Become a Member

“Tiny Oil Stock That Could Transform $1,000 into a $144,400 Windfall”

Now that’s a good tease — a tiny oil stock catches attention right away, since with oil prices having recovered we’re all pretending that we were never scared of what $30 oil would do to our energy investments. And $1,000 to $144,400, well, that just speaks for itself, no? I’ve got $1,000, and I’d much rather have $144,400.

So shall we figure out what the heck this is?

The teaser ad is from Colin McCabe of the Elite Stock Report — and of course, he would dearly love it if you’d subscribe to his newsletter. Apparently it’s $200 a year. You can subscribe if you like, I’m all for checking out whatever interests you … but if you just want to find out what this stock is, read on — I’m sure the mighty Gumshoe can figure this one out.

First, the pitch: The basic argument here is that the rising price of oil will create a demand imbalance, because so much of the supply from expensive sources (like deepwater rigs and oil sands projects) was taken offline, or exploration postponed, when oil prices collapsed last year. That imbalance will create a spike in the oil price (beyond what we’ve already seen, apparently), and will be a huge boon to those who have early-stage projects in high-cost areas. After all, when prices rise it’s the high cost producers who see the biggest boost to their bottom line, they go from money-losers to profitable producers almost overnight.

So here’s how this company is teased:

“A few hundred miles north of the Montana border, a tiny oil company has made a massive 2.25 billion barrel oil discovery…

“Independent analysis concludes the discovery is economically viable, capable of producing 56,000 barrels a day…

“And a pre-feasibility study determined the stock is worth $19.39 a share… yet, right now shares are trading for less than $0.50.

“Simply put, this is the greatest profit opportunity I’ve seen in years.”

Nice, eh? But there’s more!

“You see, this company is sitting on part of a vast oil discovery that is larger than the entire state of Florida. It contains more oil than the sheikdoms of Kuwait, Bahrain, and Dubai… combined. And it could satisfy all U.S. demand for the next 100 years.”

Then they start to talk just a little bit about exactly where this company’s land is — and yes, this is an oil sands company. The “north of Montana” bit should probably have told us that, no? And they quote that same old CBS story about the oil sands, which reflects the conventional wisdom that this source of energy will eventually be the largest foreign source of oil for the United States.

“And this tiny oil company… whom almost no one knows about… is smack-dab in the middle of it all.

“56,000 barrels a day… for 18 years

“This company’s beaten the majors to the punch, scooping up a massive swath of land in the heart of a huge oil zone that could fuel America for decades to come.

“Its property package — totaling over 100,000 acres — sits right next to Shell’s enormous thermal complex, where over 7 billion barrels of oil have been discovered. This facility currently pumps out 12,000 barrels a day, and is the crown jewel of Shell’s operations…

“But 12,000 barrels a day is nothing…

“The tiny company I’m telling you about has made a monster 2.25 billion barrel discovery of its own. And one of the most respected independent engineering firms in the business — whose clients include Chevron, Exxon, and Shell — estimates it could be capable of producing 56,000 barrels a day… for 18 years.

“A pre-feasibility study confirms this stock is worth $19.39 a share

“A pre-feasibility study completed by the same independent engineering firm confirms this company has a value of $1.2 billion at $65 oil. That works out to a whopping $19.39 a share.

“Let me repeat: $19.39 a share… that’s a 4,748% increase from today’s price.

“But you know what? $19.39 a share may be far too conservative…

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


“You see, the engineering firm based their study on only about 20% of the company’s massive land base.

“There are still tens of thousands of acres left to explore. And most of this land is in the SAME area over the SAME deposit with the SAME geological setting. So the likelihood that this company is sitting on a far greater amount of oil than we now know (possibly double) is extremely high.

“And it gets better…

“Every $1 increase in the price of oil adds $1.29 to the share price…..

“at $95 oil, each share could be worth a staggering $58.16.

“That’s a massive 14,440% increase from where the stock is trading today, enough to turn a $1,000 investment into a $144,400 windfall.”

OK, so I’ll admit — I’m jaded from reading these promises every day, but I still can’t help but do a little bit of drooling when that kind of return is dangled in the face of my decrepit portfolio.

So what is the stock?

Well, you may have noticed that the real clues were not exactly legion — but this is what we have: Worth $19.39 a share according to the feasibility study, could produce 56,000 barrels a day for 18 years, priced under 50 cents, has a project near producing Shell mines.

Throw all that into the mighty, mighty Thinkolator, and I can tell you that this must be …

Strata Oil and Gas (trades over the counter in the US at ticker SOIGF)

Now, before I get any further let me warn you: There are a lot of Stock Gumshoe readers, and volume, though already up about 200% from the recent average, is very low — so be aware that if the price shoots up it’s probably just because lots of folks heard about it here (or from Colin McCabe) and are driving the price higher. That doesn’t mean the stock is any better today than it was last week, or that the move in the shares is necessarily sustainable — caveat emptor. Or maybe caveat commodator, or however the ancient Romans would translate “investor.”

