“Little-Known $4 Greek Shipper to Double Your Money” Nancy Zambell

By Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe, December 9, 2009

Nancy Zambell, who edits the Buried Treasure Under $10 newsletter, is now teasing us that she’s found one of the “early winners of the great recovery” — that Greek shipper that can “Double your money — but you must act fast!”

And of course, you simply must subscribe to her newsletter. The newsletter’s very new and it actually gets decent reviews from my subscribers so far, though that’s no guarantee that her teaser picks are always solid gold — she also had the honor of having one of her teaser ads named the “Turkey of the Year” a few weeks ago.

But anyway, I always find it fun to have a look at her over-the-top touting … so today we’re looking for her Greek shipper.

She starts off by implying that she’s just following in Buffett’s footsteps after he agreed to purchase Burlington Northern, though with a far sexier idea:

“Mr. Buffett himself calls his BNI purchase an ‘all-in wager on the economic future of the United States.’

“I love it.

“It’s simple, and it makes sense. As the recovery builds, more goods, materials and purchased products will have to be shipped.BNI, with a near-monopoly on its strongest rail lines, will be a big winner.

“But I’m not buying Burlington-Northern.

“And neither should you, not if you want to double your money fast.

“Instead, using the same investment concept as Buffett, I’m betting on global recovery and I’m buying a Greek shipper that’s just 3 years old.

“It’s a Great Recovery play, like Buffett’s, but with much greater potential for small investors like us… we stand to make better profits than Buffett… faster, too!”

Unmentioned, of course, is that ocean shipping is far less a capacity-constrained business than North American railroads, so you get a lot of risk in exchange for your potential return, but don’t worry — we’re all smart enough to know the difference between a locomotive and a Panamax bulker, right?

So let’s get into some specifics about she particular shipper Zambell likes:

“Under $5 now, but not for long

“This young Greek shipper already has a fleet of 12 huge vessels circling the globe, loaded down with coal, grain, iron ore, fertilizers and all the other commodities that will soon increase in demand as economies worldwide recover.

“Revenues are locked in since the company charters its ships for one- to five-year contracts. Looking forward, the company’s entire fleet capacity—100% of it—is under contract for 2010. Ninety percent is booked for 2011, and 2012 is 45% booked already.

“Morgan Stanley, one of the largest commodities traders in the world, accounts for about 30% of this shipper’s sales. So yes, Wall Street knows about this buried treasure. Yet, as I write, institutional investors own less than 20% of the company’s stock.

“This could change fast. One thing’s for sure.

“This 3-year-old knows what it’s doing, and it sure is moving fast

“In just the past three years, the company has amassed a fleet of 12 huge dry bulk vessels with a capacity of about 765,000 dwt, shipper’s lingo for deadweight tonnage.”

And she’s even so kind as to break out their fleet for us:

“Our 3-year-old owns:

“7 Panamax ships carrying coal and iron ore for energy and steel production, as well as grain and a variety of other dry bulk commodities.

“2 Supramax and 3 Handysize ships carrying iron and steel products, fertilizers, minerals, forest products, ores, bauxite, alumina, cement and other construction materials…

“And the ships are young, too.

“The fleet is about half the age of the industry’s average.”

So who is this little shipping company? Thinkolator sez it must be:

Paragon Shipping (PRGN — click here for an instant trend analysis)

Paragon is indeed about three years old (3-2/3, actually, since I’m continually being told how much those months matter by my children), and they are a Greek dry bulk shipper. Their fleet does match up with Zambell’s tease, both the overall tonnage and the numbers of each class of ship (though they’ve agreed to sell one of those Handymax vessels, so I guess the fleet will soon be 11 ships).

Their fleet is quite modern, as Zambell teases — the Handymax’s were built in 1995, but the rest of the ships are less than ten years old, the company has tried to grow by buying “pre-owned” ships, but not particularly old ones. Unfortunately, the company also came into existence during a wild bull market for dry bulk shipping, when companies like Dry Ships and Diana Shipping were on CNBC every day and seemed to be transporting not iron ore to China, but holds full of cash directly to shareholders pockets. Which means that when they went public and acquired some of those ships, they were worth a lot more than they are today — and several times more than they were worth during the real dark days of the collapse last year. That pressured their debt covenants (the ships were in many cases worth less than the money borrowed to buy them), so Paragon had to do some capital raisings this year by selling equity and selling that vessel (though they apparently will have a loan come due at the sale, so it’s costing them money to sell).

