written by reader US Presidential elections

By Anonymous Questions, August 19, 2016

Isn’t it true that the stock market always
drops before the US Presidential elections due to the uncertainty of
the outcome?
And isn’t it equally true that it always bounces back up again once
the result in known?
And doesn’t it mean that there is profit in it for the stock market

With that scenario in mind, which is the best of the three possible

1. Stick with your stocks, ignore the bumpy ride. Things will get back
to normal post November 8.
2. Take your profit and offset your loses by selling your shares now,
and buy back again after the election when the new White House
resident is declared.
3. Sell your shares now, but buy back a couple of days BEFORE the
elections when the shares would have fallen almost to their low point
in anticipation of the rise after November 8.

Interesting quandary!

This is a discussion topic or guest posting submitted by a Stock Gumshoe reader. The content has not been edited or reviewed by Stock Gumshoe, and any opinions expressed are those of the author alone.



This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
August 20, 2016 2:46 am

You pose a most interesting and timely question. Your basic premise is correct and normally I would choose (1) if I was still holding stocks at this time. The answer is beyond me as I have never seen an election like this one. I think a great deal will depend on which sector the stocks are in.
Precious metals,Bio,and energy are going to be especially volatile and thus risky but positioned to return considerable profit if you choose right.
I am going to throw another risk factor into this mix.We have had the longest nonrecovery recovery on record and now are at risk of another recession starting at a time when no means to ease it using normal keynesian methods are available. The debt has simply been allowed to grow too much this time. imho
I am mulling cutting back my amount of investment or at least shorting some weak companies that would be unlikely to survive another hit,
such as the housing market or more correctly real estate with it’s huge overhang of nearly worthless paper owned by the financial entities
that have put the taxpayer on the hook to back them.
I am looking forward to comment by wiser investors than myself.

Add a Topic
👍 7797
Jay Ram
August 20, 2016 11:42 am

One of the best rules to follow in taking tests applies to this logic: whenever you see “always,” it’s almost always not going to be true.

Markets do fall during periods of uncertainty, but whether that applies in the leadup to an election depends on our expectations of the outcome. When you have a candidate taking a safe lead in the polls, that tends to give us more certainty about the outcome. In which case, the expected outcome will already be priced in while the surprise would more likely lead to a drop (unless it’s a good surprise, but I don’t think either candidate represents a good surprise).

Just expand your horizons to elections outside the U.S. over this past summer and you’ll recall a perfect example of the exact opposite trend happening.

👍 73
Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe