Support Stock Gumshoe Today!
Stock Gumshoe is supported both by advertising and by voluntary member contributions -- investors like you keep this site going.
Joining the Stock Gumshoe Irregulars for $4.50 a month or $49 a year is, first and foremost, a way to support StockGumshoe.com -- but becoming an Irregular also gives you access to the members only section of this site (which is currently in beta release -- more info about that here).
If you cannot or don't wish to make payments online through PayPal, Contributions by check or other paper correspondence can be sent to:
Stock Gumshoe
PO Box 9751
Washington, DC 20016-9751.
Donations of any amount are also always welcome -- thanks!
Thanks to all of you who have contributed so far -- you're keeping the Stock Gumshoe going!
THIS SITE DOES NOT OFFER FINANCIAL ADVICE. PLEASE READ THESE IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS AND POLICIES:
Reviews and commentary posted on this site by readers represent the opinions of those readers, and such content is not edited or approved by Stock Gumshoe. Review submissions are moderated to prevent the posting of offensive, unrelated, or spam commentary or reviews, but there is no guarantee that our moderating process will catch all such submissions. Reviews and commentary do not represent the opinion of Travis Johnson or Stock Gumshoe. Reviewers of newsletters and services represent themselves as current or past subscribers or users of those services, but no effort is made to verify their status or the substance of their experience. If you are concerned about the accuracy of the information about any newsletter or other content on this site you are encouraged to contact Stock Gumshoe. Presence or absence of a review, or the ranking, is not determined or influenced by any advertising relationships with newsletters publishers, but links to particular subscription offers for specific newsletters are usually placed as a result of an advertising or affiliate relationship. Please see below for full disclaimers and privacy policies.
4 Subscriber Reviews of Motley Fool Pro
Review by Lucca 27, January 31, 2009
I subscribe to PRO, Stock Advisor, Million Dollar Portfolio, Global Gains, Hidden Gems and Rule Breakers and will post this review on all the sites. In general I found the letters useful for ideas in an up market, but not terribly helpful in our current down market. I found some excellent companies like DWSN, EDU & CTRP that I would not otherwise have looked at. Sell recommendations usually come too late and analysts tend to fall in love with stocks and catch “falling knives”. For example the repeated recommendations of Select Comfort, Irwin Financial, First Marblehead all the way down and then the final sell recommendation at much lower prices that had been recommended a few months earlier. There seems to be a reluctance to say do nothing and wait. Recent recommendation after recommendation is substantially under water.
In general Fool is an excellent source of information on a wide variety of financial subjects and the authors seem to be competent and professional. “The Boards” can be a useful source of information and opinion, however slogging through them is tedious because there are a lot of junk postings wherein people tell the reader what they are buying (not why) and criticizing other posters, a situation that breaks into a brushfire that overwhelms a posting site for a day or two.
Unfortunately the web sites for each of the portfolios, while consistent on a stand alone basis, are a total mess when one subscribes to several newsletters. Each letter ranks performance differently. No letter as far as I can ascertain includes dividends in calculation returns, a substantial flaw in assessing the performance of a stock.
The “cafertia” approach of the newsletters is also annoying – the same stock may be recommended in two different newsletters and checking the boards requires going to three different boards to get updates. The non-subscriber board and then each of the two different subscriber boards.
All in all I do not believe that the price of any individual newsletter, each of which is a niche letter, is worth it unless one is a substantial investor, as am I, although far less substantial than a year ago. I am not going to renew any of my newsletters, except PRO which I like because it discusses options.
All in all Fool is pretty good, but it presents a conundrum. The service is intended to educate unsophisticated investors, at which it does a good job, but it is so expensive as a percentage of assets that unless a subscriber has several hundred thousand of dollars to invest they would do better in a basket of index funds. I would recommend that a new investor without a substantial portfolio subscribe to one of the services for a year or two to get some education and then go on to one of the many free sites that provide all sorts of ideas and their own boards.
Review by Andrea, February 3, 2009
I have subscribed to a variety of Motley Fool offerings, and most recently (Jan 09) started on a trial basis with this one.
As Lucca said, the other stock newsletters worked reasonably well in the bull market, but they have performed less well in the last 18 months.
I, too am interested in the PRO service, because it researches and educates on strategies other than equities.
As a whole, the Motley Fool group do educate and amuse, which is their mission statement. They have a fantastic website, which I recommend to many people, which gives one access to a very impressive array of research, as well as the Fool community, who are also contributing their own research and opinions.
Review by Peter, March 17, 2009
Overall it’s a decent service, but I canceled because at heart it’s still the same old buy and hold portfolio with a few twists (mainly: use of covered calls and short puts to buy stocks at a discount). The bullish bias dies slowly at Motley Fool. In the 3 months or so I was with the service, the only thing that got shorted was the Dollar vs the Yen (FXE, a currency ETN). In fairness, Jeff Fisher said shorting was on his radar screen but he thought it was too risky at current levels (and similarly, he thought put premiums were too high so buying puts was also out). My personal preference right now is with a top-down approach, getting the macro-economic picture right first, and then picking investments (mainly ETFs) to implement them, and going short as easily as long. While some attention is paid to the macro picture, it seems to me to be still primarily a stockpicker’s approach they’re following.
I do credit them with introducing me to options, but I quickly moved on from there and educated myself further by reading everything I could get my hands on, and I’ve been making good money playing the volatility recently.
As Lucca says, the Pro forum lacks structure, or to put it another way, is a mess. It may be OK if it’s the only service you follow and you “live” on it day and night, but it became too much effort for me to go in their once or twice a week and work my way through the jumbled threads. (I just say that by way of constructive feedback in case they read this, I don’t think it should deter anyone from subscribing).
One last issue was the price. I signed up for 2 years at 1400 dollars, which is significantly more expensive than your usual 200 a year. In fact, the lead advisor, Jeff Fisher used to run a very similar portfolio before at a newsletter called complete growth investor (which included access to a different deep value portfolio as well), and that was selling at 200 a year. 200 a year or 700… the main difference I see between the two is in the marketing.
Anyway, I don’t want to knock it too much. If you’re OK with the price and the approach which is mostly long-only, buy and hold except for a few twists, then I would recommend it.
Review by Ari, March 26, 2009
So far, so good. This is the 3rd fool newsletter that I’ve subscribed to, and so far the one I’ve been happiest with. It’s still in its starting phases, but it seems that they will be more willing to try different strategies as the markets warrant, and their options education has been top notch. I am certainly not going to judge its performance for a while longer, but I’ve been a subscriber since inception, and have been happy so far.
Have you ever subscribed to Motley Fool Pro? Submit your review now: