Cash Machine’s “Enroll in the Next 24 Hours” pitch for 8.53% Income Fund

Bryan Perry hints at an investment... "you’ll not only be getting over three times more money than a one-year CD, you’ll also know that your money will be equally as safe" -- so what is it?

By Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe, December 4, 2019

I haven’t written about Bryan Perry’s Cash Machine newsletter in several years, and I know that a lot of Gumshoe readers are interested in income investments and dividends… so I thought this would be a good one to sniff out for you.

The ad is for a subscription to his newsletter, of course (currently $49.95/yr, “on sale”), and though he dropped the “25%” from the name many years ago (when I first covered this one, it was called “25% Cash Machine“), he does still say that he aims for 25% annual returns from his model portfolios — including 10% income yields. Which is very ambitious for a dividend or income-focused newsletter, of course, but, well, it’s good to have goals.

Aiming for 10 percent dividend yields and 25% total returns means you’re probably going to be pushing the envelope a bit, so what is Perry hinting at today as his next favorite investment? Here’s the headline from the ad email I received:

“Safe 8.53% Income Fund Goes Ex-Dividend December 11: Buy Now

“Enroll In the Next 24 Hours and Grab the Next Payday!”

We’re told that this is also a monthly payer (as opposed to quarterly, like most investments)… but what other clues do we get?

“… my high net-worth readers who put $1 million in this fund will grab a $7,400 payout in less than 30 days.

“Those who invested in this little-known security when I recommended it March of last year have not only collected twelve $7,400 paydays for a total of $88,800, they are smiling all the way to the bank.”

OK, so it’s at least been paying this yield for well over a year — and that wording makes it seem that this ad was first written back in March of 2019.

We also get a few specific clues that will help the Thinkolator…

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


“Advisors Asset Management Owns 566,872 Shares…

“And they’ll be collecting their own $951,912 payday along with Wells Fargo & Company, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, and the Royal Bank of Canada.”

And he throws what looks to me to be a wild pitch in assuring readers that this is as safe as a CD…

“Once You Grab Your First Payday,

“You’ll Never Put Your Money in a CD Again

“That’s because you’ll not only be getting over three times more money than a one-year CD, you’ll also know that your money will be equally as safe.

“This is why Wall Street’s biggest insiders are already in on this deal!

“Once you see how this fund can pay you this kind of high dividend safely, I know you’ll never put your money in a CD, Treasury bill, or low-paying dividend stock again.”

The numbers track just fine, the best one-year CDs currently pay about 2.25%, but that “your money will be equally safe” is a HUGE promise to make. CDs NEVER lose value, the return of your principal is guaranteed and insured after that year is up… if you tell me you’ve got a publicly traded investment that is that safe and also yields more than 8%, I have no choice but to think you’re delusional. Or lying.

But we’ll let that pass for the moment and focus on what the actual investment is… so let me feed those clues into the maw of the Mighty, Mighty Thinkolator.

Need an extra minute here, there’s a lot of snow to brush off.

OK, fine chugging along nicely… starting to get an answer…. and THERE! This is AllianzGI Diversified Income & Convertibles (ACV), a leveraged closed-end mutual fund.

So no, it is nowhere near as safe as a CD. It both owns investments that could fall in value, and it borrows money to leverage the returns on those investments — leverage goes both ways, amplifying both good and bad returns, so they do get to build a larger portfolio and therefore pay out higher dividends from that portfolio… but if they choose poorly or are unfortunately and their portfolio falls in value, that drop will be larger than it would have been if they weren’t borrowing money.

And yes, Advisors Asset Management did own 566,872 shares… but that was back in February, since then they’ve sold more than half of those shares (they own 257,911 shares as of the September quarter). So if that’s who you were counting on for an endorsement, well, you might want to look elsewhere.

A closed-end fund, if you’re unfamiliar with the notion, usually trades like a stock (so putting “ACV” in your brokerage or research website will get you trading info and let you place orders), but it is a mutual fund that owns a diversified portfolio of stuff. It’s also different than an ETF or a regular mutual fund, though, because mutual fund shares are created or destroyed (redeemed) every day to keep the share price in tight correlation with the value of its underlying investments… a closed-end fund is, well, closed — they do not create or redeem shares every day, they issue a set number of shares in an IPO and that’s all they have (unless they do another offering someday, or decide to buy back shares), so the price is set not by the net asset value (NAV) of the underlying portfolio (as with an ETF, usually, or with a regular mutual fund all the time), but by what traders are willing to pay for that portfolio.

So closed-end funds usually don’t trade at exactly their net asset value, most of them typically trade at a discount to the value of their holdings… but they can also trade at a premium. They also typically don’t look very appealing when you compare them to regular open-ended mutual funds, mostly because the cost (and risk) of their leverage, and the fact that the management company is not incentivized to cut management costs (they’ve raised the money already, and the money can’t easily leave), mean that they typically have quite high expense ratios compared to ETFs or mutual funds (ACV’s reported expense ratio is 3.4%). They’re also quite popular investments for fixed-income investors, largely because a lot of these funds invest in bonds and other higher-yield investments and use leverage to generate high and regular dividend/distribution income for shareholders.

