Become a Member

“Panakeia 604: Generations of Family Wealth From A Possible Panacea.”

Patrick Cox's "Biggest Market Story in History" teaser for Breakthrough Technology Alert

By Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe, October 24, 2011

Readers have been avidly forwarding the latest ad from Patrick Cox to me over the past week or so — he’s been pitching his Breakthrough Technology Alert newsletter ($695 “on sale” from the $2,000 “list price”, though as I’ve written about it over the years it’s pretty much always been “on sale”). So naturally, your friendly neighborhood Gumshoe wishes nothing more than to please the eager readers of Gumshoe nation … and we’ll take a look today.

And as with most of Cox’s ads, it’s full of big big big promise — not just that there’s a company that will make you rich, but that it will change the way we live forever.

With, of course, the clever little name that represents this life-changing idea: Panakeia 604.

Here’s the Panakeia bit from Cox:

“In Greek mythology, they called her Panakeia.

“She was the Goddess of healing. She carried a potion that would heal any sickness.

“Today, the concept of Panakeia is still with us.

“You know her legacy through use of the word panacea. A panacea is a cure-all. A panacea fixes everything” ….

“What would you say if I said one revolutionary CEO and his researchers think they’ve found this mythical panacea – a modern day Panakeia in our midst.

“I’m calling it ‘Panakeia 604’.

“I call it Panakeia because it might just be a real ‘cure-all’. I call it ‘604’ because that’s the patent this CEO holds on the substance.”

So yes, that’s what we’re looking for: A panacea.

“And the science behind ‘Panakeia 604’ is shockingly simple. It boils down to the fact that scientists seem to have stumbled upon a natural ‘super treatment’.

“This ‘super treatment’ attacks the cause of many diseases and ailments.

“Better yet, it’s natural. It’s not a chemical or derived from some harsh laboratory process…

“The breakthrough contains a substance found in tomatoes and red peppers.

“But it’s NOT one of those crackpot beta-carotene or resveratrol-type stories.

“What this tiny company discovered could make those stories look quaint by comparison.

“Because the ‘super treatment’ I’ll tell you about treats the factors that cause Alzheimer’s disease.”

Sound familiar? Yep, I think so too — and they go out of their way to tease wholesome stuff like red peppers as the source of this stuff (one email even came in with the subject line, “Eat a Red Pepper — Grow Wealthier?”), though if it’s still the company I think, they’re using a source plant with a very different reputation.

We’re probably treading on a pretty well-worn path here … but let’s see what other clues Cox provides so we can ascertain whether he’s still pitching the same stock.

“Researchers from Johns Hopkins are digging through data related to Panakeia 604 as I speak to you today.

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


“300 people in the Mid-West are currently enrolled in a study that seeks to find out just how well this possible panacea works – and for which ailments…

“There’s a study in Europe going on right now too.

“The wife of a famous politician is pushing for this breakthrough to gain wider awareness too…she wants to give it to every worker in her state that she possibly can…”

So what is it?

Yep, you guessed it, Patrick Cox is again touting Star Scientific (CIGX — free trend analysis here from one of our partners, Marketclub … this one’s been jumpy), a stock he’s teased several times before (the last time around, he called it the “last stock you’ll ever need” back in May … hopefully you didn’t take that too literally if you were an adherent of his at the time, since it’s down considerably since then).

And this “Panakeia 604” is anatabine, a substance found in peppers and tomatoes, to be sure (along with a bunch of other plants), but, for our purposes, a substance that’s found in unusually high concentrations in tobacco. This substance, which they’re now marketing as an anti-inflammatory nutritional supplement called Anatabloc — they sell it themselves and you can even buy it on Amazon now. They also have a second product, called CigRX, that seems to be mostly anatabine and yerba mate, and which they market as a smoking cessation aid.

