Become a Member

written by reader Technical analysis

By hipockets, October 26, 2014

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS OF THE FINANCIAL MARKETS was mentioned weeks ago by another Irregular as an excellent reference for technical analysis (TA). ( I apologize for not being able to give him credit, but I could not find his name by searching SGS.) I bought the book because of his recommendation and because the book has 4 1/2 stars (out of 5) on Amazon. After starting to study it, I realized that reviewing the book might be a way to say “Thank You” to the Irregulars who are teaching me so much. I hope everybody finds this useful. If you don’t, you can complain to our CEO! :)

Before I get started – Joe, I was very disappointed when I found that Marxism was never mentioned. Not once! :)

The book was written by John H. Murphy; Revised 1999; New York Institute of Finance; IBSN 0-7352-006-1. Amazon’s price for a new book is about $55. Used books, as of today’s date, are available for between $25 and $30. The book has 542 pages, 19 chapters, and 4 appendices, all of which are listed at the end of this review.

To briefly sum up this review: I am glad that I bought the book. I have started using some of the techniques, and I’m convinced that it was money well spent. However, one wishing to learn TA cannot expect to read the book once and then magically be able to read charts. There must be a willingness to study the techniques and perhaps read some of the chapters more than once. Murphy says repeatedly that that the ability of analyze charts comes only with experience. TA is not a Holy Grail for guaranteeing stock performance, but I believe it has its uses.

The first edition, published in 1986, was TECHNICAL ANALYSIS OF THE FUTURES MARKETS. Although it did not specifically talk about stocks, many of the techniques can be used for either one. This second edition, published in 1999, contains much of the information from the first one, but there is much new information and the emphasis, of course, is on stocks. The differences between TA for futures and TA for stocks are well explained.

To benefit readers new to TA, one sentence from Chapter 5, and one from Chapter 6, might have been better placed early in Chapter 1. From Chapter 5: “The analyst must face the realization that he or she is dealing with percentages and probabilities. . . .” From Chapter 6: “The treatment of all chart patterns deals of necessity with general tendencies as opposed to rigid rules”.

The Good: A lot.

>> Murphy discusses many of the popular TA techniques in easy to understand language (usually, anyway, see the comment about “Elliot Wave Theory” below). Investors with no or little knowledge of TA and wanting to learn will find it invaluable. Investors who already use TA will probably learn additional techniques and at a minimum learn some nuances and variations of the techniques that they already use. There is a plethora of easy-to-read charts illustrating the techniques (easy to read except for some “Point and Figure” charts, see below), with explanations under each chart. The text font is large and easy to read.

The Bad: Not much. A few brabbles, just to be picky:

>> I earlier stated that the charts are easy to read. An exception: some of the ”Point and Figure” charts used a small font in order to pack as much data into the chart as possible. Sometimes the font size was so small that I had to use a magnifying glass.

>> I would like to have several practice charts at the end of most chapters with the question: “What is this chart telling us, and why?”

>> I would like to have a chapter on “Risk Analysis”, but since the risk would vary according to the expertise of the chart reader, I suppose such a chapter would not be possible.

>> I would like to have some discussion about the frequency of techniques occurring, e.g., “A head and shoulders pattern occurs roughly ”X” % of the time”. I would like it, but it probably can’t be done, once again due to the expertise of the chart reader. You might recognize a head and shoulders pattern, but I might not see any pattern at all.

>> The biggest complaint that I have is that Chapter 15, “Computers and Trading Systems”, says very little about software packages for PCs, although “Trade Station” is mentioned in the Chapter and later in Appendix C. I download end-of-day data daily and update my charts manually; I was hoping to find a review of some low cost software packages that would automate the procedure.

This is not a criticism of the book, but I feel that TA often would be of little use in working with microcaps. TA uses as its basis the buying and selling actions (derived from sales price and volumes) of shareholders. My thinking: The fewer the shares, the more the actions (warranted or otherwise) of a small number of shareholders can almost instantaneously affect the price. Conversely, I think TA would be of great benefit when investing in behemoths like JNJ.

