What are the Einstein’s “Space Energy” stocks from Kent Moors?

I’ve got no shortage of possible topics to write about after a couple weeks respite — the teasers didn’t stop flowing while I was gone, and the hyperbole hasn’t been turned down for the sultry days of summer — but the one that’s been requested most has been the “Einstein’s Space Energy” pitch from Dr. Kent Moors for his Energy Inner Circle trading service.

And yes, it’s all about solar energy — he says he’s got three “Alpha Solar” companies that he thinks will make us rich with 20,000% windfall opportunities… with the line that “The coming global transition to solar electricity is an energy game-changer unlike anything since the dawn of the Oil Age.”

So what are the stocks he likes?

Well, presuming that you don’t feel like coughing up $3,950 (OK, OK, it’s “on sale” for $1,950), let’s see if we can identify the picks for you from the clues he provides in the ad… ready?

Moors says that “Right now, we’re at the pivotal moment in the most lucrative ‘mega shift’ in energy history” as technological advancements have steadily brought down the cost of solar power generation to make it competitive with fossil fuels, and that’s basically the big picture argument — that solar power, or “space energy,” is in an unstoppable advance, and will soon be the number one source of electricity on the planet. Here’s some of the spiel…

“What I CAN give you, though – if you make the one move I’m about to show you… Is a lifetime of potentially huge wins as this global energy ‘mega shift’ plays out.

  • In ever-more-efficient solar “harvesting” technologies…
  • In conversion-to-AC and transmission technologies…
  • In efficient integration of solar into the electricity grid…
  • In specialized adaptive solar grid infrastructure…
  • In new energy storage and portability technologies…
  • In powerful solar “micro grids” for the military and for remote applications…”

And a bit more…

“… solar power is on pace to multiply 5,400% globally by 2050.

“So theoretically, if your solar stocks simply reflect the industry’s growth…

“It stands to reason that a basket of decent global solar plays would make you 54 times your money over the next 35 years.

“But here’s the thing…

“The “alpha” investments in ANY sector outperform simple industry growth exponentially.

“And as the record shows, I’ve got a unique ability to hone in on these ‘alpha’ companies – in any market conditions.”

There’s a lot more of this big picture argument, but I don’t want to bore you (you can see the whole ad here if you like)… And then finally we get into the hints about the specific stocks…

“URGENT SOLAR ALPHA #1: THE “STANDARD OIL” OF PV

“China produces 70% of the world’s solar modules…

“And I consider THIS company to be the best of the more than 400 Chinese PV solar companies currently in business.
That’s because they’re one of the few vertically integrated PV manufacturers in the entire People’s Republic….

“Not only are they poised to increase their market share substantially as this shortage takes effect…

“But even more so because of their ability to buy up their smaller, less financially sound competitors….

“Just a few weeks ago, the Chinese government ordered a mass consolidation of the domestic solar industry….

“These guidelines call for only 10 companies to be producing 70-80% of Chinese solar PV modules by the end of 2017!

“And yes, according to all my research…

“This ‘Standard Oil of PV” company is going to be one of them – a BIG one… they’ve already started scooping up a number of their smaller, financially distressed competitors in anticipation of this consolidation.

If you make only one investment on this “mega shift” to solar I’m telling you about…

“THIS IS IT.”

Sounds quite irresistible and yet frustratingly non-specific, yes? Well, that’s the problem the Thinkolator runs into on this one — there are a half-dozen large Chinese companies who dominate the solar cell production business, and many of them are more or less vertically integrated and in an acquisitive mood of late. And they do trade on US exchanges, for the most part.

So which one is it? The only additional clue we get is that “already this year, their stock is up more than 55% on the NYSE!”

Well, that narrows it down a bit — both because there are only a few Chinese solar companies that have been up by 55% or more year to date in 2015, and because several of the Chinese solar companies trade on the NASDAQ, not the NYSE… so the best match, though I can’t call it definitive, is Jinko Solar (JKS). Trina Solar (TSL) is fairly close, and the far larger Hanwha Q-Cells (HQCL — long ago known as SolarFun) might be more attractive as a consolidator, but TSL hasn’t been above a 50% gain this year and HQCL doesn’t trade on the NYSE, so that leaves me with JKS.

Is it any good? Honestly, I have no idea — and after the scandals of Hanergy (HNGSF) this year and Suntech Power (STPFQ) and so many others in previous years, I have a hard time trusting the accounting of these acquisitive Chinese firms who do so much business within their own conglomerates. I’d have to study them all a lot more closely to be comfortable with their prospects, and even then I’d keep positions small — I agree that solar power is on a strong uptrend, thanks both to government subsidies and to the huge supply increases from these Chinese firms in recent years, but it’s also quite challenging to be a supplier in an oversupplied market… predictions are that the demand will continue to rise, and possibly even that prices will recover a bit, which would help, but I can’t claim to be very well-versed on this sector so I’ll just leave you with that: JKS seems the most likely match on this one, but you can check into it yourself and see what you like.

How about another one?

“URGENT SOLAR ALPHA #2: THE NEW AMERICAN SUN CHAMP

“This nimble, under-the-radar American firm is a leader in innovative power generation on all scales.

“From the smallest homestead outpost on a combination of solar, wind, and generator power…

“To the biggest manufacturing plant, via the conventional electricity grid…

“This firm does it all.

“Altogether, they’ve got generating assets of over 50,000 megawatts – enough to power over 40 million homes.
Currently, they provide several million residential, business, commercial, and industrial customers with power from multiple sources…

“Including conventional (coal and oil), nat-gas, nuclear, thermal, wind, and more.

“Their real specialty, however, is solar power.”

OK, so with 50,000 megawatts of generating capacity this is a pretty large utility company — which means that solar will be a relatively small part of the business. More?

“At the time I’m writing this, they produce 1,200 megawatts of utility-scale solar – around 2.3% of their total generating capacity.

“Now, that many not sound like a lot.

“But when you consider that right now, only 0.4% of U.S. grid electricity comes from solar…

“These guys are ahead of America’s grid-solar adoption curve by 575%!

“They’ve got a strong foothold in the residential solar sector, and are pioneers of large-scale commercial and industrial solar adaptation.

“Oh, one more thing this firm has going for it…

“They’re emerging as a major player in Electric Vehicle (EV) charging.”

This one, sez the Thinkolator, is NRG Energy (NRG) — they do have about 2.3% of their generating capacity from solar (mostly utility-scale, though a bit of distributed solar as well), and they do have an electric car charging business, but both are small parts of what is a large and pretty diversified utility company that pays a steady dividend of about 2.5%. They also have that most modern and trendy of baubles on their books, a “Renewable Energy Yieldco” — NRG Yield (NYLD) was spun off a while back to offer a stronger yield on their generating assets that are under long-term contracts, and pays at about 3.5% rate now (still quite low, particularly for a utility).

I don’t know whether it’s particularly “time sensitive” as Moors indicates, but NRG has been a very poor performer over the past year — at least, compared to their peer companies in the utility sector. They do focus on alternative energy more than many of the large electricity utilities, but I don’t know whether getting 2.3% of their power from the sun is going to give them a substantial advantage over competitors who might get 1% of their electricity from solar… so far, it hasn’t helped much.

Their IPO of NYLD was pretty successful a couple years ago, and gives them another financing source as they “drop down” (sell) generating assets to the yieldco (much like a refiner might “drop down” their pipeline networks to a MLP), but they also face the same pressures as other income-oriented investments in a rate-scared environment: If investors fear rapid rises in interest rates, they tend to sell utilities and REITs and MLPs (and bonds, of course)… and if rates really do rise substantially, a utility that pays a 2-3% yield, even if it can raise that dividend every year by a few percent, is not so compelling compared to a guaranteed bond yield that could conceivably reach 4-5%.

And we’ve got one more to look for…

“URGENT SOLAR ALPHA #3: THE QUIRKY ‘SMART GRID’ ONE-OF-A-KIND

“Unlike today’s antiquated grids, in which electricity flows only one way – from generation point to consumer…
The ‘smart grid’ of the future will need the ability to feed electricity back into the grid from millions of private generation points as solar power takes over.

“It’ll also need the ability to juggle electricity from a myriad of sources – coal, gas, oil, wind, solar, nuke, hydro, thermal, steam, etc…

“And efficiently modulate it for use during periods of wildly fluctuating demand….

“… there’s one company that I’m predicting is going to positively explode out of the gate on this transition…

“It’s a quirky, fascinating international company that’s actually been around in one form or another since 1870.

“Their specialty: controlling energy.

“Through switches, relays, valves, and governors. Through sensors, circuits, computers, and breakers…

“Through every imaginable way of controlling any flow of energy, anywhere.

“Electronically, kinetically, mechanically – you name it.

“Whatever is needed to control any kind of power you want, these guys invent, manufacture, and service it.

“And one of their BIGGEST areas of expertise is controls for electricity generation and distribution.

“In other words, they’re just what the doctor ordered for a major global push into “smart grid” technology….”

“Everybody is going to know about this one-of-a-kind firm soon.

“If I’m right, they’re going to be one of the BIG early winners in the ‘mega shift’ to solar power.”

So who’s this? Well, again we’re fairly light on the specific clues from Dr. Moors here, but the Thinkolator’s best match is the old Woodward Governor Company, now known just as Woodward (WWD). They are not particularly well known, they’re still pretty small with a market cap around $3 billion and they do indeed specialize in all kinds of energy controls, with their two biggest markets being energy generation and distribution and aerospace. The stock has done pretty well over the last couple years, and investors have been generally pleased with recent news (a joint venture with GE Aerospace on fuel systems, and a new authorization for a $250 million share buyback).

Analysts have put pretty stiff growth expectations on WWD, so the valuation looks pretty decent if that growth materializes — they’re expected to grow earnings by about 10% next year (starting October 2015) and 20% in the following year, so the trailing PE of about 20 isn’t out of line even if you wouldn’t call it “cheap”, but it’s also true that they’ve struggled to deliver on that kind of growth promise over the last few years — they’ve only had one quarter of 10% year-over-year earnings growth since 2012.

This one strikes me as interesting, largely because they’ve managed to maintain pretty strong gross margins over the last decade in a business that I would assume is probably quite competitive– they must be doing something right. Whether it’s sustainable, of course, is a call I can’t make after spending 20 minutes browsing their financials, but I’m pretty impressed with this one after my first look and it makes me feel a bit warmer and fuzzier in the belly than the other two solutions the Thinkolator has found for today’s Dr. Moors tease.

But it is, of course, your money at stake — so it’s your call. What do you think? Ready for a new wave of solar riches? Think Moors is picking the right players (or, of course, do you think the Thinkolator’s results are wrong this time? Normally I can give 100% certainty for these solutions, but the clues are squishy enough that there’s room for debate today). Let us know where your thinking leads you, just use the friendly little comment box below. Thanks for reading!


Irregulars Quick Take Paid members get a quick summary of the stocks teased and our thoughts here. Join as a Stock Gumshoe Irregular today (already a member? Log in)

81
Share your thoughts...

avatar
42 Comment threads
39 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
68 Comment authors
DanPlayfulhairGr8Full!Normally DubiousJan Hard af Segerstad Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mike
Guest
Mike

Welcome Back “T”. They’re pushing this one hard!.

Thanks

gerrievr
Member

Welcome back we missed you!

N Raymond Day
Guest
N Raymond Day

Just seems to me that all these newsletter advisory companies make their money on new newsletters and not on the advice they give.

Dave
Guest
Dave

You bet they do! They’re not dummies. FAR easier to fleece the sheep than predict markets.

Don
Guest
Don

RIGHT ON DAVE!

Robert
Guest
Robert

Agreed. However, Moors whom claims having a PhD credits Einstein with I assume discovering “Space Energy” and thus which would logically lead to solar energy which evidentally was mentioned in his writings in the Theory of General Relativity in 1905. Even though solar energy is common terminology in theoretical physics today, one would more than likely hear the term “Dark Energy” if any theoretical physicist were describing a term such as “Dark Energy”. To make my point which was my original intent. Solar Energy was not only first described and explained in great detail in his first patent on solar… Read more »

dfishmon58
Member

Money Map Press push them all hard! Don’t they?

