Become a Member

“Rare Move by FDA to Ignite Tiny $4 Stock” with a “35-to-1 Bang”

Revealing the "secret" stock teased by BIotech Insider Alert -- they say you can "Profit BIG... And help 75,000 Americans see again"

By Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe, November 20, 2014

Heads up: I made a mistake on this one when it first went up on the site. We strive for at least a 99% accuracy rate in identifying teaser targets, and this is apparently my mistake for 2014. Thanks to several readers for alerting me to the fact that I moved too quickly in posting this one and made an error.

It looks like the BioScience Millionaire trading service by Ernie Tremblay over at Money Map Press has now been renamed Biotech Insider Alert… but the focus seems to be the same, with a goal of investing based in large part on the timing of FDA decisions and other science-based milestones for biotech companies (they launched this newsletter earlier in the year with the boast that they had a handle on the “most profitable calendar known to man”).

Which isn’t unusual, of course — biotech stocks, particularly those which don’t have any products for sale (and won’t for years) trade based on the development of their product pipeline, with reports on efficacy and safety moving the needle and the big decisions, like FDA approvals or partnership agreements or other key steps in the development process, often having a large impact on stock prices.

And Tremblay’s publisher, Mike Ward, has a new ad out promoting the service — all built on the promise that a move by the FDA will “ignite” this tiny stock. He throws around numbers that make you salivate, like sales going from $28 million to $1.5 billion, and the share price going from $4 to $143.

So what’s the stock? Well, they’d be happy to tell you all about it… for $5,000 (OK it’s “on sale” for $1,950). What if you don’t really want your report and you’re just kind of curious about the stock and want to research it for yourself? Well, we can help with that — let’s dig into the clues and figure out who they’re talking about.

Here’s the lead-in:

“Hi, I’m Mike Ward, Publisher of Money Map Press.

“I just wrote this check for $40,000 for a very specific reason.

“I believe in a very short time this $40,000 will be worth many times that value.

“It’s because of a very special situation I recently learned about…

“One that involves some of the smartest research scientists in America… and a breakthrough they’re making that

“I believe could be worth more than $1.5 billion dollars to one small company.

“Right now, this company has annual sales of $28 million.

“So that’s an increase in revenue of more than 53 times. The market value of this company could reach dizzying new heights.”

The check was a donation that Ward made at the behest of Ernie Tremblay, here’s how Tremblay describes it later on in the ad:

“I believe so much in this tiny $4 company and its breakthrough drug…

“That I convinced my publisher to donate 10,000 shares of its stock to the Ocular Immunology & Uveitis Foundation.

“And I can’t think of a more worthy cause…

“The Uveitis Foundation is a non-profit organization working to provide education, care, and emotional support for victims of Uveitis.

“They rely on the generosity of others, and that’s exactly what we’re giving them.

“In fact, I don’t have one shred of doubt about this tiny company and the value of the gift we’re giving the Foundation.

“I’m 100% confident in their veteran management team… their drug… and the hard science behind it.

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


“And I’m even more confident that their $4 stock is about to go on a run that could make shareholders – including the Uveitis Foundation – very rich.

“Based on my price target calculations, that $40,000 stock donation could soon be worth $1.4 million.

“And when I say soon, I mean any day now.

“Again, the drug has already zipped through two FDA trials. And my research indicates that they could soon announce results of a critical Phase 3 trial.

“When that happens, the stock is likely to go fast and furious.

“In the coming days, I wouldn’t be surprised to see big hedge funds scrambling to pick up shares for $15… $25… even $50.

“You can get in today for $4 a share.”

We’ll leave aside the tax implications that might make this an oddly tax-stupid decision in light of Tremblay’s conviction, but I do need to quickly mention the oddness: if you want to donate shares of stock to a tax-deductible cause like a charity, you donate it after it runs up — your deduction is the average price on the day you make the donation, and this is a way that you can get a deduction and avoid paying capital gains taxes on “your” profits. You don’t just buy a stock to donate it, or donate stock that has fallen in value. If they’re convinced it will go from $40,000 to $1 million+, they could get a $1 million tax deduction (in theory, assuming that fits the IRS guidelines for Mike Ward or Money Map’s tax situation) by waiting until the stock rises. And it would be strange if the foundation kept the shares of stock that they’re being given, they usually just sell it because they need the money for their work and charities don’t tend to be biotech speculators. That’s just an observation, I’m not a tax expert.

