Daily Wealth

Leave a Reply

8 Comments on "Daily Wealth"

avatar

Rob L.
Guest
0
Rob L.
March 21, 2009 8:55 am

The king of the Stansberry Self-Promotion Empire. It’s especially tough to swallow the congratulatory “top ten open recommendations” included at the end of each newsletter, especially when I have had difficulty getting into some of those trades at the recommended “DON’T BUY ABOVE THIS PRICE” levels.

In their defense, Daily Wealth is meant to be more advertisement than newsletter…and that, it does well.

Ray Miller
Guest
0
Ray Miller
March 25, 2009 1:52 pm

Daily Wealth has some interesting topics but they all lead to wanting to sell something. It never gives recommendations to buy but does do a good job of talking about sectors and where market trends might be going. You need lots of time to read it daily. As good as it gets for a freebie.

Deena
Guest
0
Deena
July 24, 2009 9:02 am

This newsletter focuses too much on advertisements and self-serving offers. I have discontinued my subscrption.

D Carlson
Guest
0
D Carlson
February 6, 2010 5:38 pm

Stansberry and Associates, in and of itself is useless. It primarily touts other newsletters. some cheap, some very pricey. Its subscription is sold with a money back guarantee which I tried to invoke but continue receiving the “newsletter” but no refund.

Ken
Guest
0
Ken
December 23, 2010 2:32 pm

Generally a lead in to continual pitches for other newletters. Not high value.

Mark
Guest
0
Mark
December 26, 2010 11:57 pm

This is not even an advisory. Why would it be included? It’s ads only. They advertise how well they’ve done. Don’t go there to find any new buying opportunities. I read it primarily for educational purposes, to keep up with trends, etc.

Mrsb
Guest
0
Mrsb
January 5, 2011 11:07 am

Review by Mark, December 26, 2010, said:
“This is not even an advisory. Why would it be included? It’s ads only. They advertise how well they’ve done. Don’t go there to find any new buying opportunities. I read it primarily for educational purposes, to keep up with trends, etc.”

ditto – as a novice investor, I have learned a ton about investing from this letter in the last two years 🙂

MachineGhost
Guest
0
MachineGhost
June 28, 2011 10:52 am
My impression after several years of subscribing (including to Daily Wealth Premium) is that Sjuggerund is a bit naive, not having enough market experience under his belt and the proper historical perspective for his judgement calls. As an example, he likes to say the phrase “XXXXXX is as cheap as its ever been” a lot, whereas “been” in the case of stocks is merely 20 years and assumes a typical post-WWII recovery (i.e. further P/E expansion from an already overvalued level). Or he’ll pooh-pooh the discrepancy between comparing trailing P/E and forward P/E which is a very mainstream (and totally… Read more »
wpDiscuz