Become a Member

“The Greatest Leap of Mankind… Unlimited FREE Energy” (Dr. Kent Moors’ Picks Revealed)

Moors says: "If you could only own one solar company for the next 10 years, this would be the one." Which? Answers from the Thinkolator

By Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe, November 18, 2015

This email pitch from Dr. Kent Moors for his Energy Advantage newsletter seems to have hit just about every inbox in North America. It has come in under a bunch of different subject lines, from “stunning breakthrough set to make OPEC obsolete” to “$5 stock make OPEC obsolete” to “Say ‘Goodbye’ to Your Electric Bill… Forever!” to “This could be the end for big oil” and “it all starts with a tiny grain of sand.”

But yes, all those subject lines and notes from a dozen different newsletters and pundits link to the same ad from Dr. Kent Moors which launches with an enticing spiel about how these tiny grains of sand are going to provide unlimited free energy.

This is an absurdly long sales pitch for Moors’ newsletter… when I print it out, it runs to 40 some pages, and he doesn’t actually get around to admitting that it’s solar power he’s talking about until page 13. And he goes to some length to push aside the concerns that many investors might have about solar by saying that it’s different now…

“Now, am I talking about solar energy? Are these energy particles the basis for what we call solar power?

“Well, yes and no…

“Technically speaking, this perpetual energy comes from the infinite power of the Sun.

“But this NEW GENERATION is completely different from what most folks imagine when they think of traditional solar power.

“I don’t know about you, but when I think of solar power, I think of expensive, cumbersome panels plastered all over my neighbor’s roof.

“And I think of liberals taxing me into oblivion so they can make everybody ‘green.’

“Rest assured, today’s new solar power has changed so much, it’s virtually UNRECOGNIZABLE.”

So yes, in the end he’s pitching some solar stocks — what are they?

A bit more of a taste from the ad to get you setarted:

“And while there will be numerous plays coming down the pike, you will NEVER have another opportunity like you have today – right now!

“You see, at the center of this energy revolution sits one tiny company that’s about to go from virtual obscurity to household name.

“Their revolutionary technology has completely transformed the way this fuel is harvested.

“At the same time, they have over 750 patents protecting their market share.

“To say this company is in the driver’s seat would be an understatement of epic proportions.

“At this moment, every major energy player on the planet is banging on their door looking for cheap energy.

“In fact, their client roster is a ‘who’s who’ of global energy players.”

I’ll try to spare you the long and drawn out spiel (you’ve already gotten it, I imagine, or you can see it here if you want the whole magilla), but let me try to pull out a few of the better clues about this “tiny company” at the “center of this energy revolution” so we can feed the Thinkolator and make sure we get the right answer…

“They’ve already locked in enormous long-term deals with the likes of Walmart, Google, the U.S. Department of Defense, and New York City.

“In addition, cities, companies and countries from around the globe – the biggest energy consumers on the planet – are rushing to harness this company’s innovative technology.

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


“I’m talking about China, India, and even Saudi Arabia!

“Domination of this emerging sector is near certain… and early investors could see a potential 10, 15, 25 times their money BEFORE this even gets going full steam.”

OK, so that’s a few clues. More…

“This company is tiny.

“And with even a small piece of the potential $48 trillion flowing toward it, the expansion is going to be off the charts.

“We’re talking 80,000% potential growth. And that’s being conservative…

“And at this moment, they are preparing an announcement that will likely send their stock into orbit, delivering early investors 10, 15, even 25 times their money, for starters.”

He doesn’t say much more about what that “announcement” might be, but he does then move on to the chemical engineering advancements and technology that he says has allowed this company to help cut costs by “a mind-blowing 99%”…

“The company I’m recommending today has taken solar cells to a whole new level… helping bring the cost of solar power down by a stunning 99%.

“And the way it works is amazing.

“In fact, their patented technology turns grains of sand, right off the beach, into highly efficient, wafer-thin solar cells that deliver dirt-cheap energy.”

Isn’t that what they all do? Turn sand into purified silicon and polysilicon and slice it into wafers? Well, apparently this particular company has some improved technology… here’s how he describes it:

“During the process, very small particles of Si called “seeds” are suspended in a cloud of gas.

“Si in the gas attaches to other Si particles, forming larger and larger beads.

“These beads eventually drop out of the gas like rain….

“The beads are then melted and formed into wafer-thin slices of 99.99% pure Si…

“The technology is 1,000% more efficient than the industry standard.