There’s also a chart in the teaser ad with the title, “Super Treatment Destroys Inflammation — Lipitor Does Not” and an impressive looking bar chart of inflammation response for “Panakeia 604” vs. Lipitor. That chart is an excerpt from one in a Roskamp Institute study that you can find abstracted on this page — and it is indeed impressive, though I don’t know what the scientific design of the study was or whether Lipitor and the Lipitor dosage in that chart has any significance beyond being a control for comparison. Lipitor seems to be a bit of a “straw man” that Anatabine is put up against, in part because it’s been such a valuable drug — my understanding is that Lipitor has impressive anti-inflammatory properties, but you wouldn’t go first to Lipitor if you had a problem with inflammation (I’m certainly inexpert on this, so feel free to chime in if you like). There have been follow-ups that seem more sensible, like the comparison of anatabine to aspirin and Celebrex and the comparison to ibuprofen and other drugs.

Star Scientific’s share price has been driven this year by both the talk about the potential for anatabine to fight inflammation, largely revolving around Alzheimer’s Disease, and by their lawsuit with big tobacco. And it’s pretty much impossible to determine that the stock should be worth any particular price — the arguments from bulls tell us that this should be the biggest supplement in the history of the world, with billions and billions in sales as everyone takes it; and bears tell us that this is a pipe-dream company that doesn’t make any money and has a product whose sales don’t (and won’t anytime soon) come anywhere close to paying for their R&D and administrative expenses. Two examples of those are the StreetSweeper folks, who bet against the stock and wrote about its woes over the Summer, and Dr. John Faessel, a SeekingAlpha contributor who’s almost as excited about the stock as Patrick Cox.

The last news was bad from the courts, which is why the shares took a hit in the last month or two — this lawsuit revolved around the initial reason for being of Star Scientific, their curing process for tobacco that supposedly makes the tobacco healthier. The word from the last lawsuit was that their patent is indeed valid, but that a jury determined that RJ Reynolds did not infringe on the patent — so no big payday there, at least not yet.

And what’s the urgency? (There’s always some urgency — otherwise, why would you get off your duff to subscribe?)

“This is the wealth chance you have today. If you act before midnight, Thursday, October 27th.

“There’s an important reason for that date – major news could break around that time.”

That potential urgency relates to the expected findings of the Flint Study, which is the big (200-300 patients) study run by the Roskamp Institute that aims to determine what impact RCP-006 has on people (RCP-006 is the clinical name for their anatabine compound, roughly the same stuff they’re selling as the Anatabloc supplement). I don’t know if they’ve announced an end date, but when the study began the implications and chatter were that we should expect some reports and/or results late in the year, which is roughly … now-ish.

I did a bit of speculating on CIGX shares earlier in the year, though that was largely a bet on the potential for their “safer tobacco” patent — which turned out poorly. I still happen to have some call options on CIGX, but they’re likely to expire worthless unless they happen to cure Alzheimer’s by next year — so by all means, let me cheer them on!

In all seriousness, Patrick Cox is an enthusiast for story stocks and this is currently his favorite story — which doesn’t mean that it won’t turn out to be a great speculation, but we should take the exciting teaser language with a big grain of salt. He also spoke at the conference at the Roskamp Institute over the summer, apparently, so he’s definitely on board with this being a life-changing nutritional supplement, so regardless of whether or not the news is great in the next few weeks I expect we’ll keep seeing the teasers.

These things move slowly, there are very early stage studies going on about anatabine and inflammation and Alzheimer’s, and there is likely to be some substantial fighting about patents if anatabine does turn out to be a life-changing supplement that everyone wants to take.

Star Scientific is trying to sell its proprietary Anatabloc supplement, and would clearly like to auction off their anatabine patents and their procedures to the highest pharma bidder, but it may be tough to claim that their anatabine is better than the anatabine that anyone else can get from tobacco or from any number of vegetables, and I have no idea whether they really have the best or only way to extract or perfect anatabine. There are other anatabine-related patents out there, and I expect others are studying it as well — I have no idea how this will wind up.

