Become a Member

What the bejeezus is “Fluorescent Sand?” Is it gonna make us rich?

Ian King's ad for his Automatic Fortunes letter hints that, "At just $5 a share this is the best bargain you can find in the stock market."

So... what is it?


This article was originally published on May 14, the questions keep rolling in so we’re re-posting it for you today — the ad has not changed, the company teased still trades at about the same price, with no meaningful news, and what follows has not been updated or revised since 5/14. Enjoy!

Today we’ve got a new letter to look at, from someone I don’t think I’ve ever written about — Ian King is an editor at Banyan Hill, and he’s pitching a letter called Automatic Fortunes ($79/yr) with a story about “The $5 Stock Leading the 5G Revolution.”

So… can we “Ride the Incoming $12 Trillion 5G Boom” and make buckets of money? Certainly we’ve looked at a LOT of 5G stories over the years, and most of those stocks have had a rough go of it in recent weeks, so let’s dig into his clues and see what it is he’s touting.

By the way, always be mindful of the details if you do “opt in” to these kind of “urgent” deals that have a ticking clock on the order form — as we’ve seen a few times, this is pitched as a lower-cost no-risk letter (“regular price” is $199/yr), and they do offer a refund… but they also throw in a three-month trial of Jeff Yastine’s Total Wealth Insider, and the small print says that if you don’t do anything you’ll see your subscription to both of those letters renewed (at $97/yr each). It’s all there in writing, but I know I certainly hear complaints from readers all the time who got charged for newsletters they don’t ever remember even ordering, or at prices that are higher than they thought they committed to.

But anyway, let’s dig in — this is one of those stories that takes a widespread “made up number” about the size of the 5G business, and implies that it’s all going to come flowing down to “one little company”… which is absurd, of course, but it does whet your appetite and get you revved up. Here’s a bit of the start of the ad:

“We have one mission: To help Main Street Americans live richer lives through investing.

“And that starts right now with this fluorescent sand opportunity.

“You can get in on the ground floor of a potential $12 trillion revenue stream….

“At just $5 a share this is the best bargain you can find in the stock market. Period.”

And they name drop a couple of institutional investors who are apparently buying shares…

“BlackRock
“JPMorgan Chase
“U.S. Bancorp”

(As if funds managed by those banks didn’t own a piece of pretty much every publicly traded stock in the US… or the world, frankly)

And we’re told that, of course, those institutions are trying to keep it in the down-low…

“And while they like to keep things secret, you can bet these behemoths see what I do: A company that stands at the forefront of the potential $12 trillion flood of incoming revenue.

“Which means it’s only a matter of time before the mainstream gets a hold of this story.

“And when that happens, the price could soar, and you’ll have missed your chance at turning a small stake into huge gains.”

So what is this “fluorescent sand” stuff? It is apparently going to help with the bandwidth traffic jam…

“On this trajectory, we’re headed for a situation much like a never-ending traffic jam on the streets.

“We’ll soon have a pile up of these ‘latest and greatest’ devices, but the technology in all of them will be unremarkable, stagnant and stuck in a previous era.

“Worse yet, our wireless and data networks simply won’t be able to handle them all….

“… thanks to fluorescent sand, the world WILL have the systems to handle the sheer volume of devices.

“And that’ll usher in an era of technological progress unlike any the world has ever seen before….

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


“Starting with the $5 company that holds the key to unlocking the true power of fluorescent sand.”

And, yes, this is clearly talking about 5G as the salvation…

“Telecom experts are heralding the arrival of 5G as the Fourth Industrial Revolution that’ll ‘result in massive changes for both consumers and enterprises.’

“The U.S. and China are even engaged in a headlong race to be the first to deploy their new 5G networks.

“The point is this: By knowing the critical resource that ALL companies will rely on, you can make an absolute fortune in the months ahead.”

So what does this little $5 company do?

“In short, this company is advancing the true potential of smart homes, driverless cars, blockchain networks, robots, and every other tech trend you’ve been hearing about.

“They hold the key to unlocking the power of these grains of sand. Of course, not in it’s raw state….”

