Energy Strategist

If you’ve subscribed to Energy Strategist, please click the stars below to indicate your rating for this newsletter, and please share any other feedback about your experience using the comment box below.

Investment Performance

Rating from 1 votes
Rating: 5.0/5. From 1 vote.
Please wait...
Your vote
  • 5 Stars 1 Votes
  • 4 Stars 0 Votes
  • 3 Stars 0 Votes
  • 2 Stars 0 Votes
  • 1 Stars 0 Votes

Quality Of Writing/Analysis

No votes yet... cast yours!
No votes yet.
Please wait...
Your vote

Value For Price

No votes yet... cast yours!
No votes yet.
Please wait...
Your vote

Customer Service

No votes yet... cast yours!
No votes yet.
Please wait...
Your vote
guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

9 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Eric Balkan
Guest
March 11, 2009 12:22 pm

I subscribed back in 2007 for about 6 months. I also tracked Elliot’s picks before and after that point. I found that his picks did very well when energy stocks were going up, and pretty badly when going down. Well, when you subscribe to a single-sector service, you have to know when to move out of that sector into something else. Elliot won’t tell you, because subscribers are paying him for energy picks and not sector selection.

I was impressed with Elliot’s knowledge of the energy field. There was a lot of good, detailed, background info here. I learned a lot from subscribing, but it’s a pricey way to learn.

RW
Guest
RW
September 29, 2009 6:56 pm

“090528Alert–I’m adding US Natural Gas Fund (NYSE: UNG) to the aggressive growth Gushers Portfolio. Buy US Natural Gas Fund under USD16; set a stop-loss at USD12.35 to protect your downside….today’s natural gas storage report was bearish. However, in response to this release, natural gas prices soared. This is the clearest sign you’ll find that all the bad news is priced into the gas market and there just aren’t any sellers out there to push gas prices lower.”

Following this rec would have lost you 23% in no time at all!
I could not believe this recommendation which I therefore did not follow. As I’m sure you now know, UNG dropped below $9 earlier this month. Is it any wonder that I cancelled my trial subscription? How could anybody claiming expertise make such a recommendation in the face of all the evidence to the contrary? I wonder how many poor suckers lost their butts on that one alone. BTW getting my money back was a hassle.

Add a Topic
338
Add a Topic
338
Add a Topic
5916
Bill
Guest
Bill
May 23, 2010 7:47 pm

Have been a subscriber since October 2008 and started buying picks in Dec. As you can imagine picks have done well – as well as the market in general. The newsletter is very educational and I feel I have a better understanding of the sector. I like the “How they rate” which rate other stocks in the sector that aren’t in the recommendation portfolios. I would recommend being careful about using short-loss – some of these picks can be volatile. I picked up an MLP at a 30% discount on May 6. Anyway, it is expensive but I plan on keeping it.

Bill
Guest
Bill
May 24, 2010 6:34 pm

Have been receiving the newsletter since Sep 2008. As you can imagine, picks have done well – similar to the Dow. The newsletter is very informative. I’ve learned a lot about the sector and about the individual picks. Based on my own investigations into recommended picks I feel pretty comfortable that the staff put in a good effort into understanding the sector and evaluating sector companies.

Add a Topic
4194