Part two of the “Curing Cancer Portfolio” Revealed

Finishing our search for Alex Daley's recent teaser picks

By bobbyo, May 29, 2012

Last week we started to look into the “Curing Cancer Portfolio” tease from the Casey Research folks, and, as promised, today we’re going to finish up and identify the other three picks for you. He says optimistically. (I’m writing as I research here, so we’ll have to see if all three disrobe for the Thinkolator as easily as number one did on Thursday.)

The Casey Extraordinary Technology folks are teasing that they have four stocks that should benefit as new cancer cures are developed, and they’ll tell you what they are as soon as you subscribe. Here at Stock Gumshoe we like to do things the hard and cheap way, so we sniff out the hints they provide, toss the clues into the Thinkolator, and cogitate on the results a bit. Number one, revealed last week, was Seattle Genetics (SGEN) … so what’s number two?

Hints, please!

“A drug discovery and development firm designing molecular therapies that disrupt cancer cell growth

“In conjunction with the National Cancer Institute and Genentech – a company that’s widely considered the founder of the biotech industry – this small firm and its partners are so confident in its technology that instead of the usual one or two clinical trials a start-up would usually undertake, they financed a couple dozen clinical trials for the treatment of a wide variety of cancers.

“In January 2012, the FDA approved one of these treatments, a new medicine that disrupts molecular components within basal cell carcinoma cells (a slow-growing type of skin cancer). This disruption results in cell death.

“This is the first – and only – drug available for people suffering from an advanced form of basal cell carcinoma.

“This ‘Curing Cancer’ portfolio pick has another drug in the pipeline that shows great promise against cancers of the neck, lungs, breast, liver, and other organs.

“And with so many other promising cancer treatments in development, we believe this company could easily triple from its current price over the next three years.”

And voila! The Thinkolator tells us straight away that pick number two is … Curis (CRIS)

Which is indeed poised to receive milestone payments and royalties on a new basal cell carcinoma drug — the drug, Erivedge, is being developed by Roche and Genentech, and was approved in January for advanced stages of that disease (it’s in phase II for “operable” forms of basal cell carcinoma). Their approach is targeting signaling pathways and networks to disrupt cancer cells, and they have some solid partners for a couple of their compounds (including Erivedge) as well as a few compounds that they’re developing on their own (so far). Their lead candidate aside from Erivedge is CUDC-101, which is in Phase 1 right now for head and neck cancer and is expected to produce some additional news this year (possible results, possible filing for new trials in other cancers or for Phase II in head and neck). I don’t know anything about the science, you can see their basic explanation here and their pipeline summary here.

I like the general idea of smallish biotechs with strong partners and with a proprietary technology that can be applied to multiple cancer targets (or drug deliver targets, like SGEN’s tech), but I don’t focus on this sector enough to have a real bead on which technologies or drugs will be the strongest. The royalty and other payments projected for Erivedge give them a relatively stable revenue stream for a small biotech, but they’re still not going to be profitable within the next year or two if the analysts are correct (assuming, of course, that they don’t have a big lump-sum payment for a new partnership deal). Read on to see what the other picks are, and then you can tell us which is your favorite.

Pick number three? This spiel is a bit longer, with more hints:

“A drug discovery company with a proprietary platform for developing genetic therapies that fight cancer

“Inside every cell are molecules called RNAi. They act as a checkpoint of sorts – when a cell’s DNA sends a message (in the form of RNA) to your cell’s ribosomes requesting the creations of a particular protein (which comprise the building blocks of your body), the message first gets paired with a RNAi designed to match that particular signal.

“RNAi works like an email spam filter – it selectively rejects messages that shouldn’t get through. It’s there to protect against viruses and other parasites, which work by sending bad messages – spam – to cause ribosomes to build copies of the virus instead of healthy proteins. It also filters internal RNA messages to direct development and gene expression, a selective off switch for otherwise healthy functions.

“In short, it controls which proteins are NOT made, and what genetic traits DO NOT develop.

“So, by controlling RNAi function, certain disorders that individuals are genetically predisposed to developing are blocked.

“And that’s what this company’s drugs do. Each drug targets a specific RNA message, which means each drug fights a specific disease.

“Right now, this company has 23 drugs in various stages of development that fight cancer and a host of other diseases. Two of these drugs are in Phase III trials (the last step before going to market).

“And the platform from which all these therapies are being developed is proprietary and protected by patent.

“Because this company is discovering more drugs and treatments than they have the resources to develop themselves, they’re now licensing their drugs to partners prior to late-phase development and commercialization.

“So through this they’re building a broad base of licensing fees, milestone payments, and royalty income.

