written by reader I dont get it… Zacks Traders in article dated 20th May spriuking GSX Techedu despite comprehensive Muddy Waters and Citron fraud alerts

By monty5235, May 22, 2020

https://www.zacks.com/stock/news/935315/all-you-need-to-know-about-gsx-techedu-inc-unsponsored-adr-gsx-rating-upgrade-to-buy?cid=CS-MKTWTCH-HL-tale_of_the_tape|yseop_template_12_zacks_rank_upgrade-935315&mod=mw_quote_news

Is the Muddy Waters/ Citron alerts re fraudulent activities of GSX Techedu ( GSX) somehow hidden from the self proclaimed expert deep delving analysts at Zacks… for what reason would they be recommending a stock under such circumstances be bought and especially given it has lost a great deal of value in just the last few weeks. I notice their accompanying graph doesnt reflect the recent drop so assume this article was penned some time ago and then published just in last few days …. doesnt bode well for Zacks as a house of prudent investment advice

This is a discussion topic or guest posting submitted by a Stock Gumshoe reader. The content has not been edited or reviewed by Stock Gumshoe, and any opinions expressed are those of the author alone.

1
Share your thoughts...

avatar
1 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe
Admin
👍14469

Zacks is mostly a quant-driven service, somewhat like Louis Navellier’s — as I understand it they identify stocks by screening and charting, not through fundamental research into the company. Frankly, it also seems to me that many of their articles are written by computers… but I don’t know if that’s true.

And, of course, opinions differ and sometimes Muddy Waters and the other fraud-sniffing short sellers do get it wrong.