written by reader Alan’s Trading game

By alanh, May 17, 2016

I thought long and hard about this title……tacky as it is, this seems as good as any. My contention is that Bio is a gamblers game, where most investors have zippo idea of the science, and the science takes soooo long to bear fruit that watching paint dry seems like a knee jerk reaction. Many gamblers just trade the news. The consequence is that, win or lose, they overract to news!!
The aim here is to exploit that over-reaction for in-out profit. Its a different form of gambling, so dont bet more than you can afford to lose without a wry smile.
Bets are like boy/girlfriends…..you have some fun while it lasts, but its best to never look back. I aim to snaffle 10%….(so when did you last get 10% per month from bank interest? ) You ’could hang on for a 100% win/lose if you like (see $sphs since dec 14 2014) But Im setting 10% as the benchmark. The plan is to monitor/buy/short stocks that have hit a catalyst, on the basis that the sp always (?) overracts. So, as catalysts happen, we will trade the opposite direction. Having made or lost roughly 10%, we’ll be out.
DONT SET A MECHANICAL STOP LOSS…..Guaranteed the whipsaw will take you out for a loss. You have to monitor end of day prices, then exit for good or bad. If you’re keen, you can always re-enter lower or hang in there…..thats your call, so dont blame me.
Have fun with a play account or, if you’re convinced, bet some minor dosh…..but never more than you can afford to wave goodbye to.
Let the fun begin.

This is a discussion topic or guest posting submitted by a Stock Gumshoe reader. The content has not been edited or reviewed by Stock Gumshoe, and any opinions expressed are those of the author alone.



This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
πŸ‘ 4092
Steve M
Steve M
May 17, 2016 7:16 pm

Isn’t the idea to buy it right after the crash, which was down to 4.00 yesterday pre-market? With nimbleness one might have gotten in near 5.00. I hemmed and hawed a bit and added pre-market at 5.5. This is now, on that tranche, about an 18% return. Buying the gaps down when there is a negative catalyst is the strategy in a nutshell, is it not? But then maybe not everyone can trade during the extended sessions. And I guess I am disobeying your maxim of get in and get out, by trying to strengthen a position — I did not have the choice of a blank slate.

Add a Topic
πŸ‘ 174
πŸ‘ 4092
May 18, 2016 8:10 am
Reply to  alanh

Vacy? lucky U, alanh. I have not had a vacation in 8+ years as I am a #caregiver and investor; or maybe I have been on vacy since 2001?
While you are on vacy here is a tread to discuss and share rockets: http://www.stockgumshoe.com/2016/05/microblog-ztne-rktz/

A system I have been learning from MM, SW, JAB and others involves laddering, utilizing… Leonardo Fibonacci was an Italian mathematician born in the 12th century. He is known to have discovered the “Fibonacci numbers,” which are a sequence of … (May bore some of you – but it fascinates me. – Boxing News
http://www.saddoboxing.comIt does for me; the fact that the golden means closest thing (the fibonocci) mathmatics of 1+1=2 2+1=3 3+2=5 1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55, so on for … ), MACD and L2. #AwesomeEternity – >>>–Jammin—>

πŸ‘ 11519
May 17, 2016 11:09 pm

Looking for $RLYP on May 26. If ZS-Pharma gets approved it should go to 9 which is the shorts target. Shorts have to cover, company cannot be worth zero regardless. Alan be nimble Steve be quick! Here is my best near future pick.

πŸ‘ 1313