“Can you see the profit potential here? We sure can – our estimate is this company could easily double your money – or better – within the next 18 to 24 months.”

This one is not quite as definitive, but we get a strong likelihood that he’s teasing Isis Pharmaceuticals (ISIS). Isis is one of the larger stand-alone developers of “antisense” RNA therapeutics, and they do have two drugs in Phase III trials right now along with 23 other compounds (if you don’t count the two Phase III trials, or the one approved drug that was developed by Novartis). Both of the Phase III compounds have partners, Teva and Genzyme, and they do state that they have so many potential targets that their goal is to license out their technologies as much as they can. The Phase III drug that is partnered with Genzyme, Kynamro, just got an “application accepted” notice from the FDA, which triggered a $25 million milestone payment from Genzyme to Isis and means they’re at least on the path to potential approval and future royalties (this one doesn’t happen to be one of their anti-cancer drugs, it targets a genetic predisposition to low “good” cholesterol).

Isis is big enough that this $25 million payment isn’t a “make or break” deal, and it hasn’t moved the stock noticeably — this is a (almost) billion dollar company, and the bet must be that their big pipeline will lead to a few blockbuster-size breakthrough drugs eventually, but so far analysts see tepid revenue growth for the next year or so and no sign of profits coming in the foreseeable future (which is the next year or two). RNA therapeutics has been a big area for investor enthusiasm, but there have been a lot of failed research projects and failed compounds in this space, so if Isis has the “magic” to properly target and tweak RNA I assume they’ll end up doing well … but, as you might guess, I don’t know the science at all and have no idea whether this will work out better than past failed programs like Sirna Therapeutics (they were bought out by Merck, so it worked out OK for investors, but from what I’ve read Merck effectively scrapped the RNA program a few years later). There are a bunch of other RNA-targeting stocks out there, including, perhaps, the next one that’s teased …

“Another bio-pharmaceutical company using RNAi therapy to kill cancer and prevent other diseases

“This company’s business strategy is to develop and commercialize a pipeline of RNAi therapeutic products. It’s also entering into collaboration and licensing agreements with companies like our “Curing Cancer” portfolio pick #3 to enable it to get the resources and funding it needs to advance its own programs.

“It’s in a prime position to advance the field of RNAi research, as its founders were the first to prove RNAi could bind to messenger RNA and prevent disease-causing genes from expressing themselves.

“Based on our evaluation formula, the prospective value of this stock is between $40 and $50. As of this writing, you can get it for around $12, giving you a chance to make 375% on your investment if you get in now.”

This one must be, sez the Thinkolator, Alnylam Therapeutics (ALNY), which was recently at around $12 (it’s “around $10” now), and is partnered with Isis. Like ISIS, ALNY has a pretty high short interest (meaning, more than 10% of the float is “sold short” in a bet that the stock will go down), and is nowhere near becoming profitable — but, also like ISIS, they appear to have quite a few irons in the fire, including a goal to have “five in 15” that focuses on getting five of their RNAi therapeutics in “advanced clinical development” by 2015. Here’s how they describe that program:

“By 2015, the company expects to have five RNAi therapeutic programs in advanced clinical development. These include ALN-TTR (for the treatment of transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis (ATTR), ALN-PCS for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia, ALN-HPN for the treatment of refractory anemia, ALN-APC for the treatment of hemophilia, and ALN-TMP for the treatment of treatment of hemoglobinopathies, including beta-thalassemia and sickle cell anemia.”

They do have six or seven drugs in the clinic, half on their own (so far) and half with partners, though most of those are in Phase 1, and they have about ten preclinical programs in “discovery and development” (“in the clinic” means that they’ve gotten FDA approval to test the drug on humans, which is what leads to that first Phase I trial).

So … there you have it, the Casey Extraordinary Technology “Curing Cancer” portfolio appears to consist of ISIS, ALNY, CRIS and SGEN. What do you think? Any favorites in that bunch, or are there other cancer-fighting biotechs out there that you believe have more potential? Let us know witha comment below.

And, as always, if you’ve tried out Casey Extraordinary Technology we want to know what you thought — does it deserve a chance from investors who are hungry for information and recommendations, or is it a dud? Somewhere in between? Click here to share a brief review, and check out our alphabetical listing of newsletters if you’d like to see if there are others that you can review for your fellow investors. Thanks!


Related Gumshoe Articles

Leave a Reply

14 Comments on "Part two of the “Curing Cancer Portfolio” Revealed"

avatar

Ventureshadow
Guest
0
Ventureshadow
May 29, 2012 5:24 pm

We’ve been hearing about high-tech antibodies and DNA/RNA controlling proteins as cures for cancer for literally decades now. They use Imminent Breakthrough Technology, SCAM rationales (selective cancer antibody mediators) and GPQ funding (get poor quick). Alnylam was the Tweedledeedum to Sirna’s Tweedledeedee. These are not investments or even speculations, they are lottery ticks. So far you would have had better outcomes with actual lottery tickets.

Doug
Guest
0
Doug
May 29, 2012 6:26 pm
For RNAi cancer therapy potential, ISIS and Alnylam aren’t anywhere near being in the running. ISIS is anti-sense RNA which about as advanced to RNAi as a single engine cessna is to a Learjet. Alnalam do have the patents in synthetic RNAi, but being synthetic the body naturally spits it out and so delivery has been and will keep holding them back for some time to come. A more promising approach is endogenous delivery using shRNA (sometimes called expressed RNAi or ddRNAi). It’s actually a gene therapy, and has gone from being too dangerous to very promising in relatively short… Read more »
Paul Asselin
Guest
0
Paul Asselin
May 29, 2012 6:53 pm

I’m a plastic surgeon. The treatment for a basal cell carcinoma is surgery; most of the time, it’s a 20 minutes surgery and there is about no recurrence.
So, why a medical treatment???
Paul

Skin
Guest
0
Skin
May 30, 2012 7:30 pm

Really? You’re a plastic surgeon, and don’t understand the utility of Erivedge in advanced, inoperable basal cell carcinoma? I’m a dermatologist and Mohs surgeon, and I have seen several such. You must not have practiced long.

Toeser
Guest
0
Toeser
May 29, 2012 7:46 pm
Check out ONCY. It should be within two years of a payday, maybe much sooner. The company has a phase III trial running, along with several phase II trials. They are treating cancer with a live virus that is effective on about 2/3rd of all cancers. They have been running tests for something like 8-9 years with no meaningful side effects, and many cancers stabilized or cured. The company has plenty of cash and a deep IP portfolio. Many of its trials are being funded by the NIH. It’s currently cheap, so the return potential is very high.
frank
Guest
0
frank
May 29, 2012 9:46 pm

and what about ONCY……….??

frank
Guest
0
frank
May 29, 2012 9:54 pm

re ONCY – I meant that this company is really flying under the radar and deserves some serious DD ( the stock is quite thinnly traded and appears to be manipulated?-Acuity Canada has its full 20% of this one; also have a squizz at the yahoo message board-most dedicated followers that I have ever seen………)

Rob
Guest
0
Rob
May 30, 2012 6:12 am

Phase 1 trials are SO early in the trial process. This is testing toxicity of the product in people who aren’t suffering . Phase 2 and 3 are then needed before it is even submitted for FDA or EMEA approval. This is too early for my liking!

Mark
Guest
0
Mark
June 2, 2012 10:08 am

Cancer has been the cause of death in so many families including mine. That’s why when Travis promoted the Jimmy fund I donated (I’m a very cheap guy) I could have got the paid for version of stock gumshoe, however I donated, I would like for one of these companies to be sucessful. Does the Jimmy fund, or the pink ribbon one give grants to these type companies. I think they at the very least they give hope. However at the very best might really come up with a cure. I remain hopeful that one will. Good work Gumshoe!!!

Bob Paglee
Guest
0
Bob Paglee
June 2, 2012 3:44 pm
As an elderly still-living survivor of several basal-cell skin cancers (fortunately none of them melanomas) that had to be RF electro-burned away (many years ago), or excised through minor surgery, or freeze-dried (more recently) with squirts of liquid nitrogen from a hand-held cryogenic dewar, I certainly favor any newer, better corrective action. But pre-cancerous skin keratoses can be corrected through timely application of fluorouracil 5% cream as I am currently doing. Personally, I would prefer to see more research directed toward early diagnosis and relief from more devastating cancers such as fast-killer pancreatic cancer that recently took the lives of… Read more »
Geb
Guest
0
Geb
June 11, 2012 11:34 pm

for a cure for cancer that works go to this site: go2delta.com . These folks have the program that will help most cancer patients. This is for real!!!

Alan Harris
Guest
0
Alan Harris
July 11, 2013 11:14 am

….cures coughs, colds, sneezes, chills and pimples on the dickie !

Bosko
Guest
0
Bosko
December 5, 2013 7:02 am

Their teasing a small biotech firm. Their share price is under $3 dollars & they say that they have a vaccine that kills off all cancers cells. I think they also say that they have FDA approval. Their teaser says the death of death. Has any one got a clue as to which small company this is? Any feedback would be great.

steve64
Member
0
steve64
August 19, 2015 8:00 pm

Well they certainly came through with ALNY $140+now

wpDiscuz