Can Americans now collect “Federal Rent Checks?”

What's the deal with getting on these "special distribution lists?"

By Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe, July 23, 2018

This ad is one of so many that make me grit my teeth over the “checks” that “everyday Americans” can easily “claim” to receive thousands of dollars a month… they’re all technically true, but they omit so much that I’m sure folks who can’t afford to get sucked into this silliness end up losing money.

So let’s look at those “Federal Rent Checks” today, dear readers — this is a pitch from Money Morning, and I’m sure some readers start salivating as soon as they read the intro:

“Under an IRS directive, millions of Americans can now collect: “FEDERAL RENT CHECKS”

“Please review the following information to see how you could receive $1,795 or more every month!”

And then some language that starts to make it seem like, hey, maybe this crazy idea of me getting free checks could be real!

“You already know that it’s your tax dollars paying for each building and facility being used by the DOJ, CIA, NASA, FDA, Congress, and even the White House.

“At one time or another, citizens like you graciously covered the construction costs.”

Right, so that’s MY White House, yes? I get to charge rent on it! This is starting to sound possible, yes?

Sorry, Not really. Not like you’re thinking. Here’s the next bit:

“Currently, over 100 federal agencies are required by law to pay rent for the properties they occupy.

“This cash is flooding into the Treasury Department, where it’s being stockpiled in the Federal Buildings Fund.

“This year it will have $11.1 billion in it.

“That’s worth repeating…

“It’s an enormous, $11.1 billion pool of money.

“And some very smart Americans have discovered an investment that allows them to tap into a large portion of it.

“Their reward: A hefty monthly check.”

See what they did there? Use an insanely huge number ($11.1 billion) and then talking about a “hefty check.” Which word gets downplayed? Investment.

So yes, this is not a free check you get in the mail because you’re a US citizen and your forefathers helped buy Columbus, Ohio… this is an investment. As you’d expect from, well, an investment newsletter.

Though, of course, the emails introducing the ad don’t use the term “investment” at all… that comes later.

What’s the actual newsletter being peddled? It’s a little complicated, but they’re primarily selling D.R. Barton’s 10-Minute Millionaire Insider, which seems to be focused on technical trading and options as well as on higher-income investments. It’s a relatively low-cost letter, they offer it at $79 for the first two years, but also throw in a one-month trial to Private Briefing, another of their newsletters that after a month will renew at $99… so if you sign up and don’t pay attention or cancel anything, you’ll end up eventually paying $178 a year. You’ll probably see lots of other prices bandied about, they tend to test price points pretty aggressively in different promotions.

This is part of how the email from Mike Ward was worded:

“… it turns out some folks have uncovered an ingenious way to exploit Uncle Sam’s rent situation.

“They’ve figured out how to add their names to a special distribution list.

“This entitles them to collect what we’ve classified as ‘Federal Rent Checks.’

“Around the second week of every month, some Americans are receiving an envelope in the mail with $1,795 in it. We found others collecting over $3,000 and $5,000 every month.”

But yes, as with every single email ad that promises you that you can “enroll” or “sign up” or “put your name on the list” for some particular checks that will come flowing your way… the word they should be using is “invest”.

These checks are returns on your investment, in pretty much every case… as is said so often it sometimes gets ignored, “it takes money to make money.” The person who collects the most rent is the person who owns the biggest chunk of the building.

Still, we think, those checks… maybe they’re really “hefty?” What does “hefty” mean, anyway?

More from the ad:

“I like to refer to them as ‘Federal Rent Checks.’

“And they can be quite large.

“Some folks have been pocketing significant amounts of money…

“Like Mitchell Lorens. He is collecting Federal Rent Checks worth $2,670 a month…”

They show dozens of smiling photos of folks who are collecting these checks, in amounts ranging from about $2,000 a month to well over $100,000 a year, all of which serves to set a baseline in your mind… “hey,” you might be thinking, “even if the lowest amount is $1,795 a month, that ain’t bad!”

Which is true, of course, $1,795 a month is nothing to sneeze at… but that’s not the amount you get if you just “sign up” with one share.

And they reiterate many of the arguments that are often made about the special “checks” you can receive if you only join this newsletter and “sign up” … how it’s better than Social Security because there are “no restrictions” on who can “sign up” … but what they really do is keep punching that hot button (for anyone who’s close to retirement) and mentioning those monthly checks.

