Become a Member

written by reader Scandium, Cobalt, and Water Purification: Clean Teq Holdings,Volume 2, 2018

By hendrixnuzzles, January 31, 2018

2017 was a year of tremendous accomplishment for Clean Teq Holdings in every respect.

We saw remarkable achievements in mine construction, in finance, and in market development, with landmark contracts in every business segment;

We saw a complex business appear as if by magic, including business offices on four continents, and the launch of business website in the water division;

We were informed of superb existing and newly-formed strategic partnerships,
with the likes of Airbus, Peng-Xin Mining, Chinese state and power entities, Chinalco, and Multotec;

We were witness to a major off-take agreement with a leading battery manufacture;

We learned of an astute acquisition of a controlling interest in a VRB business by Mr. Friedland;

We learned of deep and valuable research and development support at prestigious universities and manufacturers;
and we became sure of unseen low-cost manufacturing contacts and alliances.

And oh-by-the-way, we got a listing on the TSX.

The company inspires confidence and optimism. Robert Friedland has a deep long-term strategy, and he knows what he is doing.
I am not sure what is more impressive: His strategic vision, or his managerial talent in executing it.

Clean Teq is a company that is worth following. It is by far my largest position.
There are a lot of companies with good concepts. But Clean Teq has a deep and brilliant strategic concept which is at the heart of major world trends; a revolutionary technology; and a management that executes flawlessly.
**
GOING FORWARD: SUITABLE TOPICS FOR THIS THREAD

1. CLEAN TEQ HOLDINGS, CLEAN TEQ WATER, and their interests, or related companies.

2. Miners and producers of COBALT, VANADIUM, SCANDIUM; also nickel, zinc, graphite, lithium, rare earths, silica, and manganese.

3. WATER PURIFICATION, especially when tied into mineral extraction therefrom.

4. “TECHNO MINERS” and other innovators in mining and material extraction

See notes below on thread and topic overlaps, which are unavoidable.
**
One year ago this week, I wrote an article on Clean Teq Holdings. It was a speculative company, but
one with a visionary and proven leader, dramatic potential in specific, attractive commodities,
innovative methods and IP for mineral extraction, and big ambitions in water purification.

Clean Teq Holdings defied easy categorization, and continues to do so.
One year later, Clean Teq has not disappointed. Clean Teq has exceeded all reasonable expectations.
**
If you need background on Clean Teq, I refer you to the predecessor of this thread: “Scandium, Cobalt,
and Water Purification: Clean Teq Holdings”, where you will also find the guidelines and rules for this
thread; and to the Clean Teq and Clean Teq Water websites, which warrant close examination.

OUR BIAS AND BASIC VIEW
This thread is for those who believe in the coming EV wave, light weighting of transport, and most importantly,
in the importance of energy storage and batteries of all scales;
and also, it is for those who believe that the disruptions caused thereby will be rapid.

Because of this opinion, it follows that the existing viable battery technologies and the materials needed
for them are important. We anticipate rapid change; we subscribe to the Tony Seba “Disruption Scenario”,
that suggests disruptiv changes are occuring faster.
If you disagree with the Disruption Scenario, or the eventual proliferation of EVs,
that is fine; but please do not debate it on this thread. The thread is for those who believe in the future of battery power,
and in the immediate opporunities in commodities related to batteries and energy storage.
We will be able to see in shortly whether we are right or wrong in this belief.
If it takes longer than we think, we will complain about ”being early.”

My perspective is for the next five years. That is “long term”. This is not a trading thread.
Occasionally short-term opportunities are appropriate to call out,
but short-term trading is not the emphasis here.

On the other hand should restrain ourselves from too much attention
to developments and materials for technologies that are likely to take longer than five years to have an impact.
We are looking for investable ideas, not 10 year forecasts on the Future of Civilization.
So let’s keep it down on hydrogen fuel cells and molten salt batteries for a couple of months.
**
NOTES ON THREAD AND TOPIC OVERLAPS
Our assumption is that Li-NCM, VRB’s, and zinc batteries are going to be the main battery formats purchased,
installed or contracted for in the near-term, hence the commodities needed for them are of interest.