Then, to his credit, King does finally drop the silliness, a little bit, and clarify that yes, this “fluorescent sand” is really just “fiber optic cable networks”…

“Fluorescent sand is the secret to lightning-fast 5G that’ll usher in the next wave of technological progress.

“And it’s all possible thanks to a Nobel Prize discovery.

“Physicist Sir Charles Kao figured out that ordinary sand can be transformed into crystal clear, pure glass.

“And that glass can be turned into long, wire-like strands that can transmit lasers carrying data.

“If you guessed that I’m talking about fiber optics, you’re absolutely correct.

“In fact, you may have heard about how fiber optics holds the key to 5G and America’s next-generation wireless network.”

How so? Are we supposed to mine the stuff?

No, of course, this is just a reference to the fact that there are millions of miles of fiber-optic cable buried under the streets already, and more being added now, that will provide important backhaul and transmission services from wireless data points… as they do now for 4G towers in urban areas and for connections between data centers or, in a relatively small number of cases, for direct fiber connections for homes and businesses (like Google Fiber, or Verizon’s FiOS service).

And he talks up the “dark fiber” that’s still in place in a lot of cities, the remnant of the massive effort during the dot-com boom to put fiber networks everywhere and, eventually to overbuild networks that weren’t needed…

“EVERYTHING will depend on the massive, unknown, untapped network of fiber optic cable right beneath your feet.

“Digging new cables takes time, money and resources.

“And with the explosion of new devices coming online, we simply don’t have the luxury of waiting.

“But there’s good news. And it holds the secret to potentially making a fortune as 5G sweeps the nation in the coming months….

“The vast majority are still dormant.

“And believe it or not, companies can acquire rights to the unused fiber optics.

“That’s exactly what they’ve been doing.

“The world’s biggest companies are hoarding this unused fiber optic to brace for the imminent 5G boom.”

So does this company actually have something to do with these fiber optic networks? Not necessarily…. more from the ad:

“… it really doesn’t matter who hoards the most unused fiber optics underneath your feet.

“Because I predict that everyone will eventually rely on this one company to bring 5G to the more than a hundred million households across America.

“This firm makes the device that links you to the fiber optics beneath your feet and to the wireless 5G networks, that’ll soon be powering your Wi-Fi devices and much much more.

“Its executives come from some of the biggest names in technology.

“They held key positions at Spectralink, Nortel, Ericsson, Qualcomm, Hewlett Packard, Verizon, Microsoft and many other companies.”

OK, so that’s a nice bit of clues… what else?

“They’ve mass produced a simple device, roughly the size of a thermostat.

“It can be placed in the corner of your living room.

“They’ll be practically invisible.

“You won’t even notice they’re there.

“But they’re critical in making the 5G rollout a reality this year.

“Our existing towers keep wireless signals strong over long distances.

“And these devices fill the gaps in between — especially in crowded areas….

“The result: Lightning-fast wireless from the fiber optic cables beneath your feet…

“To the devices in your hands, car, home, office and beyond.

“In fact, Verizon, AT&T, Sprint and T-Mobile — the leading mobile providers in the word — have ALL partnered with this one company ahead of the massive 5G upgrade…..

“Their breakthrough device acts as a mini cell tower that’ll give you and I access to 5G.”

OK, so it’s some kind of equipment maker… what else are we told about this company?

This is from the order form:

“The aggressive plan that could instantly rollout 151 million of these breakthrough devices in the U.S. And this is just the beginning. They’re also targeting the Asia-Pacific market which could easily give them the lion’s share of the $12 trillion in revenue up for grabs.

“The secret $400 million ‘side business’ of this company that virtually guarantees they’ll continue raking in revenue for decades to come … giving you the chance to make more and more money right along with them.”

They even include a handy-dandy chart of this “stock leading the 5G revolution” to entice the visual learners out there, so we know the stock went from below $3 in August to peak at near $6 in late December, then was around $5 in January and, well, that’s where the chart ends.

