Friday File: Fill up your Snifter

by Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe | January 5, 2024 5:02 pm

Adding a new tipple to the Real Money Portfolio

This is premium content. To view this article (and to have full access to the rest of our articles), sign up. Already a member? Log in.

Source URL: https://www.stockgumshoe.com/2024/01/friday-file-fill-up-your-snifter/


29 responses to “Friday File: Fill up your Snifter”

  1. loic says:

    Hi thanks for the article.
    Worth mentioning is the french withholding tax on dividends is higher than the uk withholding tax.
    Can it impact your decision in choosing Pernod Ricard over Diageo ?

  2. slumbek says:

    Dear Travis, I laughed when I read your comment about nobody who didn’t grow up with moutai seems to like.it. Having worked and lived in China and also in Taiwan , I can attest to the presence of moutai at celebrations, especially lunar new year (this time around in February). I don’t like moutai and it doesn’t go well.with food, and colleagues whom I have asked aver that they don’t like moutai. But the drink is so tied up with Chinese culture and it is inexpensive that moutai (whatever the brand) is the tipple of forced choice at celebratory occasions. At least until pre-Covid years, western liquor was the preferred choice at private occasions. Another factor to consider is that ostentatious spending, especially on western luxuries, such as cognac, was actively discouraged in periods where political corruption was publicly fought against by the central government, which led to a major decrease in end-of-year celebrations. This time the issue in China is the general economic malaise, which will significantly curtail luxury spending. On a tangential anecdote, when I was in Dubai at the duty free store, I was next to a group of Indian businessmen. It may have been due to an attractive shop assistant who offered ‘impartial’ advice on what liquor to buy, but the group of about five Indian businessmen left the duty free shop each with Johnnie Walker bottles.

  3. Margaret says:

    Skrewball

  4. Margaret says:

    I love whisky. I love peanut butter. I have tried Skrewball so you don’t have to. A very bad idea, in my opinion. However, tastes vary, so…
    I have not tried Fireball, but judging by the hundreds of nips bottles that appear along my country road every week, it’s very successful.

  5. doncook99 says:

    I enjoy the Skrewball very much. It does not have much of a bite, or strong flavor, so it goes down easy. Be careful.

  6. dr77funkenstein says:

    What are people’s thoughts on David webbs new book, “the great taking?”

  7. pipsqueak20 says:

    I admit that I was reading the conversation a bit confused thinking , hasn’t Fireball been a drink made with Canadian whiskey for a long time. So I of course googled it and yes I was correct, and hadn’t just lost my mind from drinking one too many in my Uni years up hear in Canada Land. I see know that some smart cookies took it on to Dragons Den as a drink to sell at 33 and 46 proof malt called Cinnamon Malt ( so non whiskey, wine and alcohol coolers) along with the traditional Fireball Whiskey that they brand named…and that way they could market not just to liquor stores here in Canada, but to Grocery and corner stores etc , and expand to U.S…which they have done apparently very successfully.
    Hopefully I got the majority of that story correct, guessing the majority of you knew it already anyway. I guess I just never payed attention because the name was already familiar!!
    So do each of these companies for Screwball, and Fireball have stock tickers, we should follow? Any interest in one of them being acquired by a larger corporation do you think?

  8. McNebula says:

    Re you comment by Buffett “You can’t make a good deal with a bad person ” – Amen, words to live by. I have noted in a number of places that you can NOT afford to own stocks if you don’t trust management. Owning a stock IS entrusting management to act in your behalf. . . . . One of the basic question I ask myself on any/every stock own.

  9. devropr9591 says:

    Travis, totally agree with your assessment of R-P. Incredible luxury business, family long termed focus. And there ultra high products have natural moats because they must be produced in Scotland or France and they have limited supply due to raw materials.

    Two other incredible luxury brands are LVMH which, like PR is trading at lows relative to their normal evaluations and RACE (Ferrari). I chose to start a position in LVMH vs. RP over the past week.

    There is a great review of both RP and RACE on Business Breakdowns. RACE may be unlike any company on earth in their exclusivity. Growth will be modest, but consistent due to its self imposed scarcity.

    I think these companies fit into Mr. Munger’s buy great companies. That mantra is directing my investments more and more and I see more clearly how owning them is stepping over a 6” curb instead of jumping over a 5 foot fence.

    Happy New Year too.

  10. devropr9591 says:

    Regarding trusting management, here is a an example of one to not trust.

    In early 2020 the company I’ll call” Rex” hired a new CEO who previously served on their board of directors while CEO of another company. He immediately went to work to improve profitability of the company via higher margins via higher pricing. Within a year or so he increase EDITDA from 0.8B- 1.4B to 1.5- 2.5B depending on the business cycle. How did he do it (with BOD consent)?

    He immediately bagan to renege on contract obligations, refusing to ship product unless customer paid more that stipulated in the contracts. He intentionally shutter production then claimed force majeure conditions to justify shortages and higher prices. He had the company buy up leases on the special equipment needed to ship the product so that competitors could not supply customer as well. This indeed resulted in higher prices and the aforementioned increase EBITDA.

    Once these changes were operational he cut the maintenance budgets of the manufacturing plants which further reduced operational reliability and causing more shortages. He used the money slated to maintain plants to begin buying back stock. As share holders we like stock buy backs, but using true free cash flow, not cash needed to maintain operations.

    Fast forward to mid 2022. 18 customers filed lawsuits claiming Rex violated contracts placing causing hardship and duress. One company filed a lawsuit against Rex and the CEO, not for breach of contract, but for violating the Sherman Antitrust act which protects customers against anti-competitive practices. After reading lawsuit, which is over 200 pages long with numerous public quotations from he CEO, another company who previously filed a breach contract suite filed their own anti-trust lawsuit.

    In rare decision, a judge ordered Rex to resume supplying product to one customer, presumably because it was needed to maintain public safety. Normally judges do not like to enforce performance because of all the subtle nuanced, instead they assess financial penalties. But the judge told Rex to ship product per the contract which they did by shorting another very well known, high visible company, who used the product to sell directly to consumer. Their name is a household word and represents trust, reliability, integrity. Thus they suffered damage to their brand.

    Remember the increased EDITDA. Well according to one insider REX will need to spend $6b in maintenance to reestablish operational reliability and efficiency lost since 2020. So that 1-1.5b extra EDITDA was smoke and mirrors. And they will need to borrow that money at higher interest rates.

    If the USGOV decides to enter the game because anti-trust is their playground, and it is. Rex. If found guilty will likely face a consent decree which will severely hamper its ability to conduct business as normal for possibly 10 years. And people can go to prison. And the employees are left with broken company

    All this because an unscrupulous CEO was allowed by a accommodating board of directors to break the rules.

    Lastly, what is the biggest threat to capitalism? It isn’t socialism. It’s bad capitalist.

  11. Johnny Terawatt says:

    Hello Travis,

    I was fortunate enough to purchase PRNDY at about $31 on your recommendation for RI.PA earlier this month. I’m sorry if I missed it, but do you have a “buy under” price limit for the near-term. I’d like to scale into the position without getting giddy with the effervescence.

    Johnny

  12. Johnny Terawatt says:

    Hello, Travis!

    I’ve been building a position (based on your and others’ suggestions) in PRNDY and have a cost basis about 4% above the current price.

    RI just reported their quarter and I read the conference call transcript. I got the sense that the analysts were somewhat skeptical about the report. Do you have any general thoughts about their their numbers and guidance?

    Best Spring wishes to you and yours! I’m off to France soon (thanks, in part, to the money you made for me in Coresite) and will definitely have a sip of Martell and a toast to you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.