Add a Topic
605
david cregar
Guest
david cregar

Sunedison, ticker: SUNE is up 44% on NYSE. 20,000x l? Theres been quite a push last few years with the tax credit and fancy financing ( adding it to property tax, avoiding normal equity qualification.) I can only imagine in 20 yrs it can take to payoff what a dinosaur today panel (made in china?) may become.

Add a Topic
108
Jim Nadel
Guest

Travis, Good Job. You are absolutely correct on all three. I actually subscribe to Kent Moors “Energy Inner Circle”. And I’m looking at the report, “3 Urgent “Solar Alpha” Stocks.”. He recommended JKS awhile back and I made money on it by buying calls. I sold them when the price was at $30. Now that JKS has dipped into the high $20s, this might be the time to jump back in. Woodward looks interesting as well.

Add a Topic
1567
Adam
Guest
Adam

Jim, do you like Kents research overall?

Ronald E. Baker
Guest
Ronald E. Baker

Dr, Kent Moors has really gone into oratorical orbit on this one. Reminds me of his call some months ago that the oil price decline has ended and it was time to get back in; wonder what his comment is today? I’ve known Woodward for at least 50 years, visited their plant back in the 1960’s; sounds about right. No huge skyrocket here, but a solid company. The rest sound about as certain a bet as Bakken and Oil Sands crude bouncing back to $100/bbl. next week, or a fortune in oil from Coober Peddy, Australia. How does this guy… Read more »

Add a Topic
1567
Add a Topic
359
Add a Topic
878
dave
Guest
dave

He gave me an education few years back. I was under water subscribed for 6 months to his news letter .He did refund the second half of the year .He said ”theirs a ghost in the machine”. On wall st .the stock options had a ghost in it . that was my conformation I was on a ride .Looking back and laugh now. Option board as we know is in Chicago . But he knows the ghost lol on the wall st board.

Add a Topic
5916
Add a Topic
540
Add a Topic
5971
Jean
Guest
Jean

Hi Ronald, I follow Kent Moors quite a bit. He resigned from his teaching job late 2014 or early 2015. This is why he can put more time in the rest of the other things. Have a good one.

Add a Topic
1567
MIKE
Guest
MIKE

RONALD, DID YOU ATTEND ISU IN THE EARLY 60’S? IF SO I LIVED ACROSS HALL FROM YOU IN RITCHY HOUSE. JUST CURIOUS…:-)

Brian D,
Guest
Brian D,

I strongly suggest to anyone thinking about a long play in energy stocks that they view a documentary called “Pandora’s Promise” (Stone) before doing so, Solar, Wind, and Geothermal renewable energy sources are going to be extremely small players on the Global Energy Grid as mankind moves away from his reliance on carbon based energy sources. Logic dictates that Atomic Energy WILL win in the long haul. Look into the third, fourth, or fifth generation atomic reactor technologies. That is where the money will change hands!!!

Add a Topic
200
Add a Topic
2676
John
Guest
John

I can’t agree with you on that. Public opinion, however misinformed, will increasingly dictate that the spread of atomic energy is unpalatable. And until the threat of global terrorism is contained a proliferation of atomic and nuclear power will be severely curtailed. What’s missing in this debate is the advent and advances in battery technology which will ultimately determine whether or not the future of energy is renewable, atomic, hydrogen or fossil. The clue is the humble power tool powered with 18V or 24V Li batteries. (I’m not suggesting the auto industry will travel much further on this route as… Read more »

Add a Topic
1614
Ronald E. Baker
Guest
Ronald E. Baker

In theory you have a point. The problem is both timing and mass production of the new experimental battery technology. These things look great in the lab but will take decades to fully develop as big alternatives to present power sources/grids. There is also a lack of massive capital to rapidly install revolutionary, as yet unproven, new energy systems, charging stations, batteries and all that is needed to replace the grid. Nuclear power was first hyped in the late 1940’s as a great, clean, solution; yet it wasn’t really until the 1970’s, (after 30 years) that the potential of clean… Read more »