So what’s the stock? Thinkolator sez this is Inseego (INSG), which indeed matches all of those clues perfectly (including the stock chart)… and it has been bouncing around quite a bit this week, along with most of the smaller “growthy” stocks, but it is still in the $5 neighborhood.

And in case you’re wondering why you’ve never heard of Inseego, given that it’s been around for eons, we can clear that up: They used to be called Novatel Wireless, with the ticker MIFI. Can’t say that I knew a lot about that name, either, but I had at least heard of it… if memory serves, they were lining themselves up to be the kings of the “mobile hotspot” device for the five years or so when that was a viable business that people thought would be huge, before laptops got native wireless coverage and phones became hotspots.

They have almost nothing to do with “fluorescent sand,” at least directly. That’s just a pitch that a copywriter somewhere dreamed up to sell the idea of fiber optic cable networks and their importance to the 5G rollout… yes, fiber networks are genuinely important (that’s why Zayo got a buyout offer a couple weeks ago, and why the tower companies like Crown Castle (CCI) are buying up fiber to connect their towers and small cells), and I guess if you look at the strands from the end when they’re lit up they look a little bit like “fluorescent sand,” but there’s really no direct connection to Inseego that I can, well, see.

Here’s Inseego’s description of itself, which has so much jargon in it that I threw up in my mouth a little bit…

“Inseego Corp. (Nasdaq: INSG) is an industry pioneer that enables high performance mobile applications for large enterprise verticals, service providers and small-medium businesses around the globe. Our product portfolio consists of Enterprise SaaS solutions and IoT & Mobile solutions, which together form the backbone of compelling, intelligent, reliable and secure IoT services with deep business intelligence. Inseego powers mission critical applications with a “zero unscheduled downtime” mandate, such as asset tracking, fleet management, industrial IoT, SD WAN failover management and mobile broadband services. Our solutions are powered by our key innovations in purpose-built SaaS cloud platforms, IoT and mobile technologies including the newly emerging 5G technology. #Making5GReal”

They are indeed focused on 5G, both as a way to connect their Internet of Things devices and as they sell some early 5G products that seem to me essentially an updated version of the “puck” hotspots that they sold for 4G a decade or more ago. There will probably be a decent market for those in the early days, since the first uses of 5G are going to be “semi-fixed” broadband — receiving broadband service via 5G airwaves in a fixed location, like your home or office, replacing your existing cable internet… or using 5G for rapid and low-latency communication between devices for the Internet of Things, particularly for heavy and industrial uses, and Inseego is aiming at both of those markets.

That doesn’t mean it’s going to win huge orders in those businesses or turn instantly, I don’t really know, but they are in a bit of a turnaround here that’s really just underway as they try to build and sell a “comprehensive 5G portfolio” as part of their “Inseego 2.0” transformation.

So far, the most visible sign of that transformation has been selling some stock and repaying some debt and getting rid of some of their “liquidity problems” that had handcuffed the company a bit in the past few years.

By some metrics, Inseego looks downright reasonable — it’s got a market cap of only about $350 million, which isn’t bad at all for $200 million in revenue… and even though they’re not quite profitable, they’re not too far off. You could certainly find plenty of other companies with similar sales that have seriously loopy valuations, including hot new “cloud” stories like Zuora, Appian and Zscaler (all have revenue about the same as Inseego, but multibillion-dollar valuations).

Some of the difference in valuations can be explained by the different levels of growth, and investor growth expectations, but a lot of it is probably just sentiment — Inseego hasn’t been hot or exciting, it makes stuff that’s also made by a lot of other companies, and it’s been around forever… I can almost hear you yawning from here. This is the stock chart for INSG going way back to the beginning, just FYI:

INSG Chart

OK, that’s not really fair — it’s not their fault they were trading at a ludicrous price during the dot-com bubble of 2000 and 2001. Here’s what the stock has looked like since it bottomed out in October of 2001, just to provide a somewhat fairer perspective:

INSG Chart

And as long as we’re doing the visual thing, here’s what the last five years have looked like for the stock, laying over it both revenue and earnings.