“‘Federal Rent Checks’ are issued around the second week of every month, January through December.

“And by implementing a simple strategy, you can collect them every month!

“Brad Thomas served as an advisory board member for President Trump’s original campaign.

“He compared the ‘Federal Rent Checks’ that folks like John, Bonnie, Simon, Al, and Lindy are collecting to printing money.

“Money you can count on, because it’s backed by the full faith and credit of the United States.”

So that’s enough of my huffing and puffing about the language in the ad… this is an investment they’re teasing, so what is the investment?

It’s all about government buildings — or, more specifically, the buildings that are leased by the government. Naturally, like any other business, when the government needs more office space they have to rent it — they do occasionally buy buildings, but more often the government does what it always does… rent instead of buy, because that makes the current financials look better.

And as governments have become more and more strapped, both on the federal level and in states and municipalities, they’ve actually sold more properties and leased them back to give a bit of a one-time cash infusion… just like a corporation might when they’re trying to make their books look better and become more “asset light.”

So how do you profit from that? Here’s what the ad says…

“Altogether, the U.S. Government is legally required to pay rent for 9,600 federal buildings this year…..

“And there is a way for you to receive a “Federal Rent Check” every month from these “private agencies.”

“It takes about 10 minutes to set up.

“You can even use your cell phone to get started!

“Depending on your investment…

“Each of your ‘Federal Rent Checks’ could initially be made out for $1,795.

“But over time those checks could be worth much, much more.

“And that’s because…

“The longer you are on the distribution list… The bigger your Federal Rent Checks can grow!”

So how does one “claim a coveted spot on the distribution list for federal rent checks?”

I’m afraid it’s just as simple as you’re imagining: You buy shares of a Real Estate Investment Trust that owns government buildings, then collect your dividends… it’s those dividend payments that D.R. Barton is calling “Federal Rent Checks.” And the “special strategy” he cites is… buying more than one such investment, because then your dividend checks come more regularly (most REITs still pay their dividends quarterly, but if you own a bunch of them you might time it to get a check every few weeks).

For those who are unaware, REITs are Real Estate Investment Trusts — they trade just like regular companies on the stock exchange, but they are pass-through businesses when it comes to taxes — they don’t pay corporate taxes, and in exchange for that tax exemption they’re required to pass through at least 90% of their income to shareholders in the form of dividends (with the assumption being that you’ll pay taxes on those dividends, so the tax does eventually get paid).

And yes, for most REITs the dividend payments will increase over time — that’s one of the major appeals of real estate investment, rents increase over time with inflation, so if the company manages its buying and selling well and doesn’t pay too much in overhead costs, they can increase the dividend as they raise rents.

Barton even says that…

“Down the Road You Could Be Paid an Enormous Lump Sum to Transfer the Rights to Your Federal Rent Checks.

“It’s easy to find someone to pay a pretty penny to take over your spot on the distribution list. I’ll show you how.”

No trick there… if you want to “transfer your rights” to receive these dividends, you just sell the stock. If it’s worth more when you want to “transfer” in the future, then you’ve made some money (REITS do not only go up in price, of course, just like stocks do not only go up… so you could lose money, too).

So which ones specifically are being talked about? Well, there are a bunch of REITs that have occasional government tenants, mostly office REITs (the government, after all, is nothing if not a major employer of buildings full of office workers), but there are just two who are really focused entirely on being “Uncle Sam’s Landlord” (OK, they rent space to local and state governments, too… but mostly the Feds). The one that is most often teased is Government Properties Income Trust (GOV), and the smaller upstart is Easterly Government Properties (DEA).

And not a lot has changed about the story for these two over the past few years that GOV has been relentlessly teased by one newsletter or another (it was pitched for a long time as a way to earn monthly checks from a “little known Social Security contract,” since the Social Security Administration is one of its larger tenants), but it has also been touted as a way to “earn an extra $1,003 in benefits” or “tax back the government”.