So what is this stock? Well, we know it’s got some kind of drug going after Uveitis:

“most people have never heard of Uveitis…

“But it afflicts more than an estimated 19 million people worldwide. And as I mentioned… it’s a leading cause of blindness for middle-aged people in the Western world.

“Technically, Uveitis is the inflammation of the uvea, the middle part of the eye, which supplies blood and nutrients to the retina.”

OK, I’m in that group that had “never heard of” Uveitis. How about some clues about this specific company?

“A tiny California-based company has developed a breakthrough drug that has the potential to save as many as 150,000 Americans from several devastating forms of Uveitis…

“The remarkable thing about this drug is the way it fights inflammation.

“Basically, the drug attaches itself to “interleukin-1 beta,” – which is a substance made by the immune system – that causes inflammation.

“The drug regulates the cellular-signaling events that produce inflammation….

“This drug ‘unclogs’ the uvea, keeping your retina alive, and your vision intact.”

Some more clues about the company that we can feed into the Thinkolator:

“The senior management team has more than 190 years of combined drug development experience. And they’re responsible for some of the most successful drugs to ever come down the pike, including the blockbuster sleep drug, Lunesta®….

“This company books a mere $28 million in annual sales….

“… the estimated cost for this new Uveitis drug is $21,264 per year….

“At $21,264 per patient – and 150,000 potential patients – the projected market for this new drug would be over $3.1 billion”

So the $1.5 billion in sales he projects is if the company reaches “just” half of the potential patients, which is how they get their massive price target:

“Based on projected U.S. sales of over $1.5 billion, and an industry average price-to-sales ratio of 9.6, we’re looking at a first-year target – before any splits – of $143 a share.”

And plenty of even headier numbers if you include international sales, etc., but we’ll jot down in pencil that they’re projecting a 3,400%+ gain from $4 to $143.

And one more tidbit of clueiness for you:

“The U.S. Government just put this tiny company’s drug on the ‘bullet train’ to success….”

Which is his way of saying that the drug has gotten “orphan” status from the FDA — basically, that means they get a set of incentives reserved for drug developers who are working on diseases that don’t have mass numbers of patients.

So they have some kind of drug with a near-term catalyst:

“It’s already sailed through two FDA clinical trials. And the results of a critical FDA trial could be announced any day now. “

And there’s been insider buying:

“People inside this company are loading up.

“I’m talking about the company’s President, Senior Vice President, Executive Vice President, even their Board Members, including the FDA’s former Chief Counsel.”

So who is it?

My original answer was that this is the awkwardly capitalized pSivida (PSDV), a medical device company that’s actually likely to have a massive drop in earnings next year since they’re currently enjoying the one-time milestone payment for FDA approval of a partnered drug/delivery system (that’s Iluvien, which their partner Alimera Sciences will be selling to treat diabetic macular edema), and they’ll be following it up with — they hope — approval for their own Medidur (the exact same drug as Iluvien, with the same delivery system) to treat Uveitis.

But that’s not it — this is a different company called XOMA (XOMA), which is developing a monoclonal antibody drug for Uveitis and several other eye problems. So what’s up with XOMA?

XOMA’s primary asset is a monoclonal antibody called gevokizumab. It is partnered with Servier, does have orphan drug status, and is in multiple Phase III trials for different varieites of Uveitis right now, here’s how the company puts it:

“In September 2014, XOMA initiated a U.S. clinical trial of gevokizumab in patients with BDU, EYEGUARD-US, to supplement data from Servier’s EYEGUARD-B study being performed outside the U.S. and the ex-U.S. data previously generated from two Phase 2 trials of BDU patients. Upon receipt of successful results from the EYEGUARD-B study, XOMA plans to request a pre-BLA meeting with FDA. EYEGUARD-US is designed to supplement the Agency’s need for information in U.S. patients, including potentially serving as a second pivotal study.”

The stock was clobbered this year because there was hope that gevokizumab would be effective in arthritis, but that turned out not to be the case in clinical trials — which moved their focus to narrower applications for this anti inflammatory compound, particularly in Uveitis. They are also moving forward in some other skin conditions, including pyoderma gangrenosum, where they also have orphan drug status.

And yes, one clue I didn’t check is the presence of the FDA’s Chief Counsel on the board — Peter Barton Hutt, former Chief Counsel for the FDA, is on the XOMA Board of Directors. The other clues also match, and the revenue was almost $28 million over the past year (all from partnership/licensing fees, I believe) and is expected to grow a bit, to $36 million or so next year — still far short of covering their R&D and other expenses as they push forward with clinical trials, even with a partner, but it is, at least, growing (pSivida’s revenue, in contrast, will almost certainly not grow next year, not unless they strike a surprise deal with a big up front payment).