INSG Chart

So I guess that’s why it sounds pretty reasonably valued based on the level of revenue… they haven’t been making any money, and the business has generally declined over the past decade, though slowly enough that you might not notice all the time.

Analysts do have a buy on the stock, with five analysts giving a consensus target of $6.40, but even they only see about 10% revenue growth this year and 20% next year, with earnings about flat in 2019 and a predicted 26 cents in earnings per share for 2020 (giving the stock a forward PE of 18, which is not ridiculous if they can grow earnings from there).

Which means, if you’re keeping track, that this is the 147th company that is a little weak and disappointing right now, but expected to start to do better late in 2019 and then surge higher in 2020 on a wave of 5G investment.

The “secret” business is their Ctrack telematics business, which accounts for about a third of revenues — Ctrack is basically a fleet data management service that lets you track your fleet of trucks, monitor for insurance information and optimum efficiency for allocation of assets, etc. They are putting that business on the cloud and calling it a “Software as a Service” business now, and hoping to expand that both by growing their newer aviation business (tracking planes and airport equipment) and by leveraging their network and technology to connect more “assets” and open other Internet of Things “verticals” beyond aviation and trucking.

The investor presentation from Inseego sounds quite impressive, and it’s not a crazy-valuation growth story that requires real nosebleed growth, but you do have to count on them getting a big chunk of the “5G hotspot” business next year and growing their CTrack business.

My assumption would be that the risk comes primarily from the fact that the equipment business for 5G, primarily selling hotspots and mobile routers at this early stage, is probably pretty competitive… I assume that there are a lot of manufacturers angling to get this business, which will mostly be sold through the big telecom companies who are building out 5G networks (AT&T, Verizon, Sprint in the US, etc.), and that we’ll see similar 5G hotspots and “fixed wireless” routers from a variety of manufacturers.

I don’t get any sense that Inseego provides a dramatically different or better hotspot device than anyone else, but I’m not at all an expert on that equipment. Inseego appears to have the first Verizon contract to build their 5G hotspot devices, Netgear appears to be the first partner for AT&T, but these are still test programs that are limited to a few cities, with all the equipment sold by the telecom companies, and I don’t know what the economics of that equipment looks like from Inseego’s end or if these deals are exclusive for any length of time. That probably explains much of the spurt in revenue that Inseego expects next year… but I have no idea whether or not it’s likely to be sustainable. For what it’s worth, both the Netgear and Inseego hotspots use Qualcomm (QCOM) chips and modems (that makes me a little happy, since I own QCOM shares).

And, well, that’s about as far as I can take this for you on a couple hours of research — excited about “fluorescent sand” because it’s important to 5G? You probably want to look elsewhere (like the optical switch providers, all of whom are backlogged, or big producers like Corning). But if you’re just excited about the 5G rollout, and want an equipment maker who will be selling some of those hotspots that turn 5G signals into high-speed wifi networks for homes and small businesses and offer some competition for the cable companies, well, Inseego fits that bill… whether or not it fits your portfolio is, of course, your call to make. It’s your money, after all. Please do let us know what you think by submitting a comment below, our friendly little comment box doesn’t bite.

P.S. We haven’t heard any reader feedback about Automatic Fortunes yet, and Gumshoe readers always want to know the real scoop — if you’ve ever tried a subscription to Ian King’s Automatic Fortunes, please click here to let your fellow investors know what you thought. Thank you!

Disclosure: I own shares and/or call options on Qualcomm and Crown Castle among the companies mentioned above. I will not trade in any covered stock for at least three days after publication, per Stock Gumshoe’s trading rules.

Irregulars Quick Take

Paid members get a quick summary of the stocks teased and our thoughts here. Join as a Stock Gumshoe Irregular today (already a member? Log in)
guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

50 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JayBee1
Guest
JayBee1
May 14, 2019 3:12 pm

I would love to be a copywriter except for one HUGE problem: I don’t like lying. Fluorescent sand. Ha. Ha. Ha.

