Become a Member

written by reader Paradise Gained, Paradise Lost – Part Two

THE BLIND SQUIRREL DIARIES

By theblindsquirrel, January 27, 2014

[Ed. note: Here is the next exciting installment from Jim Skelton, the Blind Squirrel, who is sharing his experiences as a financial advisor with us. As with all of our contributors, the opinions he expresses are his own, and we haven’t reviewed, approved or screened his ideas. His previous articles can be seen here.

Greetings once again to all citizens of the Gumshoe Nation, far and wide. You may recall that a couple weeks back I wrote Part One – Paradise Gained – of this story of my involvement as a financial advisor (FA) with a young man that had big dreams of becoming a successful investment manager. If you missed that you can go here to get yourself up to speed. Now, let’s get on with the story.

When we last left Kurt, he was riding pretty high on the successes he had achieved in his model portfolio. The dozen or so picks he had made were all doing fine – well, maybe not all, but most were – and the super-sized return he got from Telephonos de Mexico had really propelled his average annual return calculations for the portfolio into the stratosphere. But TFONY was now behind us and Kurt was seeking the next big winner. And in addition, he had decided to put the portfolio on margin so he could leverage his returns using that method. Margin trading can be fine when all things work. But it will be a real bear if they don’t.

Kurt was unconcerned about the possibilities of anything going wrong it seemed. As 1987 progressed, the market kept its general uptrend intact, a trend that had held sway since mid-1984. And as you know, a rising tide lifts all boats. In those circumstances, a lot of people get fooled into thinking the gains they are getting are a direct result of their own stock picking prowess and not just that of the market trend. Kurt’s boat was no exception, and it was hard to tell if that was due to his powers of equity analysis or just a friendly market environment. Whatever the real reason, he was growing the account.

Then in early spring of that year he called me, quite excited. He had been researching and following a new company that was totally on fire. A new concept that was taking the nation by storm with revenues and profits anticipated to soar. And the stock price was zooming up along with all the news and hype. Kurt wanted in. Now, before the price got any further out of reach, as he was certain it was bound to do.

The company that had caught his attention was a revolutionary concept company that really was sweeping the nation by storm. It traded under the symbol HSN. Yep, Home Shopping Network, the precursor to what we know of today as purchasing on the Internet. Except, of course, there was no Internet back then, no real private ownership of personal computers as of yet.  Michael Dell and Bill Gates were still kids tinkering with an idea that was in its infancy. But HSN didn’t need any of that. It ran programming all day and night long on secondary TV channels offering people anywhere the opportunity to buy all manner of gizmos and gee-gaws if they had a phone with which to call an order in. And brother, the calls were flooding in! Especially from more rural areas where people didn’t have much access to the brick and mortar stores where they could easily shop. The primary driver of this movement came from stay-at-home housewives who were starved for the ability to shop for and buy the things they wanted or needed – or at least they felt they wanted or needed. The marketers for the programming were genius in creating a sense of urgency to buy. Buy most anything. Especially pretty and sparkly things. Women became transfixed with this new opportunity and sat and watched all day and night long to be sure they didn’t miss out on something they might see a neighbor wearing or using the very next week. It was a stampede to call and buy. And this soaring enthusiasm drove the idea that this company simply had discovered a true gold mine. But never mind that the stock price was trading without any yet reported earnings and that it was near impossible to do any sort of actual financial analysis. Everything was based on perception and belief in the future. And Kurt perceived much greater things to come.

Problem was, he had used most of the margin money he could access. I was a little worried about the possibility of a margin call if we hit a rough patch in the market. Kurt had indicated that he didn’t really have any additional fresh funds as of yet to deposit if that happened, so we’d be forced to liquidate positions in that event to cover the requirements. But he was not worried. If HSN kept the run-up intact he figured the margin debt could be covered, at least in part, by the profits sure to come from that source. And, if necessary, he could always close out a position or two of his lesser performing holdings to cover. Or perhaps even find some new money to bring in. With those options at his disposal he just didn’t see the real risk.

At the time of his call HSN was trading at an all-time high around $52.00 p/s. He directed me to buy 500 shares at market. This took his margin debt to within about 5% of max available, a razor thin margin for error. I made the buy as he instructed.

Over the next three or four days the price continued its drive upward. When it hit about $63.00, I felt I had to call him and discuss. Such a quick gain, a gain of such size, and in a stock where we had no real idea what the value actually could be, well, I felt I ought at least point that out to him. And frankly, I thought that quick gain should be taken and used to give us more breathing room re the margin debt. And even though we were still operating under his original instructions to me that I was not there to give advice, just service, I called anyway. I told him of the progress (he already knew that) but I once again pointed out that these sort of fast-movers could turn on a dime and wipe out all profits in a heartbeat. I recommended selling the position for reason stated above. He hesitated, uncertain, but in the end agreed it was a smart thing to do. Whether or not it would prove to be the right thing only time would tell. I sold the 500 shares around $63.00 that afternoon. Nice little profit – and you can’t go broke taking a profit last time I checked.