New battery technologies are better discussed on the #batteries thread ,
unless they involve a vertical commodity/battery producer.
We are interested in what is going to have an impact in five years.

For example, if you are convinced that Google is about to conquer the world with a molten salt battery,
then come on over here and recommend Morton Salt as a buy-out candidate.

But debate whether molten salt batteries have a future, and when, on the #batteries thread.

News that shows increasing penetration on solar are relevant,
as they confirm the importance of large-scale energy storage.
But we would like to know who is getting the contracts and what type of battery they are using.

There is going to be some unavoidable overlap. Nickel and manganese sources are swing metals,
sometimes they may be better discussed on the Hard Asset thread as base metals.

If you make a post on the wrong thread, don’t worry too much, there are
no fines or jail time. I do it myself all the time and I understand it can be confusing.
You can also use Travis’ new cross-reference gizmo.

Long $CTEQF $CLQ Clean Teq Holdings

This is a discussion topic or guest posting submitted by a Stock Gumshoe reader. The content has not been edited or reviewed by Stock Gumshoe, and any opinions expressed are those of the author alone.

guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

2.5K Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
👍 9968
Cowboy
Cowboy
February 9, 2018 12:24 pm
👍 709
👍 9968
Cowboy
Cowboy
February 9, 2018 9:29 pm

MGXMF–Long….. ( I am redoing this post because it has been in moderation for several hours..too many links I reckon ) HN just seeing if this was going to be another hairball, cause evidently China is involved here too, some kind of way with MGXMF. I was on ceo.ca and ran across this.. http://www.intecqlimited.com/6319/nanoflotation-david-bromley-engineering-ltd.html#nogo …which had links that said MGXMF was partners in some areas as you can see in the link. Which led me here… http://www.dbe2000.com/nanoflotation-low-energy-low-cost-water-treatment/ … Got too many windows open on this computer again, so I wanted to do some linkin before it locks up again and I lose something. I haven’t seen anything on these two companies websites that leads me to believe that they are public, but it appears that MGXMF has some type of business dealings with them. I’m bored again. sorry…Cowboy

Add a Topic
108
Add a Topic
285
👍 709
👍 9968
Cowboy
Cowboy
February 10, 2018 10:20 am
Reply to  hendrixnuzzles

MGXMF–Long…Thanks HN. I saw where MGX had an option on PurLucid. I didn’t remember the name Bromley or put them together. It is amazing, at the lack of public companies in these types of Business. We have to go in the back door to be involved. I posted this on the Battery thread also. I saw that my original post finally made moderation……Cowboy

Add a Topic
1614
👍 709
👍 9968
tanglewood
February 11, 2018 2:12 pm
Reply to  Cowboy

Cowboy if you are trying to save a lot of links and tieing up your computer, try saving them on a WordPad doc, develop your whole comment there and then paste the whole comment here. Then you can free up windows as needed.

👍 644
edski
Irregular
February 10, 2018 11:42 am

A different look at water, but good to remember the nano connection.

TED talks given in the past:
The weirdness of water…
(Pick up at 9 minute mark)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OLFwkfPxCg

Add a Topic
540
Add a Topic
540
👍 1073
Cowboy
Cowboy
February 10, 2018 1:46 pm

MGXMF–Long…U-Tube interview with Jared Lazerson published 2/8/18. Speaks of earnings coming, especially from water Purification…. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=16&v=y9G9aZP5NgY ….Cowboy

Add a Topic
540
👍 709
Griffin
Griffin
February 10, 2018 10:35 pm

$FYI – TAE Technologies Gen 5 reactor targets tripling confinement with 10 times the power by 2020

found on Yahoo and well things are slow.

https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2018/02/tae-technologies-gen-5-reactor-targets-tripling-confinement-with-10-times-the-power-by-2020.html/amp

I hope this happens just don’t be Uranium if it does.

Add a Topic
520
👍 3700
eagerbeaver
eagerbeaver
February 11, 2018 12:20 am

My apologies if this has already been posted. I have done a quick scan and didn’t see it.

