Become a Member

And the Oscar for Worst Timing from a Newsletter Goes to …

By Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe, August 10, 2007

As we endure the subprime contagion and all that appears to imply — snakes raining from the heavens, baffled bankers panhandling on the streets with signs saying “will mark to model for food,” and the decline of all stock markets everywhere forever and ever, it’s interesting (though perhaps cruel) to note the newsletter advisers who REALLY didn’t know this was coming.

There are a few candidates in recent months …

Louis Navellier was eagerly pushing Morgan Stanley (MS) and Goldman Sachs (GS) in June, saying that they should go up dramatically. Goldman was supposed to hit $300 before Labor Day, and Morgan was supposed to be worth “easily 30% more by July 4” on the Discover spinoff. To give him some credit now, Morgan did go up a little bit before the spinoff, but it’s been mostly downhill since then … and it looks like a pipe dream to predict great success for any investment banker in the next few months, especially if you were starting from their nice high prices in June.

And there were several teasers over the last couple months about various real estate finance companies — Mark Skousen talked about Centerline Holdings (CHC) (which I also wrote that I liked, to be fair), and said that insider buying meant we were headed for great returns. The shares were already looking a little cheaper back at the end of June, since subprime was already tainting most real estate shares … but it looks like those insiders, and Skousen, didn’t see the freight train coming either: it’s down another 30% or so since that teaser made the rounds. On the plus side, the indicated yield is up over 12% now, though I have no idea if they’ll have trouble paying those dividends, or if they’re being unfairly tarred with the subprime brush.

A second real estate investment that got some pretty heavy ad teasing exposure was Winthrop Realty Trust, thanks to its big holder Bruce Berkowitz of Fairholme. This was teased as the $7 Penny Hedge Fund by Dan Ferris at Stansberry, and I guess it’s saying something that the 20% haircut it’s gotten in two or three weeks (after a little recovery from the dip down to around $5) doesn’t put it at the top of the list for worst short term calls. This one actually looks more solid than some REITs recently, they just had their earnings call and said all the right things to make investors believe that they really see the subprime stuff as more of an opportunity than a threat in the long term. In the short term, it doesn’t appear to be winning any prizes.

More dramatically, and I think we have to call this one the winner of this round:

The folks at ChangeWave, in teasing the “25% Cash Machine” newsletter from Bryan Perry, picked a real stinker … and, arguably, one that they might have been able to tell was pretty closely tied in to vulnerable home mortgages. Or at least, one that they might have thought twice about selling as an annual 25% gain “without taking any wild risks.” The company that my sleuthing identified as their pick, RAIT Financial Trust (RAS), took the worst nosedive I’ve seen in a sleuthed out stock since Go Fish began it’s swoon — RAS, despite heavy insider buying (as we’ve seen in tons of real estate companies all Spring and Summer), is now down 66% in just about one month … and that’s after a bounce. On the plus side, if you have any faith at all that they’re going to continue with their dividend (I suspect there’s some trouble there, so don’t have any faith on my account), the indicated yield is now 35%.

Insider buying continues apace at many of these firms, and at some others — Thornburg Mortgage (TMA), which was also teased a little while back as one of the promising “801-K” Companies, has hit a similar crevasse, and like RAS has had strong insider buying very recently … but then again, they had strong insider buying all Spring, too, and look where that got them. Sometimes, management isn’t any more prescient than the rest of us — or than the investment advisers, especially in the short term. Insider buying, and especially those clusters of insider buying that many of these real estate firms have seen, does GENERALLY indicate a positive future (as I talked about a bit in my writeup of the “Secret USG-4 Tipsheets” teaser), but it’s certainly not an innoculation against all contagions.

And while RAS has the distinction of having the most incredible short-term collapse in Gumshoe history (save, perhaps, for a biotech or two that clearly were lottery ticket buys based on an uncertain FDA decision), maybe the reaction to their near-$100 million exposure to the bankruptcy of American Home Mortgage has been overdone — certainly, some folks think they’re a bargain now.

There have been other, milder bad short term calls of late as well in newsletter teaser land — Robert Hsu was convinced that we should buy in to New Oriental Education (EDU) before their last earnings report a couple weeks back, in order to harvest the stock boom following expected blowout earnings, and that would have set you back quite a bit if you sold right after disappointing earnings and a fall of well over 10% (it has recovered a bit since then, down only a dollar or two from when the email went out now).

