One of Peter Schiff’s Top Picks for 2009

by Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe | February 26, 2009 4:22 pm

Peter Schiff[1] has become one of the rock stars of the economic collapse. If you haven’t yet run across his fans or his critics (and they usually end up at the same place), then here’s the brief:

Schiff is a broker, he runs EuroPacific Capital. He has written two books in the past couple years, one from the “Little Books” series last fall, and the more famous “Crash Proof” in 2007 (you can see Peter Schiff’s books here[2]).

I’m no expert on the man, but he has some extraordinarily rabid fans, and is up there with Jim Cramer among the pundits that bloggers and reporters love to try to take down by disputing or maligning their stock picking records. You can take either side of that debate — personally, I read his stuff sometimes and listen to his podcast on occasion … I find his public persona to be kind of irritating because he is so focused on self promotion and his mantra of “I was right all along,” but that doesn’t mean much … I’m sure there are lots of people in the business who I wouldn’t feel warm and fuzzy about in person. He seems to be a successful broker who’s trying to very aggressively grow his business while the tide is with him, and you have the Gumshoe’s blessing to either love or hate him, as you will.

Generally, what Schiff’s brokers at EuroPacific Capital are selling are dividend-paying stocks that trade on foreign exchanges, and gold[3] and gold certificates (I think he uses the Perth Mint, though there are similar gold certificate and gold storage programs, either allocated or unallocated, all over the world).

Most of the recent criticism of him has been over the fact that many of his clients took big hits, particularly with their foreign stocks, over the last year or so — since he doesn’t run a mutual fund or a recommendations newsletter it’s probably awfully hard to pin down when or how folks might have done who have EuroPacific accounts … and frankly, I tend to have some sympathy with the interest in dividend-paying foreign stocks, even though the past six months of dollar resurgence and emerging market collapse have certainly been cruel to that strategy.

So that’s a long-winded way of getting around to today’s point: Schiff has a “teaser” stock recommendation in the latest issue of his free newsletter (the newsletter is called The Global Investor — I haven’t seen the latest issue up on their website yet, but it is being distributed via email). His teasers are set up a little differently than many — you don’t have to sign up for a trial subscription to anything to find the answer, you just have to call one of his brokers and, one might assume, sit through the sales pitch to open a EuroPacific account.

Or, of course, you can just read on a bit — I don’t want to sit through a sales pitch, either, and I’m sure the mighty Stock Gumshoe can solve this little teaser mystery.

The newsletter article calls this “One of Peter Schiff’s Top Picks for 2009”

Here are some excerpts with the clues:

“Based in Australia[4], Company #2 represents an attractive mixture of high yield[5] and growth potential, in the highly regulated, low growth utility field. Company #2 is a holding company, comprised of 5 operating units. The largest of these operating units is Western Australia’s principal natural gas[6] transmission pipeline, and the only one connecting the enormous gas reserves in Australia’s North West Shelf with rapidly growing gas demand in South Western Australia (Perth area). With a yield of around 15%, and government regulated and sanctioned monopolies, we believe this company is a very attractive purchase candidate for investors seeking yield.”

Sounds like a good start — I know a lot of folks out there in Gumshoe Nation are yield lovers. What else do we learn, aside from the fact that they persist in calling this “Company #2” for no apparent reason?

They say the company is “a growth story in an otherwise low-growth sector,” because “the natural gas pipeline earns higher returns than other regulated utilities[7] …[and has a] higher than normal rate of return until 2016.”

This investment has several business units in addition to the pipeline:

“1) an electrical utility, 2) 2 regional gas distribution companies, and 3) a power company located in the US. All of the 4 operating units are government regulated, natural monopolies that should provide stable, predictable earnings in these uncertain times….

“While this company, like most others in the utilities sector, is highly leveraged, rising interest rates have a limited effect on the profit and cash flow.”

Some other tidbits? Most of the debt portfolio doesn’t need to be refinanced until 2012, and it has reduced its leverage a little bit since the IPO[8]. Schiff thinks they will grow distributions (dividends[9]) by 5% a year going forward.

And on the stock price details …

“The company reached its 52 week high of A$3.48 in June 2008 and its low of A$1.60 in November of 2008. At a current price of around A$1.90, the company has a market cap of about A$1.2 billion and is expected to yield about 15% over the next year. The company is trading below its book value per share. The P/E ratio is 8.4 times projected 2009 earnings. The cash flow multiple, based on 2009 estimates, is 3.3.”

OK … so we feed all that into the hopper, and we find that this company is almost certainly …

DUET Group (DUE on the Australian exchange, DUETF on the pink sheets)

The shares have fallen a bit further, to A$1.68 (that would be about $1.09 at the current exchange rate) — they just released earnings, which you can see here[10], though the dividend distribution was announced earlier for last year (and the twice-yearly dividend was paid just last week, I think).