Whole chapters are devoted to the basic concepts of many of the techniques. Murphy does not dive deeply into some of the topics, since some, such as Japanese Candlesticks and Elliot Wave Theory, have had whole books written about them. He lists several resources for such topics in one of the appendices.

After explaining the basics of a technique, he frequently writes about or mentions variations of the technique. When explaining RSI, “While 9 and 14 day spans are the most common values used…..some use shorter lengths, such as 5 or 7 days, to increase volatility….[or] 21 or 58 days to smooth out the RSI signals.” Also, he frequently mentions ways to confirm a signal. Many variations of moving averages are discussed.

Chapter 1 starts with a definition: “TA is the study of market action, primarily through the use of charts, for the purpose of forecasting future price trends”. It then lists the three basic assumptions of TA:
1. Market action discounts everything.
2. Prices move in trends.
3. History repeats itself.

(I think “History can repeat itself” or “History often repeats itself ” is more likely. :) )

There is a discussion about the differences between fundamental analysis and TA. Murphy says that, in essence, the fundamentals of a stock are built into the chart. “The fundamentalist studies the cause of market movement, while the technician studies the effect.” Later in the book, he says that charts are often leading indicators of changes in fundamentals and gives a few examples.

Chapter 13, which discusses Elliot Wave analysis, is hard for me to understand, although it seems to me to be a souped-up (I checked the spelling! :) ) version of moving averages. The basic theory is well explained—price movements come in 5 advancement (up) waves and 3 correction (down) waves. Then there are 9 different levels of magnitude. Etc. There are several explanatory charts — the thing that eludes me is how to easily apply the technique to buying/selling a stock. Since I am new to charting, and since this is a complicated topic, I will wait till I master the simpler techniques before getting into this one.

Gumlandians probably will not use the concepts of time cycles (Chapter 14) unless they are long-term investors, but it’s interesting to read about them. “. . . 37 different examples of the 9.6 year cycle, including caterpillar abundance in New Jersey, coyote abundance in Canada, wheat acreage in the U.S., and cotton prices in the U.S. . . . acted in synchrony ; that is, they turned at the same time. . . .” Seasonal cycles, typical stock market cycles, and the January Barometer are some of the topics worth reading.

Chapter 18 discusses evaluating the market as a whole and why it is important. Techniques such as the Advance-Decline Line and the McClellan Oscillator are discussed, and I found the information about comparing the various market averages very educational. If the comparison is to be meaningful, there is more to it than one would think.

Chapter 19 presents a 23 item check list that can be used when thinking about buying or selling. At first, I found the checklist to be intimidating, but after re-reading it, I saw that much of it would become second nature after understanding the techniques discussed in the previous chapters.

I will close by repeating the statement that “I’m glad that I bought the book”, and saying, “ Alan, I hope you were not overloaded with complaints! ”

Here’s the Table of Contents:

Chapter 1 Philosophy of Technical Analysis
Chapter 2 Dow Theory
Chapter 3 Chart Construction
Chapter 4 Basic Concepts of Trend
Chapter 5 Major Trend Reversals

Chapter 6 Continuation Patterns
Chapter 7 Volume and Open Interest
Chapter 8 Long Term Charts
Chapter 9 Moving Averages
Chapter 10 Oscillators and Contrary Opinion

Chapter 11 Point and Figure Charting
Chapter 12 Japanese Candlesticks
Chapter 13 Elliot Wave Theory
Chapter 14 Time Cycles
Chapter 15 Computers and Trading Systems

Chapter 16 Money Management and Trading Tactics
Chapter 17 The Link Between Stocks and Futures:
Intermarket Analasis
Chapter 18 Stock Market Indicators
Chapter 19 Putting It Altogether – A Checklist

Appendix A Advanced Technical Indicators
Appendix B Market Profile
Appendix C The Essentials of Building a Trading System
Appendix D Continuous Futures Contracts
Plus Glossary, Selected Bibliography, Selected Resources, and Index.

fini

This is a discussion topic or guest posting submitted by a Stock Gumshoe reader. The content has not been edited or reviewed by Stock Gumshoe, and any opinions expressed are those of the author alone.

guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

432 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
sandiegojp
December 1, 2014 9:30 pm

Re: $CLDN chart analysis
TSM- No trade
P/V- Higher vol. and range. Close near Low (26% off). Lower High, Low, Close and Open. EMAs rising with 50EMA flattening. Close above EMAs. Fast crossed < Slow and falling. Slow flat. MACDH crossed < 0. 2FI <0 and falling. Low at Support level. Ease of downward movement. Buyers could not take 11/28 High. Position of Close indicates Sellers in charge. For the record, yesterday’s “call” was RIGHT. This is NOT a recommendation to BUY/SELL CLDN. Full disclosure: Long CLDN.

👍 491
sandiegojp
December 2, 2014 12:59 am

Re: $CTIX chart analysis
TSM- No trade
P/V- Higher vol. and range. Close near 1/2 way (44% off Low). Higher High and Open. Lower Low and Close. EMAs rising. Fast rising and crossing > Slow. MACDH crossing over 0. 2FI<0 and falling. Wide range today setting 52-wk high ($3.67). Buyers could hold high nor could seller hold low. Position of close indicates fairly even tug-of-war with slight advantage to sellers. Wide range was achieved within the first 15 minutes of trading. Close > EMAs and $0.01 < 11/28 Close. Sellers in charge. For the record, yesterday’s “call” was WRONG. This is NOT a recommendation to BUY/SELL CTIX. Full disclosure: Long CTIX.

👍 491
sandiegojp
December 2, 2014 1:08 am

Re: $ESPR chart analysis
TSM- No trade
P/V- Higher vol. and range. Close near Low (5% off). Lower High, Low, Close and Open. EMAs rising. Fast 0. MACDH <0 and falling. 2FI<0 and falling. Close just above 22-EMA and ~support. Sellers in charge.
For the record, yesterday’s “call” was WRONG.
This is NOT a recommendation to BUY/SELL ESPR. Full disclosure: Long ESPR.

👍 491
sandiegojp
December 2, 2014 1:15 am

Re: $GILD
TSM- No trade
P/V – Higher vol. and range. Close nearer Low (35% off). Higher High, Low and Close. Lower Open. EMAs falling with 50EMA>22EMA. Fast0 and rising. 3rd day that closes are close together. Evidence of entering a trading range? Buyers mildly in charge.
For the record, yesterday’s “call” was RIGHT.
This is NOT a recommendation to BUY/SELL GILD. Full disclosure: Long GILD.

👍 491
sandiegojp
December 2, 2014 1:24 am

Re: $NBY chart analysis
TSM- No trade
P/V- TSM order not filled. Higher vol. and range. Close at Low. Lower High and Close. Open and Low at 11/28 levels. EMAs and Fast and Slow falling (strong sell signal). Fast < Slow. Both <0 and falling. MACDH <0 and falling. 2FI<0 and falling. Sellers in charge all day. Close at Low indicates sellers strongly in charge. For the record, yesterday’s “call” was WRONG. This is NOT a recommendation to BUY/SELL NBY. Full disclosure: Long NBY.

👍 491
sandiegojp
December 2, 2014 1:37 am

Re: $XENE chart analysis
TSM-No trade
P/V- Higher vol. and range. Close near Low (13% off). Lower High, Low and Close. Higher Open. EMAs inching up. Low at 50EMA. Fast < Slow, >0 and falling. MACDH<0 and falling. 2FI<0 and falling. Buyers couldn't take 11/28 High. Position of close indicates sellers strongly in charge.
For the record, yesterday’s “call” was WRONG.
This is NOT a recommendation to BUY/SELL XENE. Full disclosure: Long XENE.