And the other specific earnings-based teaser I saw recently, by Mark Skousen for ABB, also failed to impress — blowout earnings were predicted, and while ABB did OK with their earnings release (though not spectacularly great) the shares have been on a fairly consistent slope down ever since. You wouldn’t have lost a lot of money if you bought on this teaser recommendation, it’s down less than 10%, but if you were expecting the “Electrifying Boost” Skousen touted, you probably would have been a bit disappointed.

It’s not particularly fair for me to call these out as short-term failures — after all, I didn’t tell you that subprime was going to collapse the international credit markets this week, either (though that’s far from being my job here). And most, if not all, of these advisers also have some really solid picks in the last six months or so — as well as differing time frames for their investments (For example: I’m sure Dan Ferris, who considers himself a long-term value investor, doesn’t usually judge his picks with an eye toward one month’s performance). This isn’t an examination of their newsletter portfolios or performance overall, just of the stocks they’ve prominently teased in their ads in recent months. As always, you can see all the teaser picks from the Gumshoe, excepting very recent stuff that has yet to be updated, on the tracking spreadsheet here.

But with all the hyperbole that goes into the investment teasers we all get in our email from newsletters and advisers every day, I think it’s important to remember just how lousy almost everyone is at making short term predictions — both individual stock reactions to events like earnings releases, and dramatic market-wide moves as we’ve seen in recent days. The fact that you get an email every day for a week saying that Goldman Sachs will go up 50% by the end of the Summer doesn’t mean that it’s any more likely to happen — even if the guy who sends it is really smart and generally has a good long term record.

And even if the idea is a grand one, impatience can often be your enemy … especially after you get riled up by the marketing language in their emails and convince yourself that the company being teased has invented a better bread-slicer. One higher-risk microcap company that I really like I found through a teaser ad, for example, Ambrian Partners (the teaser writeup is here, my purchase is noted here, FYI) … but I couldn’t justify buying until after the price fell pretty dramatically from its highs (and it may fall further still).

Thanks for continuing to read and support the Stock Gumshoe — keep spreading the word, more subscribers and participants here, and more members in the forum (also free, sign up or just be a voyeur here), mean we can shed more light on the sometimes great, sometimes terribly misleading teaser emails and ads from the investment newsletters … and maybe uncover a few investing gems in the rubble. Have a great weekend.

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
August 11, 2007 4:17 pm

Excellent post that’s what I like about this forum, dissecting the facts from hype about these newsletters with all the sleuth posters we have here!

All these newsletters are in the game to sell pieces of paper and get paid for “pumping” stocks.

Read the disclaimers at the bottom of their “teases” – Not professional stock advisers and getting paid by the featured stock to get promoted.

That said that doesn’t mean all recommendations are bad it means that you should still verify the facts and do your own investigating because there are some good stocks recommended.

I have got better advise reading what the experts say on message boards than I do newsletters.

Regards,

T Smith

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
5971
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
August 13, 2007 1:50 pm

actually, it looks like all the insider buys in RAS have occurred in the past few days from prices as low as 5.87 per share (from yahoo), so given it’s nearly back to $10 most have done pretty well so far on those purchases! bigger question is what do they believe its worth and why are they so “sure” they won’t get hit.

One Guy
Guest
One Guy
August 13, 2007 2:50 pm

That’s true, they’ve kept buying at what they must consider fire sale prices — but the insider buying that triggered this newsletter recommendation happened between March and May at prices in the high 20s/low 30s … I imagine those same insiders are all happier with their $6-9 purchases over the last week or so than with their prior purchases.

Rich
Member
Rich
July 25, 2008 4:57 pm

Appreciate the spreedsheet, GS.
Almost a year later the biggest loser has to be TMA from $26 to 18 cents. But the guy who claims direct descendence from Ben Franklin beat that with MCIWorldCom. And Senator Chuck Schumer put IMB out of biz with a bank panic when it had 97.5% performing loans and a book/cash value 10/20 times stock price. Maybe MS’s ABB will come back from 32 to 25 in a year to 53. And maybe RH’s EDU will come back from 92 to 45 to 91. Tough business, touting.

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
11

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

More Info  
4
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x