XOMA, according to its last quarterly release, is getting a bit low on cash (they say they anticipate using $55-60 million on the year, they had $59.1 million in the bank at the end of September and by my rough calculations had already run through about $40 million, so it’s not imminent but the cash burn is not exactly even) — I don’t know what other sources of funding they might have. Presumably they’d like to wait until they have some good news before they raise more money, they last did a big offering in late 2013.

There is a fair amount of insider ownership, but no insider buying over the last year (there’s been plenty of selling and option exercising, which is typical) — and they do have one huge investor, Baker Brothers, the well known biotech investing group, owns more than 20% of the company (though they last added to their holding in 2013 at about $3.60).

Interesting to see two small companies push forward with this small indication — forecasts for at least one of them are likely to be disappointed, since for such a small patient base it seems that one company will have to dominate the market for it to turn into anything near a blockbuster stock. But XOMA is, at least, far larger than pSivida… it’s still a small company, but with a $450+ million market cap it’s 10X the size of the little device/delivery system maker PSDV.

And with that, I’ll leave it to our biotech enthusiasts to chatter about it, let you know if I’ve made any mistakes in my description of the company, and you can decide for yourself if it’s going to make you rich with a 3,500% gain in the years to come. Just fill up that happy little comment window below with your thoughts and let ’em fly, we’ll all be the wiser for it.

Irregulars Quick Take

Paid members get a quick summary of the stocks teased and our thoughts here. Join as a Stock Gumshoe Irregular today (already a member? Log in)
guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

116 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jaime
Guest
Jaime
November 20, 2014 8:24 am

I don’t know as much as Ernie Tremblay or Mike Ward about Biotech stocks either, but they are pulling out all stops on promoting this stock that still seems to me to be very speculative. And they pull out comparisons to past well-known all stars. Anytime someone is selling something this hard it reminds me of an artist friend who said “Calculators don’t sell art.” I did research it somewhat and there are some insiders and institutional investors. Let’s just say I’m not banking my retirement on the service or the stock. And like many others, the presentation is lengthy and repetitive in the extreme. Someone needs to give these guys some lessons in getting to the point.

Add a Topic
4053
Add a Topic
1717
Add a Topic
5971
Myron Martin
Irregular
November 20, 2014 11:20 am
Reply to  Jaime

Well made observation on most promo’s, they are repetitive ad nauseum. An honest product should be able to be sold with half the verbiage. The desperation to get you to subscribe / invest is palpable, really turns me off.

Deborah G Flynn
November 28, 2014 7:40 am
Reply to  Myron Martin

MoneyMap is pretty awful they are like Carney cons. I actually figured out some of their teases in the past. I look to Travis because I am patently lazy since I decided to be a paid subsciber. If anyoine deserves that kind of money its Travis LOL

JOE
Guest
JOE
January 17, 2015 6:56 pm
Reply to  Myron Martin

hi my name is Joe and I just retired from ABC I worked 40 years for abc sports as an editor I must say that I never had a stock that went up!!! I lost a couple of thousand on penny stocks I” batting a 1000 never a winner what doyou think of psdv and alim joining together just looking to see how I can lose more of my pension check replys would be great

Add a Topic
5971
backoffice
Irregular
June 25, 2015 9:24 pm
Reply to  Myron Martin

I just got this relevation sent to me today, this is now June 2015! Now I find out this was hyped in Nov.2014! How do they get away with this. Hillary Kramer hooked me once for over $200.00 and now she’s begging me to join up again and give her a second chance! At what? picking my pocket again?

👍 450
Oen Tio
Oen Tio
March 28, 2016 10:44 pm
Reply to  backoffice

I have been looking at several investment letters
after I retired. Your goal is probably a easy to read and understandable
newsletter. Stock of the month by Amy Calistri might be O.K. for you.
Fee is reasonable. Amy paid off her house when she was 25 years old.
She seems to be honest and helpfull.
I had Hillary Kramer for 2 years.

