Become a Member

written by reader What do you think about Franco Nevada $FNV a gold play from Stansberry

By backoffice, October 3, 2019

that’s promising big returns for the coming Gold Bull run stating returns for this year have been close to 40 %. What do you think about this Travis?

This is a discussion topic or guest posting submitted by a Stock Gumshoe reader. The content has not been edited or reviewed by Stock Gumshoe, and any opinions expressed are those of the author alone.

guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
bm4sgs
Member
bm4sgs
October 4, 2019 4:08 pm

It was also mentioned by Jason Bodner as the gold stock of the 5 stocks on his webinar for Palm Beach Trader. Stansberry also mentioned Royal Gold RGLD. But now he’s touting a $7 stock. No idea what it is.

Add a Topic
6872
Add a Topic
210
Add a Topic
370
ash44
Member
ash44
April 10, 2020 2:48 am
Reply to  bm4sgs

Were all 5 gold stocks? Can you please share the other 4 stocks?

Add a Topic
210
bunion132
October 5, 2019 4:52 pm

I just watched the video hosted by Bill Shaw, editor of “Commodity Supercycles”, apparently a newsletter either sponsored by or under the umbrella of Stansberry Research. The video speaks highly of the gold royalties streaming model pioneered by Franco Nevada, which was later copied (with similar success) by Royal Gold. While Shaw recognizes that profits can still be made from investing in FNV and RGLD today, he hints that the big money has already been made from these.

Instead, he’s teasing a $7 stock as “The #1 Gold Stock to Buy in 2019” following the same gold streaming business model. Thinking this was a rehashed tease, I tried the Gumshoe search bar but found nothing on it. Travis?

Add a Topic
5797
Add a Topic
8838
Add a Topic
5721
👍 443
grouville
Member
grouville
January 26, 2020 1:37 pm

Bill Shaw is now running a deal call Gold Stock Analyst for Stansberry. He has a portfolio of 10 favourite gold stocks and he recommends that you hold all of them to spread the risk . The subscription costs $2000 + annual fee. The trouble is most of these stocks are OTC stocks and my broker won’t deal in them. So that’s proved a waste of money. It’s a further example of Stansberry misleading marketing, as this fact wasn’t mentioned at all in the pitch

Add a Topic
5797
Add a Topic
210
👍 2

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

More Info  
4
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x