👍 491
sandiegojp
December 2, 2014 12:00 pm

Re: Bull/Bear Traps
As some of you know, I get a newsletter from the Online Trading Academy (not an endorsement of their classes which I have not taken). I like their “theory” that you want to be on the side of the institutions. I’m not sure if the price you pay for their classes (steep) does teach you how to stop where the institutions are buying/selling, but I find some of their articles (which contain, not surprisingly, a heavy dose of sales) interesting. I thought I’d share this with the group. The full article with the chart can be found at:
http://lessons.tradingacademy.com/article/the-psychology-trap-of-conventional-learning/?elq=eb31d910b585454a917fdbd583157a74&elqCampaignId=1913
***
[W]hen it comes to learning anything that has to do with competition, be very careful with your focus. Remember one simple fact that has really shaped my career and life for that matter: If you learn and think things the same way everyone else does, you have no competitive advantage. If you learn to think different, you can really own a big edge in any competitive environment.
When it comes to trading and investing, to think it is anything but competition is a mistake. There is a buyer and a seller in every transaction and after that transaction, price either moves up or down which means there is a winner and a loser. There are many invitations to buy into a market. Some are opportunities that lead to low risk and high reward buying opportunities that end up being very profitable trades. Others are traps that lead to losses for the novice and profits for the professional. One of the most favorite and high probability trades we like to take in the Futures Extended Learning Track (XLT) is the Bull Trap or Bear Trap. For today’s piece, let’s take a look at a trading opportunity that we found using the Supply/Demand grid, a daily service produced by my team.
The opportunity was to short the USDJPY into a supply level from the Supply/Demand grid. The specific strategy is our version of the Bull Trap. Notice the supply level on the chart, the yellow shaded area and origin of supply zone lines. This is a price level where willing supply exceeds willing demand. How do we know this? Simple, price could not stay at this level and had to decline away. Again, it declines because supply exceeds demand at that level. We wrap two lines around that level and carry that level forward because we want to remember where supply exceeds demand because that is where price is likely to turn lower in the future when it reaches that level.
Nov. 25th, 2014. Supply/Demand Grid Trade: USDJPY Shorting Opportunity
[Chart]
This is a strong Bull Trap shorting opportunity for the following reason. Notice the prior session high labeled “New Session High” (blue line). That high was the session high which is a number and event most traders pay close attention to. So, when price rallied back up to that high a little while later, many traders see this as a trading opportunity. The play is to either sell short at that prior high with a buy stop just above it or buy on a break out of that prior high. When price rallied back to that level, this setup bullish expectations for most traders. Traders are taught that when a high is broken, that is a breakout and price goes higher. Sometimes this is true BUT, when there is a fresh supply level just above as was the case here, this bullish and conventional thinking is a TRAP. What we were betting on with this shorting opportunity was that when price traded above that prior high, most people would become bullish and buy right into that fresh supply level where our strategy told us banks were heavy sellers of USDJPY. If this happened, we would be the willing low risk and high reward seller along with banks.
A bit later, after that high was put in, price began to rally. Soon, it rallied above that high (penetration of blue line) and a rush of buying came into the market as expected. Our entry price from the Supply / Demand grid was to sell short at 118.25 with a stop at 118.45. Price rallied up to our supply zone which ended up being the high of the session and proceeded to fall steadily from there as seen on the chart.
Back to the Bull Trap strategy. The key factor that makes this work is knowing how everyone is trained to “think” the markets. Most are trained to buy on a new high of the day and buy at supply (retail) levels. I am trained to do the opposite. When prices are at retail (supply) levels, I want to sell to the buyer who is trained to buy at retail levels and the Supply/Demand grid is designed to look for those types of setups and more. It is not designed from conventional blue prints, it is designed from competitive blue prints.
If you’re going to compete in the game of trading, make sure you have an edge or you will lose your money to someone who does. This game is a transfer of accounts from those who fall for professional “traps,” into the accounts of those who set the “traps.” It’s the old hunter and the hunted. I do apologize if I have offended anyone with what may seem like harsh analogies but the truth is, I want to send a strong message because the average person loses money trading and that’s not OK with me. They lose because they don’t have the edge the professional does. Learn to spot the difference between traps and opportunities. It all begins with thinking different.