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
1365
Brer Rabbit
Guest
Brer Rabbit
November 20, 2014 11:24 am
Reply to  Jaime

Agree. I would not fund my retirement with this stock either. As a doctor who has treated many cases of uveitis over the years, I’m confident that the projections made for this stock are extreme. First, uveitis is an inflammatory disease that is treated initially by suppressing the inflammation with corticosteroids such as Pred Forte, and then determining the cause of the inflammatory process. It’s the cause that is then treated. In short, uveitis is most often a symptom of an underlying disease process. A common rule of thumb is that we give a patient one unexplained uveitis, and just treat the symptoms rather than subjecting them to many tests. More than one, we find the underlying cause and treat that.
Now it could be that this drug may be useful in treating other conditions.

Add a Topic
1209
Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
5971
gard
Guest
November 21, 2014 6:27 am
Reply to  Brer Rabbit

Thanks Doc, for all you do. What I noticed is that they are basing the math on a years Rx and only a single treatment would be used before looking for the cause. So I divide the $21,264 by 12, say a 1 month supply and get $1772 or less per patient. And since MD’s have a preferred drug, they wouldn’t switch right away. Maybe 5% the first year instead of 50%. I’ve drawn trend lines since May and see a converging wedge, now trading in a range of 3.81 to 4.54, which it is at now after the beginning of the promo and is likely to go back to the bottom of the trend. If I bought in now I would likely lose .70/shr. Again, Thanks for all you do for us, and may God Bless Travis and all the Irregulars, if you believe in God that is.(Not meant to be a religious discussion)

👍 223
Brer Rabbit
Guest
Brer Rabbit
November 21, 2014 10:54 am
Reply to  gard

The ‘standard of care’ treatment is much less expensive. A $100 bottle of Pred Forte 5ml should be sufficient. Treatment protocol might be 1 drop every 2 hours for 2 days, 1 drop 4 times a day for 2 days, 1 drop twice a day for 2 days, and finally 1 drop once a day for 2 days. So compare the cost of treatment between the two. It just doesn’t make sense. Have to add in the office visits in either case (probably two: initial & follow-up).

Janos
Guest
Janos
November 21, 2014 6:06 pm
Reply to  Brer Rabbit

I actually paid around 30.00 Canadian for Pred forte

James
Guest
November 24, 2014 1:26 pm
Reply to  Jaime

Biotech stocks small biotech stocks are usually a hit or a miss Their certainly not for the faint of heart.

gard
Guest
November 27, 2014 1:02 pm
Reply to  James

:Your right, they are for traders not investors

👍 223
Rosemary1
Member
Rosemary1
November 26, 2014 5:54 am
Reply to  Jaime

I really don’t understand why these people try and con their readers in this way. People must be really vulnerable to hand out so much money for his reports especially when his teaser campaign contains so much rubbish! Can anyone tell me what they think about James Rickards who also writes for them ? Very many thanks !

Add a Topic
5148
JOE
Guest
JOE
January 19, 2015 12:22 pm
Reply to  Jaime

hey Joe here does anyone think that the partnership with psdv and alim would be a better buy than xoma well just wondering any reply would be great I”m thinking about buying some shares of psdv and all this coming from a guy that never made a penny on penny stocks good luck JOE

kenneth57
November 20, 2014 8:24 am

The company is actually XOMA Corp. (NasdaqGM:XOMA). Don’t ask me how I know this!

👍 9
LT
Member
LT
November 20, 2014 10:04 am
Reply to  kenneth57

How do you know this? 🙂

seriously though, how do you know this?????

Speculation
Guest
November 23, 2014 2:10 pm
Reply to  LT

He probably bought into the hype 🙂

WaxMay
WaxMay
December 12, 2014 7:38 am
Reply to  LT

Apparently MoneyMapPress have updated their site with an explanation as to why Baker Bros are selling shares. It would be interesting to understand their perception of this if you/anyone still has access to the content 🙂

quetzal
Guest
quetzal
December 8, 2014 12:49 pm
Reply to  kenneth57

I recently subscribed to Money Map at the cheapest rate – $39 for one year which I do not plan on continuing next year. I did it primarily to get Rickard’s book for ‘free’.
Anyway, I was reading the tease which has been hammered into my inbox several times now and I simply put some clues together and did an internet search to come up with XOMA.
My search words: “uveitis drug company in california lunesta”

Some gumshoe – huh?

