“Politically Incorrect Doubler to Deliver 500% Earnings Growth” Navellier

By Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe, July 14, 2009

Well, Louis Navellier is nothing if not consistent — his ads always promise that a stock with recent huge earnings surprises is going to repeat, grow, and continue to delight investors. That’s the joy of being a trend follower — when you get it right. Of course, when you get it wrong with these fast-growth stocks the ride down the other side of the mountain can be very abrupt, but that’s the price of a ticket.

So what is he promising this time? He’d like you to subscribe to his Emerging Growth newsletter, and in exchange he’ll tell you all about this “politically incorrect doubler” that he thinks will deliver huge results.

Here’s a bit from the ad:

“Flash Alert … Politically Incorrect Doubler to Deliver 500% Earnings Growth

“Grab it now before it declares earnings and it doubles again … YOU HAVE 24 HOURS”

Sounds pretty impressive, right? I see ads with almost exactly this kind of lead-in just about every week from Navellier and his colleagues, but I’m still intrigued. What is this stock?

Well, the clues are limited — clearly, Louis’ copywriters are wise to the Gumshoe, because they supply a limited number of clues (don’t worry — it’s not that easy to beat the mighty Thinkolator).

Here’s what the ad says:

“If you’re a politically incorrect, greenback investor, as I am, then you’re going to love my next politically incorrect stock.

“The reasons are simple: It’s on the verge of another blow-out quarter, shaking up the politically correct establishment, and doubling investors money along the way….

“The company has …

* “Beat earnings expectations by 317%
* “Zero—let me repeat that, ZERO—debt
* “A market cap of under $300 million
* “Doubled since November
* “One of the strongest buy ratings of any of our stocks, and
* “Is about to clobber Wall Street and double investors’ money again.

“Unfortunately, I Can’t Tell You More or Give You This Company’s Name Here!

“You’ll find it only on my private website as an exclusive for my subscribers of record.

“Three reasons:

1. “Hedge funds and the media follow me too closely,
2. “The stock is too thinly traded, and
3. “Naming it in this email would make it impossible for you to get it at the buy-below price.

“So I can’t even hint at what industry or sector this is in because I DON’T want the rest of Wall Street to bid this one higher until after you get in.”

Your friendly neighborhood Stock Gumshoe, of course, feels no such compunction — and I don’t need a hint at the industry or sector to tell you that this is almost certainly …

Sturm Ruger (RGR)

Yes, for those who don’t know the company, there’s a reason why that “Ruger” part sounds familiar — this is the firearms manufacturer, maker of a variety of long guns and handguns for sportsmen, commercial and government security, the military, and pretty much anyone else who uses guns.

And they have had a hell of a six months, which is what caught the attention of Louis Navellier’s system — they did beat earnings by 317% recently, though that was for the December quarter, the beat for the March quarter was more like 25% or so. That was after coming in well below earnings estimates for the prior quarters, so this one has certainly run hot and cold.

Sturm Ruger has had a huge tailwind for the last six months, but there’s some debate about why — there was clearly a big run on some guns for the civilian and sporting markets when rumors and fear flew about Obama and the Democratic Congress tightening or renewing gun laws, particularly the assault weapons ban … and to a lesser extent, survivalist panic grew during the financial crisis and some folks probably bought guns for that reason, just as they buried gold coins in their back yards. Add that to continuing demand for the military with Afghanistan and Iraq operations, I’d guess, and the revenues have been very solid for Sturm Ruger.

You can also make reasonable valuation arguments about the company — they do have plenty of cash and no debt, so they shouldn’t be squeezed by the credit markets, and they are trading at a premium to the market, but not a massive premium, particularly if you believe, as Navellier seems to, that their growth will continue — the trailing PE is about 19, which if they could continue growth of well over 100% would clearly be a huge bargain, but there’s also some expectation that their profits will stop growing and will, in fact, decline next year.

Now, it’s a small company and those estimates are from only a single analyst, so they shouldn’t carry as much weight as estimates that are an average of dozens of careful analysts, but they do give you some idea of what the market expects. The “story” of gun sales seems to be continuing past trends, at least for civilians — they spike when gun owners fear more government regulation, then they tail off and return to some sort of normal trend based on real demand, which is so far being reflected in the marketplace, according to this article from the Wall Street Journal. RGR is quite near its 52-week high, even after coming off by a dollar or so, and is certainly well above the $4+ low that it hit back in November, and they’ve also gotten a slight boost of attention from their recent addition to the Russell 3000 index. I don’t know the specific date for their next earnings announcement that Navellier hints at, but the 24-hour time limit was for his newsletter deal, not for the earnings announcement … if they stick to their current schedule, earnings will probably come out in two weeks or so, and it would probably be wise to expect that announcement to bring a significant move in the share price … whether up or down, that’s a guess I’ve no confidence in making.

Sturm Ruger carries a decent dividend of near 3% at the moment, and seems to be in reasonable shape financially — I don’t personally want to own a gun company, but if you’re interested in the sector it seems that Sturm Ruger is probably slightly safer than Smith & Wesson (SWHC), which is slightly larger, carries some debt and doesn’t pay a dividend (though analysts do see SWHC continuing to grow next year, with a cheaper forward valuation than RGR). My guess is that both are probably likely to ride up and down on the fluctuating demand cycle of gun purchases by U.S. civilians.