Add a Topic
5869
Jared Jones
Guest
Jared Jones
January 17, 2020 11:07 pm
Reply to  JayBee1

INSG $9+ AND RISING AFTER HOURS

Add a Topic
7081
Nancy
Member
May 14, 2019 3:34 pm

In the Knick of time…from Thinko’
Yesterday this Rooter was on the search for literally essential small “parts.” Checked many standard US parts maker, Bourne, Laird, but all still private!
Checked in Canada! Not much hot hidden stuff unless, you expensive and not hidden and not really Canadian, “TDK” working on wireless electricity transmission,etc, so not cheap entry price of $118. See that this stock addresses what this follower foresaw as a solution to the 5G tin hats, and post office boxes-which seemed like hurrying at something despite treating under engineering as realizing something aspired to, yer imperfectly executed! Seems it has a problem based on a missed linking idea! This may be it!
Thanks for looking past the gimmicky sounding “fluorescent sand” into your research!
Nancy ! keep playing! Practice for us makes perfect!

Add a Topic
1515
Add a Topic
6265
Add a Topic
5869
Rob
Member
Rob
May 14, 2019 4:01 pm

I thought the stock you were analyzing was going to be Nokia.

👍 21714
Yash
Guest
Yash
May 15, 2019 12:14 am

Is nokia really a buy ? What do you think travis ?
I was owing shares but i sold them because nokia revenue is decreasing.

👍 21714
bunion132
May 20, 2019 12:24 am
Reply to  Yash

After being stopped out a couple of times, I’ve decided to reopen a position in NOK, too. For a multi-teased stock, this one has been pummeled down to Dec 2017 levels but is starting to turn back up. I think/hope it’s finally at a good buying point.

Add a Topic
2494
👍 441
👍 21714
D-man
Member
D-man
July 25, 2019 11:39 am

So, how do you feel about Huewei if the “trade war’ dramatically ends with a ‘deal’?

John F Mccullagh
Member
June 7, 2019 12:04 pm
Reply to  Yash

I have also initiated a small position in NOK recently which then proceeded to get even smaller

Add a Topic
2494
invest_satx
May 14, 2019 4:54 pm

To my great surprise, Inseego is this week’s “buy” from Falcon Penny, a penny stock newsletter to which I subscribe, which announces on Tuesdays. Couldn’t buy in at their recommended price, stock was rising too fast, but I did get in. So far, the price has not dropped right after my purchase, like usual, but the day is still not over.

👍 37
vivian lewis
May 14, 2019 4:57 pm

I did an update on Nokia and another 5G stalward todya, May 14, on http://www.global-investing.com which I sent to Travis. I suspect he didn’t read it yet.

Add a Topic
6265
Carbon Bigfoot
Guest
Carbon Bigfoot
May 14, 2019 6:10 pm

Recent Studies now indicate the EMF radiation is harmful to our DNA. Most susceptible are infants and children. 26,000 scientists say stop:
https://principia-scientific.org/petition-26000-scientists-oppose-5g-roll-out/
My wife and I suffer from “Electrosmog” and avoid electronics and WIFI networks or suffer headaches and tinnitus. Some studies indicate that this EMF radiation is a suspected cause of autism. Read the following report draw your own conclusions.
https://bioinitiative.org/conclusions/
Some say this liability will be bigger than the asbestos scandal.
Don’t shoot the messenger if you don’t like the message.

Add a Topic
5344
JayBee
Guest
JayBee
May 14, 2019 9:30 pm
Reply to  Carbon Bigfoot

I won’t shoot the messenger. Almost every time I go to the dentist, they want to X-ray my teeth. I tell them no, it’s dangerous. They say, no it’s not. Trust us. Phooey. I would rather that they miss a small cavity than give me a brain tumor.

I said that I wouldn’t shoot the messenger, but I do have a question for the messenger. If you say that you avoid electronics, then how do you read, and reply, to Gumshoe?

Carbon Bigfoot
Guest
Carbon Bigfoot
May 15, 2019 7:06 am
Reply to  JayBee

I minimize my time on the computer and I only use a hard-wired connection to the modem, not WIFI. I also use other preventative measure, i.e., shielding, do not use a cordless phone in the house and only carry my dumb phone when I run my daily errands-minimize my on person carry. I suggest you read the following: https://emfhelpcenter.com/
After you read and digest that information I’ll attempt to respond to your other concerns. I also make printer hard copies of info to stay off the computer. “SMART METERS” are a major problem.