I bet you know what is going to happen next, don’t you? You know – seemingly happens every time something like this takes place. Yes indeed, the very next day HSN opened UP about $2.00 from the previous close. It wasn’t long before my phone rang and there was Kurt. The first words out of his mouth were the exact same ones every one of us has used more times that we can count. He blurted out “I KNEW it, I just KNEW it!” He went on to say more such things about how he ought have held, that the stock was headed to at least $100 before year-end, etc., etc., etc. But he wasn’t angry with me. Kurt was a good guy, a reasonable investor. He knew that at the end of any discussion the decisions were his to make, and he took responsibility for that. God bless him – if only everyone had that point of view.

Kurt wanted back in, right then. He gave me an order to sell a couple other positions he was holding to raise additional funds, then use the proceeds from the previous sale of HSN to buy as many shares as he could. After some quick back-of-the-napkin figuring, we found he could shoehorn 1500 shares into the account at current prices. That would make HSN the single largest holding in the account, something near 20% or so as best I recall. A real overweight by any measure. So, on his instruction, I made the buy and vowed to myself to keep my big mouth shut going forward as he had asked me to do from the get-go. This was his baby, and he was in the driver’s seat. I was just along for the ride. Or so I thought.

As seems so often the case, Kurt’s buyback that day proved to be within $1.00 of what became the all-time high for the stock. The frenzy had broken and the selling began. Reality took hold. As it broke below $55.00, Kurt called and bought more. A couple weeks later, with the price in the $40’s, he did that again, selling off more of his core holdings to finance the buy. He was still firmly convinced this was mere profit-taking and as soon as that wave passed the stock would resume its ascent. He didn’t want to be left out of this terrific buying opportunity.

When the stock broke below $35.00, I called him. I knew he wouldn’t want to hear what I had to say, but I felt it must be said. This thing was a train wreck and he was refusing to accept reality. I wanted him to close out that position at whatever price we could get, eliminate the margin debt, and start over. Based on my calculations at the time, Kurt would come out with just a few thousand dollars more than his original deposit. We could began again. Better that than continue this madness. So I rang him up and told him exactly how I felt. He listened. He reminded me that the last time I had recommended he sell, the price jumped up the very next day. I couldn’t argue that – it was true. But I was too late in the effort anyway. By now Kurt had retreated to that final-defense emotional castle that all too many investors find themselves in when things go wrong and, to correct that, they have to admit to some errors in judgement. He simply said that the stock “had” to recover. Had to, you see. I asked why he thought it “had to” come back as he put it. No good answer, just that it must. Kurt was in full-blown denial and, like the Captain of the Titanic, was determined to ride it out to the end.

All of the aforementioned took place from the start of 1987 and ran through late summer. HSN stock stabilized somewhat and Kurt was sure the worst was past. A recovery would get underway soon he thought, and having bought in all the way down, he had positioned the portfolio for terrific gains as HSN rose to and surpassed the old highs. I prayed such would be the case, but some research reports that were coming out made a solid case for why this wasn’t a $100.00 stock, but one more like a $10.00 stock at best. I passed this information on as requested but it had no effect. He was in it to win it come hell or high water.

Then, one day soon thereafter, a miracle occurred. I opened the account one morning and there, to my great surprise, was a wire transfer in for another $100,000.00! Most of the margin debt was eliminated. It was a new day. I immediately called Kurt to see what had happened. He told me that he had secured a loan from an investor to shore up the account for now, in exchange for some sort of convoluted agreement to profit-share in the master account when it returned to its past days of out-sized gains. I really didn’t understand all he was telling me about how this was supposed to work, who that mystery investor was, etc. But I didn’t have to understand. It was done and Kurt was back on top of the world. All we had do now was wait for a return to normalcy and things would be as he always said they would. He even told me, good-natured, that I needed some chill pills so I could stop worrying so much. Secretly, I was by then wishing I had some of those mythical remedies, but I didn’t. So I kept worrying.

Oh yes – this, too. Instead of just letting this fresh cash satisfy the margin debt, he decided to do something a little different. Since this raised the amount he could access on margin again, he used $50,000 to buy more HSN at a price in the low $30’s! Just when he had the relief he needed, he used half of that to add to the problem rather than solve it. I couldn’t believe what I was hearing when he gave me that order. But he did, so I did as instructed and required. It’s a very serious violation for a broker to ignore a legitimate order an investor places. I liked my job and wanted to keep it.

When that settled, I took the past six month’s statements on the account and had a sit-down with my office manager. I felt it prudent to have him in the loop as to what had been going on just in case the world collapsed and I needed somebody in my corner that had knowledge of what I had done and why. I hadn’t done anything at all wrong in the dealings with Kurt, but wanted someone else to be up to speed on the sequence of events and outcomes in the small chance I would find that helpful. We reviewed the account activity, where things stood at the moment, and I recall his final words clearly. He said (I paraphrase), “Look, Jim, he is an adult in full charge of what is happening. He knows exactly where he stands. He makes the decisions and all trades have been clearly marked as unsolicited. He gets his confirms and statements. We’re his broker, not his Mommy.” I felt a sense of relief knowing he had my back, just in case. To back it all up, the manager sent Kurt a polite letter informing him that we had discussed the account and inviting Kurt to call and speak with him (the manager) anytime he wished.