Who is Strata? They are a small exploratory oil sands company with properties primarily in the Peace River area (that’s the smaller oil sands zone West of Athabasca), near some producing properties, including Shell’s. The map of their properties is here. They’re not producing anything right now — and in fact, from the lack of word from the company it doesn’t seem like they’re doing much of anything. Maybe they’re just sitting on their assets, hoping for better prices and a buyout or a better opportunity to raise money to begin producing oil, I don’t know … their annual report is delayed but should be out later this Summer, so soon we’ll at least know what they were doing last year.

And their pre-feasibility study for their main project (called Cadotte), which was released over a year ago, did put the “net present value” of the property at $1.2 billion. If you divide that by the number of shares currently outstanding (not counting the warrants and options), you get … exactly $19.39, per the teaser.

Of course, you may not be comfortable with the assumptions that went into that pre-feasibility study — you can read Strata’s press release about it here, or get the official SEC filing of the full study here (it’s a long one).

So … will Strata turn into a barnburner for your portfolio? That’s tough to say — from what little I’ve learned so far it seems that these guys are very new players — the corporation used to be a software company called Stratabase, and it was only four years ago that they changed their name, and changed their focus to oil and gas exploration, and two years after that they made their big oil sands discovery.

The big things that seem likely to move the stock are a significant move in the share price (many oil sands projects are on the verge of profitability now, with oil near $70 — if it spikes further they get very profitable, if it falls the producers are in real trouble.); a takeout by a reserves-hungry oil major or an oil sands competitor; or a real step toward production on their Cadotte project, which would probably require some dramatic new level of financing. They haven’t issued any financial filings for about a year, as far as I’ve seen, and they recently filed an extension for their 20-F (annual report), so we should see that in a matter of weeks. They do have a huge accumulated deficit from acquiring land, and since they’re not producing they have no earnings. It looks like they’ve been financing their exploration and acquisition projects through share sales, and they do have those assets that should remain valuable as long as oil is expensive.

So whaddya think? Like this speculation, or do you prefer the bigger oil sands players, or other energy investments? Or do you think oil’s about to fall? Share your thoughts with a comment below, if you please. And if you’ve ever subscribed to the Elite Stock Report, by all means, please click here to review it for us. Thanks!

guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

39 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
SageNot
Member
SageNot
June 29, 2009 10:44 am

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ta?s=SOIGF.OB&t=1y&l=on&z=m&q=l&p=m50,m200&a=m26-12-9,r14,ss,w14&c=

Off sharply from a recent high. This is a potential Shell Oil takeover if the Yahoo data stream is accurate.

Add a Topic
359
john sanders
Guest
john sanders
June 29, 2009 10:45 am

love your articles and what you do it gives me great insight and helps me to not make the big mistakes i used to make by jumping in those rip offs im holding several now that will never do a thing but go broke. thank you again. love reading every one of your pieces.

Dave
Guest
Dave
June 29, 2009 10:50 am

Check out this dudes experience Mr. Brisset is a Calgary-based finance and marketing professional. During his career he has worked for such multi-billion dollar corporations as Coors and Molson. His knowledge and experience in business operations and team development is of specific importance to Strata. Mr. Brisset is fluent in English and French, and received his Business degree from the University of Quebec at Montreal.

One of the board members of the oil sands boondoggle

Coors and Molson make beer don’t they?

Add a Topic
359
dlst
dlst
June 29, 2009 11:02 am

How does a company morph from software to oil-sands?? Reminds me, very unpleasantly, of Eden Energy (EDNE) which also was previously doing business in something very unrelated to oil.

Add a Topic
361
Add a Topic
359
Chris Fitzgerald
Guest
Chris Fitzgerald
June 29, 2009 11:05 am

I would proceed with great caution, I invested in a company that sounds almost like the mirror image of what was pitched for this company. That company’s name was Eden energy resources. So I bought into it, why because the prices going up quickly. And I bought into it some more, the stock reached five dollars from $.50 wow! And then the investors who pitched the deal who I speculate had a major holding in the shares from the beginning sold in the stock took a nosedive. It’s now worth six cents anybody want to buy it? Ha ha Ha investing that if you want I’m running away.

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
5971
Derf
Guest
Derf
June 29, 2009 11:13 am

What’s the deal with the forum? Is there a new one available?

dlst
dlst
June 29, 2009 11:39 am

The new forum is here:

http://www.stockgumshoe.com/forum

Bob M.
Guest
Bob M.
June 29, 2009 11:53 am

This souds suspiciously like a MYRA.PK,Myriad Entertainment. Founded by a guy up in Canada,premise was to build & open a resort in Tunica,Ms. However,it has never happened. I bought 10,000 shares & later sold them at 70 cents/share.To this day ,this outfit can’t even buy the land needed due to lack of funds.It was to have a domed golf course & grounds,making it weatherproof.Currently,its going for 6 cents a share.The guy who started it skipped long ago.This “oil” outfit sounds like a perfect investment for those who believed in Bernie Madoff.

Add a Topic
282
Add a Topic
359
AlanH
June 29, 2009 12:07 pm

I received something v similar looking today http://www.eajune3.com/TAMO_090629.html#JR

note particularly the legal disclaimers at foot.

