Become a Member

Fool’s “Small-Cap 5G Stock Targets 40X Potential”

What's being hinted at in the pitch for Motley Fool Extreme Opportunities: Next-Gen Supercycle?

By Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe, February 23, 2021

The Motley Fool has really been ramping up their weekly “Investor Digest” ads that focus on pitching their higher-end portfolio services, and we’ve covered several of those in the past few weeks… but lots of readers keep asking, so we’ll throw another one on the pile today. What’s this “Small-cap 5G stock” they’re pitching?

Ahh…. 5G… it almost makes me feel nostalgic for the good ol’ teaser pitches of two years ago, when 5G was all anyone could talk about. It got a little bit lost in the shuffle with the pandemic and the explosion of SPACs and space stocks and sports gambling and all kinds of other sexycool ideas, but it’s still out there. A transition to a new wireless standard is still a big deal, it still drives a lot of infrastructure buildout, new demand for equipment (including new phones), and, as that faster service becomes more available, it will presumably drive new innovative products that take advantage of it (remember before 4G, when you couldn’t even reliably watch videos on your phone?) Technology evolution takes some time, even discrete upgrades like 4G to 5G, but it’s clearly coming… so what’s the stock the Motley Fools are touting as a play on that?

Here’s the tempting bait they dangle:

“The Motley Fool made its name by finding transformative stocks targeting huge growth…

“Before everyone else saw the opportunity.

“And every now and then, even in this market, our analysts uncover a true under-the-radar small-cap stock with what we think is a huge growth story to tell.

“Well, Jason Moser has done just that over at Extreme Opportunities: Next-Gen Supercycle.

“This stock is exclusive – it hasn’t received a formal recommendation anywhere else at The Motley Fool.”

I’m pretty sure we haven’t looked at that Next-Gen Supercycle product from the Fool yet, but it’s basically the same idea as their other Extreme Opportunities services — they offer up a set portfolio that has already been recommended, with updates along the way as they add new stocks to it, rebalance the portfolio, and cover the updates to those stories, and, unlike the “entry level” Motley Fool stuff it’s nonrefundable (and pricey, the “on sale” offer is currently $1,399 for the first year and will auto-renew, retail price is $1,999). The Lead Advisor for this one is Jason Moser, who also helms the Extreme Opportunities: Augmented Reality service.

This is how they position the service, if you want more detail:

“Now, with 5G phone sales projected to be 60-fold by 2023…

“And a coming wave of 5G infrastructure buildout experts believe will cost $275 billion in just the U.S. alone…

“AND 5G projected to have a global impact of $17 trillion in sales by 2035…

“I trust you can see why we’re so excited about this market!

“Which may bring up another question in your mind: “What kind of returns are we targeting?”

“Lead Advisor Jason Moser and his team are aiming to build a diversified portfolio – containing stocks of different potential risk and upside – that they believe can achieve 6X to 7X growth across the next decade!”

So before ponying up $1,399 for a nonrefundable subscription you want all the info you can get, right? Let’s at least get a name for that “huge growth story” stock they’re pitching, and you can look into it, think it over, and make your own call… without the “take me to the stock!” pressure that leads people to pull out their credit cards and make rash investment decisions. The more info, the better, right?

I’ve mentioned this before, but one of the key areas were our brains get in the way is in buying stuff — if you buy a house, you keep checking on other home sales in your neighborhood so you can congratulate yourself on getting a big deal… if you buy a car, you look for good reviews of it to make you feel smart… and if you pay big bucks for a newsletter, you are incentivizing yourself to invest heavily in whatever stock they’re teasing to get you to sign up. If you pay $1,399 or $4,999 or whatever (nonrefundable, naturally) to learn about a secret stock, then once you read the secret report and get your “tip,” your brain is not going to want you to decide it’s a dumb stock idea. That would mean admitting that you just purchased something without thinking.

So that’s part of why we do what we do here — if you already know the name of the stock, and you didn’t pay for it, you’ve got a much better chance at being rational and disciplined in trying to analyze it and decide whether you want to invest.

But what, then, is this stock? Here are our final clues…

“The company made $100 million last year… in a fast-growing slice of the 5G market….

“It’s not ‘just’ a 5G stock…it’s a 5G stock with what Jason calls a ‘really attractive’ business model that sports 89% gross margins….

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


“A genuine small-cap… sub-$2 billion market cap small.”

Which means that the Thinkolator can take a day off, kick up its feet on the chaise, and wait for a bigger challenge — all we need here is a stock screener to tell us that with revenues near $100 million, gross margins near 89%, and a market cap under $2 billion, this is… Ceva (CEVA)

CEVA currently sports a $1.5 billion market cap, is unprofitable but has a 89% gross margin, and reported exactly $100 million in top-line revenue over the past four quarters. A perfect match, and there actually aren’t any other matches that are even close. And if you want a little confirmation, the Motley Fool disclosures indicate that they did not recommend the stock a few months ago, but they did recommend it as of about a week ago, when CEVA’s latest earnings call transcript was posted. (And you should read that transcript if you’re interested in the stock, it gives the company’s basic outlook on where they stand right now.)

So what does this company do? It’s a little bit like Rambus (RMBS) or Universal Display (OLED) in that it’s primarily an IP company, they own valuable patents and do basic R&D in their niche, and make money by licensing those patents and doing joint ventures with customers to advance new technologies and support new products. Rambus specializes in memory, Universal Display in OLED screen technology, and CEVA in signal processing. Here’s how they describe themselves:

“CEVA is the leading licensor of wireless connectivity and smart sensing technologies. CEVA’s technology portfolio includes digital signal processors, AI processors, wireless platforms and complementary software for sensor fusion, image enhancement, computer vision, voice input and artificial intelligence, all of which are key enabling technologies for a smarter, connected world. More than 10 billion CEVA-powered chips have shipped to date for a wide range of diverse end markets.”

The biggest driver is sales volume for wireless products that pay royalties or license fees for CEVAs IP, particularly in Bluetooth and WiFi. Here’s the quote from CEO Gideon Wertheizer from their quarterly press release last week:

“We are very pleased to end the year with another excellent quarter, in both licensing and royalties. We concluded 21 licensing agreements, including a strategic and comprehensive agreement with a top tier smartphone OEM who will develop a range of CEVA-based connectivity chips to serve its smartphone and wireless accessories product lines. Our record high royalty revenue reflects a particularly strong quarter in smartphone shipments and continued traction in our base station and IoT product category, which grew 50% year over year.”

They also do call out the big sales boom last year in several products that helped to drive revenue growth, so growing demand for things like 5G base stations, smart TVs and laptops all helped CEVA last year. On the surface, their fourth quarter was relatively weak, with both GAAP and non-GAAP revenue and earnings below where they were in 2019, but it was WAY better than analysts had been predicting so the stock surged on earnings day last week… though it has since given up those gains. The full year was pretty strong, at least on the top line, with revenue up 15% (non-GAAP income was up 2-3%).

The company is in fine shape, given their high gross margins and relatively low operating expenses, so they don’t have any need for capital — they have about $130 million in cash and no debt. The challenge is in figuring out whether they’ll be able to grow again and to get back to consistent profitability (they’ve been a publicly traded company for more than 20 years, and have only failed to make a profit in three of those years). Over time it has worked out reasonably well, here’s how CEVA (blue) has stacked up over the past 18 years or so compared to the Nasdaq 100 (QQQ, in orange) and the iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX, red):

CEVA Chart

The growth is not looking particularly overwhelming, here’s an excerpt of the guidance they gave in that earnings call last week — which sounds qualitatively good, but represents only 6% revenue growth (perhaps just because they’re being a bit conservative on the royalty forecast):

“Now for the guidance, we expect 2021 to be another growth year for CEVA as the momentum in our business continues. We are forecasting total revenue to be just over $106 million — $106 million for 2021 with growth in both royalties and licensing. Specifically, in regard to royalty revenue forecast, we are taking a wait and see approach, as the semiconductor industry has experienced extended lead times for chip orders and lean inventories, which we expect to last through the first half of the year.

“Our licensing business continues to be solid with growing opportunities in 5G, Wi-Fi 6, TWS earbuds and automotive, as Gideon earlier elaborated earlier. We are targeting another record year for licensing, which will set the stage for additional new streams of royalties in the years to come. On the royalty front, we are expecting a decline in royalties from a leading smartphone OEM, who has switched to another baseband supplier for its recently launched 5G smartphone lineup.