I don’t know of any high-value patented nutritional supplements out there, perhaps there are some, but it’s hard to picture them carrying the same kind of profits as Lipitor. Sales certainly ought to pick up if they can release some good results and get attention this Fall, since there are always folks eager to try new nutritional supplements that might really make a difference, but it will be a while before we can measure CIGX based on conventional metrics like sales, or earnings.

I know lots of my readers have followed CIGX in the couple years since Patrick Cox started pitching the stock, so it’s very likely that many of you know much more about the compound and the near-term happenings than does your friendly neighborhood Gumshoe … feel free to share that wisdom with a comment below.

For full disclosure: I still have those call options on CIGX, but won’t trade in them or the stock for at least three days.

guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

49 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Justthinkin
Guest
Justthinkin
October 24, 2011 5:33 pm

Rare, rather even handed commentary … for a change.

Much to say, no time right now, except, re ” but it may be tough to claim that their anatabine is better than the anatabine that anyone else can get from tobacco”. One cannot use anatabine, or anything else they “get from” tobacco, as a dietary supplement re FDA rules (this is synthetic anatabine, and yes, process is patented by Star (Rock Creek [WOS]).

Quickly the comparison is made to Lipitor because there is growing belief, and good evidence, that Lipitor works at all NOT because it reduces cholesterol (which it does, and it is in question as to whether or not that is good), but because it is a modestly good anti-inflammatory … but no match compared to Anatabloc (anatabine).

For the Lipitor/cholesterol/inflammation story see for example
http://www.spacedoc.com/
Much material, much reading/understanding required. Worth it.

Add a Topic
501
Add a Topic
501
Add a Topic
3022
Justthinkin
Guest
Justthinkin
October 24, 2011 5:43 pm

Should add that there is a vast, unheard though not silent, majority of us “out here” who wish the likes of Cox and Faessel and (formerly, anyway) Altucher would “dial down” the hyperbole about five notches.

This is good stuff, and likely really great stuff, but it won’t solve all the world’s problems. The company is likely a good investment, especially since the “tobacco curing” side of the company just dragged the pps way down, but really for buy/hold for the next several years. Anyone with doubts about that who is also, say, over 50 need only buy some of the product and try it. Then decide. That’s not a sales pitch … that’s an investment DD plan.

Add a Topic
501
irontail
Guest
irontail
October 24, 2011 7:04 pm

Just how many shares of CIGX does “justthinkin” own?? Trying to recapture your losses? Good Luck – maybe you should sell on the next hype jump.

David
David
October 24, 2011 8:57 pm

>>Anyone with doubts about that who is also, say, over 50 need only buy some of the product and try it<<
Oh really? And what exactly should we expect? 50% increase in IQ? Vastly increased sexual stamina? Disappearance of heart disease? A much more positive outlook on life? Return of blood pressure to normal range? 175-lb effortless loss of weight? Increased income?

Add a Topic
3515
Add a Topic
996
mitch
Guest
mitch
October 25, 2011 3:20 pm
Reply to  David

Nobody likes a smart ***. I find it entirely reasonable to suggest trying the product as a cheap way to do some DD.

Justthinkin
Guest
Justthinkin
October 24, 2011 8:59 pm

I own lots, have for a very long time … as most people who have followed the stock for long know … and I am way head … thank you for your concern. Thought that was obvious, my knowing so much about it. Nothing to hide. Luck not needed, nor is investing advice.

So, do you have any comments on facts … or do they matter to you … or do you know any?

Add a Topic
5971
David
David
October 24, 2011 9:01 pm

BTW, Lipitor “working” means that it, like the other statin drugs, reduces the level of LDL cholesterol by inhibiting chol. synthesis in the liver. The anti-inflammatory effects of statins were unexpected icing on the cake.

