Friday File: Two New Small-Cap Buys in Hated Businesses, Two (partial) Big Tech Sales

by Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe | September 20, 2019 11:07 pm

Extended Warranties, Marijuana Vape Pens, Overvalued Tech Stocks and more...

This is premium content. To view this article (and to have full access to the rest of our articles), sign up. Already a member? Log in.

Source URL: https://www.stockgumshoe.com/2019/09/friday-file-two-new-small-cap-buys-in-hated-businesses-two-partial-big-tech-sales/


20 responses to “Friday File: Two New Small-Cap Buys in Hated Businesses, Two (partial) Big Tech Sales”

  1. talktome says:

    I really like spoxf, they have over 200,000 global clients and they manage billions, I like the fact that they hold bullion and not paper claims to the metal. I purchased Sprott as an insurance policy. I also purchased MTAFF as a speculative investment. I buy options on Sand and have made some great dollars.

  2. trigell says:

    Thanks! Lots of good information here.

  3. danpreone says:

    Hi Travis,

    I cannot understand how you manage to control a stop loss trigger ( whether to act on it or not ) .
    When a stock falls below a stop loss trigger that you set , will it not automatically be sold ?
    At least that is what happened to me. For SHOP, I set a stop loss at 325. And it automatically sold when it hit below 325.
    I could not prevent it from being sold once it hit the stop loss .
    Could you please clarify if you do it differently that what I did ?
    Thanks

  4. povhq1 says:

    Travis! Did a lot of research and Disagree with your promotion of Tiptree (TIPT). The facts I found are: This company has returned negatively to investors over the last 5 years. It has also reduced it’s dividend regularly during the same period. Revenues are up, but profitability is flat to down — last cycle TIPT didn’t earn enough money to cover their dividend. (you know that isn’t sustainable). As an added bonus, TIPT compensates its CEO and hierarchy at almost twice the industry average for that size company —- smells fishy to me and I am not currently looking for mackerel. Good luck though…..

  5. mojo23 says:

    Travis, love the advice you provide to your members. Ive been a satisfied member since I joined. Keep up the great work.

    Can you shed some light on how you analyze stocks for them to get on your watch list? Id like to understand what you look for and if possible what your thought process is when analyzing potential stock investments.

  6. slumbek says:

    Dear Travis, I am an Irregular, and comment even more irregularly. Thanks for your analysis, especially on the insurance sector, always insightful. I have two sets of questions. The first is related to your selling of Apple and your lack of fretfulness over the selling of it because you have mutual funds and/or ETFs that track a broader swath of companies and Apple comprises up to 4 percent of some of them; therefore, you are still invested in Apple even after no longer having it as an individual equity holding. So at what point does it make sense (if sense is the right word) to own the mutual fund (or other investment vehicle) that has a company as part of its holdings than to ‘go solo’ on that particular stock? Another example is UPS, which is on your watch list and I believe in the Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund. Why not buy more of the fund rather than UPS shares? Presumably, you have the fund because you agree with its management style, and it has an acceptable management fee and has performed well.

    The second set of questions concern the approaching (though not inevitable) parity of the British Pound to USD and the precarious Brexit situation stressing UK companies, some that are still financially viable but overcast by the Brexit cloud, perhaps unfairly. Are there UK publicly traded companies that have attracted your attention? I remember that you had owned a British insurance company but I forget the reason you sold it. I also have read that some UK firms have been bought by Chinese entities, for example, Greene King by Li Ka-shing’s holding company, and Thomas Cooke by Fosun (whose shares you sold). So perhaps, UK firms are attractive for acquisition to some deep pockets, which may not necessarily be immediately rewarded. But that is another story. Thank again.

  7. Well, grabbing at that falling Kush knife hasn’t worked so far… vaping sentiment continues to nosedive, driving the shares lower. We’ll see, but if we get more full-on bans (like MA today, which banned e-cigs for its regulated marijuana dispensaries as well as nicotine e-cigs, for four months while health officials try to figure out what’s going on), then things could fall apart pretty quick for a company. Will keep an eye on it and look into it a bit more as the week progresses.

  8. Braulio says:

    Thanks again for your insights. My only comment is that I believe the vaping debacle will get much worse. Prevalence of lung illness cases from vaping is skyrocketing. No BS. It’s truly astounding to see. I personally dealt with 2 cases yesterday in a small town. Both young healthy prior to onset of vaping associated lung illness. Both remain hospitalized. Not good. Weird thing is vaping has been around for a while and we’re just seeing this epidemic surge. Need Doc Gumshoe to do a full analysis but the situation is dire.

  9. Trade Note: PINC

    Here’s an excerpt from what I wrote a few weeks ago when Premier (PINC) was showing a little post-earnings weakness:

    “Could the stock fall further? Of course! It’s been a relatively boring stock for five years, not generating any growth but consistently posting a profit, generating some cash, and doing relatively minor debt reduction and stock buybacks thanks to the fairly steady $4 or so that they generate each year in free cash flow. That’s reason enough for me to hold on through this fairly wild move, because I like the prospects, but it’s not reason enough for me to actually lose a lot of money on the stock so I won’t let it flounder for another year or fall dramatically further without rethinking that….

    “The challenge has been that the base business, their group purchasing organization that handles buying for member hospitals, is doing fine but is low-growth… and the “performance services” segment, which includes their higher-end consulting and the technology services and data crunching that should create more value in the future, has been sagging as hospitals have been risk-averse in recent years. I’ll keep watching, but nothing in the news this week has changed my thinking so far.”

    The Spruce Point short attack announced today helped bring the shares further down still, with claims that Premier will be losing contracts right and left… perhaps as soon as this week. That’s certainly possible, some of their member hospitals are rolling through renewal periods for the first time since they took Premier public, but I don’t have any knowledge to back up or refute Spruce Point’s assertion that some of the big members will either not renew or will demand better deals.

    The other concern, noted recently, is that Premier’s growth engine is not growing. That was exacerbated by their release of a survey last week that illustrates how slowly the transition to risk-based health insurance and reimbursement is going — and that kind of work, consulting on risk-based reimbursement and providing access to their huge cooperative member databases that include health outcomes data, is a major reason why I owned Premier. The cooperative buying network is good, but it’s essentially a glorified wholesale supplier relationship, and it makes sense that there will probably be margin pressure over time even though Premier employees and systems are embedded in their member hospitals. I expect the assertions that their earnings will be cut in half are hyperbole from Spruce Point, but certainly there’s no sign that those revenues are going to grow quickly.

    So as I noted, I won’t let this become a major money-losing position because I don’t know enough to be confident about if there’s a floor for the share price (or what it might be), and, more importantly, the recent news from their division that I hoped would be a growth engine has been disappointing… which means that with no real growth in their higher-margin division, the upside potential seems to be lower than I had thought a year ago. I don’t know if Spruce Point is going to end up being right here, but I do know that I’m unwilling to stomach more than a 10% real loss in this position given the lack of underlying growth potential… and we just hit that price today, so I’ll clear this position from the Real Money Portfolio at roughly a 10% loss.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.