The most recent Clean TeQ Company Presentation in the Investors Section:

http://www.cleanteq.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/CLQ-Investor-Presentation_January-2018-1.pdf

It’s as comprehensive, impressive, and professionally presented as we have come to expect. 23 pages

👍 465
👍 9968
Cowboy
Cowboy
February 11, 2018 12:11 pm

CTEQF–Long….DRC and Cobalt article…. https://www.edelsoninstitute.com/wealth-wave/bungle-in-the-jungle-congo-glencore-katanga-cobalt-mining/ ….Cowboy

Add a Topic
1113
👍 709
Cowboy
Cowboy
February 11, 2018 12:15 pm

CTEQF–Long… Mining deals for Cobalt are imminent article…. http://www.mining.com/bmw-mining-deals-imminent-cobalt-price-powers-report/ ….Cowboy

Add a Topic
1113
👍 709
👍 9968
secretsquirrel
secretsquirrel
February 11, 2018 8:23 pm

AUZ trading halt, ROCKET coming Tuesday ++…

BB has done his homework well….

Recent SP manipulation laughable.

Long AUZ and all here who hold.

👍 1233
👍 9968
secretsquirrel
secretsquirrel
February 12, 2018 11:18 am
Reply to  hendrixnuzzles

I don’t know the answer to when regards the cobalt, they are going as fast as possible. I however think due to the recent confirmations of how totally unstable the DRC really is, anyone wanting solid cobalt supply in a safe jurisdiction might well take a view that it’s better to wrap things up sooner rather than later. I’d add this regardless of any new developments in battery content or otherwise, especially if you are not Chinese, as IMO DRC cobalt will end up go there more than elsewhere. This based purely have feet on the ground and will of course pay where and when required as corruption if rife.

I do not think the T/H is due to a BMW O/T, just my opinion, be nice but i doubt it, BB the CEO was definitely looking for partners to work with moving forward and all indications look like that will be the case.

I would also add the CLQ seems to be not for sale, whereas AUZ perhaps could be more so for the right price.

Roll on Wednesday opening….

Long AUZ

Add a Topic
1113
Add a Topic
1113
Add a Topic
1614
👍 1233
👍 9968
SoGiAm
February 11, 2018 9:44 pm
Reply to  secretsquirrel

$AUZ.asx fp – Halt, binding off-take agreement… Thx ss
https://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20180212/pdf/43rhjdwds2dwfg.pdf

👍 11604
👍 9968
renbycage
renbycage
February 11, 2018 10:27 pm
Reply to  SoGiAm

I said 2018 will be the year of the cobalt contract, if AUZ gets the BMW deal, that would be the first chip to fall [yes, clean teq signed a contract last year]. There are a lot of car and battery companies that need to lock up their cobalt, so any contract is bullish for the entire sector, and the first contract won’t necessarily be the best. Once this trend picks up it could accelerate quickly, this is a musical chairs game, when the music stops, those that don’t have their cobalt locked up could be screwed.

Add a Topic
1113
Add a Topic
1614
Add a Topic
1113
eagerbeaver
eagerbeaver
February 11, 2018 11:12 pm
Reply to  renbycage

I would be very surprised if Robert Friedland doesn’t have a very good idea about what’s going on at the moment. Hmm… I wonder if BMW is planning to buy up the entire AUZ resource. We’ll know soon enough.

Add a Topic
2963
👍 465
renbycage
renbycage
February 12, 2018 12:19 am
Reply to  eagerbeaver

I wouldn’t be surprised to see streaming type deals, where-by car companies or other cobalt dependent parties start putting up the money to get these projects fast tracked, in return for a percentage of the take.

Add a Topic
1113
renbycage
renbycage
February 12, 2018 12:22 am
Reply to  eagerbeaver

from the releases, it sounded more like BMW were looking to lock up 10 years of cobalt supply, as opposed to buying the whole project.

Add a Topic
1113
👍 964
👍 9968
👍 9968
👍 9968
👍 9968
Lulu
February 11, 2018 10:07 pm

Lithium vs Cobalt….sorry if this was already posted.

https://nanoone.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/NanoOne_PPT_01_29_2018_web.pdf

Add a Topic
2096
👍 9968
eagerbeaver
eagerbeaver
February 12, 2018 10:33 am
Reply to  hendrixnuzzles

For what it’s worth, I have been trying to estimate the length of the AUZ demonstration autoclave.

https://australianmines.com.au/application/third_party/ckfinder/userfiles/files/Off-take-samples-on-track-for-delivery-in-February-from-demonstration-plant.pdf

Now, if the white cupboard door is approx 15 inches wide, it looks like the autoclave is 5-6 cupboard door widths long which would be 75-90 inches. One meter is just over 39 inches so two meters would give us just under 79 inches. The AUZ autoclave at approx 2 meters long is one thirtieth the length of one of the 60 meter Clean TeQ autoclaves.
AUZ says their autoclave was installed over the Christmas period and it may have been fabricated in a rush order, possibly by one of the European manufacturers, and then flown in. The tank would be easy to fabricate but the fittings would take longer. Perhaps a priority order could be completed in approx. 3 months. As for off-take samples of the hydrated Cobalt and Nickel (II) Sulphates, they may not have been produced by this plant yet. AUZ says they expect to have them ready sometime this month but it would depend on how well the commissioning went.

Add a Topic
5916
Add a Topic
1113
Add a Topic
964
👍 465
eagerbeaver
eagerbeaver
February 12, 2018 2:59 pm
Reply to  hendrixnuzzles

Yes, and it begs the question as to why would a company do an off-take agreement for cobalt and nickel sulphates with AUZ when Clean TeQ is miles ahead in the race to production. Presumably said company has had discussions with Clean TeQ. Perhaps it is as Squirrel suggests, that part or all of AUZ may be considered for sale, whereas Clean TeQ is not. One thing is certain, it’s going to be an exciting year for some junior miners of battery metals.

Long $CTEQF, $ARRRF Just took a small Lithium position in GALXF.

Add a Topic
1113
Add a Topic
964
Add a Topic
1614
👍 465
renbycage
renbycage
February 12, 2018 3:23 pm
Reply to  eagerbeaver

Clean TeQ I’m sure has their own criteria for what they are looking for in a company to which they will commit off-take. As each non-Congo source of cobalt gets committed to some car or battery company, the remaining sources will be in strong positions to have their demands fulfilled.

Add a Topic
1113
Add a Topic
1614
👍 964
Secret Squirrel
Secret Squirrel
February 12, 2018 3:29 pm
Reply to  eagerbeaver

Where did the Galaxy rumour originate from? I assume your taking a position is due to that?

If cobalt was an essential part of my production line and after the DRC situation the other day and generally I would want to firm up a solid supply very soon. This is good for all mines that are holding, even if they are a bit away from production. CLQ should be one if not the 1st into the market. I’m reading that AUZ should get there to, although the autoclaves seems to matter, I’m not sure it’s been touched a upon that much on hotcopper for example. As you say hn this year will be a great year for some junior miners in battery metals.

I have also recently taken Long positions in AEE, they have uranium, but more importantly a very large amount of vanadium.

Also Long KRC for vanadium but they also have titanium. As a back up they hit gold which pushed the SP higher recently.

Add a Topic
1113
Add a Topic
1614
Add a Topic
520
eagerbeaver
eagerbeaver
February 12, 2018 4:47 pm

Yes Squirrel, I bought on the rumor, just a few shares. I have never owned shares in a Lithium company before, so we’ll see how do now that more battery metal off-takes are expected this year.

Add a Topic
2096
Add a Topic
1614
renbycage
renbycage
February 12, 2018 8:30 pm
Reply to  hendrixnuzzles

To be honest, even Clean TeQ, with its autoclaves, worker dorms, bank financing, Friedland, the Chinese, the kangaroos…… is looking at 3.5-4 years before they are fully producing. They MAY produce SOMETHING in 2020, but its an 18 month ramp up to full production according to company guidance. We all wish we could get this done quickly, but it has to go thru the process.

👍 964
renbycage
renbycage
February 12, 2018 8:48 pm
Reply to  renbycage

By the way, for a link that backs up this timeline, see page 3. http://www.macquarie.com.au/dafiles/Internet/mgl/au/apps/retail-newsletter/docs/2017-03/CLQ280317e.pdf

It is a year old I believe, but Clean Teq guidance has been that the project is “on schedule” as opposed to behind schedule, when they postponed their DFS.