Add a Topic
5287
Add a Topic
3820
Add a Topic
3818
Mike
Guest
Mike
October 25, 2011 5:51 pm
Reply to  David

David, your total ignorance of medicine makes you an easy target, but that’s you’re fault, not, mine. Several decades ago, the FDA declared that a pharmaceutical did not have to prove that it had ANY clinical advantages if it just decreased cholesterol. So the fact that statins decrease cholesterol (LDL, HDL, VLDL, or otherwise) in no way means that statins increase or decrease your likelihood of contracting a disease, or that they increase or decrease mortality rates. It just decreases cholesterol, and b/c the myth that cholesterol causes heart disease was so embedded into both the medical scientific and lay communities by the pharmaceutical lobby, the bought and paid for FDA exempted pharmaceutical companies from having to prove any clinical significance as long as the drug changes a lab value.

What effects should you expect from anatabine? Do a little homework on the effects of low level inflammation and nuclear factor Kappa B (outside of the anatabine community – plenty at the NIH) and you will answer your own question…if you can even understand what you read.

Add a Topic
1340
Add a Topic
3022
Add a Topic
3820
Justthinkin
Guest
Justthinkin
October 24, 2011 9:19 pm

It’s an anti-inflammatory, David. It won’t help the problem your comment indicates, but if you have chronic sinusitis (#1 improvement reported anecdotally), arthritis (#2), asthma, inflammatory colon problems, or other problems that may be due to an inflammatory system overreaction, it MAY be for you. When the formal clinical (in progress) trials are completed we will know more official details. Those of us who have been taking anatabine for a year or more now already know.

SO what YOU seem to be carping about is that the company ISN’T making a bunch of “the usual” claims, and in fact is waiting for the science to sell it … and so you are obligated to make up your own? Congratulations on coming up with a new mode of criticism.

It’s interesting how so many are so anxious to jump in and critique something they know nothing about.

By the way, because it is also an MAO inhibitor (a safe one), it also can, and does, for some who need it, act as an antidepressant. Thus, “A much more positive outlook on life” is not out of the question. Maybe you should give it a try.

David
David
October 24, 2011 9:51 pm

JT, I was very mildly carping about your fill-in-the-blank claim “Anyone with doubts about that who is also, say, over 50 need only buy some of the product and try it” suggesting that just about anything that ails a person after age 50 might be fixed by anatabine. That sort of vague claim deserves to be ignored, so I was being nice by not ignoring it and instead asking you to be more specific. Thanks to your subsequent post, I see that there is a wide variety of anecdotal accounts of various placebo-responsive ailments seemingly responding to anatabine. I’m glad to hear you think it’s doing something and that you have found relief. It’ll be interesting to see what the double-blind studies turn up.

Justthinkin
Guest
Justthinkin
October 24, 2011 10:21 pm
Reply to  David

“anecdotal accounts of various placebo-responsive ailments seemingly responding to anatabine. ”

That’s why I said “try it”. This is not one of those things you take for two months and then think, “Yeah, I THINK it’s helping”. The results are rapid and very remarkable … startling for most of us.

And the invitation is a sound one: if you have such issues and you are interested, buy it and try it. If it doesn’t help, don’t buy more and don’t, by all means, invest.

I’d recommend the same thing for people thinking of investing in a company that makes an applicance or anything else. It’s one of the basic tenets of investing. How does that not make sense?

Some people just love to carp and carp and carp. Do it the hard way, I don’t care. I rest assured that it is highly likely that at some future time an anatabine product will help you greatly with something that is a real health concern for you … and you’ll be very grateful that it did. Why is it so hard to believe that the people at Johns Hopkins and Roskamp Institute are so enthusiastic because something new and very good has come about?

Add a Topic
2940
Justthinkin
Guest
Justthinkin
October 24, 2011 10:29 pm
Reply to  Justthinkin

And BTW, it appears from what is publicly known that it was those research concerns (one or both, but I believe RI), in doing research for Star Scientific on the properties of anatabine, that discovered the anti-inflammatory property of anatabine, or at least the surprising extent of it. This is apparently one of those great tales of serendipity.

