The Long Case for Receptos

by DrKSSMDPhD | January 27, 2015 4:15 pm

This is premium content. To view this article (and to have full access to the rest of our articles), sign up. Already a member? Log in.

Source URL: https://www.stockgumshoe.com/2015/01/the-long-case-for-receptos/


885 responses to “The Long Case for Receptos”

  1. DrKSSMDPhD says:

    In that same issue: human embryonic stem cells for AMD therapy:
    http://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(14)61376-3.pdf

    All well and good…..til you see who the senior author is.

  2. sandiegojp says:

    Re: Bicyclolides
    Dr. KSS, if I may impose on you I’d like your opinion on bicyclolides. I have searched the previous posts and could find no reference to these antibiotics.
    In that same vein, your opinion on $ENTA would be appreciated. I have also failed to find any reference in your previous posts to this company. Though the company’s present main source of revenue is its royalty agreement with ABBVIE, its pipeline includes a 5-yr $43MM contract with NIAID, a division of NIH, to fund the development of “bridged bicyclic antibiotic” against Category A and B bacteria. Hence, my question.

    ENTA has a market cap of $642MM. 50% of the float (9.11MM out of 18.6MM shares) is owned by institutions and the other 50% by insiders. 15% shorts though. It missed 1Q estimates, reporting revenues of $77.5MM (vs. estimates of $82.2MM), net profits of $42MM (vs. reporting a loss in the same period last year) and EPS of $2.18 (vs. estimates of $3.53). Shares have gone done by some 20% since the beginning of the year.

    Because of ABBVIE’s deal, their revenue exploded from $893K in 2013 to $77.5MM last year.

    http://www.enanta.com/research/enanta-pipeline/
    file:///C:/Users/EcoStar%20Health/Downloads/EnantaPharmaceuticalsInc_10Q_20150206.pdf

    Thanks for your help.

  3. dennis says:

    Thanks Kenny. Love your photo.

  4. AC/DC says:

    CTIX files an application with NASDAQ. Well happened earlier than I was expecting.

    http://cellceutix.com/best-yet-to-come/#sthash.Xv9Mzk6I.qxj0jDQP.dpbs

  5. DrKSSMDPhD says:

    $ACHN two-agent combination achieves SVR12 in ALL patients with six weeks of therapy. News out this am, a little sooner than guessed. Will be an interesting day for $GILD, $ABBV, $RGLS, $MRK and of course $ACHN.

    Long all but $ABBV and $RGLS, and glad I loaded up the truck with more $ACHN last week.

  6. SoGiAm says:

    ATNM-Actinium’s Chief Medical Officer to Participate in the Next Gen Immunotherapeutics Panel at the 3rd Annual Sachs Cancer Bio Partnering & Investment Forum on February 23rd
    7:00a ET February 9, 2015 (Market Wire) Print
    Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NYSE MKT: ATNM) (“Actinium” or “the Company”), a biopharmaceutical company developing innovative targeted payload immunotherapeutics for the treatment of advanced cancers, today announced that Dr. Dragan Cicic, Chief Medical Officer of Actinium will participate in the Next Gen Immunotherapeutics panel discussion on Monday, February 23, 2015 at 9:45 a.m. as part of the 3rd Annual Sachs Cancer Bio Partnering and Investment Forum in New York, NY.
    Dr. Cicic will join leading cancer experts from industry to discuss the increasing role of next generation immunotherapeutics including combination and targeted therapies in Oncology. As part of the panel discussion, Dr. Cicic will provide insight into the potential clinical and therapeutic utility of Actimab-A and Iomab(TM)-B.

  7. DrKSSMDPhD says:

    News out of $RGLS: in exploratory PoC trials of RG-101, a GalNAc-conjugated siRNA therapeutic that knocks down liver expression of MiR-122, studies clearly demonstrate NO chance of a single dose cure for HCV. Still, impressive virological knockdown, paving the way for further studies and possible shorter duration of therapy. Still, $ACHN is the better story this am, and I remain neutral on $RGLS and glad I did not own shares.

  8. SoGiAm says:

    ARTH-10-Q and prospectus out 2/9/15 for 12/31/14

  9. SoGiAm says:

    JUNO-8:00a Juno Therapeutics Establishes Manufacturing Presence in Washington State (Dow Jones) 8:00a Juno Therapeutics to Manufacture Cell-Therapy Products in Bothell, Washington (Dow Jones)

  10. SoGiAm says:

    AUPH-Aurinia Pharmaceuticals to Initiate an Open Label Clinical Study to Investigate the Impact of Voclosporin on Lupus Nephritis Biomarkers
    8:00a ET February 9, 2015 (Business Wire) Print
    Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the “Company”) (NASDAQ:AUPH) (TSX:AUP) today announced that it will initiate an open label, exploratory study to assess the short term predictors of response using voclosporin in combination with mycophenolate mofetil in patients with active lupus nephritis. AURION (Aurinia early Urinary protein Reduction Predicts Response) will examine biomarkers of disease activity at 8 weeks and their ability to predict response at 24 and 48 weeks. The Company expects to complete patient enrolment of this small pilot study by the 3rd quarter of this year.
    The Company expects that this study will act in support of its ongoing lupus nephritis clinical program. This study should provide the lupus community with a more clear understanding of voclosporin’s time to onset of action and clinical outcomes.
    In the Aspreva Lupus Management Study (ALMS), one of the largest registration quality studies ever completed that investigated the treatment of lupus nephritis, certain biomarkers after 8 weeks were extremely predictive of 24 week response rates. “We believe the AURION study has the potential to provide validation for these early biomarkers and provide valuable tools to clinicians who are managing patients with this debilitating disease,” said Dr. Neil Solomons, MD, Chief Medical Officer of Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. and co-author of ALMS.