They paid out .14125 cents per share (all these numbers are for Australian dollars) for the last six months, which they say has them on pace to deliver twice that amount, as guided, for FY09 (that would be .2825, if you don’t want to do the math). If that is indeed the current annual dividend, the yield translates to about 16.8% now. Not too shabby, though I have no idea what the tax treatment might be. Those who own the shares in Australia and enroll in their dividend reinvestment plan get a slight discount for those DRIP shares.

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


So who are these guys? The company looks like it is essentially an investment vehicle run by Macquarie, the big Australian bank that runs infrastructure investment funds around the world (and had some of them really get clobbered over the past year or so, especially some of the more leveraged ones).

DUET stands for Duet Utility and Energy Trust, and what trades at this ticker is a “stapled” unit that appears to actually be several trusts smooshed together with one public company. You can have a look here at their organizational chart[11] — be warned, it may give you a headache.

It really does own much of a critical pipeline — that part of the tease refers to their 60% ownership of the Dampier Bunbury Pipeline (learn more about that here if you like[12]). And they do own part of a US utility, Duquesne Light … if you want to see the full portfolio that information is here[13].

So … high yield, pretty significantly leveraged but perhaps not dangerously so (not sure what a standard would be for these folks, but they’re about 66% leveraged, so that yield probably depends on their core utility businesses and the pipeline continuing to perform at least reasonably well). They’re probably not terribly connected with the US dollar (which Schiff believes will ultimately fall significantly), the company largely operates in regulated businesses (though I have absolutely no idea what the regulatory framework for utilities is in Australia), and the company seems optimistic about their own future.

Is that enough for you? Let us know with a comment below, and feel free to share if you’ve dug into DUET Group to see what they’re all about. I don’t own any stock mentioned above, though I am invested in a couple US pipeline MLPs.

Endnotes:
  1. Peter Schiff: https://www.stockgumshoe.com/tag/peter-schiff/
  2. Peter Schiff’s books here: http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fgp%2Fentity%2FPeter-Schiff%2FB001J8ZIVI%3Fie%3DUTF8%26%252AVersion%252A%3D1%26%252Aentries%252A%3D0&tag=oneguysinvest-20&linkCode=ur2&camp=1789&creative=390957
  3. gold: https://www.stockgumshoe.com/tag/gold/
  4. Australia: https://www.stockgumshoe.com/tag/australia/
  5. high yield: https://www.stockgumshoe.com/tag/high-yield/
  6. natural gas: https://www.stockgumshoe.com/tag/natural-gas/
  7. utilities: https://www.stockgumshoe.com/tag/utilities/
  8. IPO: https://www.stockgumshoe.com/tag/ipo/
  9. dividends: https://www.stockgumshoe.com/tag/dividends/
  10. which you can see here: http://www.duet.net.au/duet/news/2006.htm?20090223_5
  11. have a look here at their organizational chart: http://www.duet.net.au/duet/management/structure.htm
  12. learn more about that here if you like: http://www.dbp.net.au/
  13. that information is here: http://www.duet.net.au/duet/assetportfolio/overview.htm

Source URL: https://www.stockgumshoe.com/reviews/euro-pacific-capital/one-of-peter-schiffs-top-picks-for-2009/


16 responses to “One of Peter Schiff’s Top Picks for 2009”

  1. SageNot says:

    http://www.duet.net.au/duet/investorcentre/distributions.htm

    Peter Schif needs to mend his reputation, & his insistence that the dollar will tank, while his foreign picks will shine. He’s been wrong for most of 2008 (maybe even part of 2007 too) but I’ll give him credit for this beauty.

    That’s quite a yield for a near penny stock, although Yahoo insists on NOT giving us the converted yields, what are we, chopped liver?

    Anyone who hasn’t seen Peter live is in for a treat, right or wrong, he’s the best, in his own mind.

    I lost track of his FREE newsletter
    but in the one email exchange we had years ago, well let’s say that I’m not his cup of tea. I use common sense when possible, God only knows what he uses when he, at times, is 100% wrong.

    JMHO Folks!

  2. vaag says:

    The foundation behind all of the Peter Schiff investment philosophy seems to be: How long can a countries economy survive when most everything purchased is produced in a foreign land in exchange for a piece of paper(U.S.$). A good argument, I think?

  3. Fabian says:

    Some diversification through the AUS$ makes sense to me. It really dropped well against US$ and the country is pretty well managed. Of course, a rebound of the AUS$ is linked to commodities but that’s not something that worries me too much; when the economy will rebound so will commodities.
    I am personally invested in IAF which is a closed end fund on the Australian market; advantage diversification, draw back a good deal of financial. I still love IAF better than a single bet on one company given the times and the leverage problem (66% is a lot if your line is suddenly cut).