Add a Topic
1677
David
David
October 24, 2011 11:04 pm
Reply to  Justthinkin

>>Why is it so hard to believe that the people at Johns Hopkins and Roskamp Institute are so enthusiastic because something new and very good has come about?<<
JT, it isn't a matter of belief or not. It's a matter of evidence or not.
Enthusiasm is cheap and can be misplaced. There are many promising compounds that are now on the trash heap that initially filled researchers with enthusiasm. This is not carping. It is scientific reality. I do hope anatabine has effectiveness and is safe to use in effective doses. Lord knows there's a lot of inflammatory misery to vanquish.

Add a Topic
2940
Myron Martin
Guest
October 24, 2011 10:04 pm

For my money I think I will just eat more peppers and tomatoes. Seems to me most drugs last about 10 years before the side effects become known and you really have to DIG for the information because your doctor either dosen’t know or won’t tell. DRUGS are rarely the solution to any health problem, a change in lifestyle and good nutrition mostly precludes the need for any drug. At best they mask symptoms, at worst they cause more problems than they cure. In a couple months I will be celebrating my 73rd birthday without
ever having been to a medical doctor as an adult. I have not used so much as an aspirin and have always found a natural solution to any minor health problems without resorting to drugs. Have not been bedridden or even lost a day of work since a major lifestyle change focussed on organic foods and natural supplements while avoiding most processed foods.

Add a Topic
3555
Justthinkin
Guest
Justthinkin
October 24, 2011 10:04 pm

“BTW, Lipitor ‘working’ means that it, like the other statin drugs, reduces the level of LDL cholesterol by inhibiting chol. synthesis in the liver. The anti-inflammatory effects of statins were unexpected icing on the cake.”

Read the material I linked to, David (Spacedoc.com). There’s lots of other material like it for the finding.

There is no doubt that Lipitor lowers cholesterol. The controversy is whether or not that effect on a biomarker translates into the believed effect on heart health … and, if I understand correctly, that belief fails to explain why, then (for example), so many people who do NOT have a hyper cholesterol “problem” have the very same heart health problems that Lipitor is said to help.

And so the developing theory … again, as the material at spacedoc.com and many other places indicate … is that it is the antiinflammatory property, not the cholesterol lowering property, that helps the patient’s health … and in fact it appears possible that the severe lowering of cholesterol in the process actually hurts the patient.

Quoting from spacedoc.com, written by a doctor who experienced the awful side effects of Lipitor, so he says, “I soon realized the adverse reactions involved far more than impaired cognition, including personality change, myopathy, neuropathy and a chronic neuromuscular degeneration similar to ALS and all statins were contributing to these adverse reactions, not just Lipitor®. ”

Believe what you want, but it would be nice if you first heard both sides (by reading, as in the linked material for example, people who know a lot more about it than I and, perhaps, you).

In other words, it was (originally) found that statins lowered cholesterol, and that they also improved some health outcomes, but often at the expense of serious consequential side effects … yet the conclusion was that “lowering cholesterol” is why they improved some health outcomes. That theory failed to answer some basic quesitons, like the first one cited above and others … and as to why one should have to chance making people so very sick to “make them better”.

If one considers that the anti-inflammatory effect of those drugs may actually be why they work (and there are good reasons to so presume), then the once muddy picture becomes, perhaps, clearer. “Lowering cholesterol” becomes an incidental at best, and nasty at worse, side effect of them, instead of “why they work”. Of course, this theory clobbers the most lucrative raison d’être big pharma concerns have ever had … so this would be a hard pill for the industry to swallow ; ) and one could expect a lot of resistance.

Maybe it’s something to consider, and not dismiss out of hand … or out of ignorance? Read and think about it.

Add a Topic
5287
Add a Topic
3820
Add a Topic
3818
David
David
October 24, 2011 10:29 pm

JT, I am not dismissing anything except your unwarranted broad claim of effectiveness for whatever ails a 50+-year-old. I am not saying anatabine doesn’t work for any disease of an over-active immune system—how would I know? No one knows. That’s for the controlled studies to reveal.

