Can You Get Rich from “Mobile Royalties?”

By Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe, November 29, 2010

This latest teaser ad is all about owning a “piece of an idea” — owning something valuable that gets you royalty payments, or payment for the “rental” of that idea. It’s a little bit similar to the old “Mainz Income” royalties, which were teased as a way to get recurring income that (we were told) was kind of like the income Barack Obama and Bill Clinton pull in (theirs being book royalties, while the teased ones were natural gas royalties … but still, you get the idea).

Patrick Cox, who has previously teased us many times about high tech and biotech stocks, most recently with a recurring teaser that focuses on stem cell companies. But he says that “nothing is more exciting than the mobile royalties” he’s telling us about now. And the tease this time is for his newer investment newsletter, Technology Profits Confidential (his older mostly biotech-y teasers were for his Breakthrough Technology Report).

And alas, the Agora mothership didn’t see fit to supply us with a text version of this “presentation” teaser ad, so I had to listen to Patrick’s voice for God knows how long — one of my kids was climbing on me at the same time (thanks, random school holiday!) so I didn’t quite keep track of the ticks and the tocks.

I don’t wish to imply that Mr. Cox’s voice is anything less than mellifluous, you understand, just that I wouldn’t generally have the patience to sit through an entire sales pitch if it weren’t in service to my favorite people (that’s you!)

But anyway, this newsletter is a “mass market” letter that looks at the “safer” and more blue-chippy stocks that aren’t sexy enough for his Breakthrough Technology Alert (that’s my read on the situation, though he implied as much in the presentation). And as such, it’s far less expensive and doesn’t include the little pink sheet-listed stocks … heck, in this letter he might even pick some companies that make a profit, which would probably get you drummed out of the biotech investment newsletter editor’s club.

So what’s the stock he’s pitching today? He calls this a “mobile royalty cash pool” and says it’s just getting started.

Apparently there are more than 5 billion cell phone subscriptions out there now, and this company has the valuable idea that all the cell phone companies can’t do without. Cox says that 98% of cell phones use the idea he’s teasing us about and have to pay cash royalties to the owner of the idea.

And it gets better — it’s not just mobile phones, but theyr’e also levered to get higher earnings from smart phones. The smarter the phones get, the more they depend on this “valuable idea” and have to pay more money into the pool (we’re told that they earn about about 6X more mobile royalty income from smart phones than from regular cell phones).

And Cox tells us that we can get rich just by owning the patent rights, we don’t have to own the company that makes or sells the product or develops the best factory.

This company that he’s teasing apparently pulls in hundreds of millions of dollars in royalty fees every year from Blackberries, Digital cable boxes, “smart brakes” (that one’s new to me), color laser printers, wireless speakers, flat screen TV, media devices, video game players.

And he does some quick name dropping of the clients that this company works with:

Vizio
Samsumg
Palm
Nokia
Nintendo
Casio
Amazon.com
Nokia

And says that we can claim a stake in all of it, “more easily than you might imagine.”

And that buying this stock is “like owning the pick and shovel play at the start of the California gold rush.”

And the big three are customers: Apple pays royalties on ipods, ipads, iphones and even their laptops. Google is also committed to paying the mobile royalties for a long time to come, as is Microsoft with the tablet version of Windows 7, though “most of these deals happen behind the scenes.”

Then he gets our imagination cooking to seal the deal: “What if you discovered Intel at the beginning?” He says this mobile royalty play is similar.

He’s pitching a subscription, of course, but he says this special report is “free” (with subscription, naturally) — the special report is called “How to collect a “Mobile Royalty” on Nearly Every Smart Phone Sold (Plus Millions of Laptops and More).

So what is he talking about?

Well, there aren’t that many real powerhouse intellectual property licensing firms in the world — there’s one that arguably stands head and shoulders above the rest, Qualcomm (QCOM) but they also manufacture chips and they aren’t in 98% of phones … so the one he’s teasing now is probably (not enough clues to be 100% certain this time around) …

Arm Holdings (ARMH)

This is the darling of the British tech industry, and they do have a strong portfolio of patents and intellectual property that bring in big licensing and royalty revenue on pretty much all kinds of mobile computing. They have developed a core processor design (an efficient, low energy use RISC processor) that’s licensed by hundreds of different semiconductor manufacturers to be the basic foundation of thousands of different products.

I have no idea what their royalty level is — it would make sense that they’d have more opportunity to get more of their products into smarter devices that use many different chips, and royalties and licensing fees on their newer designs are more expensive than on their legacy products, but I don’t know precisely what they earn. I do know that as of the last couple years there were claims that ARM chips were in 98 percent of cell phones, and that they are a royalty and licensing company.