“And the big thing: The cost…

“Again, traditional solar cells delivered energy at a cost of $76 per KWH.

“This company’s technology is so efficient, and creates such pure Si, they are supplying a utility company with solar at 5 cents per KWH.”

That’s not a fair or recent comparison, I expect, nor is it the work of solely this (or any) company, I think we should note. I’m not sure where he’s getting the $76 number, but it is true that solar module costs were about $76/watt back in 1977 (they’ve fallen to close to 50 cents/watt now, but were in the $5-10 range for most of the 1980s-early 2000s). That’s different from the cost per KWH that utilities are actually paying for electricity — but five cents per KWH is now pretty much the average cost of utility-scale solar projects. I think that’s where the number comes from, because later in the pitch he says “the cost of solar technology has plummeted from over $76 per watt to about 5 cents per watt” — which isn’t really accurate if you’re talking about the cost of modules, but, yes, we’ll stipulate that costs are way down throughout the solar power industry even as we argue that no one company is responsible for that 40-year drop in costs.

Photovoltaic electricity generation costs have fallen more than any other electricity generation costs over the past five years, and Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway has so far signed the cheapest solar power purchase agreement I’ve seen at under four cents per KWH from a Nevada solar farm. Costs have been coming down dramatically, with the two biggest impacts (if you ignore clean energy subsidies, which fluctuate) probably coming from both the falling cost of silicon and the falling cost of financing (solar power facilities don’t price their power based on the ongoing cost of fuel, because there isn’t any, they price it on what it costs to build the facility and how much it costs them to finance that construction — low interest rates may be as important as falling polysilicon prices).

So what is the “tiny company” Moors is touting with pronouncements like, “If you could only own one solar company for the next 10 years, this would be the one?”

We’ve got a bunch of clues in that miasma of hype we’ve gone through so far, but here’s one more:

“they signed a deal with Southern California Edison and PG&E, the nation’s two largest utility companies, to convert California’s power grid into solar.”

Uh oh. Is this maybe the worst-timed teaser pitch in history? The ads just started running early yesterday, as the stock was in the process of falling another 30%+ in a single day, part of a drop of 50% in just the past week following their earnings report… and, in total now, a drop of 90% since the peak in mid-July.

Yes, this is the stock that has almost singlehandedly destroyed a handful of hedge funds this year: SunEdison (SUNE).

Or maybe, reports the hopeful optimist, this is a well-timed pitch because the stock is bottoming out?

I don’t know — there is very little margin for error in SunEdison these days, largely because of the huge leverage they employed and the instability of the financial engineering platform on which they perched this company.

I used to know a little bit about SunEdison many years ago, back when they were MEMC Electronic Materials and were a producer of the high quality polysilicon wafers used in semiconductors and, later, solar panels. For a while there they had a nice pricing advantage, they got a good foothold on the wafer business partly because they were a serial acquirer, and demand was high… but the story has changed a bit in the years since then, they bought SunEdison back in 2009 and they’ve more recently moved to jettison the wafer production and become more of a “pure” solar company with a focus on large, utility-scale solar projects like those that SunEdison was just starting to complete six years ago, and before long they changed the name of the company to match this new focus.

And, with a push from the hedge fund guys starting a year or two ago, they tried to “create value” by committing to build huge projects but then spinning off their cash-flowing, stable assets into “yieldco” trading vehicles, companies that own solar power plant projects and the like but don’t really do anything other than pay for maintenance, collect checks, and spit out their cash to shareholders… and issue new shares to buy new projects from their “parent”… kind of like a MLP.

The figuring was that these “yieldco” companies, as they bought the solar power plants that were “dropped down” after SunEdison built them and signed long-term contracts for the power, would essentially be a cheap source of financing, because income investors would lap them up. And now, with SUNE sitting on a big ol’ pile of debt and the yieldcos trading with a dividend yield of 10%, there’s no cheap financing to be had and SUNE, now that they can’t roll over financing by selling stuff at a stiff price to the yieldcos, is essentially getting the equivalent of margin calls on the acquisitions they committed to earlier this year.

This is either a horrible time to buy, because there is a substantial risk of the company actually defaulting on debt and having even more serious issues, or a great time to buy because they’ve bottomed out and they do still own a lot of valuable power plants, and will be building more. I haven’t scoured the books, but even the analysts are having trouble modeling the outcome — not unlike Valeant, this is a shocking drop for a stock that was built to please hedge funds, who always believe that more value can be “unlocked” by some new financial structure or strategy, and showed so much strength and momentum just months ago.

SUNE was a $5 billion company a year ago, and (very briefly) a $10 billion company back in July, and now the market cap is under a billion dollars and still falling (well, OK, it’s up a few percent so far today — but do you know what it takes to recover from a 90% drop? That’s right, a gain of 900%… you don’t see those very often).

And they have $10 billion in long-term debt and another $3 billion in the minority interests that presumably represent their holdings in Terra Power and Terra Global, the two yieldcos… which also are worth far less than they were a few months ago. I don’t know if Dr. Kent Moors follows a stop loss strategy with his Energy Advantage newsletter recommendations, but if he does this might be one of those odd cases where a position could have been stopped out at the very moment that the teaser ad is beginning its heavy circulation (if you’re a subscriber, I’d be curious to hear if there was a response to today’s drop — which, unlike the earnings drop a week ago, was not caused by a known-in-advance catalyst)

And yes, if you’re dotting your i’s and crossing your t’s and want to make sure the Thinkolator is right, Google did provide about $145 million of financing for one of SunEdison’s projects, their Kern County solar plant in California that was subsequently dropped down to Terra Power (TERP). Presumably that money is part of the debt SunEdison is carrying on the books, though the debt may have all dropped down to TERP as well. Not sure how they account for debt or if SUNE still has a controlling stake in TERP.

And yes, SUNE does also have about 750 patents, and they claim to have a technology, much as Moors describes, for creating high purity silicon — they think it will let them get module costs down to 40 cents per watt, which would be 10-20% cheaper than what the cheapest high-volume producers in China have been able to do so far… they describe that process, which they call Fluidized Bed Reactor Technology (FBR), in general terms on their website here.

More hype from Moors, in case you’re running low:

“Think of an octopus, an ever-expanding octopus with 750 arms, reaching around the globe, into every country, every utility company, every corporation…

“Every aspect of the rapidly expanding solar sector… and pulling out big fat profits.

“They are so integrated in every phase of solar that they’re bound to expand in direct proportion to the niche itself.

“It is impossible to project how far they could go, because we’ve simply never seen a situation like this before.”

That’s probably true, it’s impossible to project how far they could go — but one possibility, and it’s not a non-trivial possibility given their huge debt service obligations, is that it could go to zero. I don’t know what the covenants are on their debt, if any, but from what I read they can’t currently afford to pay the debt service from their existing cash flow, so something has to give. They either have to find new buyers for their new solar projects, either the yieldcos or someone else (and the yieldcos aren’t in any shape to pay a decent price right now), or they need financing from some other source. With the stock at $3 it is tempting to assume that there is enough value to protect at least a little sliver of equity like that from being wiped out — and there probably is, but the risk is still high when the balance sheet swings so far over to debt. If things do bounce back, or if the fear subsides over SUNE (and some analysts are certainly standing up for them and think the stock should still be well over $10, though even Deutsch Bank, which defended their $28 target a week ago, cut it to $16 this week), then the rise in the share price could be phenomenal… leverage has taken them down so far, but it cuts both ways — if things turn, that leverage could also send them flying higher. There was no mention of “bottom fishing” in the teaser pitch from Dr. Moors, but that’s what you’d be trying to do if you buy SUNE here… sometimes it works, sometimes what you thought was the bottom (like $5 for SUNE last week?) turns out to not be so solid.

Your money, so it’s your call — what do you think? Expecting SUNE to recover? Think they’ll dominate the solar industry with their utility-scale projects and their new FBR process? Let us know with a comment below.

(And yes, I know Dr. Moors also teased a couple other solar picks in this ad — but I’m out of time, I’ll get to them for you tomorrow.)

Irregulars Quick Take

Paid members get a quick summary of the stocks teased and our thoughts here. Join as a Stock Gumshoe Irregular today (already a member? Log in)
guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

200 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nick Benz
Guest
Nick Benz
December 30, 2015 5:37 pm

Seemingly Bernie Madoff has been released and changed his name. I wonder how much Bernie the “Doc” was paid to use his credentials to promote this unproven commercial enterprise. If you’re smart enough to earn it, you’re smart enough to use you’re own nouse to invest it without jumping on the “sheeps” bandwagon.
Blessings and prosperity to the pure of heart.

John Escher
Guest
John Escher
December 31, 2015 12:03 pm

Even the critical reports on the hype– which seems to come directly from horses’ asses– is overly wordy and reflective of mental infection…by the source.

mark v
Guest
mark v
January 1, 2016 11:07 am

Great article. I’m always curious what they’re selling, but don’t have the patience. So Mr. Moore is just trying to pump up the stock, that’s all? I had assumed it was the Motley Fool approach to getting subscribers to purchase something before disclosing what company or new idea was. Thanks for digesting the snake oil sales pitch for us.

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
329
Add a Topic
359
don_x
January 1, 2016 10:42 pm

If you are considering SUNE as an investment, best wait until things settle down. If you are a trader and like volatile stocks, different story. Check out this article:

http://www.barchart.com/headlines/story/13061885/sunedison-stock-battles-for-speculative-attention

👍 40
fedwatcher
Member
fedwatcher
January 2, 2016 10:54 pm

Because of its heavy debt load many big traders are playing with options for and against SUNE. It seems to trade in a channel perfect for short-term options traders, moving sharply up or down. Can SUNE go to zero? Yes. Can it survive? Yes. Can it thrive? Yes. It is a gamble.

For many homes with a South facing roof, solar already is cheap enough but getting off of the grid requires storage (cost efficient lead-acid batteries require a lot of space). The technical problems for many have been solved and battery technology improvements are key to solving the problem, and will arrive. So for many, solar cell efficiency is no longer the problem, rather Storage technology is and backup generators running on liquid fuels or propane or natural gas are available at reasonable cost to provide an added layer of defense from cutting the electrical cord to the grid.

However, for apartment buildings and condos, this is not the case.

In any case existing utilities face a problem which they are solving by “greasing” local and state governments as well as fighting to remove solar subsidies at the federal level.

You will know that solar has arrived when a bill at the state or local level requires that you be connected to the grid. PG&E and the various Edison’ s will not go quietly into a much scaled down and unprofitable future.

Add a Topic
570
Add a Topic
570
Add a Topic
1614
Greg
Guest
Greg
January 5, 2016 2:39 am

Thank you for this cogent and lucid article. I followed the link on cnn today to the monologue which I realized after about 30 seconds would have to end with a bogus sales pitch. But in spite of the market free fall that stock went up 13% today. Is that just a results of the aggressive spam campaign (i.e. is that advert actually working?) or is there something about the fundamentals that came out today all of a sudden?

Add a Topic
5971
Curious
Guest
Curious
January 5, 2016 11:50 am

I found this older link today – sounds like a similar story.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/article24748930.html

SoGiAm
January 8, 2016 5:27 am

SUNE- Why Is SunEdison (SUNE) Stock Crashing?
4:29 pm ET January 7, 2016 (Zacks)
Just days after the stock gained nearly 15%, SunEdison SUNE crashed hard on Thursday. Shares of the solar power semiconductor manufacturer are down over 40% following a series of complex moves that the company made to reduce debt.

First of all, SunEdison is offering a new $725 million second lien loan that will be used to pay about $170 million on a second lien credit. Included in this loan are 28.7 million shares worth of warrants.

Also, $580 million worth of notes will be traded for a $225 million note due in 2018, plus 28 million common shares. Finally, 11.8 million common shares are being traded for $158.3 million in preferred stock.

This has triggered today’s massive sell-off because how dilutive it is for investors. Unfortunately, diluting the stock seems like a neccesary evil for SunEdison, which desperately needs to reduce its debt. However, no one was expecting the costs to be this high.

On the other hand, we saw big gains earlier this week from First Solar FSLR, based on a report that noted the company’s amount of cash in hand. Overall, it seems that the renewable energy sector is moving away from growth and becoming much more interested in value, meaning that companies with a lot of debt could be in trouble.
Best2You-Ben

Add a Topic
4359
Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
665
👍 11604
William Armstrong
William Armstrong
January 8, 2016 8:53 pm

To take a different tack, has anyone looked back at KM’s track record? This has been noted before on previous gumshoe evaluations. I subscribe to his service ($49 ?!). For me, his record is generally abysmal. Some examples: Linc Energy, UEC just to name a few. And no, he doesn’t use stop losses. But you should. Trading this stock may have some merit, but the buy & hold strategy will more than likely lead to a complete loss. I do like the general concept & am in favor with potential huge positive environmental impact …. but the debt! This gumshoe evaluation is, indeed, magnificent. Global conditions too fragile for my entrance now. Thanks for all the comments. Will follow closely.

Add a Topic
3160
Add a Topic
5971
👍 21788
jaric5942
jaric5942
January 9, 2016 7:29 am

Enclosed is Dr.Moors response to SUNE implosion: Any comments who be greatly appreciated.
Yesterday was another volatile day for SunEdison Inc. (NYSE:SUNE). The company announced a complicated deal to restructure more than $738 million in debt that includes a new issuance of stock.

Unfortunately, the move was made public during a major down-market, drawing its lead from renewed problems in China.

The result was a heavy selloff in SUNE shares.

This is an overreaction, as we have seen before. We’re getting used to this by now, with SunEdison having experienced multiple double-digit ups and downs since we added it to the Energy Advantage Portfolio.

But don’t worry. The overall prospects remain the same. While Wall Street is short-sighted, we’re in this for the long-term, as the expansion of solar power worldwide speeds up, and SunEdison remains at the forefront both in terms of technology and projects developed.

In point of fact, one of the main Wall Street concerns about the move yesterday is an element I regard as a major positive. In order to restructure its debt, SunEdison will be passing on both assets and liabilities to the two yieldcos it spun off a bit ago.

These are a new device in the power industry whereby separate subsidiaries are set up to hold producing assets and debt via holding ongoing contracts to sell generated power under long-term agreements (much as utilities do). The advantage is that the new independently traded entity – the yieldco – provides the parent company with additional access to credit while the yieldco finances ongoing projects through guaranteed lines of revenue.

In addition, one of the primary concerns addressed by some analysts yesterday is a matter that has no impact on our position. This involves whether the assets and debt service moved to the yieldcos are overvalued in the former case or excessive in the latter.

This is a valid consideration only if you are attempting to straddle holdings in both SUNE and the yieldcos. We are not. Our interest is in SUNE alone, and there the debt restructure – even with the issuance of new stock – is a positive development.

Those who are trying to bridge between the two are in large measure running short plays on one or the other. Their interest is to see that the value of both decline. You can always tell this is happening when pundits are questioning cash flow in highly capitalized companies.

Remember, SUNE does not have a cash in hand problem.

Once again, as we have witnessed over the past month, the overreaction will subside. There is simply no better way for investors to join the global solar revolution than SUNE, and with reduced debt, this is actually good news for the company.

The dip in value is also a great opportunity to lower the average cost of your investment via the dollar averaging provided by buying additional shares at a reduced price. SUNE has already started rising in afterhours trading.

Don’t worry.

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
108
Add a Topic
1673
👍 6
canadianhegemony
Guest
canadianhegemony
January 9, 2016 11:19 am

Very nice work, Travis– good sleuthing and thank you! No doubt you’ve mentioned this before, but the best way to avoid sitting through these lengthy videos (which seem to be ubiquitous among the investment newsletter teasers, health miracle teasers, and all the rest) is to let the video start, then close it.

At which point you get a prompt “Are you sure you want to leave this page?” Click “no” and it takes you to a transcript of the video (complete with photos, graphics, bold italics, multicolored script, etc.). Which needless to say is a huge timesaver because you can scan right down it to get to the bottom line. And not have to listen to someone repetitively drone on.

Richard
Guest
Richard
February 27, 2016 11:35 am

Thanks for the info re: how to get to written transcripts. I will try this today, and if it works for me, I will be a repetitive user.. And Thanks for sharing.

Lowell Haugll
Member
Lowell Haugll
January 11, 2016 12:57 am

I would like to access Kent Moore’s video & where to order his literature & info.
Any info on chemical energy developments are welcomed & appreciated!

Costas C
Guest
Costas C
January 11, 2016 9:23 am
Reply to  Lowell Haugll

Are you a friend or relative by any chance?

Joel
Guest
January 11, 2016 7:06 pm

Hi Travis!!
Did indeed come across an incredibly long, boring video put out by Dr. Moors. After twenty or more minutes of reiterations, hype & going on and on and on about a company he wouldn’t mention by name came to many of the same conclusions you expressed here in your article. Have found through the years now that when people go on & on about something, anything, and say how great something is yet won’t put a name to it in the first few minutes, then it’s much akin to listening to a “snake oil salesman”or the old Ralph Cramden gonna get rich quick scheme. Thanks much for all your input, thoughts & research that helped confirm that first impressions of this guy’s spiel was dead on!!!

Add a Topic
359
Chris
Guest
Chris
January 13, 2016 1:36 pm

You can download the video to your computer by opening it in Firefox, right-click on the video, and choose “Save Video As”. That way, you can use a local video player to fast forward through this…..

john waine
Guest
January 16, 2016 1:52 pm

how does this new and free energy work??

👍 21788
elliseconomics
Member
elliseconomics
January 24, 2016 4:44 pm

There is no doubt that there is free energy … but we have not found a way to tap into it… perhaps the B2-B ? Other wise all of these ads are total Tautology nothing more or less .. well you could say BS … Truth is the world turns on supply and demand with the added influence of the Central Banks who aid us with Inflation … which of course we pay tax on ..! We really need to stop all these dolts who are cheating new entrants.. We need to speak out on all of these Faux Experts….

Add a Topic
1340
Add a Topic
717
Add a Topic
372
👍 7
Billy
Guest
Billy
January 28, 2016 4:08 pm
Reply to  elliseconomics

All energy is free. It only costs money to deliver it in a useful way. The ground has never charged for oil, coal, uranium or wood.
The real problem that solar has to overcome is that it needs work when it is dark like at night or in the winter.

Add a Topic
359
Add a Topic
1337
Add a Topic
520
Tom Senenfelder
Guest
Tom Senenfelder
February 8, 2016 1:06 pm

Currently tax incentives and rebates is the reason Solar has been successful. Panels are expensive and if you take the incentives out they do not have a Return On Investment. There performance degrades after 15 years also and most projections of performance do not take into account the maintenance costs and degradation of output. Nor do they take into account roofing costs (roof mounted) or the environmental impact when placed in large fields created by clear cutting trees.
Most companies and individuals are installing solar panels because they are getting substantial tax incentives and subsidies. These incentives are essentially taking money from tax payer pockets and giving it to another (taking clause of constitution). All other technologies do not require tax payer funds to be viable.
How often in the winter have you seen solar installations covered in snow? Or cloudy days, If panels don’t have individual inverters then a single panel covered by the shadow of a cloud will shut the whole system down.
The one item never discussed is Energy Consumption. Being more Energy Efficient and Responsible with the materials used has a greater positive impact on the environment then Solar. Solar does not fix an individuals or companies over use of Energy or Material.

👍 21788
DLH
February 8, 2016 7:41 pm

Two areas you don’t see much discussion on are energy density, and the manufacturing/waste stream. To yield the same output as a combined cycle natural gas plant on a few acres of land, you need hundreds of acres for solar or thousands of acres for wind. And that’s just on a sunny or windy day. You can only get 30% of the nameplate capacity over a year due to intermittency.

You typically see fossil fuel backup required for every MW of installed wind or solar at the utility scale. Yes, battery storage will eventually make grid scale solar/wind less of an intermittant source, but to even out, you have to overbuild in excess of demand in order to store anything. Localizing the power source at each home justs makes the shortcomings more apparent to the customer. Individual generator backups are less efficient and more polluting than a utility scale backup plant.

Over the sixty-year life of a baseload power plant, you have to rip out and replace the panels three times. Unlike piping or turbines which rarely wear out, solar panels are not easily recycled, as they are a nasty mix of toxic metals, films and adhesives. Not to mention the waste produced during manufacturing. I’m sure Chinese manufacturing does not emphasize reducing waste or safehuarding the environment. Does anyone know the wastes produced during manufacturing of the current PV cells?

Wind and solar are great for small/remote/intermittant use, but will never replace the need for baseload power.

Add a Topic
338
Add a Topic
282
Add a Topic
1614
👍 895
SoGiAm
February 8, 2016 7:45 pm
Reply to  DLH

DLH-Thank you so very much for sharing your expertise and talents. Best2You-Ben

👍 11604
arch1
March 26, 2016 3:39 am
Reply to  DLH

Absolutely and completely true.

👍 7797
pmd3nka
pmd3nka
March 26, 2016 2:28 am

I live in Australia. Why does anyone need to cut down trees? Do they grow in your deserts?

Jocularly, pmd3nka

Add a Topic
1270
👍 11
arch1
March 26, 2016 3:45 am
Reply to  pmd3nka

Many deserts became so when the trees were cut down. Trees do grow better in some areas than others and may be harvested in a sustainable manner. If you like things made from wood you must cut down trees. Remember they are a crop just as much as is corn,,,just a longer time between harvests. Replant what you remove, is good policy.