Add a Topic
1614
Add a Topic
1337
Add a Topic
359
Douglas Asbury
Guest
Douglas Asbury

I watched the PBS two-parter the last couple of days titled “Uranium – Twisting the Dragon’s Tail.” Toward the end, the discussion of nuclear power generation turned from a focus on the Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters to a brief discussion with a researcher who is pursuing ways of using the spent rods from existing reactors to continue producing power with them until all their radioactivity has been used up in the process. However long these studies and experiments take to bear fruit – if they are able to do so (and the program host, physicist Derek Muller, seemed positive about… Read more »

Add a Topic
520
Carbon Bigfoot
Guest
Carbon Bigfoot

I can’t agree with your conclusions John, as the Energy Realities do not favor renewables as you define them. Shale Gas & Oil are the true renewables.
All of you reading this need to view the ENERGY REALITIES video from the Tenth Annual Climate Conference last month in DC that I attended.
View the Panel 3 and listen to Mark Mills at http://climate conference.heartland.org/ for a dose of TRUTH SERUM. Then tell be about batteries– I did R&D in that Industry. I know the limitations.

Add a Topic
359
Add a Topic
359
marti
Guest
marti

wrong – germany is an example of how wind works very well. nuclear energy is still very dirty and nobody wants it in their back yard.

Carbon Bigfoot
Guest
Carbon Bigfoot

Germany’s windmills are operating at less than 15% of Nameplate Capacity forcing the Germans to buy their electricity from the French who generate 80% of there power by Nuclear Reactors.

Carbon Bigfoot
Guest
Carbon Bigfoot

________________________________________ No. 178 • July 13, 2015 Contact Editor H. Sterling Burnett CLIMATE CHANGE WEEKLY #178: HIGH HURDLES FOR RENEWABLE POWER STORAGE A key mechanism for fighting climate change, some environmental activists and politicians say, is to increase the amount of electricity produced from renewable sources that do not emit carbon dioxide (CO2). As nearly everyone knows, a key problem with wind and solar power is their intermittency, which makes those power sources difficult to accommodate in the electric grid. To provide power when wind and solar aren’t producing energy, and to regulate their variable power output when they are,… Read more »

Add a Topic
1243
Add a Topic
540
Add a Topic
540
Jim S.
Guest
Jim S.

I agree with you Brian. But the type of Atomic Energy that is the likely long term solution is FUSION not the traditional FISION nuclear reactors. Two concrete efforts going on in this area: 1) the international consortium building a demonstration project in France (of all places) and 20 the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory. I have to admit that efforts to develop Fusion has been going on for a long, long, long time. I have not tried to update myself on the status of either effort. Anyone have any recent info. on them?

Dan
Guest
Dan

What is the 3.47 stock that is a defense contractor that uses nano- grid energy and developed the portable power vest, and has several defense contracts.

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
144
Add a Topic
144
8915alto
Irregular
8915alto

Don’t know if nuclear will win in the long run, but am reluctant to go overboard for solar at this point. According to several articles (some in reputable pubs), solar collection “farms” are killing birds and other wildlife by the tens of thousands. Environmentalist outrage could put a damper on long range growth. Plus, most of the “renewable” energy companies are highly dependent on government subsidies.

Add a Topic
2676
Carbon Bigfoot
Guest
Carbon Bigfoot

In addition, these SWAGs have to be backed-up by a carbon fueled (NG) generator, or gas-fired power plants—that’s in case the SUN doesn’t SHIINE at NIGHT. Of course that is not entered into ROI calculations distorting projected efficiency–GO FIGURE.
What a waste of habitat and birds. WHERE ARE THE EVIRONMENTALISTS? THEY ARE ACCOMPLISING THE REPLACEMENT OF CARBON FUELS—THE BIGGER AGENDA!!!!