I’m going to skip additional detail from that day forward right up to that awful, disasterous day of October 19, 1987. Black Monday. The Great Crash of ’87. Dow dropped 508 points to 1739, a decline of 29%. In one single day. You think the DJIA dropping 350 points in a day in today’s market is newsworthy? Trust me, in historical perspective, it’s hardly worth mention. Not since the Crash of 1929 had anything even remotely like this been experienced. Bedlam reigned supreme. Mr. Market had finally gone berserk, slaying anything and everything that got in his way. It was useless to try and get a quote. Nobody could say what anything was trading for at any moment. Quotron screens (our old quote system) just flashed and sputtered at random, and nothing you saw on them could be relied upon. Wire operators had stacks of orders waiting input (all was done manually at that time) as brokers screamed in the halls for fills. We were finding the answer to the age old question of “What’s the worst that could happen?” Now we knew, and the answer was unbelievably ugly. You just had to be in the fray to really understand what we went through that day and for the next few trading days as well. I’ll have a complete column someday on just those five days in October to try and give you a sense of what went on from the brokers’ standpoint and the investors that were being slaughtered.

But back now to Kurt. By now it was the following Wednesday and I hadn’t heard from him. And what with all the fires I was trying to get under control, working 16/18 hour days, he wasn’t my only concern. Many other people needed and deserved counsel and advice. At times like that, a little “hand holding,” if sincere, goes a long way to calming the waters. Besides, I had looked at the smoking shell hole that once was his account and found that, with the decline in price across the board, he was now underwater entirely. He owed more than the remaining value of the positions. And a margin call was being issued to recover the money. There really wasn’t anything left to say.

About Thursday I got a “cc” of a letter from Merrill Corporate to Kurt telling him that he had 24 hours to deposit funds to cover the margin debt or his account would be liquidated to cover it for him. Problem was, the account value was short of the debt by some $21,000 or so. The following Friday Kurt finally called. I thought at first I was hearing some 90-year-old man on his deathbed. The voice was frail, weak, sad beyond description. He had gotten the letter and had no way to cover the debt. I pulled up the account and found that the liquidation had already taken place anyway. Our run was done. Paradise Lost. He talked with me a little more, asking if there was anything I could do. Of course, there wasn’t. We hung up shortly after that with me wondering about what would happen regarding the $21,000 shortfall. I didn’t have the stomach at that moment to even bring that up. I knew Merrill would take care of it for me. And they did.

About two weeks later I got what was to be the next-to-final call from Kurt I was to ever get. If anything, he sounded weaker and more defeated than before. I could actually hear the tears in his quavering voice, and the absolute desperation and depression he was feeling. He had gotten the letter from Merrill regarding the shortfall and demanding immediate payment. Failing that, they would began legal proceedings to recover the losses. And that was when I got the full story, the entire truth, of the account and Kurt from his own mouth.

Kurt just opened up and the story poured out. That initial $100,000 deposit that he implied he had accumulated from some trading he had done? Not so. That was the inheritance he had gotten from his Grandfather a few months previous. It was now all gone. And that wire transfer to cover the margin debt from some unnamed investor? The “investor” turned out to be his own father who, upon hearing of Kurt’s situation, cashed in all his retirement savings and gave it to his son with assurances it would be repaid. Now Dad was broke as well, a lifetime of savings wiped away in a flash, and Kurt with no way of repayment. And as for his “experience” in the markets, there really wasn’t any at all before he opened the account with me. And as for those contacts he was prospecting for opening managed accounts with him as the manager, not a single one ever signed up. The only thing he really ever had was that beautiful business card and a boatload of confidence that this was an easy way to riches. So it turned out that Kurt, nice guy that he was notwithstanding, had not only lost his future in the attempt, but had also dragged his mother and father along with him – and that was what was truly crushing his spirit, indeed his will to live. After all this came out he did one final thing. The most heart-wrenching thing anyone up to that time had asked of me. With a voice filled with what I thought to be sincere intent, he implied that if Merrill kept after him for that remaining $21,000 he just could not take it. The reality of what he had done now sat on his soul like a huge cold stone and he could see no way out. The implication of that was left hanging in the air like a very bad smell that won’t go away. I was convinced that this was a young man was on the verge of suicide. I had to try to do something, what I didn’t know. I realized that this was a call that should have been answered by some suicide hot line, not a regular guy like me with absolutely no training in how to deal with people in this state of mind. I told him to hang in for a week or so and I’d do what I could about the debt, but not to expect miracles. It was a just and legal debt and I had never heard of anything other than monetary satisfaction that made it go away. When we hung up I seriously wondered if I’d ever hear of Kurt again.