This is what I said back in December when I wrote about GOV following a Personal Finance teaser pitch:

“This one has a super-high yield (about 9% now), but I’ve never really liked it. It’s nice to have great tenants, and the government always pays its rent on time, but GOV has never been able to meaningfully improve their performance on a per-share basis, and has no ability to raise the dividend (they’re more likely to need to cut it, unless they sell properties to generate more cash flow — the dividend is much higher than their FFO per share). I still prefer Easterly Government Properties (DEA), which is a smaller and similar company with a much nicer income statement and a lower (but slowly growing and more sustainable) dividend, though I don’t own either.”

Really, the only thing that has really changed in recent years is the share price — in the past three years the price of GOV has dropped 14%, and the price of DEA has risen 23%. GOV pays a very high dividend but has not been able to raise the dividend in many years, and DEA pays a lower but rising dividend, so the total return has been positive for both — GOV has returned 11% in three years including the dividend, DEA 43%.

And right now it’s that huge dividend yield that is no doubt catching some attention — GOV has always been a relatively high-yield REIT, even back when it yielded 8 or 9% in past years, and now the share price has fallen enough that the (unchanged) dividend yields almost 11% for current buyers. That’s what happens to REITs that investors don’t particularly like, or when they think that the dividend is unsustainable — as it may eventually be, since GOV has almost always paid out more cash in dividends than they generate from their business.

The same is true of DEA, they pay out almost exactly as much in dividends as they generate in operating cash flow, though DEA is smaller and growing more aggressively, and raising the dividend (which perhaps helps to to keep investors more confident), and DEA has a much smaller debt burden so far relative to its equity, so they do have a bit more flexibility to borrow as they grow — which helps to sustain the dividend growth.

The other little oddity here, if you’re interested in researching GOV, is that Government Properties Income Trust is externally managed — their management is provided by the RMR Group (which is also publicly traded, ticker RMR) in exchange for a fee. That’s not entirely unusual — externally managed REITs just pay a management fee instead of having employees — but in this case GOV also owns shares of both RMR itself and of another RMR-managed REIT, Select Income REIT (SIR), which in turn has spun out another REIT and still owns part of Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT).

I’d generally prefer to own a REIT whose management team is entirely focused on making that REIT specifically successful, rather than an externally managed REIT which shares leadership with a handful of other real estate companies… and really, when you look at the past performance you can see where the value is accruing — it’s not to the folks who own the properties and collect those “Federal Rent checks”, it’s to the company that manages those REITs.

To be fair, those REITs managed by RMR have been above average over the past few years, as illustrated by this chart, compared to the Vanguard REIT Index ETF (VNQ)… but it makes me squint a little bit when I see how much dramatically better that external manager has done.

So I come down about where I always seem to come down when it comes to Government Properties Income Trust: If you can’t improve per-share performance over time, I’ll look elsewhere… even if the yield hitting 11% does start to get incrementally more tempting. And Easterly Government Properties still looks more appealing to me than GOV, but neither is tempting enough to get me to buy the shares at this point.

I do always like to refer back to those “checks” they cite in these ads and do the math, to illustrate what kind of investment they’re talking about — they say that you can start collecting “as much as $1,795 per month”, and I’m pretty sure that’s the lowest number they cite for ongoing “checks”. What kind of investment would be required for that?

Well, if you’re just talking about buying GOV shares, which are very high-yielding (and therefore the easiest way to boost that “check” amount, relatively speaking), their dividend is 43 cents per quarter, per share. That’s per quarter, not per month, so if you want to get $1,795 per month you’d need to get a quarterly dividend of $5,385. If we round down a little bit, then to receive a quarterly dividend of roughly $5,300 you’d need to own about 12,500 shares of GOV. At $15.68 per share today, that would cost you about $196,000. A fairly steep investment for those who are tempted by the overhyped promises of a $79 newsletter.

Certainly it’s true that REITs can compound their earnings, and you might turn a smaller position than that into a meaningful stream of income over many years — particularly if you don’t take your dividends in cash but instead let the dividends reinvest and buy more shares, increasing your stake… but there’s no magic to it other than the mathematical magic of compounding, which works best when it is allowed to work undisturbed for a long period of time.