Feel like owning a gunmaker? Think it’s a great buy, or too late, or too early? Let us know with a comment below. And if you’ve ever subscribed to any of Navellier’s newsletters, please share your thoughts with a quick review now by clicking here — this title, Emerging Growth, is currently his top-ranked newsletter according to my readers, but none of his newsletters are in the Top 50 at the moment.

Related Gumshoe Articles

Navellier’s “Tech Doubler: breakthrough technology that turns 50-year old coaxial cable into a 1-gigabit home networking solution”

What's being teased as a "Double in a year" stock by Navellier's Emerging Growth?

14 Comments Read More

What the heck is the “Tesla of Medical Devices?”

Sleuthifying a "secret" Louis Navellier teaser stock

18 Comments Read More

Leave a Reply

16 Comments on "“Politically Incorrect Doubler to Deliver 500% Earnings Growth” Navellier"

avatar

Karen Kell
Guest
0
Karen Kell
July 14, 2009 12:57 pm

?? According to Yahoo Finance, the ticker is actually RGR.

David Ferrera
Guest
0
David Ferrera
July 14, 2009 1:04 pm

On the other side of the coin: a gun can be viewed as the purchase of a luxury item. In most instances it certainly isn’t a necessity. With rising unemployment and consumers saving rather than spending, private gun sales could experience a decline.

Moreover, unless I’m mistaken, unlike S&W, Ruger does not have any significant military contracts with which to boost sales.

SnoopyJC
Guest
0
July 14, 2009 4:32 pm

Upcoming Event(s)
Fiscal Year End: December
Date Time(ET) Upcoming Events
07/20/2009 * 18:00 Q2 2009 Sturm Ruger Earnings Release

zsbigboy
Guest
0
July 14, 2009 5:49 pm

I think the best place is in the bullet manufacturer since there are none on the shelf.

SnoopyJC
Guest
0
July 14, 2009 5:56 pm

Here is my chart analysis:

http://chart.ly/sh3dhb

Looks good above 13 with a married Put for safety before earnings on 7/20.

–joe

Jerry
Guest
0
July 14, 2009 9:40 pm

Punch in Today’s
“P.I.N #”: VZV99
And Withdraw Your
$550 Instantly

Free money just for signing up!
What’s the catch?

Jerry
Guest
0
July 14, 2009 9:41 pm

Punch in Today’s
“P.I.N #”: VZV99
And Withdraw Your
$550 Instantly

Free money just for signing up and paying $750!

james nikas
Guest
0
james nikas
July 28, 2009 11:38 pm

I have been a subsriber for over 2 months and have yet to receive funds your email codes send me.
Apparently I’m doing something wrong.
Several phone calls have been made on my part in an attempt to learn the correct procedue.
Can/will you help.
Thanks,
James Nikas

colin
Guest
0
colin
December 22, 2009 10:52 am

I bought one of his hot china stocks and got out quickly enough to save my butt. KONG was supposed to be ready to explode.

I note he’s guaranteeing a doubler or money back. Heck the $99 is worth the risk, eh? for him to be wrong, that is.

CSC

Gravity Switch
Admin
11
July 14, 2009 12:58 pm

Oops, thought I fixed that typo — having updating problems, yes it is RGR. Sorry.

Gravity Switch
Admin
11
July 14, 2009 1:16 pm

Good point. As to the military sales, I haven’t dug that deep on this one, but a quick look indicates that S&W certainly has much higher DoD contracts than Ruger recently … you could easily be correct.

spreadtrader
Member
0
spreadtrader
July 14, 2009 1:25 pm

David, you obviously don’t hail from the solid south……..lol.

A gun, a pick-up truck and a hound dog…..all very necessary.

J Krush
Guest
0
J Krush
July 14, 2009 4:12 pm
Why stop at calling gun purchases a luxury item? Why not call everything that is not absolutely necessary to basic survival a luxury? The purchase of a car, TV, computer, extra shoes, lipstick, hairspray, antiperspirant, health care, or homes could be viewed as luxury items. One can rent a home, have one pair of shoes, use the computers at the public libraries, walk or ride a bike, and forgo excellent health, smelling and looking good. They certainly aren’t necessities. If we’re going that way, why bother with education? People have lived for millenia without formal education and they still lived… Read more »
zsbigboy
Guest
0
July 14, 2009 5:52 pm

I work in the medical field and the other night a physician I work with was in bump and rob accident. A gun coud have prevented robbery, Would a pen do the same?????????????

Gravity Switch
Admin
11
July 15, 2009 9:49 am
I won’t argue about the necessity of guns, but my guess would be that for both Smith & Wesson and Sturm, Ruger the big booms in sales during times like these are probably at least as much from existing gun owners as from new ones — if you wanted a semiautomatic rifle and were afraid that new regulations would ban them, you might scrimp or go in hock to get it quickly … but if you already had a fine gun and you’re afraid of being foreclosed on, the economics might not argue for an upgrade right now, especially if… Read more »
stockcrazy10
Irregular
0
stockcrazy10
July 14, 2009 11:34 pm
wpDiscuz