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


Having no other thoughts about what I could do to help, I took the demand letter to the manager and we discussed it. Thank God I had made that earlier visit with him about Kurt and the account. He was up to speed on who and what I was talking about. After I ran it all by him, explaining as best I could what I felt was a likely outcome for Kurt if this demand of payment continued, I left it in his hands. I had done all I could. And I had a cold chill running up my spine in anticipation of what might come next.

In early November I got cc’d on another letter from Merrill corporate to Kurt regarding the debt. To my absolute amazement, Merrill had decided to stop the collection process and forgive the remaining balance. They most certainly weren’t going to refund any part of the losses, but they were willing to let this go. I made my way quickly into the managers office, letter in hand, and showed it to him. And gave my profuse thanks for his help. I don’t know what buttons he pushed or who he spoke with, but he pulled Kurt’s chestnuts out of this final fire to be sure.

It was perhaps a month later that I got my final call from Kurt. He had gotten the letter of forgiveness. He was so very grateful for this kindness. And he was in a better mental state. His voice was stronger, his attitude a little recovered from those last desperate days when we last spoke. Kurt had meanwhile been able to secure employment as a concierge at one of the 5-Star Monaco Hotels and Casinos. As part of the comp package, they gave him a small efficiency apartment on site and two meals a day. That is no small thing, living rent-free in those surroundings and eating out of a 4-star kitchen even if your table is in the kitchen itself. Plus a paycheck each week. A new start at life, and far better than having to take some menial job in the Tuscan sun all day. In appreciation for what he thought I had gotten done for him, he invited me and my wife to come for a visit anytime we wanted and he’d see to getting us comped for a room and such. I would have loved to take him up on that one day but never did. Even with the room covered, a trip to Monaco is going to be very expensive no matter what- air fare, meals, casino slush fund, car rental, etc. But the offer was sincere and appreciated. We talked awhile more about life and the future we both hoped to find and rang off. I never spoke to Kurt again. I hope his future got brighter as these many years have now passed.

So endth the tale of Paradise Found – Paradise Lost. Hope you learned something from the telling. Here are a couple takeaways you may notice:

1) Confidence in one’s abilities is necessary for success. Overconfidence, however, can destroy. As Clint Eastwood once said in one of his “Dirty Harry” movies, “A man’s got to know his limitations.” Come to know yours and live within them. I always try to recognize my own and live (and invest) accordingly.

2) Don’t let one big investment success lead you to thinking that it will be repeatable. Or that it happened due to your own superior intellect. It might. But it probably won’t. Letting that big hit convince you that this stuff is easy is a sure and certain road to oblivion. Mr. Market is always watching for people like that. He’s ready to teach a lesson they will never forget. Just ask Kurt.

3) If you trade on margin, do so sparingly and carefully. If and when things go south, even though temporary in duration, it can destroy a portfolio entirely. Be absolutely certain you can sustain the loss and not be destroyed in the process. And for the love of God, never, ever let yourself get underwater.

4) Always, always, tell your FA the truth of your personal financial situation. I can’t emphasize this too much. In fact, I will someday write an entire column on how an investor should approach dealing with a full service broker if they desire, and what to share with them. The questions they ask during the initial interview (the profiling session) may seem intrusive but there is a good reason for asking. And if they aren’t asked, you need to seek another advisor – my opinion. Don’t try to impress him/her with inflated figures of net worth, or of experience, or of risk tolerance, or of goals. If your FA is operating and advising under a false set of information about you, the odds of them giving you the advice you need is greatly diminished. You only hurt yourself and gain nothing in return.

Until next time, all the best to all of you. And stay tuned for the next chapter of the Blind Squirrel Diaries. I’ve got some suggestions for organizing your holdings that just might make your evaluations of performance more effective and helpful. See ya in February!

Jim Skelton
The Blind Squirrel

“Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn every now and then”

guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

57 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ron Dwyhalo
Member
Ron Dwyhalo
January 27, 2014 2:15 pm

Your job as an FA was to prevent the client from BLOWING himself up, instead you let the client FUEL IT! Never-mind what the client was thinking….what WERE YOU THINKING!! How is your story going to enlighten anyone to what should have been done???

jonomalley
Member
January 27, 2014 9:11 pm
Reply to  Ron Dwyhalo

What a puffed up comment. I think he made it very clear that he tried to the point of exhaustion to protect his client. In the end he had to let his client fail. Besides, who says failure and going broke are the worst things? I’m getting rich because I failed and learned great lessons. I learned lessons I’ll never fail to remember. Lessons I wouldn’t and couldn’t have learned any other way than by experiencing miserable failure. Who’s to say Kurt didn’t recover and become wildly successful?
Great story, Jim. I appreciate the lessons very much. And I’ll never ever trade on margin!

👍 88
Terry
Guest
Terry
January 28, 2014 3:41 pm
Reply to  jonomalley

Hear Here! He tried repeatedly to help his client in this great story that reads like a novel. I too have learned some (very) expensive lessons that I will never forget and that are now enriching me. Wish I had known then what I know now…but would I have listened?

investor101
Irregular
April 13, 2014 5:37 pm
Reply to  jonomalley

Wholeheartedly agree! My husband once did this with his broker and it was not a happy ending either!

