoe Premium Member (also known as an "IRREGULAR").
    • This user regularly writes articles for Stock Gumshoe. They may or may not be the author of the current article.
    • This user's comments have been "liked” by at least a few members of the Stock Gumshoe community.
    • This user has commented widely, with input that has been liked enough to earn a two-thumbs-up rating from other readers.
    • This is the highest rating a user can get. They are among the most respected commentors of our community.