Kevin
Member
June 7, 2019 11:55 am
Reply to  Carbon Bigfoot

We had the power company remove our Smart Meter; it was giving my wife headaches and she could’t sleep.

Carbon Bigfoot
Guest
Carbon Bigfoot
May 17, 2019 11:56 am
Reply to  JayBee

JayBee: This is a comprehensive Documentary of the problem. It is a bit long but you have the week-end to watch this video which will open your eyes to the extent of the corruption in the technology industry:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZTiT9ZSg3Q
Also: Takebackyourpower.net & Inpowermovement.net

Carbon Bigfoot
Guest
Carbon Bigfoot
May 18, 2019 12:30 pm
Reply to  Carbon Bigfoot

Inpowermovement.com. Sorry. Those of you trying to access principial.scientific.org article, their website hosting service is having technical issues and will hopefully back online in a few days. Great website and a Charter Member when established back in 2007

andrea van de Kelut
Guest
andrea van de Kelut
May 18, 2019 10:45 am
Reply to  Carbon Bigfoot

agreed, this is nearly untested on living things in Holland studies show that tree’s are trying to grow away from a close tower or even die. when in use. Also that same study showed people not even that close got sudden onset of a whale of a headache ! very very dangerous indeed.

erikam
erikam
May 14, 2019 10:21 pm

We are all guinea pigs in this 5G experiment,all in the name of greed There are a few cities in Europe that have banned it and a few towns in the U.S that are calling for a ban. I for one, will NOT be investing in anything to do with 5g.

Add a Topic
6265
👍 7
Tom
Member
Tom
May 15, 2019 12:11 am
Reply to  erikam

I was going to buy a new wifi 5G enabled toilet that I recently saw advertised but I soon discovered that it was full of crap.

Add a Topic
6265
ggswift
June 7, 2019 11:11 am
Reply to  Tom

Years back a guy I knew went to concert , and he spotted one of those Hippie Vans that had a toilet fixed to the roof of the van.
It was almost dark at the time so he hopped up and took a dump into the bowl, wiped himself with a napkin and threw that in also.
Would love to have been a fly on that van when the Hippie returned! LOL

👍 185
Walter P
Member
Walter P
May 18, 2019 11:09 am

5G is going to be rolled out whether you like it or not. Too much money already invested to too much money to be made to worry about little cancer or birth defects. And no, X-ray at dentist will not give you cancer. If you want to be cancer-conscious check the medicine cabinet in your bathroom — there are half a dozen carcinogens in commonly used shampoos. conditioners, deodorants, sunscreens and lotions.
If you don’t want to invest in 5G stocks that’s your choice. Someone else will.
They have been talking about the danger of radiation since the proliferation of home computers and smart phones. (for 20 years or so). They still talk. And they will keep talking, I am sure. All the while others make money.

Add a Topic
6265
Ray
Member
Ray
May 18, 2019 2:06 pm
Reply to  Walter P

20 years of Mamogram radiation causes breast cancer. the false positives leading to unecessary “treatment” are even worse. the lifetime accumulation of radiation would include Dental , airplane, cat scans, chest, etc… Several countries won’t allow 5G near schools, & even some Firehouses (where the Firemen are there for 24hours at a time) will not allow 5G antenna’s … This is all well documented Data, not opinion… Good news is gene pool will be improved, because the people dumb enough to live by the “opinion” (for sale to highest bidder, or you don.t hear it…) of the “experts” will leave the gene pool through death or infertility…

Add a Topic
3359
Add a Topic
3397
Add a Topic
2706
vinceblue
vinceblue
June 7, 2019 8:23 pm
Reply to  Ray

Please don’t spew your ignorant comments on here. Your negativity on medical imaging is harmful to the community. Fact: Mammograms save thousands of lives each year – because early detection leads to higher cure rates (and less morbidity and mortality). How else are you going to detect an otherwise inconspicuous cancer ? Wait for it to spread to your lymph nodes or bones (stage IV / incurable disease). Yes there is radiation involved and we know there are risks with radiation exposure. But the radiation doses in medical imaging are still relatively low and you should know that there is regulation by the FDA and state inspections. I won’t ask what your profession is, but I do know that it’s not in medicine. Leave topics like this up to the real experts. Thanks.