👍 964
renbycage
renbycage
February 12, 2018 8:53 pm
Reply to  renbycage

HN, this is also why I don’t agree that CTEQF is 3 years ahead of everyone else, because conceivably, if someone else ordered their autoclaves tomorrow, and they get them delivered in 3 years, they could conceivably also be ready to produce in 3 years. But from what I can see, CTEQF is at least 18 months ahead of the other australian CTEQF wannabes.

👍 964
👍 9968
renbycage
renbycage
February 12, 2018 10:01 pm
Reply to  hendrixnuzzles

No doubt, I expect them to break ground by mid year. So 3 years to build and commission, if it all goes well, start production mid 2021, with 2022 as first year full production. That is the timeline I have been going by, anything sooner is a positive surprise in my perception, but not an expectation. I said the PFS delay didn’t change anything, it just kept the same schedule from the previous year, so 2021/22.

👍 964
👍 9968
renbycage
renbycage
February 13, 2018 11:39 am
Reply to  hendrixnuzzles

I suppose we’ll find out the timeline in just about a month, it would be huge if we could speed things up. I keep my expectations in line with guidance, but very open to over-achievement. Right now I’ll use mid 2021 for first pour, if they can produce something in 2020, that would be beautiful. 2022 for first full year production feels so far away.

👍 964
👍 9968
renbycage
renbycage
February 13, 2018 1:49 pm
Reply to  hendrixnuzzles

It is very much my style, whether it is an investment, product, service, or date, to manage my expectations. I hate the feeling of disappointment, so I leave more mental space for upside than downside as a general life strategy. It seems to work, as I feel extremely satisfied with things, at least for the time being.

Add a Topic
1278
👍 964
👍 9968
John
Guest
John
February 13, 2018 12:30 am
Reply to  hendrixnuzzles

AUZ and ARL are high cost operations using old technology. People do not realise the importance of CLQ tech to make Sunrise viable. When it comes to costs CLQ has no competition. Meanwhile AUZ and ARL will sell bells and whistles while CLQ breaks ground in the second quarter. The serious money is behind CLQ.

renbycage
renbycage
February 13, 2018 1:19 am
Reply to  John

ARL and CLQ will have their PFS/DFS reports out within the next 6 weeks, then we will have some real numbers to look at. I can’t wait. I really haven’t seen how much difference there is between CLQ technology for mining laterites, and “the old technology” way, both using HPAL. So I am expecting to see some kind of pound for pound lower cost the CTEQF way, since they market themselves as a better and lower cost technology. As for Ardea, I anticipate their PFS will look very compelling, and their deposit is no “bells and whistles”, right now it truly is the biggest cobalt deposit outside the congo, and by a long shot.

Add a Topic
1113
👍 964
John
Guest
John
February 13, 2018 2:36 am
Reply to  renbycage

ARL’s KNP is decent grade, but small. It’s 1/1 acid that will ensure it’s costs are sky high. The Western Australian laterites are very different from Sunrise.

I do think it has more potential than AUZ though.

With CLQ tech ARL might make it as it has the grade. AUZ doesn’t.

👍 9968
renbycage
renbycage
February 13, 2018 4:00 am
Reply to  hendrixnuzzles

The size of Ardea’s KNP cobalt would make it 4th largest in Australia, with itself as #1, and Clean TeQ as #2. Its grade is the same as CLQ, but because it is 18 months behind, and such a huge deposit, it is very likely to have several upgrades prior to their DFS, due in 2019. John’s comment about western australian laterites vs cleanteq laterites not being the same is new info for me, so he says that will make Ardea’s costs much higher. I’ll be looking for that in the PFS.

This is what Ardea has to say that may be considered somewhat of a rebuttal to some of John’s points:

In selecting HPAL, many factors were considered, including:
• Capital expenditure (CAPEX) to develop HPAL and atmospheric leach are very similar, with HPAL actually lower cost than most variations of atmospheric leach considered (reflecting the additional reagent consumption and recovery requirements of atmospheric leaching).
• Operational expenditure (OPEX) is considerably lower for HPAL than for atmospheric alternatives.
• HPAL offers considerably lower acid consumption, which is significant in terms of cost and
environmental considerations.
• Without impinging upon cobalt and nickel production, HPAL offers flexibility to recover by-products
such as scandium, aluminium and manganese from the Goongarrie Line.