Add a Topic
605
JOE
Guest
JOE
January 17, 2015 7:42 pm
Reply to  kenneth57

Ken which do you think is better or anyone who wishes to answer PSDV ALIM or xoma or if you know the stock synbol for psdv and alim joined JOE

Add a Topic
5971
gard
Guest
July 13, 2015 3:32 pm
Reply to  JOE

Hey Joe, since I haven’t seen a reply yet, I went and looked up both on my brokers website.
Neither one looked like they were going anywhere fast. Earnings estimates for psdv were flat for the next year(steady loss) and for alim they were going up for the next year and were getting close to break even. If I were to choose one I would of course pick alim on earnings est. But I wouldn’t choose either one. Just my humble opinion

👍 223
J. MCLEOD
Member
J. MCLEOD
November 20, 2014 8:27 am

I looked at this promo acouple days ago and decided they were talking about xoma, since they were inferring a drug and not a devise

Dave
Dave
November 20, 2014 8:45 am
Reply to  J. MCLEOD

I also thought it was XOMA.
http://www.xoma.com/content/pipeline/gevokizumab.htm
http://investors.xoma.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=701926
Revenue also very nearly 28M, and about 4 bucks per share.

👍 21853
Dave
Dave
November 20, 2014 9:48 am

You’re welcome and thanks for checking.

john
Irregular
john
November 27, 2014 12:41 pm

Travis, I thought it was AUPH at $3.90.???

Sam Hall
Guest
Sam Hall
November 20, 2014 8:31 am

The FDA holds a lot of cards. When I ask the famous “follow the money” question, I sometimes feel I’m a conspiracy theorist. I added a note to another biotech stock alert about the fact that despite the Ebola scare there is no mention of Cerus’s (CERS) Intercept System for various blood products (whole blood, plasma, and platelets), since it kills any and all viruses (including Ebola). Although Intercept has been in use for years now in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia, FDA is still sitting on approval for its use in the US. Although is not a treatment or curative, the Intercept system can prevent spread of Ebola via transfusion of blood products. Given the long time after initial infection before any test can detect the Ebola virus, it would seem obvious that we should be using such a method to guarantee the safety of blood products (as opposed to our current method of verbally checking blood donors, which we already know is prone to error). My info about the efficacy of the Intercept system comes from a source both extremely knowledgeable and reliable.

Add a Topic
3022
Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
4282
Richard Epstein
Richard Epstein
November 20, 2014 9:51 am
Reply to  Sam Hall

I’ve been long CERS 5 years and traded its vacillations numerous x. I believe in its science but can’t reconcile its lack of profitability. With a proven methodology and acceptance by the EU ; what’s preventing this indispensable product from worldwide distribution? I will maintain my long position with belief the FDA will wake up and adopt this critical intervention to the spread of all blood borne pathogens! I hope the mngmt. gets it together and make this happen or vote the bums out.

Add a Topic
3022
Robert
Member
Robert
November 23, 2014 5:43 am
Reply to  Sam Hall
Robert
Member
Robert
November 23, 2014 5:47 am
Reply to  Sam Hall

Hepatitis E transmission by transfusion of Intercept blood system–treated plasma:
http://www.transfusion.ru/2014/02-17-1.pdf

modernrock
Irregular
November 20, 2014 8:39 am

Thinkolator is wrong on this one……. it is XOMA.

👍 255
👍 21853
toff
toff
November 20, 2014 1:18 pm

The Thinkolater has bugs! Say it ain’t so!

Seriously though, 99% is much better than Space Shuttle overall reliability, so not so bad after all.

👍 94
D
Member
D
November 20, 2014 4:23 pm
Reply to  toff

And the Thinkolator doesn’t explode on liftoff.

Mial Pagan
November 25, 2014 3:48 am

Travis – we forgive you! Keep up the good work!

Kenneth Harris
Kenneth Harris
November 29, 2014 3:39 am

so what everyone is saying is basically t9 not buy soma (like 100 sharers…I’m poor heh, ) and if not xoma than any other quick tips for us poor folks.

Rob
Guest
Rob
November 29, 2014 6:24 pm
Reply to  Kenneth Harris

I really like MNKD

chibana
chibana
November 20, 2014 8:44 am

Travis,
Thanks for this interesting article. I have this eye condition (Uvetis/Iritis )which first hit me in 2010 (right eye) 2011 (left eye) while on a tour in the ME. Pretty painful. Mine is a result of another auto immune condition but it was treated fairly quickly with steroid ointment and drops. I keep a bottle of drops with me at all times in case the Iritis returns so I can self treat until I can see a Doctor (which I had to do once on a trip out west). Mine seems to remain in check but I think that is also because I use Restasis eye drops and Ibuprofen (for my underlying condition). I was at the VA eye clinic last Friday and it was full of old heroes with a multitude of eye problems. My Iritis so far is very controlled but for those with more chronic conditions something like this might really improve the quality of their life. For me the steroid drops have worked fine. Maybe Eyedoc can chime in.
V/R
Tom

👍 1417
william kobin
November 20, 2014 9:05 am

Travis

How can I adequately express my gratitude to you for revealing the $4 stock . My $1,950
heart burn has been completely relieved.
Regards,

WCK

Add a Topic
5971
vivian lewis
November 20, 2014 9:43 am

I own pSividia (not in the global portfolio of course) so I am sorry Travis corrected his first guess. But despite the likely short-term loss he cites it is a cool way to treat eye diseases.
I did an update on Benitec after meeting the Australians yesterday and anyone who wants to find out more can visit my website http://www.global-investing.com and sign up for a day pass to read all about its attractions and why this site is not telling you the whole story.

Thomas
Thomas
November 20, 2014 11:10 am
Reply to  vivian lewis

This is if you want to pay $50 for another line of bullshi.

Add a Topic
372
👍 52
biotechlong (btl)
November 20, 2014 12:01 pm
Reply to  Thomas

Thomas, I would agree that we regularly receive a sufficient quantity of the unadulterated real “bull” directly from Peter French; no need to go to a “paid for services” indirect source for a second mushy helping.

👍 2794
SoGiAm
November 20, 2014 4:37 pm
Reply to  vivian lewis

I would not give you $8.99 for an annual subscription Vivian after reviewing your comments on this site. Long SGS, Dr. KSS, IRRR’s
Best-Ben

Add a Topic
3932
👍 11604
SoGiAm
November 20, 2014 5:14 pm
Reply to  vivian lewis

RE: Blt and life. Each One is responsible for their own actions/inactions, stones and which lake they decided to skip a rock in and watch the ripples effects on All otherz.
Please bury the hatchet and sit on a log as the 16th did.
https://www.google.com/search?q=abe+lincoln+sitting+on+a+log+penny&es_sm=122&biw=1269&bih=866&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=C2duVI7JNISqyQS8goLgCQ&ved=0CCoQsAQ
Best-Ben

👍 11604
Chris
Chris
November 21, 2014 3:59 pm
Reply to  vivian lewis

RE: Vivian.
This isn’t the forum to promote your global investing business. Try paid advertising elsewhere. I subscribe to Gumshoe to gain insight and knowledge from all that post and share here. I’ve looked through your site and wouldn’t spend a dime for any information you have.

👍 78
gard
Guest
November 27, 2014 12:54 pm
Reply to  Chris

I call foul. i’ve read Vivian and i conclude: leave her alone, she is worthy, as honest as the next person and I value her opinion, and do my own DD.

👍 223
Lorraine R
Lorraine R
March 3, 2015 11:33 pm
Reply to  vivian lewis

A day pass? Reading about Benitec on that site would cost me $25 ! Did I miss something?

Michael Jorrin (aka Doc Gumshoe)
Member
November 20, 2014 9:51 am

Sounds like a long, long shot. Uveitis is a fairly common comorbidiy with a kind of condition called spondyloarthropathy, which can include a lot of symptoms, but a key symptom is inflammatory backache (not mechanical backache such as I get when stacking firewood). Opthalmologists are supposed to be on the lookout for patients who have both uveitis and backaches, and there are currently biologic drugs that address both issues effedtivelyj. At present, these would be prescribed off label, but the big players (Amgen, AbbVie) will likely get indications before long.

chibana
chibana
November 20, 2014 12:59 pm

Doc Gumshoe,
Yes that is what happened to me. The Ophthalmologist diagnosed what it could be so I took numerous blood tests and came up positive for HLA B27. I had been having numerous issues with my back and joints but simply thought it more to do with 31 years in the Army and wearing body armor, getting older, and so on. Anyway I have stayed with NASIDs because I would have had to redeploy (at that time) using immune suppressants or other methods. Not to crazy about suppressing my immune system even now. Acknowledge NASIDs have risks but they seem the lesser of two evils for me. I also think since I exercised (still do) and had such an active lifestyle in the military many symptoms have been kept in check. Coupled also with the fact that no matter what when you go the military clinic with a back, shoulder, foot, knee or any other joint issue they normally prescribe Vitamin I (Ibuprofen) which of course works on all the other pain associated with other inflammatory problems. Anyway I deeply appreciate the initial diagnosis of the Ophthalmologist. At the end of the day Docs here in the USA think it is either Ankylosing Spondylitis or Spondylitis non specific (since my spine is not impacted to much yet) coupled with other arthritic conditions. Regardless NASIDS work for now.
V/R
Tom

👍 1417
Michael Jorrin (aka Doc Gumshoe)
Member
November 20, 2014 6:35 pm
Reply to  chibana

Most likely not ankylosing spondylitis, (AS) but just spondyloarthritis (SpA). The former implies that the separate bones in the spine fuse together; the latter is just pain and inflammation, which of course is bad enough. Most people with SpA do not develop AS, and I will try to employ my very limited influence with whatever Gods there be on your behalf. But NSAIDS have to be watched carefully. Be well, and thanks for the comments.