Those capital raisings, along with the very weak market for dry bulk shipping earlier this year and what was almost certainly overbuilding of these vessels during the heyday, help explain why Paragon’s stock fell from $20 to $2, and has fallen back each time it hit got much above the $5 level this year. Similar fates befell essentially all of the dry bulk shippers, whose major business is transporting commodities like coal and ore to China, but what distinguishes among them is the level of debt, the amount of risk-taking they take on their contracts (ie, do they contract their vessels out for spot charters, meaning they hire out one trip at a time at the prevailing rate, or do they use time charters for longer periods — a year, maybe several years — that lock in a steady rate?)

In general, the most volatile shippers are those with more ships committed to spot charters and more debt, the steadier ones are those who do long-term time charters and borrow less — Paragon looks to me like they’re sort of in the middle of the pack compared to the big dry bulk companies. Diana Shipping carries effectively no debt and has been relatively stable over the past year, DryShips is loaded with debt and also expanding into offshore drilling, and was highly exposed to the spot rates when things collapsed last year … Paragon has a fair amount of debt, though equity raisings have helped to even that out, and they are, as Zambell says, being fairly conservative (though most others are now, too, including DRYS) in booking much of their fleet for the next two years. And if you look at a two year chart of DSX, PRGN and DRYS, it shouldn’t be a huge surprise, as a result, that PRGN is more or less in the middle of the channel created by DSX and DRYS.

Shipping companies often trade to a great degree based on their book value, and right now some of them look like a bargain at about half of book value, including both DRYS and PRGN — but be careful, the “book value” is primarily their assessment of the carrying value of the vessels they own, which is often based on the amount they paid for those ships … which is, unfortunately, far more than some of them are currently worth. If you look at them based on earnings, PRGN trades at an estimated forward PE of about 8, DRYS about 6, and Diana about 10 … so again, more or less the middle of the road.

Paragon is far smaller than those two competitors, so it might not be a fair comparison, I just thought it might be useful to note that, compared to others in the same business, they’re not necessarily either a screaming buy or a terrifying risk — my quick glance tells me that, though they carry additional risk because they’re smaller and less diversified (losing one ship will cut earnings, for example), they look relatively middle-of-the-road for a dry bulk shipper, between the larger size and conservatism of Diana Shipping and the family scandal-tinged aggressiveness of DryShips.

Many of the dry bulk companies (and other shippers) also try to pay high dividends, though most of them were cut or suspended when rates (as measured by the Baltic Dry Index) collapsed in the economic downturn. Paragon is currently paying a nickel quarterly dividend which, annualized, would be about 4% if they keep it up at the same rate — that sounds reasonable if you forget the fact that they started out paying a far higher dividend (it was 50 cents per quarter last year) … but they are at least paying something, which distinguishes them from many competitors.

For quite a while these shippers were almost all high-risk, high-income plays, so any dividend hikes or dividend re-starts in the group will probably get a big of attention. If you’re looking for other similar companies to compare, there are quite a few — DRYS and DSX are among the larger ones, and you might also look at Eagle Shipping (EGLE), Excel Maritime (EXM), and Genco Shipping (GNK), all of which are closer in size to Paragon, and which tend to have valuations in the same ballpark based, again, on their aggressiveness and indebtedness.

I’m not a dry bulk shipping expert (on the off chance that isn’t clear from my notes above), and given the huge interest from investors over the last four or five years I expect there are probably several of you who know more about the intricacies and the distinctions among the firms — but it does sound from the cautious statements of these companies over the last couple months like the market is turning up a bit as the nascent recovery blossoms. If you believe in that worldwide economic recovery, and have the stomach for a sector that has been a very volatile play on the global economy, Paragon is one firm that at least gets quite a bit less attention than those I’ve mentioned above — whether that means it will perform any better, of course, is another question. Feel free to share your thoughts with a comment below.

Related Gumshoe Articles

Leave a Reply

18 Comments on "“Little-Known $4 Greek Shipper to Double Your Money” Nancy Zambell"

avatar

Tom K.
Guest
0
Tom K.
December 9, 2009 2:31 pm

I believe Nancy Zambell has highlighted a stock with some potential here. Paragon Shipping topped out at $25.08 per share back in October of 2007. At the current price of $4.88, it might be a good buy. Diana Shipping was the featured stock on Cramer’s Mad Money about a month ago. Thanks for the interesting article, Travis.

Tim
Guest
0
Tim
December 9, 2009 2:36 pm

I researched the shipping sector the first week in november when it actually looked like a bonefide turn around could be at the beginning. paragon is not so ‘not well known’. In light of global news the past couple weeks, I say avoid the sector entirely. The double dip recession has definitely been put back on the table for now.

SageNot
Guest
0
SageNot
December 9, 2009 2:38 pm

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ta?s=PRGN&t=2y&l=on&z=m&q=l&p=m50,m200&a=m26-12-9,r14,ss&c=

Just 2.60 PE on a world class shipper that makes money???