Justthinkin
Guest
Justthinkin
October 25, 2011 4:41 am
Reply to  David

I’ll leave it at this:

I said … being critical of the hyperbole of Patrick Cox and the like … the following:
“This is good stuff, and likely really great stuff, but it won’t solve all the world’s problems. The company is likely a good investment, especially since the “tobacco curing” side of the company just dragged the pps way down, but really for buy/hold for the next several years. Anyone with doubts about that who is also, say, over 50 need only buy some of the product and try it. Then decide. That’s not a sales pitch … that’s an investment DD plan.”

My advice, stated right there again, was: rather than believing in hyperbolic commentary, if one considers investing in this particular company, TRY THE PRODUCT if you are in a situation that makes such a trial meaningful.

(Again) That is simple advice that is a basic tenet of investing. If you are thinking about investing in a company that sells products, be familiar with the product. THEN DECIDE. In this case, unless you have an unfortunate early-onset inflammatory problem, such a trial may do you little good. I suggested that if you are 50+ there is a good chance the trial will be meaningful (one way or the other). IS THAT NOT WHAT I SAID/IMPLIED?

YOU said I made an, “… unwarranted broad claim of effectiveness for whatever ails a 50+-year-old.” REALLY!? I didn’t say that, you did. I made NO CLAIM. THAT STATEMENT RIGHT THERE, ABOVE, MAKES NO CLAIM. I simply said TRY THE PRODUCT before investing, if you are in a situation where the product may do you some good.

If you wish to redefine my statements to serve some purpose of your own, then please claim the restatement as your own work, not mine. Thank you.

Add a Topic
951
Add a Topic
501
David
David
October 25, 2011 10:01 am
Reply to  Justthinkin

>>Anyone with doubts about that who is also, say, over 50 need only buy some of the product and try it.<<

There you go again. 😉

I rest my case.

charles
charles
October 25, 2011 5:33 am

have any studies done on this product for autism? I am not being facetious as my daughter is inflicted with this condition.I ask this question as if it can “cure” dementia a condition of the brain then it follows that it may do the same for autism.

👍 21848
Baruch
Guest
Baruch
October 26, 2011 3:48 am

I have found a full report of Patrick Cox on the net:
Live Long and Prosper — Nutraceutically

Add a Topic
951
Add a Topic
4983
Ron
Ron
October 25, 2011 3:52 pm

Thanks for all the discussion on Anatabine . I would like to try it some day . I am 77 yrs old and currently being treated with Prednisone which truly is a miracle drug for recently diagnosed PMR polymyalgia Rhumatica. In 3 days i have gone from stiff as a board with many joints and muscels aching to being as limber and agile as you might expect from a 77 yr old. Great stuff. Best ant inflamitory drug out there. A few unwanted side effects such as rubber legs and diminishing eyesight but I will wait until full treatment finished and I am on maintenence dosages to dermine next move.
Has anyone made any comparisons with prednisone and anatabine as antiinflamitory drugs ?

bigjohnboston
Guest
bigjohnboston
October 26, 2011 1:11 pm
Reply to  Ron

I was prescribed Methylprednisolone in March of 2010 for 10 days and it worked
wonders on the arthritis in my spine.

I do not know the exact difference between Methylprednisolone and Prednisone but
I do know you can’t keep taking Methylprednisolone or you face serious – even deadly
side effects.

I’ve taken 4 Anatabloc lozenges a day since early September and the annoying back
pain I used to have with is 90% gone.

Venture Shadow
Guest
Venture Shadow
October 26, 2011 11:59 pm
Reply to  Ron

Polymyalgia rheumatica is specifically responsive to corticosteroids such as prednisone. This does not generalize to other conditions, and corticosteroids such as prednisone have their own substantial side-effects.

waitaminit
Guest
waitaminit
October 25, 2011 4:08 pm

I hold shares–bought due to Cox. I tried the product for six weeks and now off for a while. I suffer from sore knees and inflamed Achilles. Wierd–as soon as I started on “ana” pain became more accute. Could be coincidence. Unfortunately, I also started on a product that helps release of human growth hormone at the same time, so I stopped both. Could be a conflict between supplements, so I will wait for a few weeks, then go back on “ana” without the HGH enhancer.
I guess I’m in the DD stage “justthinkin”.