Anyone know anything. Stock price certainly has been affected by this article. Most educational.

AlanH

Add a Topic
635
Add a Topic
5971
SnoopyJC
Guest
June 29, 2009 2:01 pm

I see what you mean about the hype here possibly driving the price up, as it’s up over 53% today (and the day’s not over yet)!!!

I’m not gonna chase it.
–joe

MikeM
Guest
MikeM
June 29, 2009 3:12 pm

I am soooo thankful for this report and forum. With all the teasers and ‘skeptical’ info out there, I always look here for a sanity check.

JerriyA
June 30, 2009 12:38 am

Take a look at a long term chart..someone must have teased this company in Oct’07 as the stock jumped from about 30 cents to $2 in a matter of days…any idea what happened at that time?

Add a Topic
5971
Monnie
Guest
Monnie
June 30, 2009 4:37 pm

Does anyone knpw which junior gold mining stock Byron King is touting now,, the one that will make us all “miserable rich”?

Add a Topic
210
Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
687
ponce
Guest
ponce
July 1, 2009 8:29 pm

I was watching SOIGF since 12/06 initially @$2.29. slid to as low as $.13. I did not catch the falling knife. I was afraid it might be like BQI which I chased up to $6 and lost money. BQI at the time had the biggest sand oil land holding but could not develop it. SOIGF has not done much since then but I will keep it in my watch list. Buying now? I don’t think so.

Add a Topic
359
Add a Topic
282
Myron Martin
Guest
Myron Martin
July 1, 2009 8:51 pm

In response to Monnie’s question, Byron King is touting not ONE junior gold mining stock but a total of 8 related to the industry in some way, a royalty company I had never heard of and some producing more silver than gold.

In actual fact when I read his report I found that I already owned SIX of the 8 and a 7th was on my buy list and I have since bought it.

I have had difficulty responding to Byron through the Energy & Scarcity Newsletter by which I obtained the report, the e-mail given does not work, at least when I tried.

The reason I wanted to contact Byron, and I tried another address but have received no response, is that I wanted to CHALLENGE BYRON to a contest.

While I would have chosen 2-3 of the same picks as the BEST juniors for major profits over the next 6-18 months I would like to stack my picks against his if he allows me to pick 12 (since he picked first)
with only the most profitable eight of mine counting in comparison to his eight picks.

If Travis agrees to monitor the stocks based on May 30th prices and declare a winner after a min. of 6 months, (preferably a year) I will post Byron’s picks and my competing twelve, maybe between the two of them we can all make some good money, so what do you say to that proposal Travis?

While I am in no way in the same league as Byron based on background experience and other key credentials, I have been a “Gold bug” for 50 years and have spent the past 5 years building a precious metals portfolio by subscribing to a wide range of precious metals focussed newsletters and have done a lot of research on my own as well.

What do I have to show for it, well how about DOUBLING my money from Nov. 30th to May 30th, which should give me at least a little credability!

Add a Topic
687
Add a Topic
210
Add a Topic
5971
Barbara
Barbara
July 13, 2009 1:20 pm

I am so grateful to “The Gumshoe”. Years ago, when I started investing seriously, guys like Navalier were great. After these market ‘corrections’, I find that everyone has gone haywire and pumping and dumping just doesn’t stop. Since the BQI debacle, I started reading the Gumshoe faithfully. I have avoided some major investing pitfalls not to mention hideous newsletter costs by just reading the column. Thanks Gumshoe!! Your thinkolater rocks!!

darrell
darrell
July 14, 2009 12:01 pm

Sorry folks, I missed this thread of a promo. I have owned this for awhile as a land position, oil in the area type deal and after the latest news, I have watched price rise, I’m holding for a run up or possible buyout by their neighbor, Shell Oil.

Add a Topic
282
Add a Topic
359
Add a Topic
359
arthur
Guest
arthur
November 19, 2009 1:06 pm

I would like to ask myron martin what he thinks about the beard co.ticker brco they claim to have a huge gold play in the alaska tar sands

Add a Topic
210
Dean
Member
Dean
February 5, 2010 2:56 pm

If you are looking at the oil sands for a company already producing while continuing to develop their acres, Connacher is a good prospect. CLL.TO They use the environmentally friendly SAGD process and are finishing projects ahead of schedule and under budget. They also have conventional plays, 24% of a S American Oil company and a heavy oil refinery near the action. Not bad for $1.16.

Add a Topic
359
Add a Topic
6256
Add a Topic
5916
J fREUDENBERG
J fREUDENBERG
February 5, 2010 3:12 pm

Mr. Johnson;

I am surprised you are reviewing such old news. Their geological report came out March 29, ’06, and yes they are on the tar sands. Yes they are close to Shell, who are backing off much new investment in their project.

Timing is good with nat gas (a critical component) low, but tar sand heavy crude oil will never compete with lite oil from the huge Bakken deposit with their lower costs and emissions, even if they have to drill horizontally and fract the shale.

JSF

Add a Topic
359
Add a Topic
359
Add a Topic
878

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

More Info  
15
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x