Sound Advice

Overall Rating

Rating: 3.7. From 3 votes.
Please wait...
4.0
Rating from 11 votes
If you’ve subscribed to Sound Advice, please click the stars below to indicate your rating for this newsletter, and please share any other feedback about your experience using the comment box below.

Investment Performance

Rating from 2 votes
Rating: 4.0. From 2 votes.
Please wait...
Your vote
  • 5 Stars 1 Votes
  • 4 Stars 0 Votes
  • 3 Stars 1 Votes
  • 2 Stars 0 Votes
  • 1 Stars 0 Votes

Quality Of Writing/Analysis

Rating from 3 votes
Rating: 3.3. From 3 votes.
Please wait...
Your vote
  • 5 Stars 0 Votes
  • 4 Stars 2 Votes
  • 3 Stars 0 Votes
  • 2 Stars 1 Votes
  • 1 Stars 0 Votes

Value For Price

Rating from 3 votes
Rating: 4.0. From 3 votes.
Please wait...
Your vote
  • 5 Stars 1 Votes
  • 4 Stars 1 Votes
  • 3 Stars 1 Votes
  • 2 Stars 0 Votes
  • 1 Stars 0 Votes

Customer Service

Rating from 3 votes
Rating: 3.7. From 3 votes.
Please wait...
Your vote
  • 5 Stars 0 Votes
  • 4 Stars 2 Votes
  • 3 Stars 1 Votes
  • 2 Stars 0 Votes
  • 1 Stars 0 Votes

Share your thoughts...

6 Comments on "Sound Advice"

Notify of
avatar

Gigabyte
Guest
0

I have been a subscriber to Sound Advice since November after a 4 year hiatus (I subscribed for 10 years before that).

The Editor, Gray Cardiff, frequently recommends Real Estate (REIT) and Preferred Stock Investments, and has a value orientation. He is usually accurate on trends in these areas, hard assets and commodities, but it sounds like his readers took some lumps last fall.

MSD
Guest
0

New subscriber, four months. Sound Advice is bullish long term, value oriented, and will do well in a rising market. Montly letter, frequent updates (Either cheering positive market moves, or cheering-up subscribers when market reverses), good analysis of picks and market forecast.

pawtucket
Member
1

I have been a subscriber to sound advice for a year. Hulbert puts him on his honor roll, but 2014 was not his finest. His pick of transoceanic, RIG, WAS HORRIBLE, DOWN 63% and the worst performing stock of the sp500. In his year review, he stated the performance of each stock pick, except RIG, sent him 3 emails asking why he omitted the returns, no answer , even though he invites comments from subscribers. Have not decided to renew or not, but he will not admit his mistakes, or respond to readers emails

Rich Hoffman
Guest
0

Bill Spetrino has a consistently better record, and he admits his mistakes,
and he’s available to all his subscribers. His B.I.O. forum has many experienced,
knowledgeable investors who share their research with all the members.

hcumberland
Member
0

This is the only newsletter that I have consistently subscribed to for the last decade. Nobody is perfectly, clearly, but he has consistently outperformed the S&P and has been one of Hulbert’s top 3-5 ranked letters for the last 15 years or more.

Steve Kwapil
Guest
0

To soon to qualify after just 1 year. But conservative approach has lagged behind bull market. Bet on rising interest rates with inverse bond funds, has especially been costly in 2017. Energy bet another poor performer in 2017. If looking for a conservative approach…results probably are in your guidelines.

wpDiscuz