“With that said, we do maintain our presence in its 4G smartphones that are still expected to ship volume this year. We also see continued progress for our China-based customer, who has recently regained good momentum in low cost smartphones for emerging markets, and has also recently launched its first CEVA-powered 5G chip in China. In our base station and IoT product category, we expect to continue to outgrow the markets we are targeting. Overall, we believe that new royalty growth drivers will more than offset the decline in royalties from the 5G smartphone supplier switch.”

The stock has generally been upgraded by analysts over the past week or so, following the very strong earnings report — presumably because of the record high royalty revenue that gives some hope of a boost in scalability (since royalties are typically based on volume). Estimates now are that they will report adjusted earnings per share of 60 cents for 2021, about the same as last year, and then a 10%+ jump in revenues in 2022 that will bring earnings to 89 cents a share. If you want to use a fairly optimistic look, then, that means, at $65, that we assume they will grow earnings by 45%, and we’re paying about 70X those earnings.

If they are able to reach those goals, and keep that growth up, it’s likely to work out just fine for investors… but that is an “if.” There’s some reason for optimism, it sounds like there’s a good chance that new product introductions, particularly around new wireless standards (like 5G and WiFi6) and rapidly growing products (like the newest iterations of headphones), will provide a meaningful boost. The challenge I’d see is that they’ve pretty dramatically increased their operating and R&D costs over the past few years, partly through acquisitions, and they are looking at a real possibility for a couple weaker quarters to start 2021, because of semiconductor logjams and a little post-holiday lull in new product introductions, so it’s not at all certain that they’ll be able to grow revenue or earnings in the next couple quarters.

On the “feelings” side, qualitatively, I feel pretty good about CEVA’s chances — the numbers aren’t there right now to justify this share price, but with a new product cycle still settling in for 5G and WiFi6 and the likelihood of pretty strong design wins in their space from new customers as wireless products continue to proliferate, I’d guess that they’re in pretty good shape to return to growth that’s a little bit stronger than analysts are currently expecting. I’d hope to see a bit more of a pullback, given the possibility that the first half of this year could be pretty soft for them in terms of revenue growth as the chip business detangles itself and new product launches and volume shipments get back on track, but my instincts drive me toward thinking about buying shares.

Of course, I haven’t bought shares at this point… and I said some similarly positive things about CEVA last April, when it was being teased as one of the 5G (or 15G, he said) stocks by George Gilder, and I didn’t buy it back then, either (more’s the pity, it’s up more than 100% since then, like so many other tech stocks).

So that’s what we’ve got for you today… not a super challenging stock to find, but a tough valuation to get your head around after that big surge the shares enjoyed in January. High margin, slow growth, high potential that both the company and analysts seem to want to remain a bit conservative about at this point.

That’s just what I think, though, and it’s your thinking that matters — it is, after all, your money. Tempted by CEVA? Have other 5G favorites that light your fire? Am I missing something fantastic in this story, or being too optimistic? Let us know with a comment below… thanks for reading!

Irregulars Quick Take

Paid members get a quick summary of the stocks teased and our thoughts here. Join as a Stock Gumshoe Irregular today (already a member? Log in)
guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

36 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Enzo Pollono
Guest
Enzo Pollono
February 23, 2021 3:34 pm

It’s non refundable, properly speaking, but there is still the option of transiting to another service, if you don’t like the one you subscribed. Pretty cool, in this way you can access to two services with one stone. )(

Add a Topic
6265
👍 21650
Enzo Pollono
Guest
Enzo Pollono
February 23, 2021 4:45 pm

Well, once upon a time the MF had a policy of refunding. I did subscribe to a service and I was refunded ( actual money). Point is, that many people ( including me, helas for my ethics) subscribe, get the name of the stocks and then ask for a refund. It’s obviously untenable for a publisher. It’s not the same as buying a pair of shoes, you don’t like them, you ask for a refund, you send them back. You don’t keep them. )*

👍 21650
john c williams
Member
john c williams
February 23, 2021 6:12 pm

You nailed it!

jack--
jack--
February 23, 2021 10:25 pm

I agree, I think the fool has had some good picks over the years and it’s a shame that their scammy marketing kind of overshadows what was once a great service.

Thanks Trevor for your reasonable and fairly priced service that I was able to sign up for without any scammy emails!