If you buy 100 shares of GOV today for $1,568, for example, you’ll receive enough in dividends to buy almost another three shares next quarter (most brokers will do this reinvestment automatically and without a fee, including partial shares), then three shares the quarter after that if the price and dividend are still the same, and that does add up so soon your income is making more income… but it takes time and a steady stock, and there are external impacts from things like tenant bankruptcies (probably not the US government, but they are trying to shrink their office footprint), or from rising interest rates (which can increase costs for borrowers like REITs, and also make bonds relatively more appealing than REIT shares for some investors). And, of course, for a relatively volatile REIT like GOV that has dropped from the mid-$20s eight years ago to a low of $12 recently, the pain of seeing that drop in value in your portfolio might not be fully masked by the ongoing dividend payments.

But it is, at least, quite a bit cheaper than it has been for most of the past decade… so that’s something.

Your mileage may vary, of course, and I’m sure some of you have looked at these stocks before — perhaps you even own them. What do you think? Getting cheap enough to buy GOV here? Like that high yield even if it can’t grow? Think things will start looking up for the government building owners? Let us know with a comment below.


Irregulars Quick Take Paid members get a quick summary of the stocks teased and our thoughts here. Join as a Stock Gumshoe Irregular today (already a member? Log in)

Share your thoughts...

53 Comments on "Can Americans now collect “Federal Rent Checks?”"

Notify of
avatar

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

vivian lewis
Guest
0
*A US reader asked me to comment on Rida Morwa’s article in Seekingalpha.com about getting a 9.4% yield fromSan Francisco-based Pattern Energy, PEGI-Q, a highly-leveraged independent global alternative energy holding company invested in wind and solar. I would have sprung for its Canada sub, Pattern Renewable Holdings Canada ULC not listed , which selects the investments. PEGI sounds too good to be true for a reason. First of all the fund invests according to the research of this separate Canada unlisted outfit whose shares are privately held to achieve this splendid return. Front running inevitably occurs. Moreover, with Ontario turning… Read more »
Carbon Bigfoot
Guest
0

Financial people are not qualified to evaluate the economics, or the science around renewables, i.e., wind and solar. Here is information you need before you bite the bullet:
https://principia-scientific.org/the-excess-costs-of-weather-dependent-renewables/

AdmBuck
Guest
0
My math came out a little different from Barton’s. Current price for GOV REIT Is $16.50/share, X 8,000 shares = $132,000 I would need to fork over to start. If $132,000 earns 12%, that’s $15,840 it would earn in 1 year; or $1,320 per month. Granted, 12% earnings is nothing to sneeze at, if I had $132,000 jus sitting around, wouldn’t I be better off putting my $ in several cannabis stocks that have the potential of much higher earnings? Overall, I strongly felt that Barton missed stating (maybe purposely) that it needs $132,000 or more to start this “rent… Read more »
Add a Topic
6288
AJD
Guest
0

A fool and his money are soon parted…

James E. Walton
Guest
0

Sir, I also concur w/ your comments / argument; They go round and round with nothing for an hour; A waste of my time……..

Geo
Guest
0

I agree. Their (video) sales tactics all claim how easy it is to “get started with little to no experience. Simply follow along to said recommendations and you could soon see gains in little of over a week!” Etc. And the repetition! Sickening. Beware and check here for what others have to say regarding their other programs.

pluppo
Guest
0
Whenever I see a video that seems to be getting a bit long, showing photos and checks of all the ‘winners’, I immediately get leery. As soon as I hear ‘My Report’, though, it takes me all of 2 seconds to hit the ‘back’ button on my browser! Loll Certainly if you have over $100,000 to invest, these govt REIT’s are a seemingly good and safe investment, and a healthy, regular return that will pay itself off fairly quickly. But to sell it as something, ‘A list anyone can get on! Just follow the instructions in my $39 report!’ Sounds… Read more »
rggordo78
Irregular
34
Absolutely it needs to stop. I got duped into a couple subscriptions that thankfully I didn’t pay too much for. So being completely new at this, I started reading and reading. Information is power right? I was basically just reading Agora and MoneyMap. And what I realized was they were doing the same thing. Different people would give a great sales pitch that almost made a person desperate to throw $2,000 at them for the too good to be true sales pitch. And each person basically had the same sales pitch but with a different name. And of course to… Read more »
wegi
Irregular
19

I agree. I noticed the same thing. very frustrating.

prtrafficgroup
Member
14

How is the guy getting away with not explaining to people the TRUTH on what it takes to get the 1700 mo check