Add a Topic
3397
Add a Topic
3022
Ray
Member
Ray
June 8, 2019 12:37 am
Reply to  vinceblue

We do need more censorship, & community (communist?) concern for our comrades. Thank you for no data refuting any of my factual statements. I prefer science to “medicine” every day. Wishful thinking & Faith in human “experts”, have never worked for me. I have never met a perfect human being. I have met some Medical Doctors & their formerly stage 4 (cured for over 10 years) cancer patients in person. Have personally saved lives of hundreds, helped thousands (of people), & cost authorities 200 + million$$$… (for thousands of people, as in federal court class action, Judge Edelstein presiding…) Research is better than common knowledge, which is commonly wrong… The audience may benefit, If only one person it is worth It… Tidbit: 14% of the Disneyland measles patients were UNvaccinated…which means 86% had the # 1 side-effect; “measles” according to the vaccine “package insert” from the manufacturer…

Add a Topic
3397
Add a Topic
5482
vinceblue
vinceblue
June 8, 2019 9:06 am
Reply to  Ray

I don’t know why you continue to be ignorant here . Let’s clarify the breast cancer side of things first (rather than your flight of ideas on DisneyLand measles now). Here, I helped you with some simple resources that I found online, in plain English for you to read (and hopefully understand). :

https://ww5.komen.org/Breastcancer/Radiationexposureinyouth.html

Ray
Member
Ray
June 8, 2019 2:31 pm
Reply to  vinceblue

You found, & parrot, opinion (& spin) online… I have nothing to gain , the source you site has Million$$$ at stake! We would not need, or read, Stock Gumshoe, if we could trust the “experts”! I ask no one to believe me (or help me). You must do your own homework. You must spend 35,000+ hours, over 50+ years, & still know you are only scratching the surface (so far). Even if you did not get the highest IQ score in the history of you school, it is simple to look at the data (not opinion, spin, or abstracts); the actual data… Figures don’t lie,but; liars figure… No expert (doctor or stock broker) will feel our pain for us… They will profit from us regardless of our outcome… One size does not fit all. You are the only expert on you… Good intentions are no substitute for data. they have some good data on mamograms fron Canada & other more independent sources… Too many Opinions & no more time to spend on them…

Add a Topic
1881
Add a Topic
1515
Anne
Member
Anne
March 8, 2020 9:23 am
Reply to  vinceblue

He’s not being ignorant. I agree with what he says. Do they use x-rays to check you for prostate or testicular cancer? No. If they did would you think that’s a good idea? Only women are that dumb to think being shot up with radiation to detect cancer is a good idea. There are blood and DNA tests that would achieve the same result. But no one bothers because like lemmings women just go along. I wont.

Add a Topic
4454
Add a Topic
3397
Ray
Member
Ray
May 18, 2019 11:24 pm
Reply to  Walter P

Are we still holding our Monsanto (Bayer) stock? Good thing poisoning the world has no negative effect on stock price! Merck making fortune as more vaccines become mandatory. Funny thing, Japan outlawed vaccine under 2 years of age; apparently they outlawed “crib death” at the same time, no more S.I.D.s, how about that, despite Nuke meltdown…

Add a Topic
1029
dan yariv weisbuch
Member
dan yariv weisbuch
May 18, 2019 2:09 pm

ridi pagliaccio, now a new riddle. the wather predictors magi told FCC that the 5G wavelength present a problem (as their science is mathematics :-)). so now comes the story of new spectrum bids.
regarding the story of fluorescent sand…. to laugh or to cry as those Banyan guys believe that they can sell luftgesheft. something like in O’Henry stories.