This particular closed-end fund, managed by Allianz, looks pretty reasonable at my first glance. It trades at a small premium to the NAV, right around 2% at the moment, which is not ideal (but that fluctuates, and it’s likely to be available at a small discount before too long). It carries both preferred shares and debt for total leverage of about 30% (the debt portion is about 20%), and it has an expiration date — the fund will be liquidated on the 15th anniversary, which is in about 10-1/2 years, unless shareholders elect to extend it (doesn’t mean much now, but as that date gets closer it should tend to keep the premium or discount the shares trade at relatively limited — since the fund would presumably be liquidated and funds returned to shareholders at net asset value).

The fund had its IPO in the spring of 2015, and it collapsed immediately — probably because most closed-end funds trade at a discount but the IPO was at NAV… it looks like the shares collapsed right around the time they announced their first monthly dividend, so it was probably also partly just a reset to put the dividend yield in a similar neighborhood to competing investments.

Since then, it has done just fine and has continued to pay out that exact same 16.7 cents per month as a dividend distribution for more than four years now. And the market has been strong for the investments they own, thanks largely to falling interest rates, so they have had plenty of returns to support that dividend and also allow their net asset value to rise a bit.

Here’s how the fund describes itself:

Investment Focus: Provide total return through a combination of current income and capital appreciation, while seeking to provide downside protection against capital loss.

Why Invest:

  • Designed to dynamically allocate across convertibles, equities and income-producing securities.
  • Normally invests at least 50% of total managed assets in convertibles; can also write covered call options on the stocks held in the equity portion.
  • Attempts to dampen volatility relative to an equity-only portfolio due to the asymmetric risk/return features historically exhibited by convertible securities.
  • Managed by an experienced investment team that has a long track record in closed-end fund management.
  • 15-year limited term structure from the effective date of the Fund’s registration statement, which may be extended by 1 year based on market conditions.

The fund is not at all concentrated, their latest update says that it holds 300+ stocks, preferred stocks and bonds, and some hedging short positions, and the only positions above 1% (and just barely above that) are convertible preferreds in Bank of America, Wells Fargo and Broadcom, and some Microchip Technology convertible bonds. Their equity investments look at lot like the S&P 500, with stakes in the biggest stocks whether they pay dividends or not (Microsoft, Apple, Visa, Alphabet, Amazon and Facebook are the only common stocks in their top 20 holdings).

And, yes, the shares have done quite well over time… particularly if you did not make the mistake of buying at the IPO (NEVER buy a closed end fund at the IPO, they can almost always be bought at a discount later). Here’s what the total return performance has looked like over the past three years compared to some other income-focused investments (ACV is in blue, iShares Dividend Growth DGRO in green, the S&P 500 in purple, iShares Convertible Bond ETF ICVT in red and Invesco Preferred ETF PGX in orange):

ACV Total Return Price Chart

The part that might be catching your attention, I imagine, is the fourth quarter of 2018 — so in order to reinforce the “no, this isn’t as safe as a CD” notion, let me highlight that quarter for you with those same five investments:

ACV Total Return Price Chart

So sure, ACV is a reasonable closed-end fund if you want exposure to convertible debt and a high current income… but don’t forget what happened the last time investors were freaking out about stocks and the Federal Reserve and interest rates (the rate was at zero when ACV went public, rising gradually in 2017 and 2018 until the last Fed rate hike, in December of 2018 when the market also crashed for a little while).

The distributions for ACV haven’t changed since they started paying them in 2015, so if you had bought in that panic about a year ago you would have been buying with a dividend yield of over 11%. The yield right now is about 8.2%, with most of it being covered not by coupon payments and dividends but by the investment gains on the portfolio — with a lot of those gains having been generated by the fact that interest rates have fallen pretty sharply over the past four years. Rising interest rates or a falling stock market would both be negatives for them, but they would likely still be willing and able to keep paying the dividend (by selling investments) as long as any negative market trends like that are relatively short-term in nature.

And yes, they do go ex-dividend for the December distribution on December 11, meaning that if you want this month’s 16.7 cents (payable January 2) you would need to buy the shares by December 10. The shares regularly move more than 17 cents up or down in a day (that’s less than one percent), so I wouldn’t rush just to get one month’s dividend — you’ve got time to think it over.

You don’t get 8.2% yields without taking risk, and with this fund you’re taking both interest rate risk and stock market risk… but you’re also riding down the middle of the road a bit with the heavy emphasis on convertible bonds, so as long as stocks and bonds don’t collapse at the same time there’s a decent chance that the fund could perform better than bonds in a rising rate environment, or better than stocks in a market crash.

That’s all I know about this one, and there are a lot of other income-focused closed-end funds out there — if you have any favorites to share, or any input on ACV, please do let us know with a comment below.

And, as always, we’d like to know what investors think about any newsletters they’ve subscribed to — we don’t have many recent reviews of Perry’s Cash Machine newsletter, so if you’ve tried it out or are currently subscribed please do click here to share your experience with your fellow investors (has he consistently hit that 25% return goal? Inquiring minds wanna know.) Thank you!