Gayle
Guest
0

I completely agree with you and it should be stopped. I am tired of hearing how they want to help when far from it. They just want lots of use to pay the money so they can run up a big check from it all, but I’m done. I am tired of getting slammed with all the emails trying over and over to sell me something. Get to the point if you want to sell something and don’t drag out a hour long presentation trying to convince someone to buy something. Its disgraceful

Mary Hamilton
Guest
0

I total agree with Mr. Buck.had to say about the “HYPE of watching 45 to 1 hour of repeat, repeat, and more for an hour or so and you still have not gotten to the answere you are waiting to hear.

Walter G. Nickerson
Guest
0

I would be very careful about cannabis stocks as long as it’s illegal at the federal level. Some companies have been taxed at 100% and gone under because the govt. decided to make an example of them. Under the current administration this could Very easily happen again.

roberthebel
Irregular
79

What public ally traded USA pot company or companies have been taxed 100 Pct and have gone under ? Never heard of even one

Eddison Stines
Guest
0
I couldn’t agree more and b4 I start ranting, let me express my gratitude for your explanation and to AdmBuck for expressing my exact sentiment. I did pay the $79 not because I thought I could make some of this easy rent check, but for the opportunity to look at more of their MO. The hype which runs for an hour or more insults my intellect and patience tremendously and I have attempted many times to document the tirade like AdmBuck did but even then my patience wore thin. In order to reduce my impatience with their video presentations, I… Read more »
Elwood Lee
Guest
0

Thank you everyone for clearing up the facts. It really goes back to the old saying, “If it sounds to good to be true, it usually is!” I see the potential, but it’s certainly not like their ad implies.

Marinda Ferrell
Guest
0

This information has been more beneficial than the video presentation on Government Rent Checks. I am going to invest because it does seem profitable.

Add a Topic
5962
craig hitchman
Guest
0

I have signed up for this a while back but I have never got anything from this except my money being gone.

knud
Guest
0

Reits are a tax nightmare.

fabian
Guest
0

Good old Barton recommends 7 reits in his letter, GOV indeed, but also DEA, VNO etc. And his “federal rent check” consists of owning these reits into a Roth IRA, tax free, the tax saved being the “rent” paid to you by dear Guv. However, I think that even the “dog-who-ate-the-homework” knows this little trick in the USA.

Yvonne
Guest
0

I bit to the Investment advisors. I have subscribed to three. I am going to try to get out of them. They haven’t helped me at all in the four or five months I’ve had them. Wanted advice on marijuana stocks. Those weed millions they promised haven’t got to me yet.

Add a Topic
6289
john2handy
Member
6

I got this one also. (10 Minute Millionaire Insider) They really do make it sound so good. But the thing that drives me nuts with all of these “fomo” deals is that I haven’t found one yet that is anything more than paying for expensive upgrade spam. I try them all in my Tradestation Simulator but even finding any after all that to have the courage to put into the live account is difficult.

Margaret
Guest
0

Are these MoneyMorning, TotalWealthResearch newsletters all just scams that lure investors into losing money?

wegi
Irregular
19

Probably many disappointed people asked for refunds and canceled, so that is why the say “no refunds” now. They used to offer refunds.

mike
Guest
0

2 pence and none the richer

Wanted: honest earnings!
Guest
0
Wanted: honest earnings!
That’s a good, thorough explanation of this ‘Federal Rent checks’ pitch. I was very tempted to go for it, but knew there had to be a BIG catch lol. I don’t have anywhere near that 196K minimum to invest to get 1795. per mo. For me it would be a pretty hard stretch to scrape together 50-60K for a semi-passive income stream. I like monitoring charts, watching price action at S&R levels, etc. Gotta be something out there that can earn a nice steady 800. – 900. per mo minimum w/o exposure to stupid high risk. Protecting principle at least… Read more »
Add a Topic
6288
Jorge Padilla Ochoa
Guest
0

I rather keep my money safe in an investment that is not exposed to the stock market losses such as an IUL

JACK YOUNG
Guest
0

If you want a good REIT that currently pays .22 cents monthly, check out
“O” Realty Income