Add a Topic
6265
Add a Topic
5869
revalidate
May 19, 2019 10:10 am

If we can’t count on “Fluorescent sand,” how about the “Quantum battery?”

Add a Topic
5869
Add a Topic
1614
👍 29
kat1938
Member
kat1938
May 23, 2019 2:45 pm

fiber optic cable

👍 2
edw2269
edw2269
June 7, 2019 8:44 am

Name something that doesn’t give you cancer? Just like food, they change their mind all the time on what is good for you and what isn’t.

👍 63
Ray
Member
Ray
June 7, 2019 2:14 pm
Reply to  edw2269

Thats why we should not listen to anyone’s mind! There are always different opinions (many 4 sale to highest bidder)… Look at the data! If we can add 2+2 & get 4, we can discern the truth… spoiler alert; opinion & spin favorable to the sponsors profit is most probably not good 4 us to believe… No one else knows what is good for you & what isn’t…

vivian lewis
June 7, 2019 9:44 am

I live and work in Midtown Manhattan, the center of the universe for stocks and bond markets. My internet service and telephone went down yesterday afternoon (from former Time-Warner now Spectrum) and as I wait for the repairman I wish I had some excess cable access from Aseego

Add a Topic
495
J.Severa
Guest
J.Severa
June 7, 2019 3:50 pm
Reply to  vivian lewis

Now you’ve done it Vivian, Spectrum is one of the most hated cable companies around. I’m looking for the Class Action guys to bring high priced Spectrum to heel.

Pete
Guest
Pete
June 18, 2019 7:37 am
Reply to  vivian lewis

Who’s the little company in the fluorescent sand business I believe they’re in California

Add a Topic
5869
RICHARD ROBINSON
Member
RICHARD ROBINSON
June 7, 2019 12:45 pm

YOU GET MY RADIATION STANDING IN FRONT OF YOU MICROWAVE OVEN THAN YOU DO IN A LIFETIME OF DENTIST X-RAYS. POWER LEVELS AND DURATION OF RADIATION SHOULD BE CONSIDERED. MICROWAVE OVEN USE 1000 WATTS WHILE WIFI USES ONLY 10 MIL-WATTS, A FACTOR OF 100,000 TO 1.

Add a Topic
6265
Chris
Chris
June 7, 2019 5:59 pm

Just write it RICHARD, don’t scream in CAPS.

👍 78
Leo
Leo
June 7, 2019 11:35 pm

This is totally off topic. During the Red Sox game, there was a pitch for the Pan-Mass Challenge. I just want to know if you will be riding again this year, Travis. Thanks.

👍 21714
Gregg Johnson
Member
Gregg Johnson
June 30, 2019 6:16 pm

Seems like a lot of hot air hype for INSG. Makes me wonder what is in it for Me. King?!

Add a Topic
7081
Matt Aubert
Guest
August 30, 2019 12:39 am

Has anyone invested in company Inseego? If so what are your thoughts now? Is it still a buy? What concerns do you have now that you did not when purchasing? Thanks.

Add a Topic
6265
Steven DeFrates
Guest
September 12, 2019 5:35 am

Thank you for a proper explanation and leaving out the boasting. I really enjoyed the way you deciphered the non-sense. You stayed on course. I wished there were more people that explained everthing. quickly and informative

Nicole Koretsky
Member
Nicole Koretsky
April 25, 2020 8:42 pm

I love this site-thank you for reminding me that I’m not crazy, as I navigate these ridiculous, life-sucking videos. I’m only relieved I’ve never given Ian King a single dollar. I did make a few pennies on INSG’s volatility last week, but also long in Qualcomm and Crown Castle. It sure gets exhausting to wade through the sank oil schticks out of Banyan Hill. Good trading, everyone, and keep your heads clear as you go.

Add a Topic
7073
Add a Topic
359
Add a Topic
5563
Kamal Kalwani
Member
Kamal Kalwani
May 15, 2020 9:31 pm

Great writeup, very well explained

Add a Topic
6265

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

More Info  
55
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x