Looks t/b worth a few quid with a 20% stop loss or so!

Durwood Dugger
Guest
0
December 9, 2009 2:40 pm

Don’t ocean shipping markets have similar market rhythms to overland shipping? Didn’t Buffet make a rather large bet on the railroads becoming a major force in moving coal around the US? Doesn’t it seems likely that people in places without raw materials will still the most efficient way to bulk ship almost all commodities?

shoeless
Guest
0
shoeless
December 9, 2009 3:22 pm

How about SFL,the finance people
currently pealing back to 12.50.
PE 7.5, Div 8.8…in a consolidation

Tim
Guest
0
Tim
December 9, 2009 4:27 pm

If and when a turn around in ocean shipping looks to be firming up, I’d put money into TBSI. They are a bigger and better company with more upside potential in my opinion, when the time comes. The time isn’t here yet.

Alex
Guest
0
Alex
December 9, 2009 11:51 pm

I would be curious what people think of the new ETF “SEA”.

barbara
Guest
0
barbara
December 10, 2009 2:00 am

I found Paragon this past spring when shopping for value. I’ve held it, sold it, bought it again and seen it rebound. It pays a decent dividend for a stock priced below $5. I’m thinking it will hit at least 5.50 before the end of the year.

bengo
Guest
0
bengo
December 10, 2009 7:02 am

drys had become one of jacks.com rank 1 list just about 2 weeks ago.
hope they are right.

Mike
Guest
0
December 10, 2009 1:54 pm

What seems to be missing here is a look at supply & demand. Total shipping is down some 16-20% with 10% of fleet container ships sitting idle in port or being decommissioned.

There are orders for new container ships due for delivery in the next few years that will increase current available container capacity by over 50%. See article by German publication der Spiegel: http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,641513,00.html

This may be a very German or at least European perspective on the shipping industry but does not bode well for the world wide industry in a slow protracted recovery.

mark
Guest
0
mark
December 10, 2009 9:57 pm

What do you think of trmd ?

Mike
Guest
0
Mike
December 11, 2009 11:34 pm

Any body got thoughts about NMM? Apparently it’s a MLP spun off from NM. Numbers look pretty good. Varies depending where you look but around PE-9, ROE-19%, PEG-.88%, Net Profit Margin-36%, Dividend Yield-11%. Looks like Debt/Equity around 1.33. Price has went from about $5 to $15 in the past year.

Mike
Guest
0
Mike
December 11, 2009 11:44 pm

Any body have any thoughts about NMM? Apparently its a MLP spun off from NM. Casual glance looks pretty good. Varies depending on where you look but basically PE-9, PEG-.88, ROE-19%, Net Profit Margin-36%, Dividend Yield-11%, Debt/equity-1.33. Price went from $5 to $15 in past year.

Gary W
Guest
0
Gary W
December 13, 2009 1:38 pm

Mike, articles like this show up at the bottom of a cycle, which is a good sign. But another issue is that exporters have suffered much more than consumer nations in this “decession”. That means more competition between suppliers and lower margins for some time. It’s hard to see PRGN out-hustling the others in a crowded field. You’re right,it’s not a screaming buy.

marc z
Guest
0
marc z
January 3, 2010 4:12 pm

I am really confused about prng, I have a large holding and the last quarters I have been selling the $5 calls , and it has worked very well for me because the stock doesnt move much. I still can not figure out how a company makes $2.profit per share pays out only .20 in dividends, what is going on with the other monies?

Gravity Switch
Admin
11
December 9, 2009 2:49 pm
Sure, but railroads are heavy fixed assets without much competition (no one’s going to build a new cross-country rail line); in shipping, you often get periods of slack demand that drive companies to bankruptcy, then a sudden spurt of demand that causes rates to spike (and companies to go public), which brings in new shipping investors, who are flush with cash and who order expensive ships, then those new ships come trundling out of the shipyards and the market is saturated with new capacity, perhaps at the same time that demand slackens in a recession … or at least, that’s… Read more »
Durwood Dugger
Guest
0
December 10, 2009 1:35 pm

Thanks for your response. You have a great service. I appreciate your insights – including this one. You say “no one will build another cross country railroad.” However, I’m not sure they have to. Am I remembering correctly that there are lots of under utilized railways and surplus railroad right-of-ways still in existence and available – from previous prosperous rail eras? If so competition might arise without necessarily having to build an entirely “new railroad.” Not that this negates the total validity of your argument for the greater volatility in shipping.

spreadtrader
Guest
0
spreadtrader
January 3, 2010 5:49 pm
wpDiscuz