👍 7797
SoGiAm
February 17, 2016 3:48 pm

UBS Cuts Sunedison’s Target To $0.75 As Execution Concerns Are Starting To Materialize

👍 11604
O.J.Aspen
Member
March 2, 2016 5:35 pm

To State first.I am a Great Fan of You Travis.I like The policy of a free Stock Gumshoe Membership.You have also saved me a lot of time investigating and analyzing equities presented me in various investmentletters and mail.Back to SUNE and The Sun Energi Players in General.Their sharecourses are swinging heavily,and as a trader knowing about technical analysis you can make good money.Some days ago the share of Sune was 1.67 dollar.Next day it ended 2.17 dollars.It was a hyped extraordinary day,but anyhow.Another example is the Norwegian solarpowercompany REC going down to 0.80 N.Kr a week ago.Today it ended at 1.06 N.Kr.Companies like First Solar and Chinese Green Yingly also have a Great Variation and so on.To Finish.Alternative Clean Energy is in average increasing with 2 % yearly.I also find the difference in The Sune evaluation of UBS,s 0.75 and Deutche Bank,s 16 Dollars Highly Interesting.O.J.Aspen Norway

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
1038
Add a Topic
2388
👍 21788
anthony barbuto
Member
anthony barbuto
March 3, 2016 11:27 pm

we must go to Solar Power. It is the ONLY Free energy, in that it comes from the sky….FREE. The Expense is converting it to Electricity and putting it into the grid. Electricity can be stored…..Elon Musk is working on that with his Lithium storage packs for buildings…The Death of Oil is a good thing. We can say bye bye to the crazy Arabs in the Middle East…we don’t need their oil any more and if they want to jihad against ea other…I say let ’em…Don’t waste any more US dollars/US soldiers defending madmen.
So, if Solar is the way to go and Thieves like Obama have raped the Energy Dept of grants and loans for solar energy…then let the companies go bankrupt ( read the details in the book ” Throw them All Out)…….how can we get FREE solar energy?
The answer is SPACE.
Dr Oneil wrote High Frontier and later the book came out Colonies in Space. The idea was to have orbiting colonies in space, manufacture HUGE solar collectors…gather the FREE solar energy…beam it down to earth as microwave, then convert it to Electricity and put it into the grid. Such a system could provide UNLIMITED Electricity to the third world countries….and US, too…. Instead of China putting more coal powered generating plants on line, they could build collectors on earth. The Power Sats beam down the electricity….India and other developing countries could also get power. America or who ever is running the Power Sat show ( Japan is looking into this)…..can actually MAKE MONEY by selling the electricity….Wow what a concept….CAPITALISM…..Industry creation rather than wealth confiscation via the Demoncrats…..
The problem is getting the materials up to the Lagrange points in space…building the colonies…then building the Power Sats. Its a lot of tonnage ( read the numbers in Colonies in Space). Nasa, like all the other corrupt, inept branches of gov’t cannot manage such a program Apollo was a great program but the Space Shuttle to no where and the corrupt ISS ( read ” star crossed orbits”)….and their deliberate dragging their feet at going to Mars ( really,… we have been sending landers to Mars for FIFTY TWO YEARS,…we have enough data to choose good landing spots…Land on the god damn planet already. The Nasa plan for mars will take 20-30 years and cost HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of dollars….We don’t have the time nor money to waste….Earth will be 9 Billion people soon and resources are depleting rapidly. The Power from space, will bring dollars to the USA ( assuming we are selling the power, not the Japanese)….and with more power to the world they don’t need TEN kids to guarantee their retirement…two will do nicely, thank you…
So if Nasa won’t get the job done we need Entrepreneurs who will fund such a project…Like the Hudson Bay Colony funded trapping beaver in North America in the 1700s. Something called USA came as a result….and a man named Astor became VERY VERY rich……one way he did it was to sell supplies to the early trappers in America in exchange for fur….
We have the people who can get us to Space, cheaply and reliably ( Dr Zubrin of the Mars Society came up with a “live off the land” concept of Martian settlement). We have the technologists like Elon Musk, Burt Rutan…..we just need Entrepreneurs like Jeff Bezos, Richard Branford(?) ( The Virgin Gallactic guy)….and others.
Its On to Space to get the free energy the world needs…will cure a lot of ill..

Add a Topic
2096
Add a Topic
359
Add a Topic
359

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

More Info  
5
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x