Al B
Guest
Al B

When battery storage becomes cost effective, it won’t matter if the sun shines at night…

Add a Topic
1614
Carbon Bigfoot
Guest
Carbon Bigfoot

HAVING LAB CONSTRUCTED THE FIRST PROTOTYPE LITHIUM BATTERY THAT WORKED
( IN THE LATE 60s ) FOR NASA—IT AIN’T GOING TO HAPPEN IN MY LIFETIME OF YOURS.

Add a Topic
2096
Add a Topic
1614
RGarcia
Guest
RGarcia

Carbon Bigfoot…..Based on your age clues and average life spans, I’m guessing your predicting battery storage cost efficiencies within 15 years at he earliest.

Add a Topic
1614
midorosan
Member
midorosan

It depends how old Al B is because I think the OF is a typo and should be OR

Carbon Bigfoot
Guest
Carbon Bigfoot

Of course OF was supposed to be OR. My Bad. Common sense would tell you that. Having three strokes in my lifetime, the last in 2007 simply removed my ability to spell or proof read my comments. So for the record, moving forward I apologize for all my future spelling, or grammatical errors. Since I expect to live for another 30 years—which will make me 102, it will be 2045 before batteries will fulfill everybody’s energy wet dreams. The same goes for solar without a major change in THERMODYNAMICS. One of my savant colleagues has a website you all need… Read more »

Add a Topic
33
Richard
Guest
Richard

Hot substrate storage, salt or solid, is sufficient. Cheaper on a large scale and more reliable than batteries. Batteries are fine for smaller scale, distributed. Still not up to the cost:energy density /cycle capability for wide use.

John Yarlott
Guest

How do you store solar panel power in Hot substrate, salt or solid? I am using batteries with dismal results.

Patrick
Guest

Won’t matter whatsoever when Russia or a rogue nation drops a giant EMP bomb on the US and the power grid is knocked out for months. Trust me, its coming…..

Add a Topic
424
8915alto
Irregular
Richard
Guest
Richard

Birds has got to get somewhere near to the focal point… Perhaps this is a survival of fittest type thing.

N Raymond
Guest

So how do we fund our last years from all this advice?
I am still working at 74. Take a look at my website above.

Carbon Bigfoot
Guest
Carbon Bigfoot

SAVE YOUR MONEY—BUY THE ENERGY ETF.

Add a Topic
900
Dusty
Guest
Dusty

No promises that I got it all right but I think the Market stuff I read this morning said the China stock markets fell off a cliff in the last few days and broke through the current support. Maybe wait and see what is going on and where it all stops before buying anything in China?

Add a Topic
108
Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
108
Quincy Adams
Guest
Quincy Adams

Thanks for the “Alpha Solar” tips. Now, only 34 years and 364 days to make huge profits from them.

GARY BRODERICK
Guest
GARY BRODERICK

TRAVIS, WOULD YOU HAVE ANY INFORMATION ABOUT BYRON KING’S MILITARY TECH ALERT AND THE THREE MILITARY SUPERCONTRACTS (AS LISTED ON SOME “GOV’T TIPOFF WEBSITE” AS IT IS CALLED) WORTH 156.25 BILLION AND ALL THE 100’S AND 1000’S % GAINS THEY WILL MAKE? DON’T KNOW IF THIS IS ANOTHER PUSH FOR BYRON KING’S NEWSLETTER AT A WHOPPING $1500 PER YEAR. I KNOW I CAN’T AFFORD THAT. THANKS VERY MUCH!

jbinsc
Member

Travis, Welcome back. Do you believe that the fed meeting and an assumed .25 interest will cause the U.S. dollar to go ballistic and destroy our economy? I’m tired of hearing Stansberry and their sister companies pushing this to attempt to create fear. I appreciate your take on this, although I realize you cannot guarantee anything. Thanks,
jbinsc

BJI
Guest
BJI

AGREE, welcome back and what about Stansberry, Ron Paul, Gold Bugs and other assorted Doomsayers?

Add a Topic
210
Les
Guest
Les

A while back I subscribed to one of Mr Moors publications.
He suggested about a dozen companies. I bought about 8 and every one of them is way under water. No doubt the 4 I did not take probably went up 1000% each [not].

