I enjoyed reading all the comments about Monsanto in yesterday’s article — there certainly are strong opinions on both sides of the broad debate over genetically modified food products, and it’s great to see some back and forth that remained civil and thoughtful. Great stuff!
So now we move on to something a little less controversial, I’m guessing:
“Operation Global Rescue” Stock #2: A Very Precious Commodity!”
This is about a company that actually owns farmland … much more basic than the service providers, and, one hopes, with more of a backstop from the underlying value of that land in the long term. What might it be?
Here are the clues, in Christian DeHaemer’s words:
“This farming company was founded in 1936. They are established and safe… yet they offer one of the most exceptional growth opportunities on the planet.
“As I mentioned, the world is running out of fertile farmland… That means companies that own fertile land are worth a fortune.
“During the last 15 years, this company quietly put together a portfolio of Argentina’s very best properties. They managed to buy nearly all of them at fire-sale prices, too.
“This company owns 1.27 million acres. And, they own it for pennies on the dollar.
“The best part: The value of their farmland is not reflected in the price of their stock. This gives YOU the opportunity to buy up precious land for pennies on the dollar… and make a fortune when the rest of the world figures out what’s going on.
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...
“If you factored the price of its farmland into this company’s stock price, it’s selling for about $600 per acre.
“That’s a fraction of what quality farmland is selling for these days. For example, farmland in Iowa sells for up to $10,000 an acre. In Canada, $12,000 per acre.
“Institutional investors haven’t noticed this discrepancy yet… but, when they do… big money will flow into this stock, driving it into orbit.”
So DeHaemer thinks that even if this stock goes up 1,000% it could still be undervalued — what could it be?
It’s actually a stock we’ve looked at briefly before, back when Bill Mann at the Motley Fool was teasing a different Argentinian real estate company.
This is, according to the hard-working Thinkolator …
I wrote a little bit about CRESY back in March when I covered a Bill Mann teaser for IRSA, largely because those are the two main Argentinian real estate companies that are easy to buy, and because Cresud owns about 40% of IRSA. IRSA is a developed real estate company, for the most part, with commercial and residential projects, while Cresud is the rural REIT that owns and operates farmland.
Argentina is certainly one of the great agricultural centers of the world, and Cresud is also aggressively expanding into Brazil and other neighboring countries, both to get growth and, one assumes, to lessen their dependence on Argentina. You may remember that the new president down there tried to dramatically boost export tariffs for agricultural products, which of course infuriated the farmers, and you might also know that Argentina, though far from its low point when riots in the street accompanied the default on the national debt, is not necessarily in the greatest shape — most people think “real inflation” in Argentina is at least 20-25%, though the official number is significantly lower than that.
It’s true that CRESY carries a lot of land on it’s books that’s valued at dramatically less than the current market value — last year they did sell some land for about $225 per hectare, and that land was on their books at $7 per hectare, so it’s possible that there’s enough hidden value there that this could lead to some nice gains, even though it’s probably naive to suggest that global real estate investors and analysts haven’t looked at their real asset value.
So is it worth buying? It’s a coin flip, in my opinion — on the positive side, you’ve got a beaten down share price, and a leading company in the region with significant farming, livestock, and real estate holdings, and their performance appears to be very good on an operating basis (they released earnings today, which didn’t seem to move the stock much).
On the negative side, the shares have been getting clobbered all year for a good reason — no one knows what anything in Argentina is going to be worth in six months, or a year, and there’s very little confidence from outside investors that the economy or inflation will come under control in the near future.
So … you flip your own coin — undervalued or scary, which side comes up?