------------------
Have you checked out Robinhood yet? Free trading is great for investors just starting out... plus You and I can each earn a free share of stock right now if you open an account!


Irregulars Quick Take Paid members get a quick summary of the stocks teased and our thoughts here. Join as a Stock Gumshoe Irregular today (already a member? Log in)

22
Share your thoughts...

avatar
11 Comment threads
11 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
16 Comment authors
KennyGTravis Johnson, Stock Gumshoedazza06odoctoroAnonymous Questions Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Don Rice
Guest
Don Rice

Travis,
In discussing any of the high yield funds, it would be helpful to know the tax treatment of their distributions. The after tax yield can vary greatly depending on the mix of qualified dividends, non-qualified dividends, long or short term capital gains, return of capital, and so forth. This Allianz fund may provide distributions that are mostly taxed at ordinary income rates, but that’s a guess.
Thanks,
Don

southaustinite
Member
👍16
southaustinite

YOU COULD FIND YOUR OWN MONTHLY DIVIDEND STOCKS BY GOOGLING JUST THAT. THERE ARE SEVERAL SITES THAT LIST THEM AND SOME HAVE HYPERLINKS TO MORE INFO ON THE STOCK FOR THE FULL STORY. ACV IS 148TH ON THE LIST I FOUND.

David
Guest
David

I like SUNS for the monthly dividend and the 8% .

Carbon Bigfoot
Guest
Carbon Bigfoot

Monthlies that I own Pembina Pipeline (PBA) 5.25%. Gladstone Commercial (GOODO) 6.88%. Reasonably stable and long track record of consistent payments.

tanglesome
Member
👍43
tanglesome

Travis, any input to either of these?

#PBA looks like a good addition at first glance, especially since energy companies typically dip during January/February.

KennyG
Member
👍18
KennyG

Keep in mind that PBA is a Canadian company and so if you are a US citizen there is a certain amount of currency risk in owning these shares, and also, if held in a taxable account, there will be 15% of the distributions withheld before you get them. These can be taken as a credit on IRS Form 1116 against your Fed income taxes. This 15% will not be withheld if owned in a tax-deferre4d account assuming your broker has filed the required forms with the regulators.

rowbearto
Guest
rowbearto

ACV currently trading at 2.49% premium. The premium high was about 5.5% and low was -8.24% (That was probably Dec. last year (2018 ) during the panic. Expenses are not cheap: 3.4% including interest expense ( leverage ). I would probably nibble on this once the premium drops back.

quincy adams
Guest
quincy adams

As a former subscriber to Mr. Perry’s “Cash Machine” ( I stopped when $49/yr became $99/yr) I know that ACV has been a stalwart of his “Aggressive High Yield” portfolio, which makes the comparison to a CD even more laughable. At one time that portfolio also included Golar LNG Partners (GMLP) which now trades at just under 40% of his price when recommended. Perhaps by “CD” he means Cash Destroyer.

Jimmy Bagwell
Guest
Jimmy Bagwell

I Would Love To See What’s In His Portfolio

tampabob
Member
👍43
tampabob

There’s an easy way to find out what’s in his portfolio – subscribe to the service.

tampabob
Member
👍43
tampabob

You conveniently forget to mention that he also advised subscribers to sell it long before the 40% to which you refer. The total loss on GMLP was 7% if you bought and sold when he told you.

Add a Topic
1570
providence4
Irregular
👍5

Check out Contrarian Income Report for in depth reviews of various CEFs

Pete
Guest
Pete

I have a small roth account invested in CEF’s. I took the recos of Contrarian income investor. He makes the point for retirement investors to not worry too much about price changes of the funds, but concentrate on the income. Most of my funds have appreciated about 4 to 6 per cent over the past year, and averaged 8 per cent in dividends for a return of 12 to 14 per cent. I am quite happy with this and will commit more money to this strategy next year. I have no plans to sell any of this, so price is… Read More »

Anonymous Questions
Irregular
👍1

The Thinkolator may have misfired on this one. While I agree that everything you wrote, another fund in the Cash Machine portfolio fits better except for the x-div date. PFFA is about the same on yield and is certainly closer to CD safety than ACV since it only invests in preferred stocks and also pays monthly.

odoctoro
Irregular
👍0
odoctoro

I also subscribe to Brett Owen’s Contrarian Income Report. Note that Brett has partnered with analyst Michel Foster who claims to be the only analyst tracking and writing about CEFs only. I’m pretty happy with the service : some of the CEFs recommended by Brett and Michael are up (their shares are up) and they do pay 8%+ monthly dividend. Just FYI: reading their ULTIMATE GUIDE TO CLOSE END FUNDS, I came across the following statement: “One of the greatest misunderstandings about CEFs is that they lose when interest rates go up. That’s not true. They lose if interest rates… Read More »

dazza06
Member
👍48
dazza06

I personally only own 1 of these closed fund investments – HRZN (NASD – Horizon Financial Technology Corp). Depending on your buy in this fund generates monthly dividends over 12% pa. Please note current price brings in around 8% pa so your buy in does make a difference.

Be interested to now if Travis has had any exposure to this fund?