Add a Topic
372
Add a Topic
899
Add a Topic
372
👍 491
sandiegojp
December 2, 2014 6:02 pm

Re: $ACHN chart analysis
TSM- No trade
P/V- Higher vol. and range. Close near High (19% off). Higher High, Low and Close. Lower Open. 22EMA over 50EMA. 22EMA flattening. 50EMA rising. Fast under Slow and both >0. Fast flat. Slow falling. MACDH<0 and rising. 2FI >0 and rising. Buyers unable to breach over Resistance level. Buyers in charge all day. Position of close indicates that Buyers in charge. This is deemed a classic reversal by Wyckoff who warns that a close below 12/1 Low would be very bearish. As an added note, it would seem ACHN has entered a trading range.
For the record, yesterday’s “call” was WRONG.
This is NOT a recommendation to BUY/SELL ACHN. Full disclosure: Long ACHN.

Add a Topic
5916
👍 491
sandiegojp
December 2, 2014 6:24 pm

Re: $ARWR chart analysis
TSM- No trade
P/V- Lower vol. and range. Close near Low (18% off). Lower High, Low, Open and Close. EMAs falling. Low at 52-week low. Fast > Slow. Fast and Slow inching up. Both <0. MACDH<0 and falling. 2FI<0 and rising. Trend line connects Lows of 11/25, 12/1 and 12/2. Pattern repeated that of 12/1. Sellers in charge.
For the record, yesterday’s “call” was RIGHT.
This is NOT a recommendation to BUY/SELL ARWR. Full disclosure: Long ARWR.

👍 491
sandiegojp
December 2, 2014 6:26 pm

Re: $ARWR chart analysis
Supplement – According to Wyckoff: If there is no follow-through and prices rally above the 12/2 High, larger gains are likely.
This is NOT a recommendation to BUY/SELL ARWR. Full disclosure: Long ARWR.

👍 491
sandiegojp
December 2, 2014 7:28 pm

Re: $CLDN chart analysis
TSM- No trade
P/V- Higher vol. and range. Close near High (12% off). Higher High, Low and Close. Lower Open. EMAs rising. Fast crossing>Slow and rising. Slow rising. Both >0. MACDH undulating at 0. 2FI>0 and rising. Sellers could not take 12/1 Low. Buyers took the high (but not the High of 11/26) and controled the Close. Buyers in charge. A reversal and close < 12/2 Low would be very bearish. For the record, yesterday’s “call” was WRONG. This is NOT a recommendation to BUY/SELL CLDN. Full disclosure: Long CLDN.

👍 491
sandiegojp
December 2, 2014 7:30 pm

Re: Chart analysis
Fellow Gummies. Every night, I do the analyses I post here. So it’s not much of a burden to copy and paste the notes. However, I’d like to know if anyone reads them; if anyone finds them useful; and would really appreciate feedback from fellow Gummies who are much more expert than I are reading charts so that I may learn (along with other Gummies who read this thread). Please let me know as I don’t want to waste anyone’s time and post for the sake of posting.

👍 491
Leo S
Leo S
December 2, 2014 10:29 pm
Reply to  sandiegojp

Charts:I for one appreciate it JP, I just need more savvy to absorb it all which I am working on. Thank you for all your effort.

SoGiAm
December 2, 2014 11:07 pm
Reply to  sandiegojp

Charts-I appreciate it as well JP and agree with Leo. What I was interested in doing is to accumulate a month’s worth and analyze each equity to further my understanding.
Long all you chart except CLDN, ESPR and GILD (yet). Best-Ben

👍 11604
👍 1224
sandiegojp
December 2, 2014 11:25 pm
Reply to  hipockets

As far as I know it can be used for day, swing and position trading. It all depends on the time frames you use for your screens. For the record, I use the weekly and daily charts, so these are meant for position (i.e., long term) trading. I look forward to sharing thought on Mr. Weiss’ book. I just got a hold of Mr. Wyckoff’s original manuscript (on loan from a university in Texas!). Quite voluminous. Should quite interesting reading. I really think Wyckoff had it right and it’s a time/volume/price relations best analyzed with Renko charts… but we’ll see.

👍 491
arch1
December 3, 2014 1:33 am
Reply to  sandiegojp

JP I have been following these posts,although in general I have found that tech analysis does not work for me in bio tech,,It seems to work best with large cap stocks in my view.
On post #127 above I think general reasoning is accurate,,,market tops and bottoms can quickly bite if you get it wrong.