👍 38
Harley
Guest
Harley
January 27, 2014 2:18 pm

Enjoyed article!
As per my post on part one, I was going to add that he was probably working at the casinos!

Ron Dwyhalo
Member
Ron Dwyhalo
January 27, 2014 2:20 pm

As an investment manager, my commitment to my clients, is to prevent what happen to yours…..even if it means LOSING the client!!!

Ron Dwyhalo
Member
Ron Dwyhalo
January 27, 2014 2:25 pm

It’s amazing that you & Merrill were not sued by your client for GROSS negligence …..or was that why they for gave the $21k ?

Meg in Minneapolis
January 27, 2014 10:52 pm
Reply to  Ron Dwyhalo

Ron…My guess is that you are thinking only of our current investment scene, with most of us making all orders online and NEVER interacting with a broker. But in 1987, all trades were made with the help of a broker…and most client-broker relationships did NOT involve management of assets or advise for investments. For myself, I recall one exception to this declaration. On this occasion, I had phoned to place an order for CSCO (a ticker symbol that I had seen in the newspaper, as it posted gains each day that week). The broker had never heard of it. I held on as he checked with other brokers in the office. Not one broker had heard of CSCO, so he cautioned me not to complete my order. I ordered it anyway. And I surely do not fault the broker for allowing me to order CSCO. ..an unknown, wee company on the verge of failing or of greatness.

Blind Squirrel….I very much enjoyed your cautionary tale, and appreciated the attitudes toward investing that you conveyed.

Steve B
Steve B
January 27, 2014 3:04 pm

I credit Jim with providing an excellent cautionary story that any new investor would be wise to heed. I also suspect that ethical protocols for brokers have been tightened over the intervening years to be more assertive with a client that is obviously behaving irresponsibly or irrationally. The client in this case misrepresented his own financial situation and risk tolerances, and refused good advice, all of which definitely contributed to his downfall. In the final analysis, everyone is ultimately responsible for his own decisions, and should not need a printed warning on his drive-through coffee cup that coffee is hot.

Add a Topic
3838
Add a Topic
3838
Ron Dwyhalo
Member
Ron Dwyhalo
January 27, 2014 4:44 pm
Reply to  Steve B

His job was to PREVENT the client from DESTROYING himself

Peter Whimsey
Irregular
Peter Whimsey
February 3, 2014 11:38 am
Reply to  Ron Dwyhalo

Ron is correct. The legal issues are somewhat complicated because the broker was technically not making a “recommendation” to purchase HSN, but the ethical issue is not. Brokers at full service firms have significant obligations to their clients, and they did so in 1987 as well. How many hundreds if not thousands of ads have you seen from full service firms telling you that they are the experts, they will navigate the difficult investment fields for you, they will take care of you, “one client at a time?” Those ads cost hundreds of millions of dollars. Full service firms make lots of money. If folks want to make investments on their own, they can go to discount shops (and could back then). They go to full service firms like they go to other “professionals”- they expect that they will be given sound advice about their investments. This is presumably a pretty sophisticated group of investors on this site, but margin is a very difficult concept for most people, no matter how educated or how successful in business. (One reason the markets are getting banged around so much right now is because margin debt was at an all time high.) The degree of risk associated with going all in with margin on just one speculative stock is off the charts, and most people (certainly not Kurt) are NOT capable of understanding that risk. Merrill Lynch, which made money on every purchase and every sale AND on the margin interest, should never, ever have allowed the client to get himself in a position to be ruined like this. But then in 1987 Merrill Lynch was a pretty tough shop- witness the branch manager’s comments here. I know a number of brokers who were with the firm back then, and Merrill was known for pushing product, i.e. pushing investments they wanted to sell (not what happened here- but just saying). Remember the ads about putting lipstick on the pig and then selling the pig. Most of the big firms are doing a better job today supervising their brokers and branch managers than they did back then, partially because they have been sued so many times for actions like this one. My guess is that top management at Merrill today would be horrified to hear this story, just like Ron was.

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
886
Add a Topic
886
👍 10
angryyachtchef
Guest
angryyachtchef
January 27, 2014 3:08 pm

His arrangement with the client was to supply data, not advice.

Y’all need to get off your high horses and read what was written.

Ron Dwyhalo
Member
Ron Dwyhalo
January 27, 2014 4:52 pm
Reply to  angryyachtchef

Dylan,
This broker is for you !!

Jim Dasher
January 27, 2014 3:14 pm

Hi Jim,
Question: Would a “straddle” type of trade been appropriate, to control the above situation
from happening, or would that not have been a viable means of protection, in such a terrible situation?

Thanks,
Jim D.

👍 192
John
Member
John
January 27, 2014 3:29 pm

know your client. note. “we were still operating under his original instructions to me that I was not there to give advice, just service” clients instruction and signed by him + accepted/approved by the brokerage.
refusal to execute an order given by a client is suicidal for any f.a.
what if it would have gone up?
there would be a very costly and legitimate complaint, with many costs to be borne by the unwilling f.a. to execute.
no win situation. at any point, investors must be responsible for their own actions, this was not a managed account.
deal with it or stay away.
shifting blame is only for cowards.
a signed agreement is exactly that.
gentlemen used to do this all the time.