👍 2
Aegy
Member
Aegy
February 23, 2021 11:21 pm

I’d find it more worthwhile if they’d let you see one stock pick for free, then have you pay to see the other four. If they’re good picks, people are likely to try the free ones and then pay for the others when they get good results, because they want to go from good results to amazing results.

Enzo Pollono
Guest
Enzo Pollono
February 24, 2021 12:26 pm
Reply to  Aegy

“ I’d find it more worthwhile if they’d let you see one stock pick for free, ”…..Well, they do. They always reveal two or three of the stocks that are part of the service. For free. )(

imwize
imwize
February 24, 2021 12:18 pm

You are absolutely right I was a past subscriber and by the time some stocks make it to their newsletter the price has already increased substantially

👍 47
Trucker MB
Trucker MB
February 24, 2021 10:56 pm
Reply to  imwize

Now that Ive seen it, I can add momentum to the stock which had been idle because of little subscribers. I helped pump the stock and added some movement to it making the Fool happier with his writting

👍 27
coghead
coghead
March 7, 2021 11:08 pm
Reply to  imwize

I think it’s important to remember that the MF endorses investing vs trading. They recommend holding positions for 3-5 years. Like any stock that I have purchased some go up and some go down if I look at short term. The majority of MF recommendations that I have held have done nicely. Of course there are always some losers but I am up 134% overall.

👍 1
Enzo Pollono
Guest
Enzo Pollono
February 24, 2021 12:31 pm

“ letters who overhype a story,”….maybe, but the Fools take very seriously their motto “to educate” ( beside getting rich and have fun). They let you see their videos where they “ hype” a new service, where there is a lot of information about investing and stocks. There are free interviews with CEO of important companies or companies that they recommend. I enjoy those videos, being a member of Stock Advisor, though I never buy the service. I believe it is quite cool….)(

Badger Down
Guest
Badger Down
September 12, 2021 6:01 pm
Reply to  Enzo Pollono

No, MF is dirty. ” The “entry level” Motley Fool stuff is refundable (in big letters), then the switcheroo comes in at $1,399 and will auto-renew, no refunds. There oughtta be a law against it. Buyer Beware!

Add a Topic
329
aoraccounts
aoraccounts
February 27, 2021 11:14 am

Brownstone Research is super guilty of hyping stocks that have changed dramatically. I bought their service for $99/yr. and all of the stocks in the portfolio that I got access to were already well past their “don’t buy if over $xyz” amount.

They are guilty of serious bait and switch. And I get at least 3 emails a day and usu. more about buying some new service for $2000. As a novice, I used to think that Jeff Brown was some investing genius, now I think he’s just another self-hyping conman.

👍 91
debrat24
debrat24
July 30, 2021 9:02 am
Reply to  aoraccounts

Absolutely agree!!

👍 3
outsider
February 23, 2021 3:58 pm

Thanks for all that you do for us and particularly for digging this one out. As an advisor subscriber waiting for the emails to stop at EOY, I just couldn’t bring myself to research another Fool re-re-re-recommendation.

👍 148
ronwill
February 23, 2021 4:38 pm
Reply to  outsider

This one is actually one of their new recommendations. But most of the stocks in that service are well known names.

👍 684
outsider
February 25, 2021 12:11 pm
Reply to  ronwill

Yes, CEVA has certainly been around.
https://www.stockgumshoe.com/reviews/the-foundation-alliance/

Interestingly enough, my father bought plug and bldp on Fool recommendations a few years ago. He is quite pleased which prompted me to sign up for SA. I have yet to see anything from them which cannot be discerned with a modicum of DD, however CEVA follows the Fool premise of long plays and seems like a safe investment given their history.

Last edited 3 years ago by outsider
👍 148
laz pitts
Member
laz pitts
February 23, 2021 4:37 pm

many thanx, for your timely dissection of the “FOOLS”, 5G, Supercycle teaser !!

Add a Topic
6265
ed d schmitt
Irregular
ed d schmitt
February 23, 2021 11:01 pm

I read that several CEVA suits just sold off some shares recently. Evidently, they know what Travis suggested about the valuation. See you at $50.