JACK YOUNG
Guest
0

If you want a good REIT that currently pays a very sustainable .22 cent monthly dividend, check out “O” Realty Income

Tiana gibbens
Guest
0

I just.received a phone call today saying I was one of many chosen because.I have been paying my bills on time and so on. So.he said for me i will get a call back and right down some info and go to Wal-Mart and pick up.my 9000.00 cashiers check that I can cash immediately. Of course i didn’t do this but can anyone explain why or who is doing this and is it a real thing? Please.answer back thank you

Libmat
Guest
0

You were smart to doubt it. That’s an ongoing world wide scam. The known sources are mainly from India, Nigeria, and Eastern Europe. The US worked with several other governments to catch a significant number of those operation centers, but there are too many to eliminate them all. People are promised a real check but there’s a catch. You send them a finders fee via a gift card that you pay real money for, or you send cash via a transfer company like Wells Fargo. Their cashier’s check is bogus. So, not real. There’s no free lunch.

Suzanne
Guest
0
SCAM- The scammers will call you or email you stating you won, or you must do this in order to receive a prize etc. or even say you must send money for your grandchild who needs it for school, or some made up story. They can get family names right off of your Facebook if you don’t have it shielded from the public They will tell you to go buy gift cards or transfer money by going to a store that does wire transfers. Just don’t pay anyone you don’t know, any kind of money or give them your credit… Read more »
edward
Guest
0

has anyone got the name of the stock that is being pitched by wealth daily as “a hurricane proof power plant that fits into closet. thanks, ed.

missbaysdaddy
Member
2

I own shares of both DEA and GOV but my rent checks will not be anything like what has been stated. I have 100 shares of each and will hang onto them unless they cut the dividend then I am out and won’t be coming back.

Evelyn Mix
Guest
0

How to get on the list

Prince Harry
Guest
0

Thank you for your always in-debt analysis I come here to find the right answers to these questions. DR through money map and appearing on Fox Business TV to sell unlighted investors snake oil, just to collect $79. What a shame

Add a Topic
6289
Lee Finstad
Guest
0

I would like to learn about option trading

Add a Topic
4656
Lynn Clark, Stock Gumshoe
Admin
130

Hi Lee: Travis recommends this site for learning about options.

There are a couple of discussions on our site about trading options. Here and https://www.stockgumshoe.com/2018/05/microblog-learning-options/.

And here is a link to everything we have on the site tagged “options or futures”.

Add a Topic
570
Add a Topic
570
Add a Topic
570
Lee Finstad
Guest
0

Is there a cost to this thread

David Charles
Guest
0

Let me in the knows

Roy R Hartzler
Guest
0
I suspected what you affirmed above. I will check out the symbols you mentioned, but I generally stick to common shares of stock. I’m not sure what I am getting myself into with REITs. I do have one stock that pays me 18 cents a share per month and it has a stock price of less than 20 dollars. That is always something to consider. How much do you have to pay for the stock to get a good dividend price? Sometimes, less dividend is better if you can make up the difference in the number of shares you can… Read more »
dread357
Irregular
2

Roy R Hartzler, I follow a guy on seeking alpha named Brad Thomas and he specializes in REITs and breaks them down he has plenty of info if you want a little insight.

Patti
Guest
0
I have been “duped” 3 or 4 times because thesew people are so convincing! It’s sickening! I was desperate as well living on unemployment and was so upset the last time I was duped I reported it to the FTC and the other 3 that duped me as well! The FTC LOVES to go after scammers like this. If you go to FTC.GOV and look at the cases and all of the areas we can get scammed its amazing! They handle everything from robo calls to car dealerships falsifying information to get the loan pushed through, to make money working… Read more »
Shawn
Guest
0

So we’re is my check .

Judy Bailey
Guest
0

Hi i would like too invest into federal rent checks distabushion but i need the webb site or phone number can some one point the way please

CALL THE SEC SCAMMERS
Guest
0
CALL THE SEC SCAMMERS
It is as close as a scam as anyone can find them , My experience with stock that could never loose , I paid 2500 in their program invested another $5000 , I got bombarded every week with multiples offer that were even better and more up to date than the other , one of them was a con artist which was supposed to have written the computer program for home depot , another con artist which promised white gold , and oh yes they all brag that they held high position none of them can prove anything , stay