ARM has a long history with Apple, they developed chips in partnership for many years back when ARM was called Acorn (one of their designs was in the Newton, the long-ago predecessor of the Palm and the iPhone — and I think a newer one is also in the iPad, though I don’t know if that’s been confirmed) and was trying to compete with IBM for the basic processor core architecture used in personal computers. Acorn even built it’s own computers, a UK competitor to Apple’s personal computers decades ago — since then, ARM’s simpler and more efficient design has evolved as the winner in the mobile world, particularly thanks to the mobile developers’ constant demand for lower power consumption, and they have a pretty overwhelming ownership of this RISC processor design (some reports I’ve seen are that they get royalties on 90% of RISC processors, though for some simpler, older designs it may just be a penny or two per device, or less). They’re also, like Qualcomm, signing licensing deals like crazy in China, which leads me to think that they’re either not copyable enough or too easily identified as copies to be widely pirated.

There have been lots of rumors that someone might take over ARM, though Intel probably can’t (due to competitive concerns) and Apple, the most oft-rumored suitor, probably wouldn’t in my opinion (why would they want to bother if they can just pay a small royalty for basic processor designs? Apple management, for whatever reason, has shown no interest in large or complex acquisitions — or, really, in using their cash hoard at all).

And if no one takes them over at a premium valuation, it’s certainly reasonable for a thoughtful investor to look at ARMH right now and say it’s really freakin’ expensive. The shares go for more than 40X next year’s estimated earnings, which is steep even if you are growing rapidly and have a low cost base with possibilities for boosting margins and significantly leveraging any revenue growth.

If the analysts are correct about next year’s earnings (and they might easily not be, ARMH has blown away estimates the last couple quarters), then ARM Holdings is only expected to grow earnings at about 10% a year … which means paying 40X earnings is perhaps a bit much. Of course, if ARM’s new processor designs take off and the analysts are just being cautious, then they may grow far faster — I have no idea, they’re still relatively small compared to the giants like Intel (which is also desperately trying to get into mobile chips) or Qualcomm (ARMH has a market cap of about $8 billion, Qualcomm is roughly 10X larger).

And while royalties may well be a great way to generate recurring revenue for decades to come based on a few key ideas, they’re not necessarily a way for investors to generate income — ARMH does have a policy of paying dividends, but they’re frightfully small and have grown very slowly over the years. Current income yield is about one half of one percent, so performance of ARMH in your portfolio would depend a lot more on the price going higher, probably either through an even loftier valuation, higher earnings, or something like a takeover. Growth and momentum traders like Louis Navellier have been talking up ARMH in recent months, too, so it should come as no surprise that the stock is near it’s 52-week highs — and, if you ignore the brief and glorious apex of the internet bubble, just shy of it’s all-time highs.

And, like I noted above, the clues were not terribly specific for this one so it’s always possible that I got this teaser solution wrong — though if you can find another royalty- and licensing-based company that’s been in 98% of cell phones recently and it’s not ARMH, I’ll be pretty surprised. If you’ve a better way to get rich from our increasingly mobile world, or some wisdom to share on Arm Holdings, feel free to let ‘er rip with a comment below.


Related Gumshoe Articles

Leave a Reply

17 Comments on "Can You Get Rich from “Mobile Royalties?”"

avatar

George
Guest
0
George
November 29, 2010 6:05 pm

I also take his letter and it is ARMH.

Karen
Guest
0
Karen
November 29, 2010 7:56 pm

Take a look at MIPS!

Joanna
Guest
0
Joanna
November 29, 2010 10:04 pm

Thanks! I sat through many an Agora teaser only to be asked for about $2,000 for a "free" offer. I am glad I wasn't missing anything I could afford.

alaska
Guest
0
alaska
November 29, 2010 10:21 pm
This company does similar things…check it out…royalties on patents…..InterDigital, Inc. (NasdaqGS: IDCC ) I thought this was the teased company till you others that get the letter said otherwise…. InterDigital, Inc. engages in the design and development of digital wireless technologies for use in cellular and wireless IEEE 802 related products. It also develops solutions for enhancing bandwidth availability and network capacity, wireless security and seamless connectivity, and mobility across networks and devices. In addition, the company licenses its technologies and mobile broadband modem solutions (modem IP, know-how, and reference platforms) to mobile device manufacturers, semiconductor companies, and other equipment… Read more »
Ray
Guest
0
Ray
November 30, 2010 5:16 am

The trick with those annoying ‘video’ presentation ads is to exit the page, which brings up a dialog box offering the option to ‘Stay on this page’. Click that button and you get the entire text with no ‘video’.