Add a Topic
5916
dutchman
Irregular
dutchman
January 27, 2014 3:36 pm

I don’t think it was his responsibility and probably did more than he had to as he was told to execute the trades and keep his mouth shut. No FA is going to tell me to sell If I want to buy unless I would exceed the margin(which I dont do).

👍 9
Michael Quinn
Member
January 27, 2014 3:59 pm

HI Jim, I think that’s when I started making money by following Bonner’s advice: “sell stocks and buy gold” I hope Kurt made restitution to his parents.

Add a Topic
210
Dumbfounded
Member
Dumbfounded
January 27, 2014 4:06 pm

I am dumbfounded. Where was the due diligence on the part of the broker?
The family should sue. At a minimum margin purchases should subject the client to a more thorough examination and verification of his assets, not to mention explanation of risk
The brokers judgement is mirrored by the fact that he wrote this article as well

Malcolm Jensen
Guest
Malcolm Jensen
January 27, 2014 4:40 pm
Reply to  Dumbfounded

“Dumbfounded” is right. Of course, suing is the other great American casino (close behind Wall street), but no such suit would have a prayer, even if brought with the help of a skillful unprincipled attorney.

Add a Topic
4330
Tim Hunter
Member
Tim Hunter
January 27, 2014 10:27 pm
Reply to  Malcolm Jensen

“Dumbfounded” is the typical American jerk, where something YOU BRING UPON YOURSELF is ALWAYS someone else’s fault. Do you suppose he could build a bridge and get over it?? Once the FA told Kurt to get out of the stock, how much more due DILIGENCE might be needed??? The attitude expressed by “Dumbounded” is the one that will take us all straight down the tubes–as we sue each other for the fall.
And thanks to Malcolm for the great quip about the American casino! 🙂

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
4330
👍 192
Jim Hasak
January 27, 2014 5:26 pm

Thanks for the pair of articles – even though you did leave us hanging for a couple of weeks after the first part!

I don’t understand the eagerness of several posters to point the finger. You did what you were hired to do, and then some. Personally, I have endured some pretty fantastic losses from time to time, but I never played the blame game. What your boss said is correct, and is a good takeaway for everyone: “[The investor] is an adult in full charge of what is happening. He knows exactly where he stands. He makes the decisions and all trades have been clearly marked as unsolicited. He gets his confirms and statements. We’re his broker, not his Mommy.”

arch1
January 27, 2014 8:56 pm

Our life is a game we play where the rules keep changing. Biblical admonition– “time and unforeseen occurrence befall us all”. The only ‘sure thing’ in investing is that you will lose if you rely on sure things. You cannot evade the law of unintended consequences. Do any of these apply to paradise narrative?

👍 7797
arch1
January 27, 2014 9:02 pm

Ps. Be glad you don’t get all the government you are paying for. More laws could have made the outcome worse; so much for suing for redress

👍 7797
arch1
January 27, 2014 9:27 pm

If you try to ‘foolproof’ the world all you gain is more fools. If market analysts and
various other advisers were really all that competent they would be busy investing for themselves instead of working for others (my opinion)

👍 7797
Larry Allbritton
Member
Larry Allbritton
January 27, 2014 9:54 pm

Jim Hasak is entirely correct, you did leave us hanging a coule of weeks. Oh, and he was also correct in saying you did all you were supposed to do and then some.