Add a Topic
5554
chibana
chibana
November 20, 2014 10:12 pm

Thanks Michael. I agree it is more likely SpA.
V/R
Tom

👍 1417
DrKSSMDPhD
November 20, 2014 10:09 am

$XOMA needs a no-fly warning….it has been promising its investors that its ship will come in just any day now, since 1988. The phase 3 trial of this monoclonal is going on at only 2 sites, neither academic, one in Winston-Salem NC that was also a NovaBay study site, and one in Fargo, ND. They will have to a do a second phase 3 year after next. I suspect the agent works for Behcet uveitis, but this is not a needle-moving indication, and other agents also work.

$XOMA is the Gilligan’s Island of biotech.

👍 47658
Chris Cox
Guest
Chris Cox
November 20, 2014 10:34 am

I listened to Mike Ward’s overly long promotion and courtesy of Google determined that the company is Xoma. What I also learned is that contrary to Mike Ward’s assertion that there is a lot of insider buying there has been more selling in the past couple of months by insiders and institutions. I am sceptical of stocks that are heavily promoted.

koifish46
koifish46
November 20, 2014 11:03 am

This is typical of the promotions that Money Map Press puts out. It reminds me of Michael Robinson’s promo., back in August, of Stellar Biotech (SBOTF). In his write up he actually guaranteed the stock would up list to the NASDAQ by the end of this month. At the time of the promo the stock was at $0.60. It shot up to $2.36 in Sept. and tanked shortly after. I wonder how he will explain it when the company does not up list as he guaranteed. The stock is currently at $1.45 and I believe it would need to be at a minimum of $3 to be approved to the NASDAQ. Perhaps we will see another flood of promotions from every newsletter writer from Money Map Press.

Add a Topic
605
Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
5971
👍 20
Dave
Dave
November 25, 2014 11:20 am
Reply to  koifish46

These “guarantees” are now commonplace in this rip-off business and are just more empty hype. They are usually something like “We guarantee blah-de-blah will happen by such-and-such time and if not, you get a full refund of your subscription cost.” As many services offer a full refund within 1 month to a year without the silly “guarantee”, the guarantee is worthless. Perhaps needless to point out, but they certainly will not refund your losses in the market due to their lousy advice or the tank that usually follows the pump.

XOMA is enjoying a nice run-up at the moment. It could easily plunge in the next week or month.

Lannas
Lannas
November 20, 2014 11:05 am

Anyone know CTI BioPharma Corp. (CTIC)?
Hilary Kramer has a Buy on the stock. Says it is ready to move.

Add a Topic
1491
Add a Topic
5971
👍 853
Lannas
Lannas
November 20, 2014 11:20 am
Reply to  Lannas

It used to be Cell Therapeutics, Inc. , changed their name in May 2014.

👍 853
👍 21853
SoGiAm
November 20, 2014 12:19 pm

Has anyone developed a list of equities to follow going into ASH Dec 2-6?
Best-Ben

👍 11604
duped
duped
November 21, 2014 1:13 am
Reply to  Lannas

CTIC has had about 4 reverse stock splits. Check out Adam F’s opinion of their CEO Jim Bianco. Thinks he may be the “winner” of the trophy for All-Time Worst Biotech CEO. It’s been pretty much a way for the Bianco brothers to keep cushy jobs while creating nothing of value since at least 1999.
I quit my job on the gains I had in this stock and watched paralyzed while it dropped from an intraday high of $77 on 10/22/2000 to….about 1 dollar. I lost close to three-quarters of a million dollars. It kept issuing more shares till it had nearly half a billion shares outstanding. I believe it hit a low of 6 cents. Eventually it clawed back to the $1-$3 range by virtue of all the splits. And there’s never been a change in management. IMHO, AVOID CTIC as if it was infectious ebola.