Add a Topic
3555
Tommy
Member
Tommy
October 25, 2011 4:41 pm

@ David
It would seem JT’s harmless claim of “Buy some and try it for yourself” would support his stock purchases all by itself. I searched on Amazon as the Gumshoe said to find some. IT’S $100 A BOTTLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Not exactly a 9.99 supplement like most supplements are priced.
Won’t be running right out to “Try some” any time soon that’s for sure!!!

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
34
Add a Topic
3555
waitaminit
Guest
waitaminit
October 25, 2011 5:11 pm

price does give one pause–should last 30-45 days, if you come off the recommended dosage a bit.

Brian
Guest
Brian
October 25, 2011 6:12 pm

Cox has a track record that is simply awful. Many of his picks are in the dustbin of history. He was touting nano particles as the greatest invention of the century, and we all know how that went as did the nano stocks he recommended, Anabatine when and ‘if” it gets FDA approval might be worth an investment, for now it remains a pipe dream.

Add a Topic
3022
Steve
Guest
Steve
October 25, 2011 7:02 pm
Reply to  Brian

I would agree with the comment about adverse events becoming known only many years later. Most studies with meds are done on limited populations for finite amounts of time. Patients often remain on these meds for years, often having to combine them with other meds not tested together with each other. My son with Crohn’s disease has been on a variety of immunosuppressants over the years,was in one pediatric investigational study out of desperation. The med worked for him but we watched through the years as they gradually added more and more adverse events to the company’s website for the med. He, of course, knew about them as they occurred. He got ten years out of it but the last few were tough.
Think of all of the recent vitamin studies that disproved taking vitamins before you start gobbling Cox’s stuff.
Steve

Add a Topic
5399
bigjohnboston
Guest
bigjohnboston
October 26, 2011 1:13 pm
Reply to  Brian

no need to get FDA approval. it is a food supplement – available now.

Add a Topic
3022
john
Irregular
john
October 25, 2011 7:43 pm

Mike..Oct 25 is correct. Cholesterol is the biggest pharmaceutical rip of last 40 years. It’s only one indication for ” possible” heart complications.. There are many other factors such as you CRP score.. Ask your doctor to give that test.. It’s more of an indication than Cholesterol.. It measures the amount of inflamation in your blood vessels. As long as your triglicerides are good and your HDL , Your LDL will have less of a factor on your score. My LDL is always around 130 and Doc and me decided it was hereditary.. No big deal..My HDL and Tri’s are VG..

Add a Topic
3820
Add a Topic
3820
Jon Loren
Guest
Jon Loren
October 25, 2011 7:51 pm

What is is the Nutraceutical Patrick Cox is promoting ?

Thanks Jon

Add a Topic
951
thefamilyman
Guest
thefamilyman
November 19, 2011 5:23 am
Reply to  Jon Loren

Go to Anatabloc.com

John W
Guest
John W
October 25, 2011 7:53 pm

Forget the stock, anything that actually reduces inflammation is what I want. But it is difficult to “experience” a reduction of inflammation directly. Aspirin reduces inflammation. Curcumin, extract of dirt cheep turmeric, is touted as, argue-able, the best anti-inflammatory nutraceutical. But I for one can never tell if curcumin is actually doing anything for/to me. So if this anatabine stuff is better, bring it on!

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
5554
Add a Topic
5554
John W
Guest
John W
October 25, 2011 7:59 pm
Reply to  John W

I want to add, this is an extract of nite-shade plants, and nite-shades are said to goose arthritis symptoms, so if one reacts to these plants (tomato, potato, tobacco, peppers, eggplant, etc) — aint it ironic that arithritis is an autoimmune disease of inflammation–
and if anatabine contains the same substances as nite-shades …um …..

Add a Topic
501
Add a Topic
5554

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

More Info  
18
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x