Blind Guide
Member
Blind Guide
January 27, 2014 10:53 pm

OUCH…What a painful lesson for young ‘Kurt’…and – perhaps – for Blind Squirrel as well in having made this ‘confession’ public!!
This may not be the venue for such a venture but – since this discussion has taken a turn toward ethics and morals already – I am going to ‘cast my bread upon the waters’ by offering a further ‘analysis’ of the take-aways one might gain from Kurt’s story as told by Blind Squirrel which is (IMHO) a nice bit of story-telling.
Kurt’s experiences reminded me very much of another story – a very old one – that I’ve read. It was recorded nearly 2000 years ago as having been the teaching of a then-obscure Jewish ‘prophet’ and is classically known today as the Parable of the Prodigal. Of course, not all the details are identical but – to anyone familiar with the parable – Kurt’s youthful personality traits, resultant choices and ensuing ‘mis-adventures’ are easily identified in that story so I won’t insult your intelligence by recounting them here except for two to I will return in a moment.
I will say first that I was taken by a couple ‘minor details’: 1) the generosity of Kurt’s grandfather and 2) the compassion of his father who ‘put it all on the line’. Obviously, Kurt was very much loved! Nevertheless, the take-away point I wish to propose is not merely “Love is the answer!” as the song says; instead; I would suggest that love is the problem.
“WHAT?!” you say? How so?
In another place in the same series of books in which the Parable was recorded, we are taught that “the love of money is the root of all evil” – mind you – not the money itself but the LOVE of it. Consider here Kurt’s and the Prodigal’s stories: so long as they were ‘in the chips’ in faraway lands, life was good; when ‘the market turned’ they were wallowing in the pig-pen of despair! Ergo: wealth was their measure of life.
What ‘saved’ them both was that each recognized the error of their ways, accepted responsibility and – on some level – repented and asked forgiveness.
Interestingly – in the tribal culture of the Prodigal – his demand for his portion of inheritance prior to the patriarch’s death was tantamount to saying to his father: “I wish you dead; you are dead to me!” Accordingly, it is surprising that he had the ‘hutzpah’ to return at all and explains fully why he knelt in repentance and offered himself a slave!
In Kurt’s case, the depth of his responsibility for having squandered his inheritance and his father’s retirement was poignant enough to cause him to nearly end his life. Fortunately- though it may have been just given the extent of monetary losses he inflicted on his father by his own selfishness – he did not succumb to that temptation for then his father’s and grandfather’s investments in him would have been utterly unrealized. Rather, he chose – and these are the two character traits I return to – he humbled himself and became grateful of his lot.
Now – like most of the Gumshoe Nation, I suppose – I read this blog in an effort to increase my (meager) ‘wealth’ or, at least, recover my IRA’s losses. Nevertheless, I would posit that the central take-away from Blind Squirrel’s ‘confession’ of his relationship with Kurt and of Kurt’s story is this: we are not defined by wealth or a lack of it; whatever our lot, let us be humbly grateful remembering always that we came into this world naked and will leave it in the same estate.
In another place in that same collection of books mentioned before and attributed to that same Jewish ‘prophet’ is this saying with which I will conclude my comments:
“Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal:
But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal:
For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.”
Matthew 6:19-21
King James Version (KJV)
Yes, LOVE is the answer…
Invest wisely!!

Add a Topic
1209
lrdrvr
Irregular
lrdrvr
January 28, 2014 3:10 pm
Reply to  Blind Guide

Blind Guide,

This is one of the most insightful comments I’ve read anywhere online in a long time.

Thank you.

👍 7
Blind Guide
Member
Blind Guide
January 29, 2014 9:46 pm
Reply to  lrdrvr

How kind you are, Irdrvr…thanks…you’re more than welcome to any encouragement I may have provided!
Frankly, I didn’t expect my comment to pass muster (moderation)…this is, after all, an investment blog and my commentary was decidedly off-topic…grateful to see that another perspective is allowable here!
And, glad to have ‘struck a chord’ with you…
All the best!

charlier1955
January 31, 2014 11:02 am
Reply to  Blind Guide

I can’t decide if I like Travis, his co writers, or the community he has built the most. There are very few publications where I real almost everything, including the comments. I love you all.

Here is the correct quote:
Please note “all kinds” should have been included.
1 Timothy 6:10
For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil. Some people, eager for money, have wandered from the faith and pierced themselves with many griefs.

It is always important to read a verse in context. Here is the whole chapter with that quote:
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Timothy+6&version=NIV

Thx Blind Guide

👍 43
Blind Guide
Member
Blind Guide
January 31, 2014 4:18 pm
Reply to  charlier1955

Hello Charles,
Thanks for your kind words and for sharing your insight & perspective on my usage of Paul’s letter to Timothy. Without making too much of it (I hope), I grew up with the KJV and whenever I pull from memory it is to that most-familiar translation my mind always goes. In that rendering – the KJV – my quotation is accurate. (Even a blind guide avoids the ditch some of the time!)
But ‘correct’?
I’ll come back to that in a moment.
Being personally comfortable with the now-arcane usage of the 2nd person in English, I find significant value in the KJV translation’s discrimination between formal 3rd-person and intimate 2nd-person language; nevertheless; I think it is interesting and often instructive to compare quotations in various renditions to – hopefully – gain a broader perspective. In this case, the KJV is precise and seems insistent that “the love of money is THE root of ALL evil” while the NIV is less specific or intense even though maintaining that “the love of money is A root of ALL KINDS of evils”. One might quibble over the apparent inconsistency of these details of scope; however; both are useful for instruction in ‘wholistic’ living – that is – living with an eye to the bigger picture of what life’s meaning and value may be.
In that regard, your admonition of reading in context is invaluable since all of the ‘tenets’ I mentioned in my previous post are included in 1 Timothy 6 as well as – by reference – the passage from Matthew 6 with which I closed (see v. 19) together with practical advice for application in daily living (see verses 17-18).
Now, as to the matter of ‘correctness’, I would direct your attention to another passage which – as does 1 Tim. 6:10 – also involves the issue of scope and conciseness (concision?): Isaiah 7:14. Herein, the prophecy of Jesus Christ’s entrance into this world is recorded. The NIV offers an alternative meaning to the word ‘virgin’; suggesting ‘young woman’ (in footnote b) as acceptable and that passage is referenced to the Gospel’s description of the actual event of Christ’s conception in Matthew 1:23. Admittedly, Mary was certainly a young woman; however; what is potentially at stake in my seemingly-unimportant ‘trivial pursuit’ of wording is the miracle of Christ’s ‘virgin birth’ and – by implication – His deity as well.
So, for ‘my money’, the KJV is the ‘better buy’ when ‘investing’ in Faith.
Again, it is so generous of you to have honored my post by having shared your interest & perspective and; thereby; to have offered me opportunity to opine further.
Thank you & invest wisely!