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
4282
DBMD
Irregular
DBMD
November 21, 2014 6:08 am
Reply to  Lannas

Janus Associated Kinase 2 (JAK2) and FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) for myleodysplasia, old blood. They have competitors in this area and they are not to market. Pixantrone approved in the E.U. for the treatment of adult patients with multiply relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Again a small market. I have been in this on for awhile but not much movement. Several other drugs in pipeline, one for Glioblastoma, but much time before any to market.

Add a Topic
5809
👍 1097
modernrock
Irregular
November 20, 2014 11:20 am

XOMA is up from sub $4.10 when I posted it yesterday AM in discussions. 10% plus in 26 hours so far.

👍 255
Ray Lynn
Ray Lynn
November 20, 2014 12:30 pm

I got out of the market last December when I decided to move from Texas to Arizona. I just didn’t have time to check on stocks everyday. But I recently decided I needed to get back in since I’m now settled. Got caught in the fly-paper ad from Jim Rickards and joined Money Map Press looking for stocks I might buy. We all have to do research and be comfortable with any stock we buy and, after research, have three stocks recommended by various authors there at Money Map. Bought two others but lost money on them – Softbank – got in too late, and Kratos that had bad earnings and took a nose dive. Still have Apple, Alibaba, and Ekso which are in the green (so far). But the point I want to make is the newsletter writers there carpet-bomb us each time one of the writers comes out with a new letter. Maybe three times in the same week we get emails (from each writer) pushing the same newsletter. As I told my daughter, I evidently signed up to get on a mailing list.
Further, I had somehow found Stock Gumshoe the last time I was buying stocks. This is undoubtedly the best subscription I could have found. And immediately after signing up at Money Map I signed up again for Stock Gumshoe. I have to admit that these newsletter writers can make their spiel sound very good and you can almost see the stocks rising as you read them. But I subscribe to none of them until I check with Stock Gumshoe. So far I have subscribed to no other newsletter and probably won’t. I always get a chuckle from Travis’ wry sense of humor as he analyzes these newsletters.

Add a Topic
5463
Add a Topic
605
Add a Topic
5971
chibana
chibana
November 22, 2014 8:15 am
Reply to  Ray Lynn

Ray,
Concur. Stock Gumshoe is superior on so many levels. I only use two services; Gumshoe and Motley Fool. Both are good but Gumshoe allows for far more interaction with great investors from all levels of expertise. I like to play with some of the tools (CAPs) at Motley Fool which is fun at times….when I am doing better with my selections. 🙂
V/R
Tom

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
329
Add a Topic
329
👍 1417
Bill W
Bill W
November 20, 2014 1:35 pm

Google search of uveitis and orphan drug results in many Abbvie hits but also Xoma. Anyone know Abbvie vs Xoma benefits?

philippe
Member
philippe
November 20, 2014 3:04 pm

to date Xoma has only made real money for its bankers. It may, one day, see the light…but trials take time. Dont buy a biotech stock unless its market cap = reasonably projected sales in 2-3 years…

Add a Topic
5971
Ian S
Ian S
November 20, 2014 4:03 pm

Mike Ward tells us the same management team were responsible for LUNESTA. This sleeping aid is marketed by Sunovion Pharmacutecals Inc, a wholly owned subsidiary of Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma.
I would be surprised therefore if XOMA had not tried to flog this new drug to the same Japanese giant, before they ever got to trying to market it themselves. So I guess Dainippon were not keen to buy it. I would stand aside from this one, most management teams follow the same path they used before if it was successful.

Add a Topic
1717
yolande selman
Guest
yolande selman
November 20, 2014 9:17 pm

Hi Guys , sorry but do allow me to shift the discussion a bit to ask a Q anyone figured out the tease from Charles Mizrahi ‘s “The Next Berkshire Hathaway?

Add a Topic
2637
modernrock
Irregular
November 21, 2014 10:35 am
Reply to  yolande selman

better luck will be had if you start a discussion instead of post randomly in other threads.

👍 255
Lynn W
Member
Lynn W
November 20, 2014 11:45 pm

I thought that XOMA was granted ‘Orphan Status’ back in 2012, but I do see that in 2014
AbbVie’s Humira won orphan drug status for uveitis. Is it possible this is what Mike Ward is pushing/promoting?

Read more at: http://www.pharmatimes.com/article/14-05-20/AbbVie_s_Humira_wins_orphan_drug_status_for_uveitis.aspx#ixzz3JfteicjS

Add a Topic
1717

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

More Info  
5
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x