Add a Topic
1113
Add a Topic
1270
Add a Topic
1113
👍 964
👍 9968
Cowboy
Cowboy
February 12, 2018 10:50 am

AMYZF– Long ( small position )…..Samsung to recycle Cobalt from batteries https://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/companies/2018-02-12-samsung-sdi-to-recycle-cobalt-from-cellphones-to-meet-rising-global-demand/ ….Cowboy

Add a Topic
1113
👍 709
edski
Irregular
February 12, 2018 11:21 am

Morning everyone.
I had an interesting thought this morning. (to me anyway!)

I was thinking since there were streaming deals, buy offs, etc., I wonder if anyone ever thought of Co-Op’s. Farming has done it forever, and with all of the enormous costs involved today and the product scattered among thousands of permits, I think that it might one day become necessary to collectively work together to survive for some companies.
I am not talking about Bitcoin mining here.

Just a thought.

Add a Topic
3640
👍 1073
Cowboy
Cowboy
February 12, 2018 5:40 pm

CTEQF–Long…. We have a fix for this in Australia I believe ! China’s Cobalt conundrum… https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/china-s-cobalt-conundrum-congo Cowboy

Add a Topic
1270
Add a Topic
1113
👍 709
Griffin
Griffin
February 12, 2018 5:44 pm

$CTEQF – Appointment of Operations Director to support Clean TeQ Sunrise Project development

Clean TeQ has today announced appointment of Mr Tim Kindred as Clean TeQ Sunrise Project Operations Director, an
important leadership role as the project progresses through development and into operations.

https://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20180213/pdf/43rjk1c7nj18gy.pdf

note, I’d like to see this guys resume for how many jobs he has finished ahead of schedule.

$CTEQF long

👍 3700
SoGiAm
February 12, 2018 8:44 pm
👍 11604
Griffin
Griffin
February 13, 2018 11:44 am

$CTEQF – These American Cities Are Running Out of Water

found on Yahoo;

http://observer.com/2018/02/los-angeles-atlanta-miami-and-san-francisco-are-running-out-of-water/amp/

CTEQF long

Add a Topic
540
👍 3700
eagerbeaver
eagerbeaver
February 13, 2018 3:52 pm

Benefits of Clean TeQ’s ore processing over the traditional methods.

On page 14 of Clean TeQ’s January 2018 Investor’s Report,

http://www.cleanteq.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/CLQ-Investor-Presentation_January-2018-1.pdf

three methods of ore processing are compared, namely Clean TeQ’s Clean-IX method involving Ion-Exchange after HPAL, traditional smelting (pyrometallurgical), and hydrometallugical, using aqueous fluids. Clean TeQ’s process involves significantly fewer steps than the others. So I sent the following question to their IR and received a very prompt reply from Richard Glass.

Question: Hello Richard,

With respect to your January 2018 Investor Presentation I have a question regarding Clean-IX processing on page 14. Your processing of the ore to yield high purity samples of Cobalt and Nickel (II) Sulphates involves significantly fewer steps than the traditional methods. Does this mean that Clean TeQ’s processing is both faster and cheaper than the other methods, and is it possible to put some comparative figures on this?
Many thanks for your help.

Clean TeQ Response

Thanks for your email.
It’s hard at this point to put precise figures on the benefits, however there is a benefit both from a Capex and Opex perspective.
Capex wise, if we replaced our ion-exchange component of the flow sheet with a traditional CCD system, the Capex benefit is probably in the range of 20-30%. Other benefits include a much smaller footprint. Opex wise, we’re working on these numbers as part of our DFS (due for release this quarter), however we predict there will also be strong operating cost benefits.
The ion-exchange flow sheet is not necessarily faster, however it does result in better recoveries.

(CCD – Countercurrent Distribution is a method of separating substances.)

Add a Topic
1113
Add a Topic
964
👍 465
👍 9968
John
Guest
John
February 14, 2018 12:14 am
Reply to  hendrixnuzzles

AUZ PR Dept.

LOL!!

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

More Info  
15
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x