Add a Topic
635
Blind Guide
Member
Blind Guide
January 27, 2014 11:05 pm

Oops…please insert “which” between ‘to’ and ‘I will return in a moment…should’ve proof-read before hitting the POST button!!

👍 192
Gary W
Guest
Gary W
January 28, 2014 3:28 am

I lost seven figures in options in the 2000 dotcom bust. The options agreement I signed with Fidelity had all kinds of fine print absolving them of all liability. And I’m sure they didn’t mind the $56K in commissions I paid them over 10 months. However, in 1985-87 I was trading through a full-service broker, and he kept me from making trades that would have been very profitable. Bottom like, I still don’t know which was worse. I did however do quite well in 2009-2011, so I think it’s the market trend that matters most.

Add a Topic
570
Add a Topic
570
Add a Topic
3600
takeprofits
Irregular
January 28, 2014 10:08 am

Well said Jim, been there done that. You are absolutely right, “you can not please all of the people all of the time” and like you said, you can lead a horse to water but you can not make him drink.’ No matter how careful you are as a journalist or an analyst in your guidance, there will always be some people who make you want to tear your hair out in frustration at the conclusions they come too and actions they take. One has to have a pretty thick skin to operate in a public forum at the best of times, but I think your experience has valuable lessons for anyone at any level of life experience. As far as investing goes, I am always aware of the dangers of greed, I aim to take my profits out of the middle, i.e. making sure an up trend is firmly established before entering and selling at least half when I have a double. If I miss the bottom 20% and sell a little too early and miss the final 20% before a top, I do not obsess about it. By analogy it is like using public transit, if you miss one bus there will be another one along in a few minutes you can catch.
Greed and fear are 2 extremes you want to avoid like the plague and when you can recognize both and guard against them you are on the way to becoming a great investor.

Add a Topic
540
👍 418
investor101
Irregular
April 13, 2014 5:53 pm
Reply to  takeprofits

As a new investor, I find that Jim wrote a very informative article that I will make note of. We are all adults here and no one else in the whole world is responsible for the actions I decide to take with my life and my assets. I will always take away information from any encounter and make my decisions, hopefully not based on greed! We have lost so much money with different FA’s through the years, but never were of the opinion that we should sue them! Mr Market is very fickle! No blame cast for actions, from my point of view!

👍 38
Peter Whimsey
Irregular
Peter Whimsey
February 3, 2014 1:40 pm

Actually Ron is correct. And Mr. Skelton is digging the hole deeper. As Ron knows, and Jim should remember, in 1987 a broker’s relationship with his client was governed by Rule 405 of the New York Stock Exchange, the “know your customer rule.” The Rule, and subsequent rules today, require the broker to understand the investment his client is purchasing; he is not allowed to sell an investment that he doesn’t himself understand. So due diligence was (and is) REQUIRED. It is not a “dream world;” it is the real world. The notion that it was “difficult” back in the dark ages of the 1980’s to perform due diligence is not a defense. Furthermore, the notion that the broker back then was just too busy with all his accounts, and all his efforts to get more accounts, and all of the paperwork foisted upon him by his firm to properly look after his clients is extremely troubling. The proper response here, as Ron suggested, was to tell Kurt that neither you nor your firm had performed proper due diligence with respect to HSN, that the investment, plus margin, that he wanted to make were crazy risky, and that if he still wanted to do them, he needed to find another firm. The proper response was not to put your head in the sand and continue to take his money in the form of commissions and margin interest until he blew up his life.

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
144
👍 10
arch1
February 3, 2014 2:43 pm
Reply to  Peter Whimsey

John; I admit great ignorance in investing, stock market,etc. How well has what you say worked since 2007 til now & for stock holders of GM, Chrysler, Detroit & so on?

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
5971
👍 7797
arch1
February 3, 2014 2:48 pm
Reply to  Peter Whimsey

John;addendum In my ignorance I did not mention bond holders & perhaps equate bonds with riskiness of stock market.

Add a Topic
718
Add a Topic
5971
👍 7797
Peter Whimsey
Irregular
Peter Whimsey
February 4, 2014 9:23 am
Reply to  arch1

Not sure I understand your question? If part of your question is should brokers have been able to foresee that the government would illegally favor the unions over the bondholders of GM and Chrysler, the answer is absolutely not.

👍 10
sfimar
sfimar
January 27, 2014 11:47 pm

I liked the article and it has some great learnings…I belive there are many people nowadays thinking they are some kind of genius because their portfolio is going up up up…but sometimes you have to remember “it’s the market, stupid”…hehe
Anyway, I think these articles are a nice contribution to SGShoe webiste….by the way, I like SGShoe more and more every day/week…nice things going on here…

Cheers,
James

👍 150

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

More Info  
4
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x