  4. Tor(Victor) says:

    Recently Macquarie bought out Puget Sound Energy, a major utility here in the NorthWest. Everybody was against this since we knew that in the long run our cost would do nothing but go up. After a nasty fight the Utility Commission finaly decided in favor of the merger. They promised not to steal our assets One minor plus is that we will get a merger credit of $0.00552/therm for the next 10 years. Not much against the current cost of $1.37/term. But its something.

  5. JohnnnyB says:

    Four men were calling the declining market well ahead of its demise.

    Three of the four hit the nail on the head and were publicly ridiculed; Nouri Roubini given the uncomplimentary title “Dr. Doom; Nassim Nicholas Taleb the author of The Black Swan; and of course the subject of todays essay Peter Schiff.

    Peter has been seen in a video clip titled “Video of The Year” by some in the news media in which he calls the fatal market downturn correctly, while other gurus on the panel of the TV interview practically laughed him off the show and suggested investing in Bear Stearns and Lehman while Peter said sell all you have and buy gold.

    The fourth man, more low key, but saying the same thing, in fact warning about the sub-prime issues in a speech in South Africa some time in December 2005 to the top mutual fund investors at their annual ra ra event is John Mauldin.

    As Nassim pointed out so well in a recent video with Roubini none of the people who called the crash correctly are working in the Obama administration, just the ones who called it wrong time after time after time.

    Roubini has been advising foreign heads of European countries but not in the USA. Is that because a prophet has no honor in his own country?

    Please note that Michael Dell and Bill Gates waited in line for two hours recently at Davos to hear Roubini and Nassim talk about where the economy was headed in the near future. That speaks volumes to me. Why is it when we here the truth we often despised it?

  6. john sloan says:

    Good post by JohnnnyB
    Taleb and Roubini are great – Mauldin even more so – but the top prophet is Martin Weiss.

  7. Jim says:

    I have had a europac account for a number of years and though Mr. Schiff has been right on some of his points, unless you have good amounts of cash to play with in your account, people don’t return your calls after numerous voice and emails, even to Mr. Schiff himself. I have legitimate beef with his brokerage from money I lost because you can’t speak to your broker on the phone in order to place sell orders before certain stocks they recommended tanked. Though they were decent stocks, I can only hope they will recover. I’m positive if I was a high net worth investor, I’d have the red carpet rolled out but a small account doesn’t seem to matter (maybe 10K, was over 15 k at one time. If you have $$$, I’m sure you’d do well with his firm, as more opportunites open up, as with any private firm. Just be wary if you have a smaller account. He does seem to know what he’s talking about but, yes, he is a legend in his own mind as others have pointed out. That being said, he does have the fact that he has been right on alot of the economy though, some of his 2008 picks are off, but, in this market who has been up?

  8. peik van waveren says:

    Martin Weiss? Really? I took his advice about Y2K and I still get ribbed by my friends, and family!

  9. Medstuff says:

    John Mauldin certainly seems to be a favorite. Even he undercalled the severity of this correction – he is the “muddle through” guy. Peter Grandich should also be added to our list of prophets, although he got hurt on junior miners, BUT AT LEAST HE ADMITS IT.

  10. DAVID HATHAWAY says:

    NEWSLETTERS

    The value of newsletters are determined from two very disparate
    points of view.

    1. You and I judge them on whether we make or lose money on their recommendations.

    2. The authors and publishers judge them on “how clever” the text is and whether or not they make money from their subscriptions.

    When I was young and naive (sp?)
    I thought the world ran on principles, now I percieve it to
    run on bravado, bullying and bullshit. But even with that dark outlook, the sun comes up every morning and once in a while someone
    surprizes me by making a decision on principle. I enjoy your ideas.

    David

  11. singh says:

    louis navallier new pick
    anyone kows name??
    This One Little Stock Could
    Make You Rich

    The reason is simple:

    While Bolivia may control 50% of the world’s lithium, our company controls 30% of the world’s market share.

    How can this be? Because unlike Bolivia’s vast untapped reserves, this company has one of most sophisticated mining operations in the world. And—most important—the company is located in a country that is very friendly to America’s energy needs.

    So while Bolivia attempts to send the lithium prices higher our company will not only see its market share increase but will automatically profit.

    Which is why the company’s 359% earnings growth and 82% profits in the last 12 months are just a sneak preview of what’s headed your way.

    Grab It Now Before It Doubles Again

    With America set to spend $2 billion on lithium battery development, it’s only a matter of time before lithium demand jumps and Bolivia’s leader works to choke off supply.

    The result will not only create a stampede for lithium, but also put powerful upward pressure under the stock price of our world-class, U.S.-friendly lithium company.

    Since the President has already signed off on the stimulus package, my palms itch in anticipation of the profits that are headed our way.

  12. WEL says:

    MAXIDEX DEXAMETHASONE WARNING

    I had eye surgery and in the post-op pack was MAXIDEX(dexamethasone) drops by ALCON LABS.

    Two days later I was BLIND

    Use Google and enter EPOCRATES MAXIDEX REACTION to verify

    Or call 800-757-9195

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.