Eric
Guest
0
Eric
November 30, 2010 11:45 am

I'm leaning more toward a possibility of the owners of the 4G network of towers and infrastructure in the U.S., Clearwire [NASDAQ:CLWR], are the ones he is referring to. And a Google search reveals some activity with the REIT approach for them, as he had mentioned in the article. I also thought that it was interesting that he mentioned Intel, since they helped Clearwire to invent 4G.

qdupouy
Guest
0
qdupouy
December 9, 2010 4:01 pm
ARMH has already gotten a lot of hype, and I have read that Apple is no longer going to use their technology (instead using their own) in their devices, which could hurt their business a lot. I think a better way to "get rich from our increasingly mobile world" would be to invest in American Towers (AMT), which builds cellular towers around the world, but their main business being in the US. These towers are leased out to the cellphone service providers so they can place antennas on them. Cellphone service providers need them to supply service, and with 4G… Read more »
Cefejs
Guest
0
Cefejs
December 16, 2010 10:21 am

Not knowing the details of teaser, for me it seems it is IDCC. Company, I suspect having the most patents in mobile industry and not manufacturing any single device, but instead…signing licencing deals with handset manufacturers and earning royalties.

Cefejs
Guest
0
Cefejs
December 16, 2010 10:22 am

IDCC has been working on the bandwidth crunch issue for several years and they have technologies that are on the cutting edge for solving the bandwidth crunch that carriers are already facing. It's just a matter of time before we see companies like AT&T, Verizon, and Sprint signing deals with IDCC. A license with a major carrier (domestic or international) will immediately propel this stock into triple digits. This is the market Bill Merritt has spoken of that is 5-7 times larger than the $150 Billion dollar handset market.

Cefejs
Guest
0
Cefejs
December 16, 2010 10:24 am
Now let's look at the current value of IDCC's LTE/4G portfolio. Based on independent estimates that have been presented at least 3 times in IDCC analyst presentations and conference calls, each .1% royalty on LTE/4G handsets is worth $900 Million. No one knows for sure what rates IDCC will ultimately get on LTE/4G, but I can easily make a case for 1.5% (QCOM has published a FRAND rate of 3.25% and IDCC's LTE portfolio is neck and neck with QCOM, but we'll say that QCOM is #1 and IDCC is #2). Based on the value of their LTE portfolio alone,… Read more »
Anon!
Guest
0
Anon!
March 3, 2014 6:03 am

Yep… I wrote this one, actually. It was ARM… and it ended up being a very good play for those who followed it. ARM returned over 110% before it was cashed out of the portfolio. It continues to be a good company. It was just a little pricey and there were others worth making room for. Surprised you found the tease “not specific” though. I was sure I’d given it away with providing so much detail.

Gravity Switch
Admin
11
November 29, 2010 10:32 pm

Thanks! Yep, after digging in a little I found there are a lot more of these smallish IP folks than I would have thought. Interesting companies, tough to handicap 'em unless you know the technology (and, preferably, a bit of patent law)

V2P
Guest
0
V2P
November 29, 2010 11:33 pm

Yes this is what I mean. sorry i just post it above without looking at your comments.

I do agree IDCC. It has good track record on fundamental. I think.

timmuggs
Guest
0
timmuggs
November 30, 2010 7:25 pm

have some IDCC too. Made a ton on them about 10 years ago. THey have lots of IP in different aspects of wireless. Almost no debt, $13/share in cash, very high margins, growing revenues and single digit PE. I'm in IDCC again with a significant amount.

I hope it does well.

V2P
Guest
0
V2P
November 29, 2010 11:31 pm

Take a look at IDCC. I have been looking at IDCC. It has exposure to licensing and royalties for the phone. Please have a look at IDCC. and give me comment whether should I buy it or not. I bought it before and just sold it at 34. Looking for another entry.

alaska_the-greatland
Guest
0
alaska_the-greatland
December 2, 2010 1:32 am

Gee, a thanks from the venerable Gumshoe makes my day. woot woot

Jer
Guest
0
Jer
December 6, 2010 10:57 pm

Yes, I got so mad at them I wrote them several emails saying, "Why are you calling these videos?" and, "I will not listen to them." Finally they wrote back and said just exit the page and then click on "Cancel" in the dialog box and you can read the text. Works every time so now I scroll through all the text in a minute or two and see what they're selling.

wpDiscuz