👍 36
quincy adams
Guest
quincy adams
February 23, 2021 11:17 pm

Another techie with EBITDA in the roundoff of their market cap. So many to choose from. Take the usual MF pop and run.

bill myers
Member
bill myers
February 24, 2021 11:38 pm

i joined motley fool -one of their promotions -all ever got out of them was trying to sell some wonderful service – if you want to give them some money be my guest

Add a Topic
329
John Harvard
February 25, 2021 1:50 pm

If they were alive, the Tweedles would be invested up to their necks, complete with stocks, puts, calls, and options. Humpty Dumpty would be reading Motley Fool out loud to Alice, who would be wide eyed and ready to invest!

Add a Topic
4656
Mark Huxley
Mark Huxley
February 27, 2021 12:11 pm

Hey Travis. I absolutely love the work you do. You some how manage to get down to the raw fundamentals, in quite vivid detail in a short letter to your followers. Very well done, and even more appreciated.

I purchased shares of Gilat Sattelites (GILT) At about $5/share, Accumulating until $9, and sold 60% of my position in lots between $18-$21. I currently have began slowly scaling my position back up as I believe their recent drop was an over reaction to over all market volatily. I also believe it was actually one of your articles that led me towards such an awesome investment.

I simply would like to reiterate that I believe GILT is well poised to continue growth in the years to come in the 5g/satcom sec. As well as would like to state that I believe they would be a perfect M&A target for VZ, T, or even Apple or AMZN. I do not believe Musk would have much use for a GILT acquisition in the near term, but potentially down the road if they happen to establish themselves as legitimate StarLink competition.

Anyways, curious on your thoughts here. Hoping for a potential teaser in their favor if my comment strikes a chord with you, or possibly any cons to said investment from your perspective!

Take Care Travis,
Thanks for all the hard work and great reading!
-Hux

Add a Topic
6265
Add a Topic
5923
👍 21650
Stevie
Stevie
February 27, 2021 12:38 pm

Travis, a key point which seems to have been overlooked here, is that CEVA has a TINY TINY float of ONLY
22 mill shares! This means improvements in any of the metrics will be magnified straight into the stock price. I know when I bought 500 SHOP it also had a tiny float of 30 mill shares at the time. Sad to say I sold out long before it hit $1281/share!

👍 22
klgaertner
Irregular
klgaertner
February 27, 2021 1:58 pm
Reply to  Stevie

Float is meaningless. Price is meaningless. Splits and Reverse Splits are meaningless. Only Float TIMES share price is meaningful. Note: Berkshire’s float is tiny.

Stevie
Stevie
February 27, 2021 2:34 pm
Reply to  klgaertner

<> And look at the price….

👍 22
klgaertner
Irregular
klgaertner
February 27, 2021 4:47 pm
Reply to  Stevie

Repeating. Float numbers, as such, are meaningless for purposes of valuing an enterprise. When I invest $10,000 in a $10 billion company, I own one-millionth of it. This is true whether my investment was recorded as 10,000 shares at $1, or 100 shares at $100, or 1/100th share at $1 million (corresponding to floats of 10 billion, 100 million, and 10,000 shares). Regardless of its nominal float, my investment will double when the company’s market value doubles.

(Nonetheless, if market behavior demonstrated that a float sweet spot truly existed, then rational companies would exploit it by splitting or reverse splitting to target that float value. I’ve never heard of a treasurer advocating this.)

Randy
Guest
Randy
February 27, 2021 7:32 pm
Reply to  Stevie

Me too in @ 60 out at 145

Randy
Guest
Randy
February 27, 2021 7:33 pm
Reply to  Randy

1k shares

Charles
Member
Charles
February 27, 2021 12:45 pm

What I want to know is the name of the stock that the former user of CEVA switched to. That may be the place to store the family jewels.

Add a Topic
10798
Dee Dee
Member
Dee Dee
February 27, 2021 5:03 pm

Hello everyone,
I am a new Bee and wondering if anyone has an opinion on Luke Lango- Editor, Hypergrowth Investing. Does anyone subscribe to his service – wondering if it’s worth purchasing his news letter.

Add a Topic
12211
olufa04
olufa04
February 28, 2021 8:57 am

I read on an investment website that ceva execs have been dumping stock.
https://www.gurufocus.com/stock/CEVA/summary.
What do you make of this?

Add a Topic
6265
👍 21650
sfolaw
Member
sfolaw
June 4, 2021 4:40 pm

5G stocks

Add a Topic
6265

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

More Info  
32
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x