Add a Topic
5916
Add a Topic
540
jacksten
Irregular
jacksten

I don’t know what has happened to Oxford, Money Map, and several other names but I now get at least 5 or more of the same teasers nearly every day. I bring it to their attention but to no avail. Still unhappy over my loses in High Velosity!

Add a Topic
605
William Armstrong
Guest
William Armstrong

Travis, I can’t thank you enough for evaluation of investments I have wound up NOT making. With all the incessant hype on this thinly-disguised solar play, it can’t be good at least in my lifetime. Moors may be a great teacher, a great council to the world’s oil elite, a great husband and father. He just ain’t no stock picker, at least in my experience.
Heme

Add a Topic
359
Add a Topic
5971
AlB
Guest
AlB

Moors isn’t a great anything except a big pile of sh..

backoffice
Member

what’s the $3 tiny bio-tech guaranteed or they’ll write you a thousand dollar check?

Karl
Guest
Karl

Hopefully that one’s next on Travis’ list.

masthead
Member

I remain amazed at how little interest there is in thorium as a fuel for nuclear power. There is a huge database of the history of thorium (not good for making nuclear warheads) vs. uranium (very good for making nuclear warheads, and much more costly for rad waste disposal). Those who claim to be interested in the environment and ecology, etc. sort of fell off the train on this issue, or so it seems to me. Hard to take them seriously… I guess there is some need to make sure that Iran and Pakistan use uranium in their nuclear programs… Read more »

Add a Topic
1487
Add a Topic
1487
Add a Topic
520
hendrixnuzzles
Member

Hi Ankrclnkr, the reason there is no interest is because there is no way to invest in it, or at least no way that has the promise of a reasonable return in the foreseeable future. It may be a great idea and there was considerable interest in it on previous threads. But the trouble is (1) that there are very low prices in the other energy sectors, (2) there are no thorium plants we know of that will go online within the next five or ten or fifteen years , and (3) there doesn’t seem to be commodity market for… Read more »

Add a Topic
1487
Add a Topic
1487
tagteam5
Member
tagteam5

Thorium reactors and infrastructure: Where is Elon Musk when you need him? This is a guy who gets private consultation with the POTUS, and billions of loans/grants/loan backing. Instead of playing around with luxury cars, he should consider getting behind the Thorium alternative. I think there is one in Oak Ridge TN, that was shut down around 1998 after operating for 50 years or so (correct me as needed). There is a guy on YouTube with some interesting video on this subject, if you have the 45+ minutes to soak it all in. Would not Thorium be the optimal test… Read more »

Add a Topic
1487
Add a Topic
3239
Add a Topic
1487
tom breznau
Guest
tom breznau

Travis,

You are the best! My email too is full of the over-hyped stuff and I hate trying to read it!

Keep up the great work!

Paul @ Eco Stores Direct
Guest

Fantastic analysis, T

Peter Barrett
Guest
Peter Barrett

Welcome back three out of three ain’t bad, I agree that Woodward looks interesting and maybe NRG, however, whist it has a P/NTAV of 1,67 the total liabilities are frightening even for a utility.

Regards Peter Barrett

Add a Topic
1340
neither1
Member
neither1

Thorium could be very competitive to uranium in cost of energy production. But As said,, there is no infrastructure for it. The U.S. actually has one of the largest supplies of thorium, and it is abundant in the world. Reactors are similar but different to uranium reactors. Thorium reactors are MUCH safer than uranium, and easier to control. They have been thoroughly designed and the technology exists. The real reason that thorium is not used and uranium is, is that with uranium nuclear weapons can be produced but not with thorium. Back in the 1930’s when we were at a… Read more »

Add a Topic
1487
Add a Topic
520
Add a Topic
1487
Alfred Jones
Guest
Alfred Jones

Have you looked into The Cutting Edge for just $1,795. A small $3 tech firm has just landed a major partnership with Microsoft in a deal that could soon be worth billions to this tiny company. If there is enough interest it would be nice to know who they’er hinting at.

Todd