I’ve gotten a big pile of questions about the latest teaser pitch from Jeff Brown, who is now taking credit for the rise of the CRISPR stocks and sees another big surge coming.
And for what it’s worth, he was one of the early newsletter guys promoting the three primary CRISPR stocks a few years ago, when they all went public… though there was plenty of fanfare, and all three stocks (CRSP, EDIT and NTLA) still have plenty of fans.
This is what the shares have looked like since the three IP leaders in CRSPR became available for trading, you can see that Intellia has lagged the S&P 500 but Editas and Crispr Therapeutics (CRSP) have done quite well, especially in the past few months, though they’ve also had plenty of volatility and if you bought in 2018 instead of 2017, well, you’re not nearly as happy. Brown first teased EDIT back in March of 2016, when his newsletter was just getting started, and by late 2017 he was teasing all three stocks.
But what’s being touted now? The primary focus of his “God Key” promotion a few years ago was Editas (EDIT), mostly because it was winning some patent battles in court, but is he pitching that same stock again? He’ll spill the beans if you pony up $2,000 (non-refundable) for a two-year subscription to Exponential Tech Investor… but let’s see if we can ID the stock for you from the clues he drops in the ad…
He says that the FDA has given the “Cure” a green light, and the mainstream doesn’t realize it yet… and he says he knows this because he “saw something I wasn’t supposed to see” at a special closed-door meeting in Cambridge recently.
And what’s the “Cure” for? The most common sort of inherited blindness… so, yes, a big deal.
The ad, which as far as I can tell started running last week before Thanksgiving (that’s when we started getting questions), says that “when the market opens tomorrow at 9:30 am, this small cap, with the possible cure for blindness, could start to skyrocket too.”
He loads up on that, saying that there’s potential for “up to 10x gains in a single day” as this news comes out… which is pretty ridiculous, but far from the being the most ludicrous claim I’ve ever seen.
So will your financial life “change forever” if you make the “one move” he recommends in one day?
No, of course, not, but that doesn’t mean the stock can’t do well… so what’s the story?
This small cap “must make their announcement” and it’s “mandatory by law” according to the FDA.
So far, this technology is only known to work “in the lab” — conventional thinking says we’re five years away from it working in humans… but several key executives including the chief scientific officer were at this roundtable that Jeff Brown says he attended, and based on what they said he thinks LCA10, the most common type of childhood blindness, is on the verge of a cure. People could walk away from treatment with vision for the first time, with initial tests indicating that the will see with 90% clarity after treatment.
So will it “kick into high gear” and gain 1,000% in a day when this news comes out? did it already come out a few days ago and we missed out on that action? What’s the story?
He says the reason for the urgency is the “government document” he shares on screen, which is a file from clinicaltrials.gov with the ID number NCT#03872479, “A Single Ascending Dose Study in Participants with LCA10” that was reportedly “recruiting” as of October 28, 2019 for this trial of the drug AGN-151587, also known as EDIT-101.
Which, of course, means this is, yes, another pitch about Editas (EDIT) — that’s how they number their drugs, EDIT-101 being the first one they’ve worked on that is moving into clinical trials. The drug is actually being developed by Allergan (AGN), with Editas as a collaborator, so that’s why the primary name is AGN-151587.
And about this special document, Brown says “NO one has seen this before, I only just got my hands on it.”
And that it “brings to light” that the FDA has designated this “small-cap’s blindness cure” as an “IND,” which he says is a “very special designation” and “like a fast pass.”
Which is pretty silly, of course — this clinical trial plan was first filed back in March, and is publicly available for anyone to see right here.
And the FDA initially approved it as an IND over a year ago (that just stands for “Investigational New Drug”, meaning they got approval to begin testing it in humans” — that’s what makes a drug “clinical” instead of “pre-clinical” — no IND, no clinical trials, no human testing).
Is there some big news about EDIT-101 in the offing? Not particularly in the past week or so, nor is one anticipated in the next few weeks — they have been “enrolling” for the past few months, trying to find appropriate test subjects, and the first patient has now been screened to receive the drug… but the first dosing is expected “by early 2020” according to the latest quarterly update from Editas on November 12.
So what’s this rule from the FDA that requires news to come out soon? From what Brown says, it’s just that “they must report results” — and reporting trial results “sparks a special phase” of the biotech stock’s life cycle when the stock can surge dramatically higher.
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...
Which is true, of course, reporting results is required for clinical trials if you want to keep advancing a drug toward eventual approval, and is a big deal for biotech stocks — they don’t trade based on financial data, they trade based on the performance of their drugs in clinical trials and, later, on the FDA’s decisions about whether their drugs can begin more trials or, eventually, receive approval to market the drug.
And Brown says “You have to make your move before the biotech reports to the FDA” — and I suppose that’s true, if you want to bet on them reporting good news in a particular clinical trial… but in this case, I don’t get the urgency. The first patient has not yet been treated with this experimental medicine, and the FDA won’t be receiving an update from this clinical trial for at least a few weeks (and that assumes they report something about this first patient in the days immediately after dosing and don’t wait for the “real” longer-term and multi-patient results, which rarely happens but is not impossible).
So yes, Editas is preparing to enter Brown’s “Stage 1” and could take off if they report great results from EDIT-101 in this first clinical trial… but it’s not going to be tomorrow, and it wasn’t last week. Yes, this small cap “must report to the FDA” as Brown says, but no, it’s not going to be “as soon as tomorrow at 9:30am” — they have to report results, but not before they have results, and since the first person won’t be dosed for probably at least a few weeks, and they are planning to dose 18 patients in this first trial, it’s going to be a while before we get any real clinical trial results.
What’s up with that bit about “tomorrow’s opening bell” and the urgency? It’s largely a sales tactic, I expect — particularly because it means the ad can work for a while, they didn’t cite a particular day on which the news will come, just “tomorrow.”