  11. SoGiAm says:

    TRVN-http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20150209005138/en/Trevena-Announces-Positive-Results-Phase-1-Multiple#.VNi6A-bF8Qc

  12. Opposeablethumb says:

    Move on to new thread, Jack!

  13. simong156 says:

    As a “Crohn” I had particular interest in RCPT and the MEIP story – having been given the dreaded lactulose for comstipation(!).

    I have purchased a number of shares of each. They are my only biotech holdings and account for ten per cent or so of my portfolio. I should probably diversify slightly, and I have also been intrigued by the TMO and ESPR information. Would I be accurate I thinking that TMO is the comparative giant, with ESPR slightly more established and the other two, upstarts?

    The good doctor suggests we all contribute information as and when we see it. Where would we do that? In new discussion threads, back here, in whatever biotech story is latest? What’s the protocol?

  14. Subramania Kaushik says:

    $RCPT
    Oral presentations (2015)
    OP024 A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled induction trial of an oral S1P receptor modulator (RPC1063) in moderate to severe Ulcerative Colitis: Results of the TOUCHSTONE study
    W. Sandborn*1, B. Feagan2, D. Wolf3, G. D’Haens4, S. Vermeire5, S. Hanauer6, S. Ghosh7, H. Smith8, M. Cravets8, P. Frohna8, S. Gujrathi8, A. Olson8

    1University of California San Diego, Division of Gastroenterology, La Jolla, United States, 2University of Western Ontario, Department of Gastroenterology, London, Canada, 3Atlanta Gastroenterology Associates, Emory Saint Joseph’s, Atlanta, United States, 4Academic Medical Centre, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 5University Hospital Leuven, Department of Gastroenterology, Leuven, Belgium, 6Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Digestive Health Center, Chicago, United States, 7University of Calgary, Department of Gastroenterology, Alberta, Canada, 8Receptos, Inc., Clinical Development, San Diego, United States
    Background
    RPC1063 is an oral, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) 1 and 5 receptor modulator in clinical development for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and relapsing multiple sclerosis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 0.5 mg (low dose, LD) and 1.0 mg (high dose, HD) RPC1063 in comparison to placebo (PBO), and characterize the safety of RPC1063 in patients with moderate to severe UC.
    Methods
    This was an international, 8-week induction trial in UC, with a continuing maintenance period for responders. 197 patients were randomized (1:1:1) and treated once daily with PBO (n=65), LD (n=65) or HD (n=67). The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects in remission (Mayo score ≤ 2, no subscore >1) at Wk 8. Secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients in response (reduction in Mayo score of ≥ 3 and ≥ 30 % with a decrease in the rectal bleeding score of ≥1 or a rectal bleeding score ≤1), proportion of patients with mucosal improvement (endoscopy score ≤1), and the change in Mayo score. Safety assessments included ECG, Holter monitoring, pulmonary function testing, optical coherence tomography and adverse events (AEs).
    Results
    95% of patients completed the induction portion of the study. The proportion of patients achieving clinical remission was 16.4% for HD (p=0.0482 vs. PBO), 13.8% for LD (p=0.1422), and 6.2% for PBO. The proportion of patients with clinical response was 58.2% for HD (p=0.0140), 53.8% for LD (p=0.0648), and 36.9% for PBO. The proportion of patients with mucosal improvement was 34.3% for HD (p=0.0023), 27.7% for LD (p=0.0348), and 12.3% for PBO. The improvement in Mayo score from baseline was 3.3 points for HD (p=0.0035), 2.6 points for LD (p=0.0986), and 1.9 for PBO.

    The AE profiles were comparable between groups, with approximately 31% of patients experiencing a treatment emergent AE (TEAE) across all groups. The most common TEAEs in the study were worsening of ulcerative colitis (HD 1 [1.5%], LD 2 [3.1%], PBO 3 [4.6%]) and anemia/decreased Hgb (HD 0, LD 3 [4.6%], PBO 3 [4.6%]). Only modest effects on heart rate were seen with no notable cardiac, pulmonary, ophthalmologic or malignancy AEs observed. Transient ALT ≥3x ULN occurred in 3 patients (HD 1 [1.5%], LD 2 [3.1%]) and decreased with continued treatment.
    Conclusion
    Modulation of S1P receptors in patients with moderate to severe UC with RPC1063 1 mg induced clinical remission, clinical response, and mucosal improvement, validating a novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of UC. The positive efficacy and the safety/tolerability results from this study suggest a favorable risk-benefit profile of RPC1063 that supports a Phase 3 UC program.
    Posted in: Oral presentations (2015)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.