👍 7797
sandiegojp
December 2, 2014 7:37 pm

RE: $CTIX chart analysis
TSM – Trade possibly setting up on the short side
P/V – Higher vol. and tighter range. Close near High (8% off). Higher Low and Close. Lower High and Open. EMAs rising. Fast crossed > Slow, both >0 and both rising. MACDH crossed >0. 2FI>0 and rising. Buyers in charge all day and close indicates buyers likely to remain in charge.
For the record, yesterday’s “call” was WRONG.
This is NOT a recommendation to BUY/SELL CTIX. Full disclosure: Long CTIX.

Add a Topic
899
👍 491
sandiegojp
December 2, 2014 7:38 pm

Re: $ESPR

👍 491
sandiegojp
December 2, 2014 7:47 pm

Re: $ESPR chart analysis (sorry about post #134 – finger slipped)
TSM – No trade
P/V – Higher vol. and range. Close at High. Higher High and Close. Lower Open and Low. EMAs rising. Fast < Slow and falling. Slow falling. Both >0. MACDH<0 and rising. 2FI>0 and rising. Open took out 12/1 Low but sellers could not hold. Buyers in charge all day. Close took out 12/1 High but below 11/26 and 11/17 Close (11/17 set 52-wk High). Buyers in charge. If there is little or no follow-through on 12/3 and prices rally above 12/2 High, larger gains are likely.
For the record, yesterday’s “call” was WRONG.
This is NOT a recommendation to BUY/SELL ESPR. Full disclosure: Long ESPR.

👍 491
sandiegojp
December 2, 2014 7:57 pm

Re: $GILD chart analysis
TSM – Short side trade possibly setting up
P/V – Higher vol. and narrower range. Close nearer High (34% off). Higher Low, Close, Open and High. 22EMA crossed < 50EMA, both falling. Fast setting up to cross > Slow. Fast rising. Slow falling. Both <0. MACDH <0 and rising. 2FI >0 and rising. While sellers appeared to have been in charge yesterday, there was ease of upward movement today and the position of the close would indicate that buyers remain in charge.
For the record, yesterday’s “call” was RIGHT.
This is NOT a recommendation to BUY/SELL GILD. Full disclosure: Long GILD.

Add a Topic
899
Add a Topic
899
👍 491
sandiegojp
December 2, 2014 8:04 pm

Re: $NBY chart analysis
TSM – No trade
P/V – Higher vol and same range as 12/1. Close 1/2 way between High and Low (“Hinge”). Higher High and Close. Open and Low at same level as 12/1. EMAs falling. Fast < Slow. Fast inching up and Slow falling. MACDH<0 and rising. 2FI >0 and rising. Nothing decisive achieved. Be alert for potential action, but likely remain in trading range.
For the record, yesterday’s “call” was WRONG.
This is NOT a recommendation to BUY/SELL GILD. Full disclosure: Long GILD.

👍 491
sandiegojp
December 2, 2014 8:12 pm

Re: post #137
Errata: Should read –
This is NOT a recommendation to BUY/SELL NBY. Full disclosure: Long NBY.

👍 491
sandiegojp
December 2, 2014 8:40 pm

Re: $XENE chart analysis
TSM – Insufficient data
P/V – Higher vol. and wider range. Close near 1/2 way (45% off High). Higher High, Low and Close. Lower Open. EMAs rising. Fast < Slow. Fast inching down. Slow falling. Both >0. MACDH <0 and rising. 2FI >0 and rising. Sellers could take the 12/1 Close (above Low). However, Buyers could hold to the High (higher than 12/1) which was at resistance level. The Close is near the High of 12/1 indicating that Buyers exist at that level. Buyers likely in charge. However, this is an ambiguous and the Open is likely to dictate how the trading will develop on 12/3.
For the record, yesterday’s “call” was WRONG.
This is NOT a recommendation to BUY/SELL XENE. Full disclosure: Long XENE.

👍 491
👍 1224
1 5 6 7 8 9 19

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

More Info  
4
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x